search
Back to results

Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization With Ventricle to Ventricle Timing in Heart Failure Patients

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Simultaneous VV Pacing
Sequential VV Pacing
Sponsored by
Abbott Medical Devices
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Patient has a standard indication for a CRT-D. Patient has the ability to complete a 6-minute hall walk with the only limiting factor to be fatigue or shortness of breath. Patient is geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule. Prior to 1 month of randomization, patient's HF medications are maintained stable and remain stable throughout the study. Patients requiring a CRT-D replacement must comply with BOTH of the following: > 1 HF related hospitalization No class improvement or worsening in NYHA scale Exclusion Criteria: Patient's life expectancy is less than 12 months. Patient has had cardiac surgery within 6 months of enrollment. Patient has an epicardial ventricular lead system. Patient is less than 18 years old. Patient is pregnant.

Sites / Locations

  • Ohio State University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Simultaneous VV Pacing

Sequential VV Pacing

Arm Description

Programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing

Programmed to sequential biventricular pacing

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

CRT Responder Rate
Patients underwent baseline NYHA class and 6-minute hall walk distance (6-MHWD) assessment. After device implantation AV delays were optimized and all patients were programmed to simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing. At the 3-month follow-up, the NYHA class and 6-MHWD were reassessed. Non-responders were randomized 1:1 to either sequential BiV pacing with VV optimization or simultaneous BiV pacing. The responder rate at 6 months post randomization was compared between the two groups. Which is why the numbers are broken further down in the Outcome Measure table.

Secondary Outcome Measures

NYHA Class Progression
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification provides a way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina pain.
6 Minute Hall Walk Distance Test (6-MHWD)
Patients were considered non-responders if the 6-MHWD had not improved by greater than or equal to 10% compared to baseline. This statement is accurate and appropriate.
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving your heart each time it contracts. The left ventricle is the heart's main pumping chamber, so ejection fraction is usually measured only in the left ventricle (LV).

Full Information

First Posted
September 10, 2005
Last Updated
February 1, 2019
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00187200
Brief Title
Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization With Ventricle to Ventricle Timing in Heart Failure Patients
Official Title
RESPONSE HF - Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization With Interventricular (VV) Timing in Heart Failure Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the benefit of interventricular (V-V) delay optimization in reducing the non-responder rate in patients with cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) devices. The primary endpoint of this study is CRT responder rate. For patients enrolled with new CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled: < 10% improvement in 6-minute hall walk, and no class improvement or worsening in New York Heart Association (NYHA) scale. For those receiving CRT-D devices as replacements of older CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled: > 1 heart failure (HF) related hospitalization, and no class improvement or worsening in NYHA scale.
Detailed Description
Study Methods This is a prospective, randomized (simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing vs. sequential BiV pacing) study. Any patient that receives an FDA approved St. Jude Medical (SJM) CRT-D with V-V timing is eligible for enrollment. At 3 months post enrollment (or at implant for CRT-D replacements), patients screened as non-responders are randomized to either simultaneous or sequential BiV pacing. Patients requiring a replacement CRT-D device that are identified as non-responders to CRT are enrolled at the screening/randomization visit. Patients are followed for a period of 6 months post randomization: Enrollment (1 week pre CRT-D implant to < 2 weeks post CRT-D implant) Screening/Randomization Visit (3 months post enrollment) Follow-up Visit (6 months post randomization) Total # of centers - 80 centers Sample size - 800 patients screened for CRT non-responders

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Heart Failure

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
816 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Simultaneous VV Pacing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing
Arm Title
Sequential VV Pacing
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Programmed to sequential biventricular pacing
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Simultaneous VV Pacing
Intervention Description
Right ventricular and left ventricular pacing delivered simultaneously.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sequential VV Pacing
Intervention Description
Right ventricular and left ventricular pacing delivered sequentially.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
CRT Responder Rate
Description
Patients underwent baseline NYHA class and 6-minute hall walk distance (6-MHWD) assessment. After device implantation AV delays were optimized and all patients were programmed to simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing. At the 3-month follow-up, the NYHA class and 6-MHWD were reassessed. Non-responders were randomized 1:1 to either sequential BiV pacing with VV optimization or simultaneous BiV pacing. The responder rate at 6 months post randomization was compared between the two groups. Which is why the numbers are broken further down in the Outcome Measure table.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
NYHA Class Progression
Description
New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification provides a way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina pain.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
6 Minute Hall Walk Distance Test (6-MHWD)
Description
Patients were considered non-responders if the 6-MHWD had not improved by greater than or equal to 10% compared to baseline. This statement is accurate and appropriate.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Description
Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving your heart each time it contracts. The left ventricle is the heart's main pumping chamber, so ejection fraction is usually measured only in the left ventricle (LV).
Time Frame
Randomization and 9 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient has a standard indication for a CRT-D. Patient has the ability to complete a 6-minute hall walk with the only limiting factor to be fatigue or shortness of breath. Patient is geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule. Prior to 1 month of randomization, patient's HF medications are maintained stable and remain stable throughout the study. Patients requiring a CRT-D replacement must comply with BOTH of the following: > 1 HF related hospitalization No class improvement or worsening in NYHA scale Exclusion Criteria: Patient's life expectancy is less than 12 months. Patient has had cardiac surgery within 6 months of enrollment. Patient has an epicardial ventricular lead system. Patient is less than 18 years old. Patient is pregnant.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raul Weiss, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ohio State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Response of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Optimization With Ventricle to Ventricle Timing in Heart Failure Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs