search
Back to results

Robot-based Tele-echography II - A Comparative Study

Primary Purpose

Abdominal Injuries, Thoracic Injuries, High Energy Trauma

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Robot-Based Tele-Echography (TER)
ultrasound method FAST
Sponsored by
University Hospital, Grenoble
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Abdominal Injuries focused on measuring robot-based tele-echography, tele-medicine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Person registered with the French Social Security or benefiting from an equivalent health insurance system Person sent to hospital for thoracoabdominal high energy trauma Exclusion Criteria: Ward of court or under guardianship Adult unable to express their consent Person deprived of freedom by judicial or administrative decision Person hospitalized without their consent Person under legal protection Person participating in another clinical study

Sites / Locations

  • University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Robot-Based Tele-Echography (TER)

ultrasound method FAST

Arm Description

ultrasound performed according to the method Tele-Echography

ultrasound performed according to the method FAST (Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

The diagnosis concordance between the radiologists using the robot-based tele-echography and the emergency physicians (FAST bedside examination) is evaluated thanks to the Cohen kappa interrater agreement coefficient.

Secondary Outcome Measures

sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV are estimated with a 95% confidence interval
qualitative scores (including comfort and experience of the patient, quality of the echographic method evaluated by the physicians).

Full Information

First Posted
February 21, 2006
Last Updated
September 14, 2016
Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Collaborators
France Telecom R&D
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00295438
Brief Title
Robot-based Tele-echography II - A Comparative Study
Official Title
Robot-based Tele-echography II - A Comparative Study Using Two Echographic Modalities for Diagnosis of Thoracoabdominal Injuries at the Trauma Center of the Grenoble University Hospital.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
No diagnosis of visceral lesion was placed on 18 included patients. The study is thus stopped prematurely for ethical reasons.
Study Start Date
February 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Grenoble
Collaborators
France Telecom R&D

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to evaluate the concordance of diagnosis of injuries in thoracoabdominal trauma using two different echographic methods. The first method is a robot-based tele-echography performed by radiologists in a remote location. The second is bedside echography performed by emergency physicians according to the FAST (Focussed Assessment by Sonography of Trauma) examination.
Detailed Description
Principal objective: to evaluate the concordance of diagnosis of injuries in thoracoabdominal trauma using two different echographic methods (robot-based tele-echography performed by radiologists in a remote location vs bedside echography performed by emergency physicians according to the FAST examination). Objective 2: after the realization of a gold standard method, if there is a concordance between the two different echographic methods, sensitivity and specificity are estimated. If not, the evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of each method with analysis of their discordance is performed. Objective 3: qualitative evaluation of each echographic method by the patient and the physicians. Material and methods: This therapeutic, mono-centre, prospective, randomized, cross-over, open, controlled trial is being conducted in 70 patients. All the patients will have the two different echographic methods in a sequential but randomized way. The robot-based tele-echography is performed by a radiologist in the North University Hospital of Grenoble. The bedside echography is performed by the emergency physicians in the trauma center in the South University Hospital of Grenoble.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Abdominal Injuries, Thoracic Injuries, High Energy Trauma
Keywords
robot-based tele-echography, tele-medicine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
18 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Robot-Based Tele-Echography (TER)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ultrasound performed according to the method Tele-Echography
Arm Title
ultrasound method FAST
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ultrasound performed according to the method FAST (Focused Assessment Sonography for Trauma)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Robot-Based Tele-Echography (TER)
Intervention Description
Robot-Based Tele-Echography, ultrasound performed by the radiologist
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ultrasound method FAST
Intervention Description
FAST,ultrasound performed by the emergency doctor
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The diagnosis concordance between the radiologists using the robot-based tele-echography and the emergency physicians (FAST bedside examination) is evaluated thanks to the Cohen kappa interrater agreement coefficient.
Time Frame
6 month
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV are estimated with a 95% confidence interval
Time Frame
6 month
Title
qualitative scores (including comfort and experience of the patient, quality of the echographic method evaluated by the physicians).
Time Frame
6 month

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Person registered with the French Social Security or benefiting from an equivalent health insurance system Person sent to hospital for thoracoabdominal high energy trauma Exclusion Criteria: Ward of court or under guardianship Adult unable to express their consent Person deprived of freedom by judicial or administrative decision Person hospitalized without their consent Person under legal protection Person participating in another clinical study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean-Jacques Banihachemi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Urgences Traumatologiques de l'hôpital SUD - Centre Hospitalier et Universitaire - Grenoble - B.P. 185 38042 GRENOBLE Cedex 09 - France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38000
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
14663989
Citation
Vilchis A, Masuda K, Troccaz J, Cinquin P. Robot-based tele-echography: the TER system. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2003;95:212-7.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Robot-based Tele-echography II - A Comparative Study

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs