Efficacy and Safety Study of Netarsudil 0.02% Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate 0.4% Ophthalmic Solution in Japanese Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Primary Purpose
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02%
Ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Primary Open Angle Glaucoma focused on measuring Glaucoma, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 20 years of age or older
- Diagnosis of POAG or OHT in both eyes (POAG in one eye and OHT in the fellow eye is acceptable)
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) +0.7 log MAR or better (20/100 Snellen or better or 0.20 or better in decimal unit) in each eye
- Willingness and ability to give signed informed consent and follow study instructions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Clinically significant ocular disease
- Pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion component glaucoma, history of angle closure glaucoma, or narrow angles
- Previous glaucoma intraocular surgery
- Refractive surgery in either eye
- Ocular trauma
- Ocular infection
- Any corneal disease
- Known hypersensitivity to any component of netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02%, ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%, or to topical anesthetic.
- Cannot demonstrate proper delivery of the eye drop
- Clinically significant systemic disease
- Participation in any investigational study within 30 days prior to screening
- Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, nursing, planning a pregnancy, or not using a medically acceptable form of birth control.
Sites / Locations
- Seijo Clinic
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% and netarsudil ophthalmic solution vehicle
Ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%
Arm Description
1 drop netarsudil 0.02% in the evening and 1 drop netarsudil vehicle in the morning in each eye.
1 drop ripasudil twice daily in the morning and evening in each eye.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Comparison of both groups mean diurnal IOP at Week 4 (Day 29). IOP will be measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Mean diurnal IOP was calculated as the average of 3 IOP values across 09:00, 11:00 and 16:00 time points.
Secondary Outcome Measures
IOP at Weeks 1 and 2
Mean diurnal IOP as measured in mmHg at each post-treatment visit.
Mean Change IOP From Baseline at Days 8, 15, 29
Mean change from baseline in mean diurnal IOP as measured in mmHg at each post-treatment visit.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04620135
First Posted
October 26, 2020
Last Updated
February 1, 2023
Sponsor
Aerie Pharmaceuticals
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04620135
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Netarsudil 0.02% Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate 0.4% Ophthalmic Solution in Japanese Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
Official Title
A Single-masked, Randomized, Multi-center, Parallel-group, 4-week Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Once Daily Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% Compared to Twice Daily Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.4% in Japanese Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma (POAG) or Ocular Hypertension (OHT)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 30, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 9, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 30, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Aerie Pharmaceuticals
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
A Phase 3 Study Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of Netarsudil Ophthalmic Solution 0.02% QD to Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate Ophthalmic Solution 0.4% BID, for Treatment of Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Over A 4-Week Period.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Primary Open Angle Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
Keywords
Glaucoma, Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma, Ocular Hypertension
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
This study adopted a single-masked study design. Treatment assignments were masked to the Investigator, the clinical study team (Sponsor, designated personnel involved in day-to-day study management, Monitors, Data Managers, and Statisticians), and the subjects for the duration of the study. The netarsudil and ripasudil bottles were different in the study, however, investigators and subjects were masked to study drug assignment.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
245 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02% and netarsudil ophthalmic solution vehicle
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
1 drop netarsudil 0.02% in the evening and 1 drop netarsudil vehicle in the morning in each eye.
Arm Title
Ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
1 drop ripasudil twice daily in the morning and evening in each eye.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02%
Other Intervention Name(s)
Vehicle: Netarsudil ophthalmic solution
Intervention Description
Topical sterile ophthalmic solution Other Name: Rhopressa®
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%
Intervention Description
Other Name: Glanatec®
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intraocular Pressure (IOP)
Description
Comparison of both groups mean diurnal IOP at Week 4 (Day 29). IOP will be measured by Goldmann applanation tonometry and reported in millimeters mercury (mmHg). A higher IOP can be a greater risk factor for developing glaucoma or glaucoma progression (leading to optic nerve damage). Mean diurnal IOP was calculated as the average of 3 IOP values across 09:00, 11:00 and 16:00 time points.
Time Frame
29 Days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
IOP at Weeks 1 and 2
Description
Mean diurnal IOP as measured in mmHg at each post-treatment visit.
Time Frame
Day 8, Day 15
Title
Mean Change IOP From Baseline at Days 8, 15, 29
Description
Mean change from baseline in mean diurnal IOP as measured in mmHg at each post-treatment visit.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Days 8, 15, 29
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
20 years of age or older
Diagnosis of POAG or OHT in both eyes (POAG in one eye and OHT in the fellow eye was acceptable)
Medicated intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 14 mmHg in at least one eye and < 30 mmHg in both eyes at screening visit
For POAG eyes, unmedicated (post washout) IOP ≥ 15 mmHg and < 35 mmHg in the study eye at 2 qualification visits (09:00 hours), 2-7 days apart. At second qualification visit IOP ≥ 15 mmHg and < 35 mmHg at 11:00 and 16:00 hour (in the same eye).
For OHT eyes, unmedicated (post washout) IOP ≥ 22 mmHg and < 35 mmHg in the study eye at 2 qualification visits (09:00 hours), 2-7 days apart. At second qualification visit IOP ≥ 22 mmHg and < 35 mmHg at 11:00 and 16:00 hours (in the same eye)
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) +0.7 log MAR or better (20/100 Snellen or better or 0.20 or better in decimal unit) in each eye
Willingness and ability to give signed informed consent and follow study instructions
Exclusion Criteria:
Clinically significant ocular disease
Retinal diseases that may progress during the study period
Pseudoexfoliation or pigment dispersion component glaucoma, history of angle closure glaucoma, or narrow angles
Previous glaucoma intraocular surgery
Refractive surgery in either eye
Ocular hyperemia score of moderate (+2) or severe (+3) at Qualification Visit #2
Ocular trauma
Ocular infection or inflammation
Any corneal disease that may confound assessment
Evidence of corneal deposits or cornea verticillata
Known hypersensitivity to any component of netarsudil ophthalmic solution 0.02%, ripasudil hydrochloride hydrate ophthalmic solution 0.4%, or to topical anesthetic.
Mean central corneal thickness >620 um
Any abnormality preventing reliable Goldmann applanation tonometry of either eye (e.g. keratoconus)
Cannot demonstrate proper delivery of the eye drop
Clinically significant systemic disease
Participation in any investigational study within 30 days prior to screening
Women of childbearing potential who are pregnant, nursing, planning a pregnancy, or not using a medically acceptable form of birth control.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Joella Kittrell
Organizational Affiliation
Aerie Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Seijo Clinic
City
Setagaya-Ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety Study of Netarsudil 0.02% Ophthalmic Solution Compared to Ripasudil Hydrochloride Hydrate 0.4% Ophthalmic Solution in Japanese Subjects With Primary Open Angle Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs