search
Back to results

Robotic or Open Radical Cystectomy in Treating Patients With Bladder Cancer

Primary Purpose

Stage 0is Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Stage I Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Stage II Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Questionnaire Administration
Radical Cystectomy
Radical Cystectomy
Sponsored by
University of Southern California
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Stage 0is Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Indication for radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer
  • All types of urinary diversions
  • Tis-T3 Urothelial cancer; patients will be stratified according to clinical stage
  • Ability to consent
  • Patient meets criteria to be a surgical candidate

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Inability to give consent or adhere to follow-up schedule
  • T4 tumor
  • Bulky lymphadenopathy (> 2 cm)
  • Prior pelvic radiation
  • Not surgical candidate because of significant co-morbidity
  • Uncontrolled coagulopathy

Sites / Locations

  • USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Arm I (RRC)

Arm II (ORC)

Arm Description

Patients undergo RRC at day 0.

Patients undergo ORC at day 0.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in patient reported quality of life, as measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30
The results for the two arms will be summarized using graphical methods and standard descriptive statistics. Means (or medians) and associated 95% confidence intervals-for each arm separately and for the difference-will be used to display the patterns. For QoL variables that are assessed at multiple times post cystectomy, regression methods that accommodate repeated measures will be used to assess patterns over time. Analyses will compare the two arms using general linear regression models and stratifying for the four variables used for stratification prior to randomization.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in erectile dysfunction, as measured by the SHIM score

Full Information

First Posted
March 1, 2016
Last Updated
May 1, 2019
Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02699853
Brief Title
Robotic or Open Radical Cystectomy in Treating Patients With Bladder Cancer
Official Title
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Robotic Versus Open Radical Cystectomy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
PI decided to revamp the protocol completely and will submit as new study.
Study Start Date
April 12, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 16, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 16, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Southern California
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This randomized phase II trial studies how well robotic radical cystectomy (RRC) or open radical cystectomy (ORC) works in treating patients with bladder cancer. Cystectomy is a surgical procedure to remove all or part of the bladder (the organ that holds urine) or to remove a cyst (a sac or capsule in the body). In RRC, the the surgeon makes small cuts in the abdomen and uses a thin, lighted instrument with a camera attached called a scope. With the help of a robot, the surgeon removes the bladder and other nearby structures. In ORC, the surgeon makes a cut into the lower abdomen to expose the urinary tract in order to remove the bladder and nearby structures. It is not yet known whether RRC or ORC has fewer complications, better quality of life, and faster recovery time in treating patients with bladder cancer.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To compare RRC to ORC in terms of the difference in European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core (QLQC)30 quality of life instrument assessed at baseline to day 30 after radical cystectomy (RC). II. To compare RRC to ORC in terms of the 90-day high-grade complication rate (where high grade is defined as Clavien-Dindo grade 3-5). III. To compare the peri-operative cost of the RC procedure, as defined as from the day of hospital admission to the day of hospital discharge. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To estimate the differences between RRC and ORC in terms of the following quality of life outcomes: Narcotic requirements prior to RC, during hospital stay and on days 7, 14, 30, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months; Visual Analog Scale (VAS) pain score prior to RC and on days 7, 14, 30, 6 weeks, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months; the EORTC-QLQ-30 prior to RC and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; the bladder cancer index (BCI) at 30 days and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; the Sexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM) prior to RC and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months; the World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of Life (QOL) questionnaire prior to RC and at 30 days and 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. II. To estimate the differences between RRC and ORC in terms of the following surgical and complication outcomes: all complications occurring intraoperatively, during postoperative hospitalization and during the 90 days post cystectomy assessed at 7, 14, and 30 days; at 6 weeks and at 3 months-graded according to the Clavien-Dindo classification; all complications, all grade 3+ complications, and all grade 4+ complications; time to oral intake; estimated blood loss during surgery, number of transfusions on the day of surgery; drop in hematocrit at 24 hours; lymph node yield; and positive surgical margin. III. To estimate the differences between RRC and ORC in terms of the following cost-related outcomes: operation room time; number of disposables used; pharmacy costs; length of hospital stay; admission to intensive care unit (ICU) prior to discharge & length of stay in ICU; number of hospital readmissions within 30 and 90 days (3 months); necessary tests/procedures to treat complications during hospitalization and within 30 and 90 days. OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. ARM I: Patients undergo RRC at day 0. ARM II: Patients undergo ORC at day 0. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 7 days, 30 days, 6 weeks, and at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stage 0is Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Stage I Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Stage II Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma, Stage III Bladder Urothelial Carcinoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm I (RRC)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo RRC at day 0.
Arm Title
Arm II (ORC)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients undergo ORC at day 0.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Radical Cystectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Complete Cystectomy
Intervention Description
Undergo RRC
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Radical Cystectomy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Complete Cystectomy
Intervention Description
Undergo ORC
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in patient reported quality of life, as measured by the EORTC-QLQ-C30
Description
The results for the two arms will be summarized using graphical methods and standard descriptive statistics. Means (or medians) and associated 95% confidence intervals-for each arm separately and for the difference-will be used to display the patterns. For QoL variables that are assessed at multiple times post cystectomy, regression methods that accommodate repeated measures will be used to assess patterns over time. Analyses will compare the two arms using general linear regression models and stratifying for the four variables used for stratification prior to randomization.
Time Frame
Baseline and 1-month post cystectomy
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in erectile dysfunction, as measured by the SHIM score
Time Frame
up to 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Indication for radical cystectomy for urothelial cancer All types of urinary diversions Tis-T3 Urothelial cancer; patients will be stratified according to clinical stage Ability to consent Patient meets criteria to be a surgical candidate Exclusion Criteria: Inability to give consent or adhere to follow-up schedule T4 tumor Bulky lymphadenopathy (> 2 cm) Prior pelvic radiation Not surgical candidate because of significant co-morbidity Uncontrolled coagulopathy
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mihir Desai
Organizational Affiliation
University of Southern California
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
USC / Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Robotic or Open Radical Cystectomy in Treating Patients With Bladder Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs