Safety and Efficacy of DCB Therapy for ISR Under the Guidance of QFR (UNIQUE-DCB-II Study )
Primary Purpose
Coronary Heart Disease
Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
drug coated balloon
drug eluted stent
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Heart Disease focused on measuring Quantitative flow ratio, drug coated balloon, Drug eluted stent, In-stent restenosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
● Meet the diagnostic criteria for patients with coronary in-stent restenosis and QFR<0.8 of target lesion in the coronary stent
Exclusion Criteria:
- QFR less than 0.8, dissection above type B and thrombosis formation after pre-dilation of ISR
- Severe congestive heart failure [LVEF <30% or NYHA( New York Heart Association) III/IV)]
- Severe valvular heart disease
- Life expectancy no more than 1 year or factors causing difficulties in clinical follow up
- Intolerance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
- Known intolerance or allergy to heparin, contrast agents, paclitaxel, iopromide, rapamycin, polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer, Co-Cr alloy or platinum-chromium alloy
- Leukopenia or thrombopenia
- A history of peptic ulcer or GI bleeding in the previously
- Stroke within 6 months prior to the operation
- A history of severe hepatic or renal failure
Sites / Locations
- Nanjing First Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Other
Arm Label
drug coated balloon
drug eluted stent implantation
Arm Description
A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug coated balloon treated group after randomization schedule.
A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug eluted stent treated group after randomization schedule.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The incidence rate of late lumen loss after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ISR
The incidence rate of late lumen loss between DCB treated group and DES treated group evaluated by quantitative coronary analysis in patients with ISR
Secondary Outcome Measures
The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events
The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events including all myocardial infarction, any revascularization and all-cause death
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04119986
First Posted
October 7, 2019
Last Updated
April 19, 2022
Sponsor
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04119986
Brief Title
Safety and Efficacy of DCB Therapy for ISR Under the Guidance of QFR (UNIQUE-DCB-II Study )
Official Title
Safety and Efficacy of Drug Coated Balloon Therapy for Coronary In-stent Restenosis in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Under the Guidance of QFR (UNIQUE-DCB-II Study)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Not yet recruiting
Study Start Date
December 1, 2022 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
December 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In 1970, the first percutaneous balloon coronary angioplasty opened a new chapter of interventional therapy. However, the incidence of intracoronary restenosis was about 30%. Subsequently, bare metal stents and drug-eluting stents (DES) reduced the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) to 5%-10% and it was still a bottleneck treated by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Currently, ISR is mainly treated by balloon angioplasty, stent implantation and coronary artery bypass grafting.
In 2014, the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology recommended that drug balloon therapy (DCB) and new generation DES should be the preferred strategies for ISR treatment. Compared with DES, DCB treatment can avoid the inflammation of intima caused by multi-layer stent strut, and reduce the risk of intimal hyperplasia and thrombosis in stent. However, DCB lacks sustained radial support. Even if the residual stenosis is less than 30% after sufficient pre-dilation, the elastic retraction of the intima still exists. In addition, the antiproliferative effect of paclitaxel is significantly worse than that of sirolimus and its derivatives, and there is a lack of long-term sustained release of anti-proliferative drugs. Compared with DCB, DES can obtain long-term stable radial support and long-term anti-proliferation effect, but stent struts exposed in the vascular lumen are at risk of stent thrombosis. The new generation of DES improves the design of stent platform, improves the polymer coating, and applies new anti-proliferative drugs. It effectively reduces the inflammation of vascular wall, speeds up the process of vascular re-endothelialization, promotes early vascular repair, and significantly reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis. Recent BIOLUXRCT, RESTORE and DARE studies provide more powerful evidence for the treatment of ISR by new generation DES.
Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) is the second generation FFR detectional method based on coronary contrast image. The latest FAVOR II results also confirm that QFR is more sensitive and specific than quantitative coronary analysis (QCA) in the diagnosis of myocardial ischemia caused by coronary artery stenosis. However, there is no report of ISR treated with DCB under the guidance of QFR. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of DCB in the treatment of in-stent restenosis in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) under the guidance of QFR compared with DES implantation.
Detailed Description
The current study is designed as a multicenter, randomized and prospective study aiming to evaluate the safety and efficacy of drug balloon therapy for ISR in patients with CHD under the guidance of QFR compared with DES implantation. Based on previous study reported, the incidence rate of target lesion failure is about 3% in patients with ISR undergoing DES implantation. And the design of non-inferiority study was performed in our study. Moreover, the investigators estimated 10% loss follow-up of these patients in each arm. As a result, a total of 220 patients with ISR were required, and with 110 patients per group as a ratio of 1:1 randomization.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Heart Disease
Keywords
Quantitative flow ratio, drug coated balloon, Drug eluted stent, In-stent restenosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
220 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
drug coated balloon
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug coated balloon treated group after randomization schedule.
Arm Title
drug eluted stent implantation
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
A total of 110 patients with ISR are assigned to drug eluted stent treated group after randomization schedule.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
drug coated balloon
Intervention Description
Balloon/vessel diameter ratio 0.8-1.0, 8-12 ATM (atmosphere), lasting for >30 seconds.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
drug eluted stent
Intervention Description
with regular techniques
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The incidence rate of late lumen loss after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with ISR
Description
The incidence rate of late lumen loss between DCB treated group and DES treated group evaluated by quantitative coronary analysis in patients with ISR
Time Frame
Follow-up coronary angiography at 12 months after the procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events
Description
The incidence rate of patient-related ischemic events including all myocardial infarction, any revascularization and all-cause death
Time Frame
Clinical follow up at 30 days, 6, 9 and 12 months after the operation
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
● Meet the diagnostic criteria for patients with coronary in-stent restenosis and QFR<0.8 of target lesion in the coronary stent
Exclusion Criteria:
QFR less than 0.8, dissection above type B and thrombosis formation after pre-dilation of ISR
Severe congestive heart failure [LVEF <30% or NYHA( New York Heart Association) III/IV)]
Severe valvular heart disease
Life expectancy no more than 1 year or factors causing difficulties in clinical follow up
Intolerance to aspirin and/or clopidogrel
Known intolerance or allergy to heparin, contrast agents, paclitaxel, iopromide, rapamycin, polylactic acid-glycolic acid copolymer, Co-Cr alloy or platinum-chromium alloy
Leukopenia or thrombopenia
A history of peptic ulcer or GI bleeding in the previously
Stroke within 6 months prior to the operation
A history of severe hepatic or renal failure
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Fei Ye, MD
Phone
+86 13327823900
Email
doctor_ye@126.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Xiangqi Wu, MD
Phone
+86 15250997876
Email
15250997876@163.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Fei Ye, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nanjing First Hospital
City
Nanjing
State/Province
Jiangsu
ZIP/Postal Code
210006
Country
China
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jie Zhou
Phone
+8613913893984
Email
565219791@qq.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25173601
Citation
Kolh P, Windecker S, Alfonso F, Collet JP, Cremer J, Falk V, Filippatos G, Hamm C, Head SJ, Juni P, Kappetein AP, Kastrati A, Knuuti J, Landmesser U, Laufer G, Neumann FJ, Richter DJ, Schauerte P, Sousa Uva M, Stefanini GG, Taggart DP, Torracca L, Valgimigli M, Wijns W, Witkowski A; European Society of Cardiology Committee for Practice Guidelines; Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, Dean V, Deaton C, Erol C, Fagard R, Ferrari R, Hasdai D, Hoes AW, Kirchhof P, Knuuti J, Kolh P, Lancellotti P, Linhart A, Nihoyannopoulos P, Piepoli MF, Ponikowski P, Sirnes PA, Tamargo JL, Tendera M, Torbicki A, Wijns W, Windecker S; EACTS Clinical Guidelines Committee; Sousa Uva M, Achenbach S, Pepper J, Anyanwu A, Badimon L, Bauersachs J, Baumbach A, Beygui F, Bonaros N, De Carlo M, Deaton C, Dobrev D, Dunning J, Eeckhout E, Gielen S, Hasdai D, Kirchhof P, Luckraz H, Mahrholdt H, Montalescot G, Paparella D, Rastan AJ, Sanmartin M, Sergeant P, Silber S, Tamargo J, ten Berg J, Thiele H, van Geuns RJ, Wagner HO, Wassmann S, Wendler O, Zamorano JL; Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery; European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions. 2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization: the Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Developed with the special contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI). Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):517-92. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu366. Epub 2014 Aug 29. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29447782
Citation
Wong YTA, Kang DY, Lee JB, Rha SW, Hong YJ, Shin ES, Her SH, Nam CW, Chung WY, Kim MH, Lee CH, Lee PH, Ahn JM, Kang SJ, Lee SW, Kim YH, Lee CW, Park SW, Park DW, Park SJ. Comparison of drug-eluting stents and drug-coated balloon for the treatment of drug-eluting coronary stent restenosis: A randomized RESTORE trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Mar;197:35-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2017.11.008. Epub 2017 Nov 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29101020
Citation
Xu B, Tu S, Qiao S, Qu X, Chen Y, Yang J, Guo L, Sun Z, Li Z, Tian F, Fang W, Chen J, Li W, Guan C, Holm NR, Wijns W, Hu S. Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Dec 26;70(25):3077-3087. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2017.10.035. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Safety and Efficacy of DCB Therapy for ISR Under the Guidance of QFR (UNIQUE-DCB-II Study )
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs