search
Back to results

Safety and Efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Combined With Laser, Bevacizumab Combined With Laser Versus Laser Alone for the Treatment of Diffuse Non-tractional Diabetic Macular Edema (ALBA)

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Macular Edema

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Grid laser
Triamcinolone Acetonide
Bevacizumab
Sponsored by
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Macular Edema

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met:

  1. Age ≥18 years from both sexes. Women of childbearing age should use adequate contraception methods and submit a negative pregnancy test.
  2. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2 (documented by ADA or WHO guidelines) and serum HbA1c <11% at the time of randomization (determinations done in the last two months).
  3. Patient able to give informed consent.
  4. Eye with clear media, pupil dilation and patient able to cooperate to perform retinography, OCT and fluorescein angiography.
  5. Patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema; the patient must have at least one:

    5.1) retinal thickening within 500 μ from the center or 5.2) hard exudates within 500 μ from the center if associated with adjacent retinal thickening or 5.3) the size of retinal thickening at least 1 area disc, part of which is less than 1 DD of the center.

  6. Patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema.
  7. Patients with not tractional diabetic macular edema.

A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present:

  1. Women of childbearing age not using adequate contraceptive methods.
  2. Pregnancy and lactation. Pregnancy test was performed before starting treatment.
  3. Chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation.
  4. Allergy to any of the drugs included in the study.
  5. Systemic use of steroids in the last 4 months.
  6. Patient intends to change his place of residence within 3 years after recruitment, whenever you go to an area not covered by the study.
  7. Blood pressure>180/110. If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible.
  8. HbA1c> 11% in the current analysis or done in the last 2 months.
  9. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hare exudates, nonretinal condition).
  10. An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.)
  11. Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more
  12. History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids or intravitreal antiangiogenic.
  13. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization.
  14. History of focal, grid or panretinal photocoagulation within 4 months prior to randomization.
  15. Need of panretinal photocoagulation in the first 4 months of treatment.
  16. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy.
  17. Major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, vitrectomy, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization.
  18. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization.
  19. Intraocular pressure >25mmHg.
  20. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma; note: angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion). A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous.
  21. History of cortisone-induced glaucoma that required IOP-lowering treatment.
  22. History of prior herpetic ocular infection.
  23. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis.
  24. Aphakia.
  25. Presence of pseudoexfoliation.
  26. Evidence of external ocular infection, including: conjunctivitis, chalazion and blepharitis.

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Universitario Dr Negrín

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Grid laser

Triamcinolone 4 mg

Bevacizumab

Arm Description

It's a reference standard as the treatment which is currently accepted for NTDDME

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
To evaluate the effect on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of intravitreal triamcinolone (Triesence ®) or bevacizumab (Avastin ®) in combination with grid laser therapy compared to grid laser therapy alone after 12 months of treatment, in diabetic patients with not tractional diffuse macular edema (NTDDEM)

Secondary Outcome Measures

To assess the safety of intravitreal Triesence (r)
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.
To measure average change in mean central macular thickness in each group.
To measure average change in mean central macular thickness (in microns) obtained by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at each follow-up visits compared to the baseline visit in each of the three groups.
To assess the safety of intravitreal Avastin (r)
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
To assess the safety of intravitreal grid photocoagulation
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability

Full Information

First Posted
April 7, 2011
Last Updated
February 11, 2021
Sponsor
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01572350
Brief Title
Safety and Efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Combined With Laser, Bevacizumab Combined With Laser Versus Laser Alone for the Treatment of Diffuse Non-tractional Diabetic Macular Edema
Acronym
ALBA
Official Title
Randomized Multicenter Clinical Trial of Three Parallel Groups to Estimate the Safety and Efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Combined With Laser, Bevacizumab Combined With Laser Versus Laser Alone for the Treatment of Diffuse Non-tractional Diabetic Macular Edema.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Universitario de Canarias

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This clinical trial is designed to investigate differences in terms of efficacy (mean change in best corrected visual acuity obtained after 12 months of treatment) and safety, of 3 therapeutic estrategies for non-tractional macular edema in diabetic patients: a) laser alone; b) laser plus tiramcinolon; and c) laser plus bevacizumab.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Macular Edema

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
105 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Grid laser
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
It's a reference standard as the treatment which is currently accepted for NTDDME
Arm Title
Triamcinolone 4 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Bevacizumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Grid laser
Intervention Description
Grid laser therapy acts as the standard to refer to as it is the treatment which is currently accepted by EMDDNT.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Triamcinolone Acetonide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Triesence
Intervention Description
Triamcinolone 4 mg followed by modified grid laser therapy after 3-4 weeks
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bevacizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Avastin
Intervention Description
Bevacizumab (1.25 mg initially, weeks 6 and 12) followed by modified grid laser therapy after3-4 weeks
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA)
Description
To evaluate the effect on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of intravitreal triamcinolone (Triesence ®) or bevacizumab (Avastin ®) in combination with grid laser therapy compared to grid laser therapy alone after 12 months of treatment, in diabetic patients with not tractional diffuse macular edema (NTDDEM)
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To assess the safety of intravitreal Triesence (r)
Description
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months
Title
To measure average change in mean central macular thickness in each group.
Description
To measure average change in mean central macular thickness (in microns) obtained by Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) at each follow-up visits compared to the baseline visit in each of the three groups.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment was initiated.
Title
To assess the safety of intravitreal Avastin (r)
Description
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame
Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months
Title
To assess the safety of intravitreal grid photocoagulation
Description
Type of adverse events, severity and number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability
Time Frame
Baseline, 3m, 6m and 12 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
To be eligible, the following inclusion criteria must be met: Age ≥18 years from both sexes. Women of childbearing age should use adequate contraception methods and submit a negative pregnancy test. Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus type 1 or type 2 (documented by ADA or WHO guidelines) and serum HbA1c <11% at the time of randomization (determinations done in the last two months). Patient able to give informed consent. Eye with clear media, pupil dilation and patient able to cooperate to perform retinography, OCT and fluorescein angiography. Patients with clinically significant diabetic macular edema; the patient must have at least one: 5.1) retinal thickening within 500 μ from the center or 5.2) hard exudates within 500 μ from the center if associated with adjacent retinal thickening or 5.3) the size of retinal thickening at least 1 area disc, part of which is less than 1 DD of the center. Patients with diffuse diabetic macular edema. Patients with not tractional diabetic macular edema. A patient is not eligible if any of the following exclusion criteria are present: Women of childbearing age not using adequate contraceptive methods. Pregnancy and lactation. Pregnancy test was performed before starting treatment. Chronic renal failure requiring dialysis or kidney transplantation. Allergy to any of the drugs included in the study. Systemic use of steroids in the last 4 months. Patient intends to change his place of residence within 3 years after recruitment, whenever you go to an area not covered by the study. Blood pressure>180/110. If blood pressure is brought below 180/110 by anti-hypertensive treatment, patient can become eligible. HbA1c> 11% in the current analysis or done in the last 2 months. An ocular condition is present such that, in the opinion of the investigator, visual acuity would not improve from resolution of macular edema (e.g., foveal atrophy, pigmentary changes, dense subfoveal hare exudates, nonretinal condition). An ocular condition is present (other than diabetes) that, in the opinion of the investigator, might affect macular edema or alter visual acuity during the course of the study (e.g., vein occlusion, uveitis or other ocular inflammatory disease, neovascular glaucoma, Irvine-Gass Syndrome, etc.) Substantial cataract that, in the opinion of the investigator, is likely to be decreasing visual acuity by 3 lines or more History of prior treatment with intravitreal corticosteroids or intravitreal antiangiogenic. History of peribulbar steroid injection within 6 months prior to randomization. History of focal, grid or panretinal photocoagulation within 4 months prior to randomization. Need of panretinal photocoagulation in the first 4 months of treatment. History of prior pars plana vitrectomy. Major ocular surgery (including cataract extraction, scleral buckle, vitrectomy, etc.) within prior 6 months or anticipated within the next 6 months following randomization. History of YAG capsulotomy performed within 2 months prior to randomization. Intraocular pressure >25mmHg. History of open-angle glaucoma (either primary open-angle glaucoma or other cause of open-angle glaucoma; note: angle-closure glaucoma is not an exclusion). A history of ocular hypertension is not an exclusion as long as (1) intraocular pressure is <25 mmHg, (2) the patient is using no more than one topical glaucoma medication, (3) the most recent visual field, performed within the last 12 months, is normal (if abnormalities are present on the visual field they must be attributable to the patient's diabetic retinopathy), and (4) the optic disc does not appear glaucomatous. History of cortisone-induced glaucoma that required IOP-lowering treatment. History of prior herpetic ocular infection. Exam evidence of ocular toxoplasmosis. Aphakia. Presence of pseudoexfoliation. Evidence of external ocular infection, including: conjunctivitis, chalazion and blepharitis.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alicia Pareja, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Universitario de Canarias
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Dr Negrín
City
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33506177
Citation
Pareja-Rios A, de Armas-Ramos E, Aldea-Perona A, Bonaque-Gonzalez S. Alone laser versus bevacizumab plus laser for diffuse diabetic macular edema (ALBA randomized trial). Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Jan 15;13:2515841420988210. doi: 10.1177/2515841420988210. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Efficacy of Triamcinolone Acetonide Combined With Laser, Bevacizumab Combined With Laser Versus Laser Alone for the Treatment of Diffuse Non-tractional Diabetic Macular Edema

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs