search
Back to results

Role of Vagal Tone in Rumination Syndrome

Primary Purpose

Rumination

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Diaphragmatic breathing
Deep Slow Breathing
Normal breathing
Sponsored by
Queen Mary University of London
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rumination focused on measuring cardiac vagal tone, deep breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, vagal nerve, vagal tone, cognitive behavioral therapy, visceral hypersensitivity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Healthy volunteers (HVs)

    • 18-65 years old
    • No history of any gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in the 3 months prior to the study.
    • No medications 3 months prior to the study
  2. Rumination patients

    • 18-65 years old
    • Fulfilling ROME IV clinical criteria for rumination
    • Confirmed rumination syndrome by High Resolution Impedance Monometry within 12 months prior to the study
    • No history of performing DiaB as a therapy for rumination syndrome.
    • No medications which may affect vagal tone, the number of rumination episodes and GI motility 3 months prior to the study. (i.e. opioids, Baclofen , anticholinergics drugs, prokinetics, beta-blockers)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or lactating women
  • History of GI surgeries apart from appendectomy
  • Alcohol or substance abuse, mental health illness
  • Inability to obtain informed consent
  • Non-fluent English speakers
  • Participants with food intolerances or allergies that would not be able to take in the test meal (McDonalds Big Mac meal)
  • Major comorbidities such as significant cardiac/pulmonary disease, cancer, life-threatening conditions or other life-limiting conditions
  • Evidence of relevant organic diseases. (in endoscopy, CT.)
  • Evidence of major esophageal motility disorders (Chicago classification ver3.0) (21)
  • Known allergy to ECG electrodes or latex
  • History of diabetes

Sites / Locations

  • Wingate Institue

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm 7

Arm 8

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Diaphragmatic breathing in healthy volunteers in study1

Diaphragmatic breathing in rumination patients in study1

Deep slow breathing in healthy volunteers in study1

Deep slow breathing in rumination patients in study1

Normal breathing in healthy volunteers in study1

Normal breathing in rumination patients in study1

Diaphragmatic breathing in study 2; cross over test

Deep slow breathing in study 2; cross over test

Arm Description

Healthy volunteers will perform diaphragmatic breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Healthy volunteers will perform deep slow breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Rumination patients will perform deep slow breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

healthy volunteers will perform normal breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

rumination patients will perform normal breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.

Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing in randomized cross-over test. The investigators will compare the effects on rumination.

Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing in randomized cross-over test. The investigators will compare the effects on rumination.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Comparison of changes in cardiac vagal tone (CVT) calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram between healthy volunteers and rumination patients in Study 1
CVT is calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram and measured on a validated linear vagal scale, where 0 represents full atropinisation. The investigators will continuously measure CVT during the 15-min baseline period, 30-min meal period, 15-min intervention period, and 3-h postprandial period.
Comparison of changes in Meal-induced discomfort scores between healthy volunteers and rumination patients in Study 1
This score consists of 3 visual analog scales (VAS) of the level of nausea, fullness and epigastric discomfort. Each scale is graded from 0 to 5, where score 0 represents no perception and score 5 represents an extremely uncomfortable sensation. A Total score can vary between 0 and 15.
Comparison of changes in the number of rumination episodes between Diaphragmatic breathing group and Deep slow breathing group in Study 2
Subjects will count the number of rumination episodes during 1-hour postprandial period in the laboratory.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Comparison of changes in cardiac vagal tone (CVT) calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram among 3 respiratory exercises in Study 1
CVT is calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram and measured on a validated linear vagal scale, where 0 represents full atropinisation. The investigators will continuously measure CVT during the 15-min baseline period, 30-min meal period, 15-min intervention period, and 3-h postprandial period.
Comparison of the number of rumination episodes among 3 respiratory exercises in rumination patients in Study 1
The subjects will count the number of rumination episodes the 15-min baseline period, 30-min meal period, 15-min intervention period, and the first 1-hour postprandial period.
Comparison of Treatment Evaluation scores in 2 groups in Study 2
The subjects will rate the perception of their complaints compared to the pre-treatment period from -3 to +3: -3 totally unbearable, -2 much worse, -1 slightly worse, 0 no change, +1 slightly better, +2 much better, and +3 totally resolved).
Comparison of changes in Meal-induced discomfort scores among 3 respiratory exercises in Study 1
This score consists of 3 visual analog scales (VAS) of the level of nausea, fullness and epigastric discomfort. Each scale is graded from 0 to 5, where score 0 represents no perception and score 5 represents an extremely uncomfortable sensation. Total scores can vary between 0 and 15.

Full Information

First Posted
March 26, 2019
Last Updated
April 20, 2022
Sponsor
Queen Mary University of London
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03912636
Brief Title
Role of Vagal Tone in Rumination Syndrome
Official Title
Rumination Syndrome: Role of Vagal Tone and Effect of Respiratory Manoeuvres on Severity and Frequency of Rumination
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 1, 2019 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Queen Mary University of London

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Rumination syndrome is a condition in which people repeatedly and unintentionally regurgitate undigested or partially digested food from the stomach, rechew it, and then either re-swallow it or spit it out. The mechanism of the disease is not well understood. The investigators believe that discomfort in the stomach during and immediately after meals may be an important factor for this disease. The reason for such discomfort can be due to an alteration of nervous regulation of the stomach. The investigators can study the nervous regulation that affects the stomach and other parts of the body by analysing in detail an electrocardiogram that is performed continuously for several hours. From this analysis, The investigators can study a parameter called cardiac vagal tone (CVT). Diaphragmatic breathing (DiaB) is a respiratory exercise, in which people mainly move their abdomen to breath. DiaB is a common treatment for rumination syndrome. Patients doing DiaB can reduce the number of rumination episodes. The mechanism by which DiaB improves rumination is unknown. There is another type of breathing called slow deep breathing (SlowDB), in which people mainly breathe with their chest. SlowDB is used as a therapy for increased pain in the food pipe (oesophagus) and it might also be effective on rumination syndrome. The investigators believe that both DiaB and SlowDB can improve rumination, by modifying the nervous control of the stomach (that the investigators can monitor by measuring continuously cardiac vagal tone (CVT)). The aims of the study are to investigate the association between gastric discomfort during a meal, CVT variations (measured with the electrocardiogram during the meal) and the severity of rumination episodes. The investigators will also study how DiaB and SlowDB can modify this variable during the test. In a second step, The investigators will assess the clinical effect of respiratory exercises (DiaB and SlowDB) on the severity and frequency of regurgitations in patients diagnosed with rumination syndrome. Method This research consists of two separate studies. Study1 (to investigate the mechanism of rumination syndrome) 10 healthy volunteers and 10 rumination patients will join Study1 on 3 separate days. On each visit, the investigators will place electrocardiogram sensors and a belt that can measure the thorax or abdominal movement. All subjects will get instructions to perform SlowDB or DiaB, answer some questionnaires, eat the test meal, perform normal breathing/DiaB/SlowDB for 15 minutes, and stay quietly on the chair for 3 hours. Study 2 (to assess the effect of DiaB and SlowDB on rumination syndrome) 10 patients with rumination syndrome will join Study 2. On the first visit, subjects will have the test meal, answer the symptom questionnaire 1 hour after the meal, and learn how to perform either DiaB or SlowDB. After the first visit, subjects perform DiaB or SlowDB during 15 minutes after every meal for 4 weeks. On the second visit, subjects will have the test meal, answer the symptom questionnaire 1 hour after the meal, and learn how to perform the other respiratory exercise. After a 2-week break, subjects will perform the other respiratory exercise for the next 4 weeks. On the last visit, subjects will have the test meal and answer the symptom questionnaire 1 hour after the meal.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rumination
Keywords
cardiac vagal tone, deep breathing, diaphragmatic breathing, vagal nerve, vagal tone, cognitive behavioral therapy, visceral hypersensitivity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
In study 1 for the pathophysiology of rumination syndrome, the investigators will recruit 10 healthy volunteers and 10 patients. In study 2 for the treatment, the investigators will recruit 10 patients and perform the cross-over test, in which the patients will perform 2 breathing exercises and the investigators will compare the effects.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
When the investigators analyze the data, the investigator will be blinded to the conditions of the participants and the types of breathing exercises.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Diaphragmatic breathing in healthy volunteers in study1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Healthy volunteers will perform diaphragmatic breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.
Arm Title
Diaphragmatic breathing in rumination patients in study1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.
Arm Title
Deep slow breathing in healthy volunteers in study1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Healthy volunteers will perform deep slow breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.
Arm Title
Deep slow breathing in rumination patients in study1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Rumination patients will perform deep slow breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.
Arm Title
Normal breathing in healthy volunteers in study1
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
healthy volunteers will perform normal breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.
Arm Title
Normal breathing in rumination patients in study1
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
rumination patients will perform normal breathing, and the investigators will investigate changes of cardiac vagal tone.
Arm Title
Diaphragmatic breathing in study 2; cross over test
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing in randomized cross-over test. The investigators will compare the effects on rumination.
Arm Title
Deep slow breathing in study 2; cross over test
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Rumination patients will perform diaphragmatic breathing in randomized cross-over test. The investigators will compare the effects on rumination.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Diaphragmatic breathing
Intervention Description
Subjects will perform Diaphragmatic breathing after the test meal.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Deep Slow Breathing
Intervention Description
Subjects will perform Deep Slow Breathing after the test meal.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Normal breathing
Intervention Description
Subjects will perform Normal Breathing (as a control) after the test meal as a control.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of changes in cardiac vagal tone (CVT) calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram between healthy volunteers and rumination patients in Study 1
Description
CVT is calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram and measured on a validated linear vagal scale, where 0 represents full atropinisation. The investigators will continuously measure CVT during the 15-min baseline period, 30-min meal period, 15-min intervention period, and 3-h postprandial period.
Time Frame
from baseline to 3-hour postprandial period.
Title
Comparison of changes in Meal-induced discomfort scores between healthy volunteers and rumination patients in Study 1
Description
This score consists of 3 visual analog scales (VAS) of the level of nausea, fullness and epigastric discomfort. Each scale is graded from 0 to 5, where score 0 represents no perception and score 5 represents an extremely uncomfortable sensation. A Total score can vary between 0 and 15.
Time Frame
baseline, every 5 minutes during the 30-min meal period, every 30 minutes during the 3-hour postprandial period
Title
Comparison of changes in the number of rumination episodes between Diaphragmatic breathing group and Deep slow breathing group in Study 2
Description
Subjects will count the number of rumination episodes during 1-hour postprandial period in the laboratory.
Time Frame
from baseline to after the 4-week intervention period
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of changes in cardiac vagal tone (CVT) calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram among 3 respiratory exercises in Study 1
Description
CVT is calculated from R-R intervals in electrocardiogram and measured on a validated linear vagal scale, where 0 represents full atropinisation. The investigators will continuously measure CVT during the 15-min baseline period, 30-min meal period, 15-min intervention period, and 3-h postprandial period.
Time Frame
from baseline to 3-hour postprandial period.
Title
Comparison of the number of rumination episodes among 3 respiratory exercises in rumination patients in Study 1
Description
The subjects will count the number of rumination episodes the 15-min baseline period, 30-min meal period, 15-min intervention period, and the first 1-hour postprandial period.
Time Frame
Baseline, meal period, 15-min intervention period, and first 1-hour postprandial period
Title
Comparison of Treatment Evaluation scores in 2 groups in Study 2
Description
The subjects will rate the perception of their complaints compared to the pre-treatment period from -3 to +3: -3 totally unbearable, -2 much worse, -1 slightly worse, 0 no change, +1 slightly better, +2 much better, and +3 totally resolved).
Time Frame
Baseline and every week during the 4-week intervention period
Title
Comparison of changes in Meal-induced discomfort scores among 3 respiratory exercises in Study 1
Description
This score consists of 3 visual analog scales (VAS) of the level of nausea, fullness and epigastric discomfort. Each scale is graded from 0 to 5, where score 0 represents no perception and score 5 represents an extremely uncomfortable sensation. Total scores can vary between 0 and 15.
Time Frame
baseline, every 5 minutes during the 30-min meal period, every 30 minutes during the 3-hour postprandial period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Healthy volunteers (HVs) 18-65 years old No history of any gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms in the 3 months prior to the study. No medications 3 months prior to the study Rumination patients 18-65 years old Fulfilling ROME IV clinical criteria for rumination Confirmed rumination syndrome by High Resolution Impedance Monometry within 12 months prior to the study No history of performing DiaB as a therapy for rumination syndrome. No medications which may affect vagal tone, the number of rumination episodes and GI motility 3 months prior to the study. (i.e. opioids, Baclofen , anticholinergics drugs, prokinetics, beta-blockers) Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or lactating women History of GI surgeries apart from appendectomy Alcohol or substance abuse, mental health illness Inability to obtain informed consent Non-fluent English speakers Participants with food intolerances or allergies that would not be able to take in the test meal (McDonalds Big Mac meal) Major comorbidities such as significant cardiac/pulmonary disease, cancer, life-threatening conditions or other life-limiting conditions Evidence of relevant organic diseases. (in endoscopy, CT.) Evidence of major esophageal motility disorders (Chicago classification ver3.0) (21) Known allergy to ECG electrodes or latex History of diabetes
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mays Jawad
Organizational Affiliation
Joint Research Management Office, Queen Mary, University of London
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Wingate Institue
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
E1 2AJ
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The investigators will not share the data with other researchers outside of our team.

Learn more about this trial

Role of Vagal Tone in Rumination Syndrome

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs