search
Back to results

Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE) (ROSE)

Primary Purpose

Osteoporosis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Screening
Control
Sponsored by
Odense University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Osteoporosis focused on measuring Screening, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Absorptiometry, Photon, Fracture prevention, Women, Patient prespective

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - 80 Years (Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Women
  • Age 65-80 years
  • Inhabitants of the Region of Southern Denmark

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Self-reported use of antiosteoporotic treatment and a diagnose of osteoporosis
  • Unability to give informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • Dept. of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Other

Arm Label

Screening

Control

Arm Description

Two-step screening process using FRAX risk score assessment followed by DXA scanning for high risk participants.

Control arm - Fracture risk assessment by FRAX without any intervention

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The effect of screening for osteoporosis with a two-step programme involving FRAX risk score followed by DXA for the prevention of hip fracture and other osteoporosis-related fracture events
Comparison of register data concerning hospitalizations for primarily hip fracture between the intervention and control group as a whole. Power calculations suggest three years of followup on average, but this time frame could be increased if participation falls short.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cost-effectiveness / cost-utility of a two-step screening programme.
Comparison of register-based health related costs due to antiosteoporotic medications combined with generated costs due to hospitalizations for osteoporosis-related fractures. Follow-up time is defined by the primary outcome measure

Full Information

First Posted
June 29, 2011
Last Updated
October 23, 2014
Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Collaborators
University of Southern Denmark, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01388244
Brief Title
Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE)
Acronym
ROSE
Official Title
Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Odense University Hospital
Collaborators
University of Southern Denmark, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE) is a randomised population-based study, including 20,904 Danish women aged 65-81 years, investigating the effectiveness of a two-step screening programme for osteoporosis, using a questionnaire based on FRAX® followed by DXA-scan of those at highest risk. Further, the study is expected to provide knowledge about cost-effectiveness, patient preferences and acceptance of screening programme to prevent fractures
Detailed Description
Osteoporosis is highly prevalent especially in postmenopausal women. Approximately 46 % of all women will suffer at least one osteoporotic fracture after the age of 50. The US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) and National Osteoporosis Foundation (NOF) recommend screening with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) in all women aged 65 years and above regardless of risk factors. Nevertheless, the use of clinical risk factors has been shown to enhance the risk-gradient and accuracy of fracture risk prediction. The FRAX risk assessment score was derived from large population-based cohorts and validated in separate validation cohorts. Its use as a risk assessment tool is endorsed by WHO, but no prospective studies examining the effect of a screening programme using a combination of FRAX and DXA in a two-step manner have been performed previously. 35,000 women aged 65-80 years were selected at random from the population in the Region of Southern Denmark and -before inclusion-randomised to either a screening group or a control group. As first step, a self- administered questionnaire regarding risk factors for osteoporosis based on FRAX® was issued to both groups. As second step, subjects in the screening group with a 10-year probability of major osteoporotic fractures ≥15 % were offered a DXA scan. Patients diagnosed with osteoporosis from the DXA scan were advised to see their GP and discuss pharmaceutical treatment according to Danish National guidelines. The primary outcome is incident clinical fractures as evaluated through annual follow-up using the Danish National Patient Registry. The secondary outcomes are cost-effectiveness, participation rate and patient preferences. The aim of the ROSE study is to investigate the effectiveness of a two-step population based osteoporosis screening programme using FRAX® based on self-administered questionnaire to select women for DXA followed by the standard osteoporosis treatment according to national guidelines and delivered by GPs in the Region of Southern Denmark. Secondary aims are to clarify whether the screening programme is cost-effective and to assess the patients' preferences, experience and acceptance of the screening programme. Moreover, sub-studies allow assessment of the effectiveness of FRAX® alone or combined with individual clinical risk factors in the prediction of fractures and the impact of socioeconomic factors for participation and outcome.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoporosis
Keywords
Screening, Risk Assessment, Fractures, Absorptiometry, Photon, Fracture prevention, Women, Patient prespective

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
35000 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Screening
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Two-step screening process using FRAX risk score assessment followed by DXA scanning for high risk participants.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Control arm - Fracture risk assessment by FRAX without any intervention
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Screening
Other Intervention Name(s)
DXA scan
Intervention Description
Screening by risk factor assessment (FRAX) followed by DXA
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Control
Intervention Description
Observation by use of register data
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The effect of screening for osteoporosis with a two-step programme involving FRAX risk score followed by DXA for the prevention of hip fracture and other osteoporosis-related fracture events
Description
Comparison of register data concerning hospitalizations for primarily hip fracture between the intervention and control group as a whole. Power calculations suggest three years of followup on average, but this time frame could be increased if participation falls short.
Time Frame
Three years follow-up on average
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cost-effectiveness / cost-utility of a two-step screening programme.
Description
Comparison of register-based health related costs due to antiosteoporotic medications combined with generated costs due to hospitalizations for osteoporosis-related fractures. Follow-up time is defined by the primary outcome measure
Time Frame
Three years follow-up on average

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Women Age 65-80 years Inhabitants of the Region of Southern Denmark Exclusion Criteria: Self-reported use of antiosteoporotic treatment and a diagnose of osteoporosis Unability to give informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Brixen, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
University og Southern Denmark, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dept. of Endocrinology, Odense University Hospital
City
Odense
ZIP/Postal Code
5000
Country
Denmark

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28875257
Citation
Rothmann MJ, Moller S, Holmberg T, Hojberg M, Gram J, Bech M, Brixen K, Hermann AP, Gluer CC, Barkmann R, Rubin KH. Non-participation in systematic screening for osteoporosis-the ROSE trial. Osteoporos Int. 2017 Dec;28(12):3389-3399. doi: 10.1007/s00198-017-4205-y. Epub 2017 Sep 5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
26590810
Citation
Holmberg T, Bech M, Gram J, Hermann AP, Rubin KH, Brixen K. Point-of-Care Phalangeal Bone Mineral Density Measurement Can Reduce the Need of Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry Scanning in Danish Women at Risk of Fracture. Calcif Tissue Int. 2016 Mar;98(3):244-52. doi: 10.1007/s00223-015-0084-4. Epub 2015 Nov 21.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Risk-stratified Osteoporosis Strategy Evaluation Study (ROSE)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs