search
Back to results

Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease (FOCUS)

Primary Purpose

Anemia, Hematologic Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy
Restrictive (Symptomatic) Transfusion Strategy
Sponsored by
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anemia focused on measuring Blood Disease, blood transfusion

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Has undergone surgical repair for a hip fracture Has a postoperative Hgb level below 10 g/dL within three days of surgery Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or peripheral vascular disease) or cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, or creatinine levels greater than 2.0 mg/dL) Exclusion Criteria: Unable to walk prior to hip fracture Declines blood transfusions Suffered multiple traumas Pathologic fracture of the hip due to malignancy Clinically recognized acute myocardial infarction within the 30 days prior to study entry Previously participated in the trial and fractured the other hip Symptoms associated with anemia (e.g., ischemic chest pain) or actively bleeding at the time of randomization

Sites / Locations

  • University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy

2

Arm Description

Transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL.

Symptomatic transfusion strategy, a more conservative strategy, in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Inability to Walk 10 Feet or Across a Room Without Human Assistance or Death
ascertained via telephone follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, or Death for Any Reason
Mortality at 30 Days
Mortality at 60 Days
Composite Outcomes (a) Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Pneumonia and b) Death, Myocardial Infarction, Pneumonia, Thromboembolism, or Stroke
Myocardial Infarction
Postoperative Complications (e.g., Wound Infection, Thromboembolism, Stroke)
Disposition Status (i.e., Nursing Home Placement)
Nursing Home Residence
Function - Lower Extremity Activities of Daily Living,at 30 Days
Using the Functional Status Index, score range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
Function - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, at 30 Days
Using the Older Americans Resources and Services Functional Assessment Questionnaire, score range from 0 to 4, higher scores indicating greater dependency
Function - Fatigue/Energy, at 30 Days
Using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illnesses Therapy-Fatigue, score range from 0 to 52, higher scores indicating greater level of energy
Function - Lower Extremity Activities of Daily Living. at 60 Days
Scale range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
Function - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, at 60 Days
Scale range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
Function - Fatigue/Energy, at 60 Days
Scale ranging from 0 to 52, higher scores indicating greater level of energy
Length of Stay in Hospital for United States Participants
Length of Stay in Hospital for Canadian Participants

Full Information

First Posted
October 9, 2003
Last Updated
October 28, 2020
Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00071032
Brief Title
Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease
Acronym
FOCUS
Official Title
Functional Outcomes in Cardiovascular Patients Undergoing Surgical Hip Fracture Repair (FOCUS)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2003 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2009 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare liberal red blood cell transfusion therapy with restrictive red blood cell transfusion therapy in surgical patients with cardiovascular disease or risk factors.
Detailed Description
BACKGROUND: Red blood cell transfusions are an extremely common medical intervention in both the United States and worldwide; over 14 million units of blood are transfused in the United States. Between 60 and 70 percent of all blood is transfused in the surgical setting. Despite the common use of red blood cell transfusions, the threshold for transfusion has not been adequately evaluated and is very controversial. A decade ago, the standard of care was to administer a peri-operative transfusion whenever the hemoglobin (Hgb) level fell below 10 g/dl (the "10/30 rule"). Concerns about the safety of blood, especially with respect to HIV and hepatitis, and the absence of data to support a 10 g/dl threshold led to the current standard of care, which is to administer blood transfusions based on the presence of symptoms, and not a specific Hgb/hematocrit level. However, there have not been any randomized clinical trials done with surgical patients that have tested the efficacy and safety of withholding blood until the patient develops symptoms, or the "10/30" approach to transfusion. Patients with underlying cardiovascular disease are at greatest risk of adverse effects from reduced Hgb levels. DESIGN NARRATIVE: This is a multi-center randomized trial to test the effectiveness of a transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dl (liberal transfusion) in improving patient outcome. This will be compared to the restrictive (symptomatic) transfusion strategy in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia or Hgb less than 8 g/dL. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the two transfusion strategies. The liberal (10 g/dl) threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dl through hospital discharge. Restrictive (Symptomatic) transfusion strategy patients will receive red blood cell transfusions for symptoms of anemia, although transfusion is also permitted, but not required, if the Hgb level falls below 8 g/dl. Outcomes will include functional recovery (primary outcome: ability to walk 10 feet across a room without human assistance or death 60 days post-randomization), lower extremity activities of daily living and instrumental activities of daily living, survival up to 60-days and long-term, disposition (i.e., nursing home placement), and postoperative complications (e.g., myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or death in hospital, pneumonia, wound infection, thromboembolism, stroke). Ambulation at 60 days is known to be highly predictive of ultimate functional outcome as well as of mortality at one year. Because inability to walk has such important implications for quality of life, and because it is a common problem, it far outweighs the small risk of viral infection or other complications from transfusion in elderly patients. The trial will also evaluate the effect of transfusion threshold on postoperative risk of acute cardiac ischemia. The strategy will be to enhance surveillance for ischemic events by increasing the number of EKG and serum troponin measurements beyond those already called for in the original FOCUS protocol. There is an ancillary study to the trial (R01 HL085706) to examine delirium as an outcome in a subsample of 139 patients. We will assess short-term (in hospital) and longer-term (after 30 days) severity of delirium.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anemia, Hematologic Diseases, Cardiovascular Diseases, Heart Diseases, Myocardial Infarction, Thromboembolism, Pneumonia, Cerebrovascular Accident
Keywords
Blood Disease, blood transfusion

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2016 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transfusion strategy that maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL.
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Symptomatic transfusion strategy, a more conservative strategy, in which blood transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms of anemia.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Liberal (10 g/dL) Transfusion Strategy
Intervention Description
This transfusion strategy will maintains postoperative Hgb levels above 10 g/dL. This threshold strategy will use enough red blood cell units to maintain Hgb levels at or above 10 g/dL through hospital discharge or up to 30 days after randomization.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Restrictive (Symptomatic) Transfusion Strategy
Intervention Description
Transfusion is withheld until the patient develops symptoms from anemia (i.e., chest pain or ECG changes thought to be ischemic, congestive heart failure, unexplained tachycardia or hypotension unresponsive to fluids) or until the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL. Transfusion is permitted, but is not mandatory, if the hemoglobin level falls below 8 g/dL.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Inability to Walk 10 Feet or Across a Room Without Human Assistance or Death
Description
ascertained via telephone follow-up
Time Frame
60 days after randomization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Myocardial Infarction, Unstable Angina, or Death for Any Reason
Time Frame
In-hospital
Title
Mortality at 30 Days
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Mortality at 60 Days
Time Frame
60 Days
Title
Composite Outcomes (a) Death, Myocardial Infarction, or Pneumonia and b) Death, Myocardial Infarction, Pneumonia, Thromboembolism, or Stroke
Time Frame
In-hospital
Title
Myocardial Infarction
Time Frame
In-hospital
Title
Postoperative Complications (e.g., Wound Infection, Thromboembolism, Stroke)
Time Frame
In hospital
Title
Disposition Status (i.e., Nursing Home Placement)
Description
Nursing Home Residence
Time Frame
60 days
Title
Function - Lower Extremity Activities of Daily Living,at 30 Days
Description
Using the Functional Status Index, score range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Function - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, at 30 Days
Description
Using the Older Americans Resources and Services Functional Assessment Questionnaire, score range from 0 to 4, higher scores indicating greater dependency
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Function - Fatigue/Energy, at 30 Days
Description
Using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illnesses Therapy-Fatigue, score range from 0 to 52, higher scores indicating greater level of energy
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Function - Lower Extremity Activities of Daily Living. at 60 Days
Description
Scale range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
Time Frame
60 Days
Title
Function - Instrumental Activities of Daily Living, at 60 Days
Description
Scale range 0 to 11, higher scores indicate greater dependency
Time Frame
60 Days
Title
Function - Fatigue/Energy, at 60 Days
Description
Scale ranging from 0 to 52, higher scores indicating greater level of energy
Time Frame
60 Days
Title
Length of Stay in Hospital for United States Participants
Time Frame
Days from randomization to discharge
Title
Length of Stay in Hospital for Canadian Participants
Time Frame
Days from randomization to discharge

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Has undergone surgical repair for a hip fracture Has a postoperative Hgb level below 10 g/dL within three days of surgery Diagnosis of cardiovascular disease (e.g., coronary artery disease, congestive heart failure, stroke or transient ischemic attack, or peripheral vascular disease) or cardiovascular risk factors (e.g., diabetes mellitus, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, tobacco use, or creatinine levels greater than 2.0 mg/dL) Exclusion Criteria: Unable to walk prior to hip fracture Declines blood transfusions Suffered multiple traumas Pathologic fracture of the hip due to malignancy Clinically recognized acute myocardial infarction within the 30 days prior to study entry Previously participated in the trial and fractured the other hip Symptoms associated with anemia (e.g., ischemic chest pain) or actively bleeding at the time of randomization
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey L. Carson, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Terrin
Organizational Affiliation
University of Maryland, College Park
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Medicine & Dentistry of NJ
City
New Brunswick
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08903
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17176334
Citation
Carson JL, Terrin ML, Magaziner J, Chaitman BR, Apple FS, Heck DA, Sanders D; FOCUS Investigators. Transfusion trigger trial for functional outcomes in cardiovascular patients undergoing surgical hip fracture repair (FOCUS). Transfusion. 2006 Dec;46(12):2192-206. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2006.01056.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22168590
Citation
Carson JL, Terrin ML, Noveck H, Sanders DW, Chaitman BR, Rhoads GG, Nemo G, Dragert K, Beaupre L, Hildebrand K, Macaulay W, Lewis C, Cook DR, Dobbin G, Zakriya KJ, Apple FS, Horney RA, Magaziner J; FOCUS Investigators. Liberal or restrictive transfusion in high-risk patients after hip surgery. N Engl J Med. 2011 Dec 29;365(26):2453-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1012452. Epub 2011 Dec 14.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
34932836
Citation
Carson JL, Stanworth SJ, Dennis JA, Trivella M, Roubinian N, Fergusson DA, Triulzi D, Doree C, Hebert PC. Transfusion thresholds for guiding red blood cell transfusion. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Dec 21;12(12):CD002042. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002042.pub5.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25499165
Citation
Carson JL, Sieber F, Cook DR, Hoover DR, Noveck H, Chaitman BR, Fleisher L, Beaupre L, Macaulay W, Rhoads GG, Paris B, Zagorin A, Sanders DW, Zakriya KJ, Magaziner J. Liberal versus restrictive blood transfusion strategy: 3-year survival and cause of death results from the FOCUS randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015 Mar 28;385(9974):1183-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62286-8. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Effectiveness of Two Blood Transfusion Strategies in Surgical Patients With Cardiovascular Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs