search
Back to results

Safety and Effectiveness of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption (BBBD) in Subjects With Suspected Infiltrating Glioma (BBBD)

Primary Purpose

Glioma

Status
Suspended
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Exablate BBBD
Sponsored by
InSightec
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Glioma

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 85 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Male or Female between 21-85 years of age who are able and willing to give informed consent
  2. Subjects with suspected Grade II, III or IV infiltrating glioma (IG) on pre-operative brain imaging scans who have a non-enhancing component and are planned for surgical resection.
  3. Karnofsky Performance Score 70-100
  4. Able to communicate sensations during the Exablate BBBD procedure

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Tumor originating from the deep midline, thalamus, midbrain, cerebellum or brainstem.
  2. Multifocal tumors
  3. MRI or clinical findings of:

    1. Active or chronic infection(s) or inflammatory processes
    2. Acute or chronic hemorrhages, specifically any lobar microbleeds, and no siderosis, amyloid angiopathy, or macro-hemorrhages
    3. Intracranial thrombosis, vascular malformation, cerebral aneurysm or vasculitis
  4. More than 30% of the skull area traversed by the sonication pathway is covered by scars, scalp disorders (e.g., eczema), or atrophy of the scalp
  5. MR non-compatible metallic implants in the skull or the brain or the presence of unknown MR unsafe devices
  6. Significant cardiac disease or unstable hemodynamic status

    1. Documented myocardial infarction within six months of enrollment
    2. Unstable angina on medication
    3. Unstable or worsening congestive heart failure
    4. Left ventricular ejection fraction below the lower limit of normal
    5. History of a hemodynamically unstable cardiac arrhythmia
    6. Cardiac pacemaker
    7. Patient has right-to-left, bidirectional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts
    8. Subjects with relative contraindications to perflutren including subjects with a family or personal history of QT prolongation or taking concomitant medications known to cause QTc prolongation,
    9. Perflutren sensitivity or allergy ii. QT prolongation observed on screening ECG (QTc > 450 for men and >470 for women)
  7. Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic > 180 and diastolic BP > 120 on medication)
  8. Unable to discontinue use of anti-coagulant/antiplatelet therapy as per local standard.
  9. History of a liver disease, bleeding disorder, coagulopathy or a history of spontaneous hemorrhage or evidence of increased risk of bleeding
  10. Abnormal coagulation profile (Platelets < 80,000), PT (>14) or PTT (>36), and INR > 1.3.
  11. Large lacunar lesions that cannot be navigated around
  12. Known cerebral or systemic vasculopathy
  13. Significant depression and at potential risk of suicide
  14. Known sensitivity/allergy to gadolinium, or other intravascular contrast agents
  15. Active seizures despite medication treatment (defined as >1 seizure per week) which could be worsened by disruption of the blood brain barrier
  16. History of anaphylactic shock
  17. Active drug or alcohol disorder which have a higher risk for seizures, infection and/or poor executive functioning
  18. Positive HIV status, which can lead to increased entry of HIV into the brain parenchyma leading to HIV encephalitis
  19. Potential blood-borne infections which can lead to increased entry to brain parenchyma leading to meningitis or brain abscess
  20. Any contraindications to MRI scanning,
  21. Impaired renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2
  22. Severe Respiratory Illness
  23. Currently in a clinical trial involving an investigational product or non-approved use of a drug or device
  24. Pregnancy or Lactation

Sites / Locations

  • University of Maryland
  • The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Exablate Test Arm

Control Test Arm

Arm Description

Subjects will undergo ExAblate BBBD prior to their standard of care tumor removal

Subjects will undergo their standard of care tumor removal

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall safety of the Exablate BBBD procedure itself as measured through the collection of adverse events
Safety of the Exablate BBBD procedure will be evaluated by patient examination and post-procedure MRI exams assessing changes in the treated region. Adverse events will be reported by the Investigator and monitored in both treatment arms.
Effectiveness of BBBD as determined by the proportion of subjects in whom a GTR is acheived
The proportion of subjects in whom a gross total resection (actual versus planned) is achieved as measured on post-operative imaging compared to pre-resection imaging

Secondary Outcome Measures

Confirmation of accuracy of Exablate BBBD targeting
Confirmation that new BBBD by contrast enhancement in a previously non-enhancing area overlies the intended target for BBBD. (ExAblate arm only)
Return Rate for Second Surgery for Completion of Resection
Comparison of the Return Rate between the two treatment arms.

Full Information

First Posted
December 8, 2020
Last Updated
October 24, 2022
Sponsor
InSightec
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04667715
Brief Title
Safety and Effectiveness of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption (BBBD) in Subjects With Suspected Infiltrating Glioma
Acronym
BBBD
Official Title
A Pivotal Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Exablate Model 4000 Using Microbubble Resonators to Temporarily Mediate Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption (BBBD) in Subjects With Suspected Infiltrating Glioma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
Study suspended until priorities can be reassessed
Study Start Date
June 2023 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
InSightec

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of using the Exablate Type 2 system using microbubble resonators (Exablate Test Arm) to disrupt the Blood-Brain Barrier for the purpose of temporarily transforming, and thereby 'marking', regions of infiltrating gliomas prior to planned surgical resection, for the purpose of improving tumor visualization during the surgery to achieve a greater proportion of subjects who receive a Gross Total Resection (GTR) per plan compared to those not undergoing a BBBD procedure prior to resection (Control Arm).
Detailed Description
After being informed about the study and potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent will undergo screening to determine eligibility for study entry. Patients who meet the eligibility requirements will be randomized in a 2:1 ratio to Exablate Test Arm and to Control Arm, respectively. The following assessments will occur: Pre-surgical planning and Post-surgical visit MRI exams with and without contrast will be collected for evaluation by the study core lab; Any return to surgery for additional resection will be captured All subjects will be seen at ~Week 2, and ~4-Weeks post resection for physical and neurological exams and to assess for complications or adverse events. These visits should coincide with standard (Neuro-oncology) care following resection. Long-term outcomes will be collected during standard of care Neuro-oncology care follow-up visits for up to 2 years post resection; standard of care MRIs and RANO assessments will be collected.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Glioma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Independent Reviewers (neurosurgeon/neuroradiologist), functioning as an Imaging Review Core Lab, will be blinded to the treatment assignment.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Exablate Test Arm
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo ExAblate BBBD prior to their standard of care tumor removal
Arm Title
Control Test Arm
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo their standard of care tumor removal
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Exablate BBBD
Intervention Description
Blood brain barrier disruption using ExAblate Type 2 device using microbubble resonators
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall safety of the Exablate BBBD procedure itself as measured through the collection of adverse events
Description
Safety of the Exablate BBBD procedure will be evaluated by patient examination and post-procedure MRI exams assessing changes in the treated region. Adverse events will be reported by the Investigator and monitored in both treatment arms.
Time Frame
Approximately 2 months
Title
Effectiveness of BBBD as determined by the proportion of subjects in whom a GTR is acheived
Description
The proportion of subjects in whom a gross total resection (actual versus planned) is achieved as measured on post-operative imaging compared to pre-resection imaging
Time Frame
MRI 72 hours post resection
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Confirmation of accuracy of Exablate BBBD targeting
Description
Confirmation that new BBBD by contrast enhancement in a previously non-enhancing area overlies the intended target for BBBD. (ExAblate arm only)
Time Frame
MRI immediately after the ExAblate procedure
Title
Return Rate for Second Surgery for Completion of Resection
Description
Comparison of the Return Rate between the two treatment arms.
Time Frame
Approximately 2 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Evaluation of circulating tumor biomarkers
Description
Collection of blood for evaluation of circulating tumor biomarkers (e.g. circulating tumor DNA [ctDNA])
Time Frame
pre- and post-BBBD procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male or Female between 21-85 years of age who are able and willing to give informed consent Subjects with suspected Grade II, III or IV infiltrating glioma (IG) on pre-operative brain imaging scans who have a non-enhancing component and are planned for surgical resection. Karnofsky Performance Score 70-100 Able to communicate sensations during the Exablate BBBD procedure Exclusion Criteria: Tumor originating from the deep midline, thalamus, midbrain, cerebellum or brainstem. Multifocal tumors MRI or clinical findings of: Active or chronic infection(s) or inflammatory processes Acute or chronic hemorrhages, specifically any lobar microbleeds, and no siderosis, amyloid angiopathy, or macro-hemorrhages Intracranial thrombosis, vascular malformation, cerebral aneurysm or vasculitis More than 30% of the skull area traversed by the sonication pathway is covered by scars, scalp disorders (e.g., eczema), or atrophy of the scalp MR non-compatible metallic implants in the skull or the brain or the presence of unknown MR unsafe devices Significant cardiac disease or unstable hemodynamic status Documented myocardial infarction within six months of enrollment Unstable angina on medication Unstable or worsening congestive heart failure Left ventricular ejection fraction below the lower limit of normal History of a hemodynamically unstable cardiac arrhythmia Cardiac pacemaker Patient has right-to-left, bidirectional, or transient right-to-left cardiac shunts Subjects with relative contraindications to perflutren including subjects with a family or personal history of QT prolongation or taking concomitant medications known to cause QTc prolongation, Perflutren sensitivity or allergy ii. QT prolongation observed on screening ECG (QTc > 450 for men and >470 for women) Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic > 180 and diastolic BP > 120 on medication) Unable to discontinue use of anti-coagulant/antiplatelet therapy as per local standard. History of a liver disease, bleeding disorder, coagulopathy or a history of spontaneous hemorrhage or evidence of increased risk of bleeding Abnormal coagulation profile (Platelets < 80,000), PT (>14) or PTT (>36), and INR > 1.3. Large lacunar lesions that cannot be navigated around Known cerebral or systemic vasculopathy Significant depression and at potential risk of suicide Known sensitivity/allergy to gadolinium, or other intravascular contrast agents Active seizures despite medication treatment (defined as >1 seizure per week) which could be worsened by disruption of the blood brain barrier History of anaphylactic shock Active drug or alcohol disorder which have a higher risk for seizures, infection and/or poor executive functioning Positive HIV status, which can lead to increased entry of HIV into the brain parenchyma leading to HIV encephalitis Potential blood-borne infections which can lead to increased entry to brain parenchyma leading to meningitis or brain abscess Any contraindications to MRI scanning, Impaired renal function with estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 mL/min/1.73m2 Severe Respiratory Illness Currently in a clinical trial involving an investigational product or non-approved use of a drug or device Pregnancy or Lactation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Graeme Woodworth, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Maryland, Baltimore
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Maryland
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Effectiveness of Blood-Brain Barrier Disruption (BBBD) in Subjects With Suspected Infiltrating Glioma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs