search
Back to results

Safety and Efficacy Study of AI Wall Thickness Measurement (EchoNet-LVH-RCT)

Primary Purpose

Heart Failure

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sonographer Evaluation
AI Evaluation
Sponsored by
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Heart Failure

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Sonographers and cardiologists at CSMC Echocardiography Lab All transthoracic echocardiogram studies performed in the CSMC echocardiogram lab Exclusion Criteria: transthoracic echocardiogram studies not able to be measured by sonographers in run in period

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Sonographer Annotation

    Artificial Intelligence Annotation

    Arm Description

    Currently, sonographer technicians provide preliminary interpretations prior to validation and overreading by cardiologists. This staggered, stepwise evaluation allows for the introduction of AI decision support with minimal impact on patient care. Physicians are already used to adjusting the preliminary report given the variable training of sonographers and on the lookout for changes, variation, or adjustments that need to be made.

    A novel AI algorithm developed to assess measurements of left ventricular diameter during diastole (LVIDd), intraventricular septum thickness during diastole (IVSd) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness during diastole (LVPWd). The AI will provide preliminary assessments for cardiologist evaluation.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Proportion of studies for which the difference in wall thickness between preliminary to overread is greater than 0.3cm for LVIDd
    Proportion of significant difference in LVIDd between preliminary to final assessment
    Proportion of studies for which the difference in wall thickness between preliminary to overread is greater than 0.2cm for IVSd
    Proportion of significant difference in IVSd between preliminary to final assessment
    Proportion of studies for which the difference in wall thickness between preliminary to overread is greater than 0.2cm for LVPWd
    Proportion of significant difference in LVPWd between preliminary to final assessment
    mean absolute error (MAE) of LVIDd between preliminary to overread between the two arms
    Measurement difference of LVIDd between preliminary to final assessment
    mean absolute error (MAE) of IVSd between preliminary to overread between the two arms
    Measurement difference of IVSd between preliminary to final assessment
    mean absolute error (MAE) of LVPWd between preliminary to overread between the two arms
    Measurement difference of LVPWd between preliminary to final assessment

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    mean absolute error (MAE) of wall thickness between cardiologist overread vs. historical clinical report wall thickness
    Mean absolute error (MAE) of wall thickness between cardiologist overread with initial interpretation vs. prior clinical report wall thickness
    Time to complete each imaging study
    Time for sonographers and cardiologists to complete a study (in seconds)
    Effects of the AI systems integration with computer-human interaction (Blinding)
    Whether cardiologists can tell the difference between human vs. AI initial interpretation (Bang's blinding index, or the proportion of studies guessed correctly to be AI or sonographer compared to ground truth of whether it was AI or sonographer).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    March 3, 2023
    Last Updated
    August 31, 2023
    Sponsor
    Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT05791227
    Brief Title
    Safety and Efficacy Study of AI Wall Thickness Measurement (EchoNet-LVH-RCT)
    Official Title
    EchoNet-LVH-RCT: Blinded, Randomized Controlled Trial of Artificial Intelligence Guided Precision Assessment of Wall Thickness
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Not yet recruiting
    Study Start Date
    November 1, 2023 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 1, 2024 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    November 1, 2024 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Device Product Not Approved or Cleared by U.S. FDA
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    To determine whether an integrated AI decision support can save time and improve accuracy of assessment of echocardiograms, the investigators are conducting a blinded, randomized controlled study of AI guided measurements of wall thickness in parasternal long axis view compared to sonographer measurements in preliminary readings of echocardiograms.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Heart Failure

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Studies will be randomized 1:1 to either sonographer preliminary report finding or AI preliminary report finding with final adjudication by the cardiologist. With AI preliminary report, the preliminary interpretations will be generated by AI (artificial intelligence) technology [a semantic segmentation model] and the PACS system's native reporting workflow will be used visualize measurements of left ventricular diameter during diastole (LVIDd), intraventricular septum thickness during diastole (IVSd) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness during diastole (LVPWd). The study team will assess how much cardiologists edit and change this preliminary interpretation is from the final interpretation.
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
    Masking Description
    Measurements shown in Picture Archiving and Communication System (PACS) without direct communication between sonographer and cardiologist. Annotations are shown without identifiers on how the annotations were done. Cardiologists are blinded to source of preliminary interpretation.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    4000 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Sonographer Annotation
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Currently, sonographer technicians provide preliminary interpretations prior to validation and overreading by cardiologists. This staggered, stepwise evaluation allows for the introduction of AI decision support with minimal impact on patient care. Physicians are already used to adjusting the preliminary report given the variable training of sonographers and on the lookout for changes, variation, or adjustments that need to be made.
    Arm Title
    Artificial Intelligence Annotation
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    A novel AI algorithm developed to assess measurements of left ventricular diameter during diastole (LVIDd), intraventricular septum thickness during diastole (IVSd) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness during diastole (LVPWd). The AI will provide preliminary assessments for cardiologist evaluation.
    Intervention Type
    Diagnostic Test
    Intervention Name(s)
    Sonographer Evaluation
    Intervention Description
    A sonographer will assess measurements of left ventricular diameter during diastole (LVIDd), intraventricular septum thickness during diastole (IVSd) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness during diastole (LVPWd).
    Intervention Type
    Diagnostic Test
    Intervention Name(s)
    AI Evaluation
    Intervention Description
    An AI model will assess measurements of left ventricular diameter during diastole (LVIDd), intraventricular septum thickness during diastole (IVSd) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness during diastole (LVPWd).
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Proportion of studies for which the difference in wall thickness between preliminary to overread is greater than 0.3cm for LVIDd
    Description
    Proportion of significant difference in LVIDd between preliminary to final assessment
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Title
    Proportion of studies for which the difference in wall thickness between preliminary to overread is greater than 0.2cm for IVSd
    Description
    Proportion of significant difference in IVSd between preliminary to final assessment
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Title
    Proportion of studies for which the difference in wall thickness between preliminary to overread is greater than 0.2cm for LVPWd
    Description
    Proportion of significant difference in LVPWd between preliminary to final assessment
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Title
    mean absolute error (MAE) of LVIDd between preliminary to overread between the two arms
    Description
    Measurement difference of LVIDd between preliminary to final assessment
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Title
    mean absolute error (MAE) of IVSd between preliminary to overread between the two arms
    Description
    Measurement difference of IVSd between preliminary to final assessment
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Title
    mean absolute error (MAE) of LVPWd between preliminary to overread between the two arms
    Description
    Measurement difference of LVPWd between preliminary to final assessment
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    mean absolute error (MAE) of wall thickness between cardiologist overread vs. historical clinical report wall thickness
    Description
    Mean absolute error (MAE) of wall thickness between cardiologist overread with initial interpretation vs. prior clinical report wall thickness
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Title
    Time to complete each imaging study
    Description
    Time for sonographers and cardiologists to complete a study (in seconds)
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes
    Title
    Effects of the AI systems integration with computer-human interaction (Blinding)
    Description
    Whether cardiologists can tell the difference between human vs. AI initial interpretation (Bang's blinding index, or the proportion of studies guessed correctly to be AI or sonographer compared to ground truth of whether it was AI or sonographer).
    Time Frame
    10 Minutes

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    100 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Sonographers and cardiologists at CSMC Echocardiography Lab All transthoracic echocardiogram studies performed in the CSMC echocardiogram lab Exclusion Criteria: transthoracic echocardiogram studies not able to be measured by sonographers in run in period
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    David Ouyang
    Phone
    18324951605
    Email
    david.ouyang@cshs.org

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided

    Learn more about this trial

    Safety and Efficacy Study of AI Wall Thickness Measurement (EchoNet-LVH-RCT)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs