search
Back to results

Safety and Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With an Aluminium Hydroxide-adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of Birch Pollen Allergens

Primary Purpose

Pollen Allergy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Birch pollen allergoid
Placebo
Sponsored by
Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pollen Allergy focused on measuring specific immunotherapy, birch pollen allergy, Allergovit

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Rhinitis Rhinoconjunctivitis Positive skin prick test to birch pollen Positive radioallergosorbent test (RAST) to birch pollen Positive provocation test result to birch pollen Exclusion Criteria: Serious chronic diseases Other perennial allergies

Sites / Locations

  • Allergopharma Joachim Ganzer KG

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

Specific Immunotherapy

Arm Description

Sterile aluminium hydroxide suspension for subcutaneous injection were applied in the upper arm. Vials with strength A contained 0.0125 mg/mL and with strength B 0.125 mg/mL histamine-dihydrochloride and strength 0 was produced by dilution of strength A. The vials containing the placebo solution were identical in their outer appearance with the active study preparation of the birch pollen allergoids.

Subcutaneous injections with birch pollen allergoid were applied in the upper arm. Vials with three different concentrations were used: Strength A (1000 TU/mL), strength B (10 000 TU/mL) and strength 0 (100 TU/mL) by dilution of strength A.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Symptom Medication Score (SMS)
The primary endpoint was the area under the curve (AUC) of the daily sum of the Symptom Medication Score (SMS) after two years of double-blind treatment. Each patient recorded the information used for deriving the SMS over a period of eight to twelve weeks during the two double-blind pollen seasons in 2006 and 2007.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Adverse events (AEs)
Safety: (all five years of treatment) occurrence of adverse events (AEs).

Full Information

First Posted
December 8, 2005
Last Updated
July 2, 2014
Sponsor
Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00263627
Brief Title
Safety and Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With an Aluminium Hydroxide-adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of Birch Pollen Allergens
Official Title
A Multicentre Randomised Placebo-controlled Double-blind Clinical Trial for Evaluation of Safety and Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With an Aluminium Hydroxide-adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of Birch Pollen Allergens
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2005 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Allergopharma GmbH & Co. KG

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The aim of this clinical trial is to show safety and efficacy of the allergoid preparation of birch pollen allergens in the treatment of birch allergic patients in a representative number of patients.
Detailed Description
Type I allergy is an immune-disorder which stems from the formation of IgE antibodies against proteins and glycoproteins from plants, insects, animals and fungi, most of which for healthy subjects are considered to be harmless. However, in allergic patients the cross-linking of specific IgE-antibodies on effector cells by allergens activates an immunological cascade leading to the symptoms of Type I allergy including rhinitis, conjunctivitis, asthma, and anaphylactic shock. Pollens from wind-pollinated plants including trees, grasses and weeds, are amongst the most frequent and potent elicitors of Type I allergy. It is not possible to avoid exposure to these pollens and therefore the symptoms that patients inevitably suffer must be treated with either symptomatic medication or allergen specific immunotherapy. The Betulaceae family includes the genera Alnus (alder), Betula (birch) and Corylus (hazel). Trees belonging to these genera are widespread in middle and northern Europe and, in combination with the fact that they shed large quantities of wind-borne pollen, leads to their allergenic significance. The prevalence of sensitisation to birch pollen has been studied, and in the case of a middle European (Viennese) population, for example, it has been demonstrated that approximately 40 % of patients with allergic rhinitis are sensitised. Although the pollen season for any one genera seldom lasts for more than a few weeks, the well-documented cross-reactivity between the different Betulaceae and other tree pollens of the Fagales order contributes to a protracted season of symptoms for many allergic patients. Allergoids are prepared by chemical modification of partially purified native aqueous aller-gen extracts. Native allergen extracts are depleted of components with a molecular mass of less than 5000 Dalton by diafiltration prior to chemical modification with aldehydes. The modification causes a substantial reduction in the allergenicity of the extract as can be judged by skin prick testing, provocation testing, histamine release from sensitised leukocytes and measurement of IgE-binding activity by RAST-inhibition. However, immunogenic activity and T-cell reactivity are retained. These properties enable allergoids to be used as a basis for allergen specific immunotherapy with a reduced risk of inducing IgE-mediated side-reactions and the possibility of administering larger doses of immunogen over a shorter time course than with native allergens.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pollen Allergy
Keywords
specific immunotherapy, birch pollen allergy, Allergovit

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
253 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Sterile aluminium hydroxide suspension for subcutaneous injection were applied in the upper arm. Vials with strength A contained 0.0125 mg/mL and with strength B 0.125 mg/mL histamine-dihydrochloride and strength 0 was produced by dilution of strength A. The vials containing the placebo solution were identical in their outer appearance with the active study preparation of the birch pollen allergoids.
Arm Title
Specific Immunotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subcutaneous injections with birch pollen allergoid were applied in the upper arm. Vials with three different concentrations were used: Strength A (1000 TU/mL), strength B (10 000 TU/mL) and strength 0 (100 TU/mL) by dilution of strength A.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Birch pollen allergoid
Other Intervention Name(s)
specific immunotherapy
Intervention Description
Subcutaneous injections were applied in the upper arm. Vials with three different concentrations were used: Strength A (1000 TU/mL), strength B (10 000 TU/mL) and strength 0 (100 TU/mL) by dilution of strength A.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Comparator
Intervention Description
Sterile aluminium hydroxide suspension for subcutaneous injection were applied in the upper arm. Vials with strength A contained 0.0125 mg/mL and with strength B 0.125 mg/mL histamine-dihydrochloride and strength 0 was produced by dilution of strength A. The vials containing the placebo solution were identical in their outer appearance with the active study preparation of the birch pollen allergoids.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Symptom Medication Score (SMS)
Description
The primary endpoint was the area under the curve (AUC) of the daily sum of the Symptom Medication Score (SMS) after two years of double-blind treatment. Each patient recorded the information used for deriving the SMS over a period of eight to twelve weeks during the two double-blind pollen seasons in 2006 and 2007.
Time Frame
over a period of eight to twelve weeks during the two pollen seasons in
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adverse events (AEs)
Description
Safety: (all five years of treatment) occurrence of adverse events (AEs).
Time Frame
Entrire study period.
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Well days
Description
Number of "well days" (Symptom Score ≤ 4, Medication Score = 0)
Time Frame
Entire diary period

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Rhinitis Rhinoconjunctivitis Positive skin prick test to birch pollen Positive radioallergosorbent test (RAST) to birch pollen Positive provocation test result to birch pollen Exclusion Criteria: Serious chronic diseases Other perennial allergies
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Annemie Narkus, M.D.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Allergopharma Joachim Ganzer KG
City
Reinbek
ZIP/Postal Code
21465
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.allergopharma.de
Description
Leader in specific allergy research and therapy
URL
https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu/ctr-search/trial/2005-000025-35/DE
Description
Click here for information about this trial in the European Clinical Trials Register

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Efficacy of Specific Immunotherapy With an Aluminium Hydroxide-adsorbed Allergoid Preparation of Birch Pollen Allergens

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs