search
Back to results

Safety and Efficacy Study of Lotus Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (REPRISE III)

Primary Purpose

Aortic Stenosis

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lotus Valve System
CoreValve/Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System
LOTUS Edge Valve System
Sponsored by
Boston Scientific Corporation
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Stenosis

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has documented calcific, severe native aortic stenosis with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2) and a mean pressure gradient >40 mm Hg or jet velocity >4.0 m/s, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics
  2. Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥18 mm and ≤29 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]) and, for the randomized cohort, is deemed treatable with an available size of both test and control device. For the U.S. Continued Access Study cohort the acceptable aortic annulus size is ≥20 mm and ≤27 mm.
  3. Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class ≥ II
  4. There is agreement by the heart team (which must include a site investigator interventionalist and a site investigator cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high or extreme operative risk for surgical valve replacement (see note below for definitions of extreme and high risk, the required level of surgical assessment, and CRC confirmation) and that TAVR is appropriate. Additionally, subject has at least one of the following.

    • Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score ≥8% -OR-
    • If STS <8, subject has at least one of the following conditions: Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, severe pulmonary hypertension (>60 mmHg), prior chest radiation therapy, coronary artery bypass graft(s) at risk with re-operation, severe lung disease (need for supplemental oxygen, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] <50% of predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide [DLCO] <60%, or other evidence of severe pulmonary dysfunction), neuromuscular disease that creates risk for mechanical ventilation or rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement, orthopedic disease that creates risk for rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement, Childs Class A or B liver disease (subjects with Childs Class C disease are not eligible for inclusion in this trial), frailty as indicated by at least one of the following: 5-meter walk >6 seconds, Katz Assessment of Daily Living (Katz ADL) score of 3/6 or less, body mass index <21, wheelchair bound, unable to live independently, age ≥90 years, other evidence that subject is at high or extreme risk for surgical valve replacement (CRC must confirm agreement with site heart team that subject meets high or extreme risk definition)
  5. Heart team (which must include a cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement.
  6. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent.
  7. Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits.

Note: Extreme operative risk and high operative risk are defined as follows: Extreme Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk ≥50% at 30 days; High Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk ≥15% at 30 days. Risk of operative mortality and morbidity must be assessed via an in-person evaluation by a center cardiac surgeon and must be confirmed by the CRC (which must include an experienced cardiac surgeon).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve.
  2. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total creatine kinase (CK) elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of creatine kinase-myoglobin band (CK-MB) elevation and/or troponin elevation).
  3. Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment.
  4. Subject has end-stage renal disease or has glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <20 (based on Cockcroft-Gault formula).
  5. Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve.
  6. Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation.
  7. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason.
  8. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis.
  9. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac mass, vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention.
  10. Subject has (hemoglobin) Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3.
  11. Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or clopidogrel.
  12. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions.
  13. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin, nickel, tantalum, titanium, or polyurethanes.
  14. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment.
  15. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
  16. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty or pacemaker implantation, which are allowed).
  17. Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization.
  18. Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <20%.
  19. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices.
  20. Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease).
  21. Subject has thick (>5 mm) protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch
  22. Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the test and control device delivery systems as defined in the device Instructions For Use.
  23. Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.).
  24. Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint.
  25. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation.
  26. Subject has severe incapacitating dementia.

Sites / Locations

  • Banner Good Samaritan
  • Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea
  • Scripps Clinic
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • Veteran's Administration Palo Alto Medical Center
  • University of California at Davis Medical Center
  • Stanford University Medical Center
  • Washington Hospital Center
  • Morton Plant Mease Healthcare System
  • Delray Medical Center
  • University of Miami Hospital
  • Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute
  • Emory University Hospital
  • Piedmont Hospital
  • Evanston Hospital
  • St. John's Hospital - Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants
  • St. Vincent's Hospital
  • University of Kansas Hospital
  • Union Memorial Hospital
  • Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
  • University of Michigan
  • Cardiac & Vascular Rearch Center of Northern Michigan - Northern Michigan Hospital
  • William Beaumont Hospital
  • Abbott Northwestern Hospital - Minneapolis Heart Institute
  • University of Minnesota Medical Center
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Washington University School of Medicine - Barnes Jewish Medical Center
  • Morristown Memorial Hospital
  • Kaleida Health
  • North Shore University Hospital
  • Columbia University Medical Center
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • NC Heart and Vascular Research - Rex Hospital
  • Wake Forest University School of Medicine
  • Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital
  • Cleveland Clinic Foundation
  • Ohio State University Medical Center
  • Ohio Health Research and Innovation Institute - Riverside Methodist Hospital
  • Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
  • Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
  • Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
  • Medical City Dallas Hospital
  • Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
  • Methodist Heart Hospital
  • Inova Fairfax Hospital
  • University of Washington Medical Center
  • Swedish Medical Center
  • Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
  • The Prince Charles Hospital
  • Monash Medical Centre
  • Providence Health - St. Paul's Hospital
  • McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital
  • Clinique Pasteur
  • Centre Hôpital Universitaire Rangueil
  • Herzzentrum Universität Leipzig
  • Universitares Herzzentrum UKE (Hamburg)
  • Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Lotus Valve System - Randomized

CoreValve TAVR System - Randomized

Lotus Valve Sytem - Single-arm 21mm Cohort

Lotus Valve System - Single-arm Continued Access Cohort

Lotus Valve System - Single-arm Roll-in Cohort

LOTUS Edge Valve System - Single-arm Edge Nested Registry

Arm Description

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with CoreValve/Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with 21mm Lotus Valve System

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with 23mm, 25mm and 27mm LOTUS Edge Valve System.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Events Included in the Primary Safety Endpoint
Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, life-threatening and major bleeding events, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications
Percentage of Participants With Events Included in the Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation (based on core lab assessment).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Greater Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation
Moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation based on Independent echocardiographic core lab assessment performed using the Unifying 5-Class Grading Scheme for Aortic Regurgitation by Pibarot et al (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2015: 8: 340-60). The grading scheme ranges from Trace (the least clinically significant) to severe (the most clinically significant).

Full Information

First Posted
July 21, 2014
Last Updated
December 15, 2021
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02202434
Brief Title
Safety and Efficacy Study of Lotus Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement
Acronym
REPRISE III
Official Title
REPRISE III: Repositionable Percutaneous Replacement of Stenotic Aortic Valve Through Implantation of Lotus™ Valve System - Randomized Clinical Evaluation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
RCT/Roll-in completed. CAS/21mm/Nested Registry terminated (investigational device is no longer available)
Study Start Date
September 22, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 8, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 21, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Lotus™ Valve System and LOTUS Edge™ Valve System for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in symptomatic subjects with calcific, severe native aortic stenosis who are considered at extreme or high risk for surgical valve replacement.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Stenosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1425 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lotus Valve System - Randomized
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System
Arm Title
CoreValve TAVR System - Randomized
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with CoreValve/Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System
Arm Title
Lotus Valve Sytem - Single-arm 21mm Cohort
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with 21mm Lotus Valve System
Arm Title
Lotus Valve System - Single-arm Continued Access Cohort
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System
Arm Title
Lotus Valve System - Single-arm Roll-in Cohort
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with Lotus Valve System
Arm Title
LOTUS Edge Valve System - Single-arm Edge Nested Registry
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with 23mm, 25mm and 27mm LOTUS Edge Valve System.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Lotus Valve System
Intervention Description
Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CoreValve/Evolut R Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement System
Intervention Description
Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LOTUS Edge Valve System
Intervention Description
Procedure: Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Events Included in the Primary Safety Endpoint
Description
Composite of all-cause mortality, stroke, life-threatening and major bleeding events, stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury, or major vascular complications
Time Frame
30 days following procedure
Title
Percentage of Participants With Events Included in the Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Description
Composite of all-cause mortality, disabling stroke, or moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation (based on core lab assessment).
Time Frame
1 year following procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Moderate or Greater Paravalvular Aortic Regurgitation
Description
Moderate or greater paravalvular aortic regurgitation based on Independent echocardiographic core lab assessment performed using the Unifying 5-Class Grading Scheme for Aortic Regurgitation by Pibarot et al (J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2015: 8: 340-60). The grading scheme ranges from Trace (the least clinically significant) to severe (the most clinically significant).
Time Frame
1 year following procedure
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Successful Deployment of the Study Valve
Description
Successful deployment of the study valve
Time Frame
at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Successful Retrieval of the Study Valve if Retrieval is Attempted
Description
Successful retrieval of the study valve if retrieval is attempted
Time Frame
at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Successful Repositioning of the Study Valve if Repositioning is Attempted
Description
Successful repositioning of the study valve if repositioning is attempted
Time Frame
at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Each Grade of Aortic Valve Regurgitation in Each Location: Paravalvular, Central, and Combined
Description
Grade of aortic valve regurgitation: paravalvular, central, and combined. An Independent echocardiographic core lab assessment was performed using the Unifying 5-Class Grading Scheme for Aortic Regurgitation for the locations paravalvular, central and combined. The grading scheme has a range from Trace to Severe. A grade of Trace is the least clinically significant (better outcome) and a grade of Severe is the most clinically significant (worse outcome).
Time Frame
at discharge or 7 days post-procedure (whichever comes first)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Procedural Success
Description
Defined as implantation of the study device in the absence of death, disabling stroke, major vascular complications, and life-threatening or major bleeding
Time Frame
30 days post procedure
Title
Percentage of Participants With Procedural Success
Description
Defined as absence of procedural mortality, correct positioning of a single transcatheter valve into the proper anatomical location , intended performance of the study device (effective orifice area [EOA] >0.9 cm2 for body surface area (BSA) <1.6 m2 and EOA >1.1 cm2 for BSA ≥1.6 m2 plus either a mean aortic valve gradient <20 mm Hg or a peak velocity <3m/sec, and no moderate or severe prosthetic valve aortic regurgitation) plus no serious adverse events
Time Frame
30 days post procedure
Title
Additional Indications of Prosthetic Aortic Valve Performance as Measured by Transthoracic Echocardiography 1
Description
Assessed by an independent core laboratory, including effective orifice area, mean and peak aortic gradients, and peak aortic velocity
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Additional Indications of Prosthetic Aortic Valve Performance as Measured by Transthoracic Echocardiography 2
Description
Assessed by an independent core laboratory - mean and peak aortic gradients
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Additional Indications of Prosthetic Aortic Valve Performance as Measured by Transthoracic Echocardiography 3
Description
Assessed by an independent core laboratory - peak aortic velocity
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Additional Indications of Prosthetic Aortic Valve Performance as Measured by Transthoracic Echocardiography 4
Description
Grade of aortic valve regurgitation: paravalvular, central, and combined. An Independent echocardiographic core lab assessment was performed using the Unifying 5-Class Grading Scheme for Aortic Regurgitation for the locations paravalvular, central and combined. The grading scheme has a range from Trace to Severe. A grade of Trace is the least clinically significant (better outcome) and a grade of Severe is the most clinically significant (worse outcome).
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Health Status as Evaluated by Quality of Life Questionnaires
Description
SF-12 and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy - Baseline scores and changes from Baseline at 30 days, 6 months and 1 year SF-12 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-12): Measures functional health and well-being. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status. Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ): Quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. Scores are transformed to a range of 0-100, in which higher scores reflect better health status.
Time Frame
Assessed at Baseline, 1 and 6 months; and 1, 3, and 5 years, at Baseline, 1 and 6 months and 1 Year reported
Title
Percentage of Participants With Mortality
Description
All-cause, Cardiovascular, and Non-cardiovascular
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Stroke
Description
Disabling Stroke and Non-disabling Stroke
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Myocardial Infarction (MI)
Description
Periprocedural (≤72 hours post index procedure) and spontaneous (>72 hours post index procedure)
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Bleeding
Description
Life-threatening (or disabling) and major (defined below) Life-threatening or Disabling Bleeding Fatal bleeding (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium [BARC] type 5124,125) Bleeding in a critical organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, or pericardial necessitating pericardiocentesis, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome (BARC type 3b and 3c) Bleeding causing hypovolemic shock or severe hypotension requiring vasopressors or surgery (BARC type 3b) Overt source of bleeding with drop in hemoglobin of ≥5 g/dL or whole blood or packed red blood cells (RBC) transfusion ≥4 units (BARC type 3b) Major Bleeding (BARC type 3a) Overt bleeding either associated with a drop in the hemoglobin level of at least 3.0g/dL or requiring transfusion of 2 or 3 units of whole blood/RBC, or causing hospitalization or permanent injury, or requiring surgery AND does not meet criteria of life-threatening or disabling bleeding
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Acute Kidney Injury
Description
Acute kidney injury based on the AKIN System Stage 3 (including renal replacement therapy) or Stage 2 Change in serum creatinine (up to 7 days) compared to baseline: Stage 1: Increase in serum creatinine to 150-199% (1.5-1.99 × increase compared with baseline) OR increase of ≥0.3 mg/dl (≥26.4 mmol/L) Stage 2: Increase in serum creatinine to 200-299% (2.0-2.99 × increase compared with baseline) Stage 3: Increase in serum creatinine to ≥300% (>3 × increase compared with baseline) OR serum creatinine of ≥4.0 mg/dL (≥354 mmol/L) with an acute increase of at least 0.5 mg/dL (44 mmol/L) -OR- Based on urine output (up to 7 days): Stage 1: <0.5 ml/kg per hour for >6 but <12 hours Stage 2: <0.5 ml/kg per hour for >12 but <24 hours Stage 3: <0.3 ml/kg per hour for ≥24 hours or anuria for ≥12 hours Note 1: Subjects receiving renal replacement therapy are considered to meet Stage 3 criteria irrespective of other criteria.
Time Frame
≤7 days post index procedure
Title
Percentage of Participants With Major Vascular Complication
Description
Major vascular complication - including access site related and non access site related
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Repeat Procedure for Valve-related Dysfunction
Description
Repeat procedure for valve-related dysfunction (surgical or interventional therapy)
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Hospitalization for Valve-related Symptoms or Worsening Congestive Heart Failure
Description
Hospitalization for valve-related symptoms or worsening congestive heart failure (New York Hear Association [NYHA] class III or IV)
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With New Permanent Pacemaker Implantation
Description
New permanent pacemaker implantation resulting from new or worsened conduction disturbances
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With New Onset of Atrial Fibrillation or Atrial Flutter
Description
New onset of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Coronary Obstruction
Description
Coronary obstruction
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Percentage of Participants With Ventricular Septal Perforation
Description
Ventricular septal perforation
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Percentage of Participants With Mitral Apparatus Damage
Description
Mitral apparatus damage
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Tamponade
Description
Cardiac tamponade
Time Frame
≤72 hours post index procedure
Title
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Aortic Valve Malpositioning
Description
Prosthetic aortic valve malpositioning, including valve migration, valve embolization, or ectopic valve deployment
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Aortic Valve Thrombosis
Description
Prosthetic aortic valve thrombosis
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.
Title
Percentage of Participants With Prosthetic Aortic Valve Endocarditis
Description
Prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis
Time Frame
assessed at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years post index procedure, at discharge, 30 days, 6 months, and 1 year post index procedure reported.

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject has documented calcific, severe native aortic stenosis with an initial aortic valve area (AVA) of ≤1.0 cm2 (or AVA index of ≤0.6 cm2/m2) and a mean pressure gradient >40 mm Hg or jet velocity >4.0 m/s, as measured by echocardiography and/or invasive hemodynamics Subject has a documented aortic annulus size of ≥18 mm and ≤29 mm based on the center's assessment of pre-procedure diagnostic imaging (and confirmed by the Case Review Committee [CRC]) and, for the randomized cohort, is deemed treatable with an available size of both test and control device. For the U.S. Continued Access Study cohort the acceptable aortic annulus size is ≥20 mm and ≤27 mm. Subject has symptomatic aortic valve stenosis with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class ≥ II There is agreement by the heart team (which must include a site investigator interventionalist and a site investigator cardiac surgeon) that subject is at high or extreme operative risk for surgical valve replacement (see note below for definitions of extreme and high risk, the required level of surgical assessment, and CRC confirmation) and that TAVR is appropriate. Additionally, subject has at least one of the following. Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) score ≥8% -OR- If STS <8, subject has at least one of the following conditions: Hostile chest, porcelain aorta, severe pulmonary hypertension (>60 mmHg), prior chest radiation therapy, coronary artery bypass graft(s) at risk with re-operation, severe lung disease (need for supplemental oxygen, forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1] <50% of predicted, diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide [DLCO] <60%, or other evidence of severe pulmonary dysfunction), neuromuscular disease that creates risk for mechanical ventilation or rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement, orthopedic disease that creates risk for rehabilitation after surgical aortic valve replacement, Childs Class A or B liver disease (subjects with Childs Class C disease are not eligible for inclusion in this trial), frailty as indicated by at least one of the following: 5-meter walk >6 seconds, Katz Assessment of Daily Living (Katz ADL) score of 3/6 or less, body mass index <21, wheelchair bound, unable to live independently, age ≥90 years, other evidence that subject is at high or extreme risk for surgical valve replacement (CRC must confirm agreement with site heart team that subject meets high or extreme risk definition) Heart team (which must include a cardiac interventionalist and an experienced cardiac surgeon) assessment that the subject is likely to benefit from valve replacement. Subject (or legal representative) understands the study requirements and the treatment procedures, and provides written informed consent. Subject, family member, and/or legal representative agree(s) and subject is capable of returning to the study hospital for all required scheduled follow up visits. Note: Extreme operative risk and high operative risk are defined as follows: Extreme Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk ≥50% at 30 days; High Operative Risk: Predicted operative mortality or serious, irreversible morbidity risk ≥15% at 30 days. Risk of operative mortality and morbidity must be assessed via an in-person evaluation by a center cardiac surgeon and must be confirmed by the CRC (which must include an experienced cardiac surgeon). Exclusion Criteria: Subject has a congenital unicuspid or bicuspid aortic valve. Subject has had an acute myocardial infarction (MI) within 30 days prior to the index procedure (defined as Q-wave MI or non-Q-wave MI with total creatine kinase (CK) elevation ≥ twice normal in the presence of creatine kinase-myoglobin band (CK-MB) elevation and/or troponin elevation). Subject has had a cerebrovascular accident or transient ischemic attack within the past 6 months prior to study enrollment. Subject has end-stage renal disease or has glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <20 (based on Cockcroft-Gault formula). Subject has a pre-existing prosthetic aortic or mitral valve. Subject has severe (4+) aortic, tricuspid, or mitral regurgitation. Subject has a need for emergency surgery for any reason. Subject has a history of endocarditis within 6 months of index procedure or evidence of an active systemic infection or sepsis. Subject has echocardiographic evidence of new intra-cardiac mass, vegetation or intraventricular or paravalvular thrombus requiring intervention. Subject has (hemoglobin) Hgb <9 g/dL, platelet count <50,000 cells/mm3 or >700,000 cells/mm3, or white blood cell count <1,000 cells/mm3. Subject requires chronic anticoagulation therapy after the implant procedure and cannot be treated with warfarin (other anticoagulants are not permitted in the first month) for at least 1 month concomitant with either aspirin or clopidogrel. Subject has had a gastrointestinal bleed requiring hospitalization or transfusion within the past 3 months, or has other clinically significant bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy that would preclude treatment with required antiplatelet regimen, or will refuse transfusions. Subject has known hypersensitivity to contrast agents that cannot be adequately pre-medicated, or has known hypersensitivity to aspirin, all P2Y12 inhibitors, heparin, nickel, tantalum, titanium, or polyurethanes. Subject has a life expectancy of less than 12 months due to non-cardiac, comorbid conditions based on the assessment of the investigator at the time of enrollment. Subject has hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy. Subject has any therapeutic invasive cardiac or vascular procedure within 30 days prior to the index procedure (except for balloon aortic valvuloplasty or pacemaker implantation, which are allowed). Subject has untreated coronary artery disease, which in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires revascularization. Subject has severe left ventricular dysfunction with ejection fraction <20%. Subject is in cardiogenic shock or has hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical support devices. Subject has severe vascular disease that would preclude safe access (e.g., aneurysm with thrombus that cannot be crossed safely, marked tortuosity, significant narrowing of the abdominal aorta, severe unfolding of the thoracic aorta, or symptomatic carotid or vertebral disease). Subject has thick (>5 mm) protruding or ulcerated atheroma in the aortic arch Subject has arterial access that is not acceptable for the test and control device delivery systems as defined in the device Instructions For Use. Subject has current problems with substance abuse (e.g., alcohol, etc.). Subject is participating in another investigational drug or device study that has not reached its primary endpoint. Subject has untreated conduction system disorder (e.g., Type II second degree atrioventricular block) that in the opinion of the treating physician is clinically significant and requires a pacemaker implantation. Enrollment is permissible after permanent pacemaker implantation. Subject has severe incapacitating dementia.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Rizik, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael J Reardon, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Banner Good Samaritan
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85018
Country
United States
Facility Name
Scottsdale Healthcare - Shea
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85258
Country
United States
Facility Name
Scripps Clinic
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
Veteran's Administration Palo Alto Medical Center
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94304
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California at Davis Medical Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford University Medical Center
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington Hospital Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Morton Plant Mease Healthcare System
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Delray Medical Center
City
Delray Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33484
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami Hospital
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baptist Cardiac and Vascular Institute
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33176
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Hospital
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Evanston Hospital
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. John's Hospital - Prairie Cardiovascular Consultants
City
Springfield
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
62701
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent's Hospital
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46290
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Hospital
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Union Memorial Hospital
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21218
Country
United States
Facility Name
Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02215
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cardiac & Vascular Rearch Center of Northern Michigan - Northern Michigan Hospital
City
Petoskey
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
49770
Country
United States
Facility Name
William Beaumont Hospital
City
Royal Oak
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48073
Country
United States
Facility Name
Abbott Northwestern Hospital - Minneapolis Heart Institute
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55407
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Minnesota Medical Center
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine - Barnes Jewish Medical Center
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Morristown Memorial Hospital
City
Morristown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07960
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kaleida Health
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14203
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Shore University Hospital
City
Manhasset
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
NC Heart and Vascular Research - Rex Hospital
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest University School of Medicine
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lindner Center for Research and Education at The Christ Hospital
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic Foundation
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State University Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio Health Research and Innovation Institute - Riverside Methodist Hospital
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97225
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75226
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical City Dallas Hospital
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
United States
Facility Name
Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Methodist Heart Hospital
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inova Fairfax Hospital
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22042
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aurora St. Luke's Medical Center
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53215
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Prince Charles Hospital
City
Chermside
State/Province
Queensland
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Monash Medical Centre
City
Clayton
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3168
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Providence Health - St. Paul's Hospital
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6Z1Y6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University Health Centre, Royal Victoria Hospital
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3A
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Clinique Pasteur
City
Toulouse
State/Province
Midi-Pyrenees
ZIP/Postal Code
31076
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Hôpital Universitaire Rangueil
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Facility Name
Herzzentrum Universität Leipzig
City
Leipzig
State/Province
Saxony
ZIP/Postal Code
04289
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitares Herzzentrum UKE (Hamburg)
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Erasmus MC - University Medical Center Rotterdam
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3015 CE
Country
Netherlands

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36301543
Citation
Rizik DG, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, Bajwa T, Kleiman NS, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Thourani VH, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Iyer VS, Buchbinder M, Gotberg M, Bjursten H, Allocco DJ, Reardon MJ. Long-term Outcomes of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With the Lotus Valve vs CoreValve/EvolutR: A Secondary Analysis of the REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Oct 3;5(10):e2238792. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.38792.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32856530
Citation
Goel K, O'Leary JM, Barker CM, Levack M, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, Bajwa T, Kleiman N, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Allocco DJ, Rizik DG, Reardon MJ, Lindman BR. Clinical Implications of Physical Function and Resilience in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Sep;9(17):e017075. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.017075. Epub 2020 Aug 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31640455
Citation
Meduri CU, Kereiakes DJ, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, O'Hair D, Linke A, Waksman R, Babliaros V, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Rizik DG, Iyer VS, Schindler J, Allocco DJ, Meredith IT, Feldman TE, Reardon MJ. Pacemaker Implantation and Dependency After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in the REPRISE III Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Nov 5;8(21):e012594. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.012594. Epub 2019 Oct 23.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30810703
Citation
Reardon MJ, Feldman TE, Meduri CU, Makkar RR, O'Hair D, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Babliaros V, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Rizik DG, Iyer VS, Gleason TG, Tchetche D, Rovin JD, Lhermusier T, Carrie D, Hodson RW, Allocco DJ, Meredith IT; Reprise III Investigators. Two-Year Outcomes After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement With Mechanical vs Self-expanding Valves: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2019 Mar 1;4(3):223-229. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2019.0091.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29530883
Citation
Asch FM, Vannan MA, Singh S, Khandheria B, Little SH, Allocco DJ, Meredith IT, Feldman TE, Reardon MJ, Weissman NJ. Hemodynamic and Echocardiographic Comparison of the Lotus and CoreValve Transcatheter Aortic Valves in Patients With High and Extreme Surgical Risk: An Analysis From the REPRISE III Randomized Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2018 Jun 12;137(24):2557-2567. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.034129. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29297076
Citation
Feldman TE, Reardon MJ, Rajagopal V, Makkar RR, Bajwa TK, Kleiman NS, Linke A, Kereiakes DJ, Waksman R, Thourani VH, Stoler RC, Mishkel GJ, Rizik DG, Iyer VS, Gleason TG, Tchetche D, Rovin JD, Buchbinder M, Meredith IT, Gotberg M, Bjursten H, Meduri C, Salinger MH, Allocco DJ, Dawkins KD. Effect of Mechanically Expanded vs Self-Expanding Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement on Mortality and Major Adverse Clinical Events in High-Risk Patients With Aortic Stenosis: The REPRISE III Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2018 Jan 2;319(1):27-37. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.19132.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Efficacy Study of Lotus Valve for Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs