search
Back to results

RESPECT Trial - (Rapid Extravascular Sealing Via PercutanEous Collagen ImplanT) (RESPECT)

Primary Purpose

Surgical Wound

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Manual compression
Cardiva VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System
Sponsored by
Cardiva Medical, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Surgical Wound focused on measuring vascular closure system, manual compression, femoral arteriotomy, percutaneous endovascular procedures

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Pre-Operative Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing an elective, non-emergent diagnostic or interventional endovascular procedure via the common femoral artery using a 6 or 7 Fr introducer sheath

Pre-Operative Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Advanced refusal of blood transfusion, if necessary;
  2. Active systemic or a cutaneous infection or inflammation;
  3. Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder and/or chronic use of systemic steroids;
  4. Known, significant history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, von Willebrand's disease or current platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3, baseline INR ≥1.8, or fibrinogen level less than 150 mg/dl (if received a fibrinolytic agent within prior 24 hours);
  5. Severe co-existing morbidities having a life expectancy of less than 30 days;
  6. Currently involved in any other investigational clinical trial;
  7. Ipsilateral femoral arteriotomy within the previous 30 days;
  8. Planned endovascular procedure within the next 30 days;
  9. Previous ipsilateral femoral artery closure using a permanent implant-based closure device;
  10. Previous vascular grafts or surgery at the target vessel access site;
  11. History of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, revascularization or deep vein thrombosis in the ipsilateral limb;
  12. Unilateral or bilateral lower extremity amputation(s);
  13. Significant anemia with a hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL or a hematocrit less than 30%;
  14. Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine of > 2.5 mg/dl);
  15. Females who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant within 3 months of the procedure, or lactating;
  16. Extreme morbid obesity (BMI greater than 45 kg/m2) or underweight (BMI less than 20 kg/m2);
  17. Unable to routinely walk at least 20 feet without assistance (see protocol);
  18. Known allergy/adverse reaction to bovine derivatives, sodium hyaluronate or hyaluronan preparations;
  19. Procedures that extend hospitalization (e.g., staged endovascular procedure, CABG);
  20. Administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 8 hours of the procedure.

Intra-op Exclusion Criteria

  1. An introducer sheath with an overall length greater than 11 cm, or not 6 Fr or 7 Fr diameter;
  2. Femoral artery diameter less than 6 mm at access site;
  3. Difficult insertion of procedural sheath or needle stick problems at the onset of the procedure (e.g., multiple stick attempts, "back wall stick", etc.);
  4. Angiographic evidence of more than minimal calcium, atherosclerotic disease, or stent within 1 cm of the puncture site;
  5. Overlapping Common Femoral Vein and Femoral Artery at access site;
  6. Placement of ipsilateral venous sheath during procedure;
  7. Arterial access site located not at common femoral artery (e.g., on or below the bifurcation, above the lower border of the inferior epigastric artery, or above the pelvic brim);
  8. More than one access site required;
  9. Loss of distal pulses in the ipsilateral extremity during the procedure;
  10. Subjects receiving unfractionated heparin with an ACT greater than 300 seconds in the absence of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or greater than 250 seconds in the presence of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (may wait to remove introducer sheath until ACT level reaches the target value);
  11. Intra-procedural bleeding around sheath, or suspected intraluminal thrombus, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or AV fistula;
  12. Systemic hypertension (BP greater than 180/110 mmHg) or hypotension (BP less than 90/60 mmHg) prior to randomization;
  13. Length of the tissue tract, the distance between the anterior arterial wall and skin, is estimated to be less than 2.5 cm;
  14. If the physician deems that a different method should be used to achieve hemostasis of the arterial site or that the subject should not attempt ambulation according to the protocol requirements.

Sites / Locations

  • Thomas Hospital
  • Christiana Care
  • Holmes Regional Medical Center
  • St. John's Prairie Heart
  • St. Vincent's Heart Center of Indiana
  • King's Daughters Medical Center
  • Terrebonne General Medical Center
  • Lafayette General Medical Center
  • Washington Adventist Hospital
  • Tufts University
  • William Beaumont Hospital
  • Cooper Health System
  • Winthrop University Hospital
  • New York-Presbyterian Hospital
  • Forsyth Medical Center
  • Oklahoma Heart Institute
  • Heart Hospital of Austin
  • Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
  • CAMC Health Education and Research Institute, Inc.
  • St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Manual compression

VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System

Arm Description

Using manual compression to reach hemostasis

The Cardiva VASCADETM Vascular Closure System (VCS) is indicated for the percutaneous closure of common femoral artery access sites while reducing times to hemostasis and ambulation in patients who have undergone diagnostic or interventional endovascular catheterization procedures utilizing 6 Fr or 7 Fr procedural sheaths.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to Hemostasis (TTH)
Primary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and first observed and confirmed arterial hemostasis.
Rate of Combined Access Site-related Major Complications
Primary safety endpoint Access site-related bleeding requiring transfusion; Vascular injury requiring repair (via surgery, ultrasound guided compression, transcatheter embolization or stent graft); New ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia causing a threat to the viability of the limb and requiring surgical or additional percutaneous intervention. This compromised blood flow is documented by subject symptoms, physical exam and/or a decreased or absent blood flow on lower extremity angiogram.; Access site-related infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or extended hospitalization; New onset access site-related neuropathy in the ipsilateral lower extremity requiring surgical repair; Permanent access site-related nerve injury. (> 30 days)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Time to Ambulation (TTA)
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject stands and walks 20 feet without evidence of arterial re-bleeding
Time to Discharge Eligibility (TTDE)
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject is medically able to be discharged based solely on the assessment of the access site, as determined by the medical team
Time to Hospital Discharge (TTHD)
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject is actually discharged from the hospital
Device Success
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - ability to deploy the delivery system, deliver the collagen, and achieve hemostasis with VASCADE alone or with adjunctive compression
Procedure Success
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - attainment of final hemostasis using any method and freedom from major vascular complications through 30 days
Rate of Combined Minor Access Site Complications
Secondary safety endpoint Access site-related bleeding requiring greater than 30 minutes to achieve hemostasis; Access site-related hematoma > 6 cm; Late access site-related bleeding (following hospital discharge); Ipsilateral lower extremity arterial emboli; Ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis; Access site-related vessel laceration; Access site wound dehiscence; Localized access site infection treated with intramuscular or oral antibiotics; Arteriovenous fistula not requiring treatment; Pseudoaneurysm requiring thrombin injection or fibrin adhesive injection; Pseudoaneurysm not requiring treatment; New onset access site-related neuropathy in the ipsilateral lower extremity not requiring surgical repair; Ipsilateral pedal pulse diminished by two grades or transiently lost.

Full Information

First Posted
February 10, 2011
Last Updated
January 8, 2020
Sponsor
Cardiva Medical, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01297322
Brief Title
RESPECT Trial - (Rapid Extravascular Sealing Via PercutanEous Collagen ImplanT)
Acronym
RESPECT
Official Title
A Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Trial to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the Cardiva VASCADE VCS vs. Manual Compression for the Management of the Femoral Arteriotomy After Percutaneous Endovascular Procedures
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cardiva Medical, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this trial is to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Cardiva VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System (VCS) in sealing femoral arterial access sites. Hypothesis: The Cardiva VASCADE™ VCS provides times to hemostasis (TTH) and time to ambulation (TTA) results that are less than manual compression by a clinically meaningful and statistically significant margin. The rate of major access site-related complications with the Cardiva VASCADE™ VCS is non-inferior to the major complication rates of manual compression for sealing femoral arterial access sites.
Detailed Description
A prospective, randomized, controlled multi-center clinical trial designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the study device in sealing femoral arterial access sites and providing reduced times to hemostasis and ambulation compared with manual compression at the completion of diagnostic or interventional endovascular procedures performed through 6 Fr or 7 Fr introducer sheaths. Subjects will be randomized in a 2:1 treatment device to control ratio.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgical Wound
Keywords
vascular closure system, manual compression, femoral arteriotomy, percutaneous endovascular procedures

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
420 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Manual compression
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Using manual compression to reach hemostasis
Arm Title
VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The Cardiva VASCADETM Vascular Closure System (VCS) is indicated for the percutaneous closure of common femoral artery access sites while reducing times to hemostasis and ambulation in patients who have undergone diagnostic or interventional endovascular catheterization procedures utilizing 6 Fr or 7 Fr procedural sheaths.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Manual compression
Intervention Description
Standard of Care
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cardiva VASCADE™ Vascular Closure System
Intervention Description
Investigational Hemostatic Vascular Closure System
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Hemostasis (TTH)
Description
Primary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and first observed and confirmed arterial hemostasis.
Time Frame
Up to 1 hour
Title
Rate of Combined Access Site-related Major Complications
Description
Primary safety endpoint Access site-related bleeding requiring transfusion; Vascular injury requiring repair (via surgery, ultrasound guided compression, transcatheter embolization or stent graft); New ipsilateral lower extremity ischemia causing a threat to the viability of the limb and requiring surgical or additional percutaneous intervention. This compromised blood flow is documented by subject symptoms, physical exam and/or a decreased or absent blood flow on lower extremity angiogram.; Access site-related infection requiring intravenous antibiotics and/or extended hospitalization; New onset access site-related neuropathy in the ipsilateral lower extremity requiring surgical repair; Permanent access site-related nerve injury. (> 30 days)
Time Frame
30 days +/- 7 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Ambulation (TTA)
Description
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject stands and walks 20 feet without evidence of arterial re-bleeding
Time Frame
Up to 1 day
Title
Time to Discharge Eligibility (TTDE)
Description
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject is medically able to be discharged based solely on the assessment of the access site, as determined by the medical team
Time Frame
Up to 2 days
Title
Time to Hospital Discharge (TTHD)
Description
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - elapsed time between device (VASCADE) or sheath (manual compression) removal and when subject is actually discharged from the hospital
Time Frame
Up to 2 days
Title
Device Success
Description
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - ability to deploy the delivery system, deliver the collagen, and achieve hemostasis with VASCADE alone or with adjunctive compression
Time Frame
Up to 1 day
Title
Procedure Success
Description
Secondary effectiveness endpoint - attainment of final hemostasis using any method and freedom from major vascular complications through 30 days
Time Frame
30 days +/- 7 days
Title
Rate of Combined Minor Access Site Complications
Description
Secondary safety endpoint Access site-related bleeding requiring greater than 30 minutes to achieve hemostasis; Access site-related hematoma > 6 cm; Late access site-related bleeding (following hospital discharge); Ipsilateral lower extremity arterial emboli; Ipsilateral deep vein thrombosis; Access site-related vessel laceration; Access site wound dehiscence; Localized access site infection treated with intramuscular or oral antibiotics; Arteriovenous fistula not requiring treatment; Pseudoaneurysm requiring thrombin injection or fibrin adhesive injection; Pseudoaneurysm not requiring treatment; New onset access site-related neuropathy in the ipsilateral lower extremity not requiring surgical repair; Ipsilateral pedal pulse diminished by two grades or transiently lost.
Time Frame
30 days +/- 7 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Pre-Operative Inclusion Criteria: Patients undergoing an elective, non-emergent diagnostic or interventional endovascular procedure via the common femoral artery using a 6 or 7 Fr introducer sheath Pre-Operative Exclusion Criteria: Advanced refusal of blood transfusion, if necessary; Active systemic or a cutaneous infection or inflammation; Pre-existing immunodeficiency disorder and/or chronic use of systemic steroids; Known, significant history of bleeding diathesis, coagulopathy, von Willebrand's disease or current platelet count < 100,000 cells/mm3, baseline INR ≥1.8, or fibrinogen level less than 150 mg/dl (if received a fibrinolytic agent within prior 24 hours); Severe co-existing morbidities having a life expectancy of less than 30 days; Currently involved in any other investigational clinical trial; Ipsilateral femoral arteriotomy within the previous 30 days; Planned endovascular procedure within the next 30 days; Previous ipsilateral femoral artery closure using a permanent implant-based closure device; Previous vascular grafts or surgery at the target vessel access site; History of symptomatic peripheral arterial disease, revascularization or deep vein thrombosis in the ipsilateral limb; Unilateral or bilateral lower extremity amputation(s); Significant anemia with a hemoglobin level less than 10 g/dL or a hematocrit less than 30%; Renal insufficiency (serum creatinine of > 2.5 mg/dl); Females who are pregnant, planning to become pregnant within 3 months of the procedure, or lactating; Extreme morbid obesity (BMI greater than 45 kg/m2) or underweight (BMI less than 20 kg/m2); Unable to routinely walk at least 20 feet without assistance (see protocol); Known allergy/adverse reaction to bovine derivatives, sodium hyaluronate or hyaluronan preparations; Procedures that extend hospitalization (e.g., staged endovascular procedure, CABG); Administration of low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) within 8 hours of the procedure. Intra-op Exclusion Criteria An introducer sheath with an overall length greater than 11 cm, or not 6 Fr or 7 Fr diameter; Femoral artery diameter less than 6 mm at access site; Difficult insertion of procedural sheath or needle stick problems at the onset of the procedure (e.g., multiple stick attempts, "back wall stick", etc.); Angiographic evidence of more than minimal calcium, atherosclerotic disease, or stent within 1 cm of the puncture site; Overlapping Common Femoral Vein and Femoral Artery at access site; Placement of ipsilateral venous sheath during procedure; Arterial access site located not at common femoral artery (e.g., on or below the bifurcation, above the lower border of the inferior epigastric artery, or above the pelvic brim); More than one access site required; Loss of distal pulses in the ipsilateral extremity during the procedure; Subjects receiving unfractionated heparin with an ACT greater than 300 seconds in the absence of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor or greater than 250 seconds in the presence of a glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor (may wait to remove introducer sheath until ACT level reaches the target value); Intra-procedural bleeding around sheath, or suspected intraluminal thrombus, hematoma, pseudoaneurysm, or AV fistula; Systemic hypertension (BP greater than 180/110 mmHg) or hypotension (BP less than 90/60 mmHg) prior to randomization; Length of the tissue tract, the distance between the anterior arterial wall and skin, is estimated to be less than 2.5 cm; If the physician deems that a different method should be used to achieve hemostasis of the arterial site or that the subject should not attempt ambulation according to the protocol requirements.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James B. Hermiller, Jr., MD, FACC
Organizational Affiliation
The St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana, St. Vincent Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Thomas Hospital
City
Fairhope
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36532
Country
United States
Facility Name
Christiana Care
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
ZIP/Postal Code
19718
Country
United States
Facility Name
Holmes Regional Medical Center
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32901
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. John's Prairie Heart
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62769
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent's Heart Center of Indiana
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46290
Country
United States
Facility Name
King's Daughters Medical Center
City
Ashland
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
41101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Terrebonne General Medical Center
City
Houma
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lafayette General Medical Center
City
Lafayette
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70503
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington Adventist Hospital
City
Takoma Park
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20912
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts University
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
William Beaumont Hospital
City
Royal Oak
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48073
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cooper Health System
City
Camden
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08012
Country
United States
Facility Name
Winthrop University Hospital
City
Mineola
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11501
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York-Presbyterian Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Forsyth Medical Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oklahoma Heart Institute
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heart Hospital of Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sentara Norfolk General Hospital
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23507
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23298
Country
United States
Facility Name
CAMC Health Education and Research Institute, Inc.
City
Charleston
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
25304
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent's Hospital Melbourne
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3065
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
10577443
Citation
Lehmann KG, Heath-Lange SJ, Ferris ST. Randomized comparison of hemostasis techniques after invasive cardiovascular procedures. Am Heart J. 1999 Dec;138(6 Pt 1):1118-25. doi: 10.1016/s0002-8703(99)70078-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9656045
Citation
Simon A, Bumgarner B, Clark K, Israel S. Manual versus mechanical compression for femoral artery hemostasis after cardiac catheterization. Am J Crit Care. 1998 Jul;7(4):308-13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7759724
Citation
Kussmaul WG 3rd, Buchbinder M, Whitlow PL, Aker UT, Heuser RR, King SB, Kent KM, Leon MB, Kolansky DM, Sandza JG Jr. Rapid arterial hemostasis and decreased access site complications after cardiac catheterization and angioplasty: results of a randomized trial of a novel hemostatic device. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Jun;25(7):1685-92. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00101-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14654485
Citation
Castaneda F, Swischuk JL, Smouse HB, Brady T. Gelatin sponge closure device versus manual compression after peripheral arterial catheterization procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Dec;14(12):1517-23. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000099530.29957.dd.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12847195
Citation
Hoffer EK, Bloch RD. Percutaneous arterial closure devices. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2003 Jul;14(7):865-85. doi: 10.1097/01.rvi.0000071086.76348.8e.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10392872
Citation
Gerckens U, Cattelaens N, Lampe EG, Grube E. Management of arterial puncture site after catheterization procedures: evaluating a suture-mediated closure device. Am J Cardiol. 1999 Jun 15;83(12):1658-63. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00174-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14556868
Citation
Kinnaird TD, Stabile E, Mintz GS, Lee CW, Canos DA, Gevorkian N, Pinnow EE, Kent KM, Pichard AD, Satler LF, Weissman NJ, Lindsay J, Fuchs S. Incidence, predictors, and prognostic implications of bleeding and blood transfusion following percutaneous coronary interventions. Am J Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;92(8):930-5. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(03)00972-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9595617
Citation
Newcombe RG. Interval estimation for the difference between independent proportions: comparison of eleven methods. Stat Med. 1998 Apr 30;17(8):873-90. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0258(19980430)17:83.0.co;2-i. Erratum In: Stat Med 1999 May 30;18(10):1293.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

RESPECT Trial - (Rapid Extravascular Sealing Via PercutanEous Collagen ImplanT)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs