search
Back to results

Researching Emotions And Cardiac Health (REACH): Phase II (REACH II)

Primary Purpose

Congestive Heart Failure, Emotions, Patient Compliance

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PP-based health behavior intervention
Sponsored by
Massachusetts General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Congestive Heart Failure focused on measuring Heart Failure, Positive Psychology, Adherence to Health Behaviors

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients with NYHA class I, II, or III HF admitted to an MGH inpatient unit or outpatients at the MGH Heart Center. Patients with NYHA class IV HF have ongoing HF symptoms at rest, making it difficult for them to increase physical activity and other health behaviors; therefore, they will not be included. HF diagnosis will be confirmed via chart review and with the patient's treatment team as needed.
  • Suboptimal adherence to health behaviors. This will be defined as a total score of ≤15 on three Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) items regarding diet/exercise/medications. The MOS SAS has been used in multiple prior studies assessing adherence in cardiac patients, including our own studies in this population. This threshold score on the MOS SAS will ensure that all participants will have the potential to improve their health behaviors.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive deficits impeding a participant's ability to provide informed consent or participate, assessed via a 6-item cognitive test that is sensitive and specific for screening for cognitive impairment in research participants.
  • Medical conditions precluding interviews or likely to lead to death within 6 months.
  • Inability to speak English, inability to read or write, inability to walk, or lack of a telephone.

Sites / Locations

  • Massachusetts General Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Intervention Arm

Arm Description

Participants will all undergo a 10-week PP-based health behavior intervention and adherence measurements (baseline and Week 10). The participants will receive an ActiGraph accelerometer. They will be asked to begin wearing the accelerometer after their initial visit. Participants will wear the ActiGraph for 7 days at baseline and again at 10 weeks.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Feasibility of the PP-based Health Behavior Intervention
Feasibility will be measured by examining the number of completed exercises.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Changes in PANAS Scores
The positive affect items on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a well-validated scale used in other intervention trials and in patients with HF, will be used to measure positive affect (Range: 10-50). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect.
Changes in LOT-R Scores
Life Orientation Test-Revised is a well-validated 6-item instrument used to measure dispositional optimism (Range: 0-24). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of optimism.
Changes in HADS-Anxiety Subscale Scores
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety subscale was be used to measure anxiety. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Change in HADS-Depression Subscale Scores
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-depression subscale was be used to measure depression. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate worse outcome (i.e. greater levels of depression).
Changes in KCCQ Scores
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a well-validated questionnaire of health status in HF. The full scale will be used to measure HF-specific health-related QoL (HRQoL), and an eight-question subset of the KCCQ will be used as a measure of HF symptoms (QoL score range: 0-100; total symptom score range: 0-100). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher QoL scores indicate better HF specific health-related QoL, and higher total symptom scores indicate fewer symptoms.
Changes in SF-12 Scores
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 (SF-12) will be used to measure quality of life. This is an instrument which has been used in multiple cardiac studies in the past (SF-12 Mental Composite Score and Physical Composite Score Range: 0-100 each). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher level of health related QoL.
Changes in MOS SAS Scores
Three Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) items assessing medication, diet, and exercise, will be measured individually and as a composite score (Range: 3-18). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate better adherence to health behaviors.
Changes in Daily Sodium Intake (as Measured With the SSQ)
The Scored Sodium Questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report scale that assesses the frequency with which participants consume a variety of sodium-containing foods, ranging from "Rarely or Never Eaten" to "At Least Once Daily." It is used to calculate daily sodium intake (Range: 0-215). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher sodium intake.
Self-Reported Medication Adherence (SRMA)
The Self-Reported Medication Adherence (SRMA) asks what percent of the time (in 10% increments) participants took all of their medications as prescribed in the past week and in the past 2 weeks (Range: 0-10). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks.
Change in Physical Activity
Measured by Actigraph accelerometer, in number of steps per day.
Change in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (Actigraph)
ActiGraph GT3X+ step counters are validated as measures of physical activity and have been used in numerous studies of physical activity in patients with medical illness. In this trial, participants will wear the accelerometer for one week at baseline and again for one week at 10 weeks to assess the feasibility of doing so and to ensure adequate capture of physical activity. Change was calculated by subtracting the MVPA at baseline from the MVPA at 10 weeks.
Feasibility of Actigraph
Feasibility will be measured by examining the number of participants who use of the Actigraph.
Acceptability of the Exercises: Utility Score
Participants will provide ratings of utility after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater utility of the exercise. Weekly utility ratings were averaged to provide an overall utility score of the exercises.
Acceptability of the Exercises: Ease Score
Participants will provide ratings of ease after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater ease of the exercise. Weekly ease ratings were averaged to provide an overall easy score of the exercises.
Immediate Impact of the Exercises: Optimism Rating
Participants will provide ratings of optimism before and after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Weekly pre- and post-exercise ratings of optimism were averaged to provide an overall pre- and post-exercise optimism score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of optimism.
Immediate Impact of the Exercises: Positive Affect Rating
Participants will provide ratings of positive affect, before and after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Weekly pre- and post-exercise ratings of happiness were averaged to provide an overall pre- and post-exercise score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect.

Full Information

First Posted
October 14, 2016
Last Updated
August 30, 2021
Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02938052
Brief Title
Researching Emotions And Cardiac Health (REACH): Phase II
Acronym
REACH II
Official Title
Developing a Positive Psychology Intervention to Promote Health Behaviors in Heart Failure: proof-of Concept Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 6, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 24, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 10, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Collaborators
National Institutes of Health (NIH), National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The focus of this study is to examine the feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary impact of our customized positive psychology (PP)-based health behavior intervention in a group of patients with mild to moderate heart failure (HF).
Detailed Description
The investigators are proposing a study that will specifically and innovatively focus on the development of a novel positive psychology intervention that is adapted for patients with HF. The MGH inpatient units and MGH Heart Center outpatients will serve as the source of subjects for the study, with patients who have a diagnosis of HF serving as potential subjects. The investigators will enroll 10 HF patients, who will take part in an 10-week PP-based health behavior intervention. In this project, the investigators hope to do the following: Test an 10-week, telephone-delivered health behavior intervention utilizing PP exercises and systematic goal-setting in a brief, non-randomized, proof-of-concept trial (N=10). Determine whether this initial intervention is feasible in a small cohort of HF patients. Explore potential benefits of the intervention on outcomes of interest (e.g., optimism, positive affect). Baseline information about enrolled participants will be obtained from the patients, care providers, and the electronic medical record as required for characterization of our population. This information will include data regarding medical history (history of prior acute coronary syndrome, coronary artery bypass graft, congestive HF, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, and current smoking), current medical variables (renal function, left ventricular ejection fraction, NYHA class), medications, and sociodemographic data (age, gender, race/ethnicity, living alone). Participants will under go an initial visit during which they will meet with study staff in person (or if preferred over the phone). • They will fill out baseline questionnaires, and be provided a treatment manual with weekly exercises, along with a copy of Learning to Live with Heart Failure. The PP and goal-setting portions of the intervention will be introduced, and the first exercise will be assigned. Finally, participants will be provided an ActiGraph accelerometer to wear for 7 days, as well as a personal step counter to keep. Participants will undergo weekly phone sessions for 10 weeks. For the positive psychology segment the participant will review the previous week's exercise, discuss of the rationale of the next week's exercise, and be assigned the next week's exercise. For the goal-setting segment the participant will review the health goal from the prior week, receive education about a health behavior, discuss ways to improve health behaviors, and set a goal for the next week. Participants will undergo a follow-up phone call at 10 weeks that asks the same questions that were answered during the initial visit, as well as questions about their experience using the ActiGraph. • At Week 10, participants will wear another ActiGraph for 7 days.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Congestive Heart Failure, Emotions, Patient Compliance
Keywords
Heart Failure, Positive Psychology, Adherence to Health Behaviors

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
10 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will all undergo a 10-week PP-based health behavior intervention and adherence measurements (baseline and Week 10). The participants will receive an ActiGraph accelerometer. They will be asked to begin wearing the accelerometer after their initial visit. Participants will wear the ActiGraph for 7 days at baseline and again at 10 weeks.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
PP-based health behavior intervention
Intervention Description
The positive psychology exercises include 3 modules: Gratitude-based activities, Strength-based activities, and Meaning-based activities. The goal setting exercises include 3 modules: Physical activity, Heart-healthy diet, and Medication adherence.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Feasibility of the PP-based Health Behavior Intervention
Description
Feasibility will be measured by examining the number of completed exercises.
Time Frame
10 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in PANAS Scores
Description
The positive affect items on the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), a well-validated scale used in other intervention trials and in patients with HF, will be used to measure positive affect (Range: 10-50). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect.
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Changes in LOT-R Scores
Description
Life Orientation Test-Revised is a well-validated 6-item instrument used to measure dispositional optimism (Range: 0-24). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of optimism.
Time Frame
Change of score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Changes in HADS-Anxiety Subscale Scores
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-anxiety subscale was be used to measure anxiety. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher levels of anxiety.
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Change in HADS-Depression Subscale Scores
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)-depression subscale was be used to measure depression. This is a well-validated scale with few somatic symptom items that can confound mood/anxiety assessment in medically-ill patients (Range: 0-21). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate worse outcome (i.e. greater levels of depression).
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Changes in KCCQ Scores
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a well-validated questionnaire of health status in HF. The full scale will be used to measure HF-specific health-related QoL (HRQoL), and an eight-question subset of the KCCQ will be used as a measure of HF symptoms (QoL score range: 0-100; total symptom score range: 0-100). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher QoL scores indicate better HF specific health-related QoL, and higher total symptom scores indicate fewer symptoms.
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Changes in SF-12 Scores
Description
The Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 (SF-12) will be used to measure quality of life. This is an instrument which has been used in multiple cardiac studies in the past (SF-12 Mental Composite Score and Physical Composite Score Range: 0-100 each). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher level of health related QoL.
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Changes in MOS SAS Scores
Description
Three Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) items assessing medication, diet, and exercise, will be measured individually and as a composite score (Range: 3-18). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate better adherence to health behaviors.
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Changes in Daily Sodium Intake (as Measured With the SSQ)
Description
The Scored Sodium Questionnaire (SSQ) is a self-report scale that assesses the frequency with which participants consume a variety of sodium-containing foods, ranging from "Rarely or Never Eaten" to "At Least Once Daily." It is used to calculate daily sodium intake (Range: 0-215). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks. Higher scores indicate higher sodium intake.
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Self-Reported Medication Adherence (SRMA)
Description
The Self-Reported Medication Adherence (SRMA) asks what percent of the time (in 10% increments) participants took all of their medications as prescribed in the past week and in the past 2 weeks (Range: 0-10). Change was calculated by subtracting the score at baseline from the score at 10 weeks.
Time Frame
Change in score from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Change in Physical Activity
Description
Measured by Actigraph accelerometer, in number of steps per day.
Time Frame
Baseline and 10 weeks
Title
Change in Moderate to Vigorous Physical Activity (Actigraph)
Description
ActiGraph GT3X+ step counters are validated as measures of physical activity and have been used in numerous studies of physical activity in patients with medical illness. In this trial, participants will wear the accelerometer for one week at baseline and again for one week at 10 weeks to assess the feasibility of doing so and to ensure adequate capture of physical activity. Change was calculated by subtracting the MVPA at baseline from the MVPA at 10 weeks.
Time Frame
Change in MVPA from Baseline to 10 weeks
Title
Feasibility of Actigraph
Description
Feasibility will be measured by examining the number of participants who use of the Actigraph.
Time Frame
Baseline and 10 weeks
Title
Acceptability of the Exercises: Utility Score
Description
Participants will provide ratings of utility after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater utility of the exercise. Weekly utility ratings were averaged to provide an overall utility score of the exercises.
Time Frame
Weeks 1-10
Title
Acceptability of the Exercises: Ease Score
Description
Participants will provide ratings of ease after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Higher scores indicate greater ease of the exercise. Weekly ease ratings were averaged to provide an overall easy score of the exercises.
Time Frame
Weeks 1-10
Title
Immediate Impact of the Exercises: Optimism Rating
Description
Participants will provide ratings of optimism before and after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Weekly pre- and post-exercise ratings of optimism were averaged to provide an overall pre- and post-exercise optimism score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of optimism.
Time Frame
Weeks 1-10
Title
Immediate Impact of the Exercises: Positive Affect Rating
Description
Participants will provide ratings of positive affect, before and after each exercise, measured on a 10-point Likert scale (0-10). Weekly pre- and post-exercise ratings of happiness were averaged to provide an overall pre- and post-exercise score. Higher scores indicate higher levels of positive affect.
Time Frame
Weeks 1-10

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients with NYHA class I, II, or III HF admitted to an MGH inpatient unit or outpatients at the MGH Heart Center. Patients with NYHA class IV HF have ongoing HF symptoms at rest, making it difficult for them to increase physical activity and other health behaviors; therefore, they will not be included. HF diagnosis will be confirmed via chart review and with the patient's treatment team as needed. Suboptimal adherence to health behaviors. This will be defined as a total score of ≤15 on three Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale (MOS SAS) items regarding diet/exercise/medications. The MOS SAS has been used in multiple prior studies assessing adherence in cardiac patients, including our own studies in this population. This threshold score on the MOS SAS will ensure that all participants will have the potential to improve their health behaviors. Exclusion Criteria: Cognitive deficits impeding a participant's ability to provide informed consent or participate, assessed via a 6-item cognitive test that is sensitive and specific for screening for cognitive impairment in research participants. Medical conditions precluding interviews or likely to lead to death within 6 months. Inability to speak English, inability to read or write, inability to walk, or lack of a telephone.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher M Celano, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Massachusetts General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30273277
Citation
Celano CM, Freedman ME, Beale EE, Gomez-Bernal F, Huffman JC. A Positive Psychology Intervention to Promote Health Behaviors in Heart Failure: A Proof-of-Concept Trial. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2018 Oct;206(10):800-808. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000883.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Researching Emotions And Cardiac Health (REACH): Phase II

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs