search
Back to results

Role of Geminin and Mcm-2 in Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Immunohistochemistry
Sponsored by
Assiut University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Renal Cell Carcinoma focused on measuring Geminin, prognosis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Adult patients who will undergo radical or partial nephrectomy for primary Renal cell carcinoma (Group A).
  • Adult patients who will undergo simple nephrectomy for benign causes (Group B).

Exclusion criteria:

  • Patients with secondary renal metastasis.
  • Patients with metastatic spread at time of presentation or operation.
  • Patients with renal urothelial carcinomas.
  • Children with renal tumors (less than 18 years).
  • Patients who are unfit for surgical treatment.
  • Patients who are refusing surgical treatment.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Group A

    Group B

    Arm Description

    Group (A) [study cases] Adult patients who will undergo radical or partial nephrectomy.for primary renal cell carcinoma.

    Group (B) [control cases] Adult patients who will undergo simple nephrectomy for benign causes

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Number of participants that develops recurrence of tumor as assessed by Multi slice CT
    Number of patients that develops recurrent tumor after partial or radical nephrectomy as diagnosed by Multi slice CT will be assessed
    Number of participants that develops Tumor metastasis as assessed by Multi slice CT
    Number of patients that develops tumor metastasis after partial or radical nephrectomy as diagnosed by Multi slice CT will be assessed

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 20, 2018
    Last Updated
    September 29, 2018
    Sponsor
    Assiut University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03692533
    Brief Title
    Role of Geminin and Mcm-2 in Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Official Title
    Role of Immunohistochemical Markers , Geminin and Mcm2 in Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma, and Its Clinicopathological Correlation. A Prospective Controlled Study
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2018
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    October 1, 2018 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    October 1, 2020 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 1, 2020 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Assiut University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The study aim is to prospectively assess the prognostic significance of immunohistochemical markers Geminin and Mcm-2 in cases of renal cell carcinoma and to detect its clinicopathological correlation.
    Detailed Description
    Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is one of the most common urological malignancies. Approximately 338,000 people are diagnosed with RCC worldwide each year, representing approximately 2-3 % of all cancers. RCC can be classified into non-epithelial and epithelial, according to cell origin. The four major types are of epithelial origin includes: clear cell renal carcinoma (ccRCC), papillary, chromophobe renal carcinoma (chRCC) and collecting duct carcinoma. The most common subtype of RCC is ccRCC which accounts for approximately 70-80% of all renal cell carcinomas. Prognostic factors for RCC can be classified into: anatomical, histological, clinical, and molecular factors. Anatomical factors include tumor size, venous invasion, renal capsular invasion, adrenal involvement, Lymph node and distant metastasis. Histological factors include tumour grade, RCC subtype, sarcomatoid features, microvascular invasion, tumour necrosis, and invasion of the collecting system. Clinical factors include performance status, local symptoms, cachexia, anaemia, platelet count, neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, C-reactive protein (CRP) and serum albumin. As regard the molecular factors, numerous markers such as carbonic anhydrase IX, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF), Ki67, PTEN (phosphatase and tensin homolog), osteopontin and other cell cycle and proliferative markers are being investigated. The efficiency and accuracy of biomarkers studies using immunohistochemical and tissue microarray techniques are still variable and unclear in regards to prognostic significance in patients with renal tumors. Multiple biomarkers shown to be significant to assess diagnosis and prognosis in these patients and other were not significant. In the RCC cell cycle, minichromosome maintenance 2 (Mcm2), Geminin define the proliferative state. Investigators are able to determine differential levels of expression of various markers in normal tissue compared with indolent and aggressive tumors. Among platforms used in determining the presence of biological markers in surgical pathology specimens, immunohistochemistry is perhaps the most commonly available tool in the routine diagnostic laboratory. Immunohistochemistry allows detection of antigens expressed on tumor cells, hence permitting characterization of the tumor. This study was designed to assess the prognostic significance of Geminin and Mcm-2 in cases of renal cell carcinoma and to assess its clinicopathological correlation.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Renal Cell Carcinoma
    Keywords
    Geminin, prognosis

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    2 groups : Group A include cases and Group B includes controls
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    80 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Group A
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Group (A) [study cases] Adult patients who will undergo radical or partial nephrectomy.for primary renal cell carcinoma.
    Arm Title
    Group B
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Group (B) [control cases] Adult patients who will undergo simple nephrectomy for benign causes
    Intervention Type
    Diagnostic Test
    Intervention Name(s)
    Immunohistochemistry
    Intervention Description
    Histopathological study and evaluation: For each case, the tissue samples will be evaluated by the pathologist for detecting the histopathology and in cases of malignant renal spicemens the pathologist will also assess the histologic type, Fuhrman nuclear grade, cellular invasion of perinephric fat, and the extent of any vascular invasion seen by microscopy. Immunohistochemistry: Immunohistochemical staining will be performed by using the following antibodies: Geminin and Minichromosome maintenance-2 (MCM-2). Evaluation of the immunohistochemical staining will be performed by light microscopy. The interpretation of immuno-reactivity will be performed in a quantitative manner by analyzing the extent of the staining positivity of the tumor cells. Immuno-staining of greater than 10% of tumor cells is required for scoring as a positive case.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Number of participants that develops recurrence of tumor as assessed by Multi slice CT
    Description
    Number of patients that develops recurrent tumor after partial or radical nephrectomy as diagnosed by Multi slice CT will be assessed
    Time Frame
    2 years
    Title
    Number of participants that develops Tumor metastasis as assessed by Multi slice CT
    Description
    Number of patients that develops tumor metastasis after partial or radical nephrectomy as diagnosed by Multi slice CT will be assessed
    Time Frame
    2 years

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion criteria: Adult patients who will undergo radical or partial nephrectomy for primary Renal cell carcinoma (Group A). Adult patients who will undergo simple nephrectomy for benign causes (Group B). Exclusion criteria: Patients with secondary renal metastasis. Patients with metastatic spread at time of presentation or operation. Patients with renal urothelial carcinomas. Children with renal tumors (less than 18 years). Patients who are unfit for surgical treatment. Patients who are refusing surgical treatment.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Mohamed A Allam, PhD
    Phone
    +201021474046
    Ext
    Ass.lecturer
    Email
    m.abdelghany746@gmail.com
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Abdelmonem A Elhaggagy, MD
    Phone
    +201223980551
    Ext
    professor
    Email
    a.elhaggagy@aun.edu.eg

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    26406148
    Citation
    Motzer RJ, Escudier B, McDermott DF, George S, Hammers HJ, Srinivas S, Tykodi SS, Sosman JA, Procopio G, Plimack ER, Castellano D, Choueiri TK, Gurney H, Donskov F, Bono P, Wagstaff J, Gauler TC, Ueda T, Tomita Y, Schutz FA, Kollmannsberger C, Larkin J, Ravaud A, Simon JS, Xu LA, Waxman IM, Sharma P; CheckMate 025 Investigators. Nivolumab versus Everolimus in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 5;373(19):1803-13. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510665. Epub 2015 Sep 25.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    28055103
    Citation
    Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017 Jan;67(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21387. Epub 2017 Jan 5.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    26996659
    Citation
    Humphrey PA, Moch H, Cubilla AL, Ulbright TM, Reuter VE. The 2016 WHO Classification of Tumours of the Urinary System and Male Genital Organs-Part B: Prostate and Bladder Tumours. Eur Urol. 2016 Jul;70(1):106-119. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2016.02.028. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    20633979
    Citation
    Ljungberg B, Cowan NC, Hanbury DC, Hora M, Kuczyk MA, Merseburger AS, Patard JJ, Mulders PF, Sinescu IC; European Association of Urology Guideline Group. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update. Eur Urol. 2010 Sep;58(3):398-406. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.06.032. Epub 2010 Jul 12.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    21741163
    Citation
    Sun M, Shariat SF, Cheng C, Ficarra V, Murai M, Oudard S, Pantuck AJ, Zigeuner R, Karakiewicz PI. Prognostic factors and predictive models in renal cell carcinoma: a contemporary review. Eur Urol. 2011 Oct;60(4):644-61. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.06.041. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    14532767
    Citation
    Kim HL, Belldegrun AS, Freitas DG, Bui MH, Han KR, Dorey FJ, Figlin RA. Paraneoplastic signs and symptoms of renal cell carcinoma: implications for prognosis. J Urol. 2003 Nov;170(5):1742-6. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000092764.81308.6a.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    26969090
    Citation
    Haas NB, Manola J, Uzzo RG, Flaherty KT, Wood CG, Kane C, Jewett M, Dutcher JP, Atkins MB, Pins M, Wilding G, Cella D, Wagner L, Matin S, Kuzel TM, Sexton WJ, Wong YN, Choueiri TK, Pili R, Puzanov I, Kohli M, Stadler W, Carducci M, Coomes R, DiPaola RS. Adjuvant sunitinib or sorafenib for high-risk, non-metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (ECOG-ACRIN E2805): a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):2008-16. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00559-6. Epub 2016 Mar 9. Erratum In: Lancet. 2016 May 14;387(10032):1998.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    15076282
    Citation
    Kim HL, Han KR, Zisman A, Figlin RA, Belldegrun AS. Cachexia-like symptoms predict a worse prognosis in localized t1 renal cell carcinoma. J Urol. 2004 May;171(5):1810-3. doi: 10.1097/01.ju.0000121440.82581.d3.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    22918393
    Citation
    Sim SH, Messenger MP, Gregory WM, Wind TC, Vasudev NS, Cartledge J, Thompson D, Selby PJ, Banks RE. Prognostic utility of pre-operative circulating osteopontin, carbonic anhydrase IX and CRP in renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2012 Sep 25;107(7):1131-7. doi: 10.1038/bjc.2012.360. Epub 2012 Aug 23.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    27279544
    Citation
    Choueiri TK, Escudier B, Powles T, Tannir NM, Mainwaring PN, Rini BI, Hammers HJ, Donskov F, Roth BJ, Peltola K, Lee JL, Heng DYC, Schmidinger M, Agarwal N, Sternberg CN, McDermott DF, Aftab DT, Hessel C, Scheffold C, Schwab G, Hutson TE, Pal S, Motzer RJ; METEOR investigators. Cabozantinib versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma (METEOR): final results from a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17(7):917-927. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30107-3. Epub 2016 Jun 5.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    25427043
    Citation
    Wilkerson ML, Lin F, Liu H, Cheng L. The application of immunohistochemical biomarkers in urologic surgical pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2014 Dec;138(12):1643-65. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2014-0078-RA.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    15814627
    Citation
    Dudderidge TJ, Stoeber K, Loddo M, Atkinson G, Fanshawe T, Griffiths DF, Williams GH. Mcm2, Geminin, and KI67 define proliferative state and are prognostic markers in renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Apr 1;11(7):2510-7. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-1776.
    Results Reference
    result
    PubMed Identifier
    24485757
    Citation
    Alexiev BA, Drachenberg CB. Clear cell papillary renal cell carcinoma: Incidence, morphological features, immunohistochemical profile, and biologic behavior: A single institution study. Pathol Res Pract. 2014 Apr;210(4):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.prp.2013.12.009. Epub 2014 Jan 9.
    Results Reference
    result

    Learn more about this trial

    Role of Geminin and Mcm-2 in Prognosis of Renal Cell Carcinoma

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs