search
Back to results

Safety Study of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors

Primary Purpose

Malignant Melanoma, Colorectal Carcinoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
PLX4032
Sponsored by
Plexxikon
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Malignant Melanoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Solid tumors confirmed histologically whose tumors are refractory to standard therapy, or for whom standard or curative therapy does not exist
  • Patients from whom paired melanoma biopsies are planned must have a V600E+ BRAF mutation confirmed prior to the administration of PLX4032
  • Previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to starting PLX4032 therapy, and all associated toxicity must be resolved prior to administration of PLX4032
  • Patients in the Extension cohorts (melanoma or adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum) must have both a V600E+ BRAF mutation and measurable disease (by RECIST V 1.0 criteria) prior to the administration of PLX4032. All patients enrolled must provide archival or fresh melanoma tumor biopsy for confirmation of V600E+ BRAF mutation status by TaqMan assay
  • ECOG performance status 0 or 1
  • Life expectancy ≥ 3 months
  • Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Brain metastases that are progressing or have been documented to be stable for less than 3 months, or for which systemic corticosteroids are required
  • Investigational drug use within 28 days of the first dose of PLX4032
  • Uncontrolled intercurrent illness
  • Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, or significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate absorption

Sites / Locations

  • University of California Los Angeles
  • Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center
  • Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
  • Royal Melbourne Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

PLX4032

Arm Description

Open-label, sequential dose escalation

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.
Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed and an Unconfirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version (v) 1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
BOR of confirmed /unconfirmed (total) response was defined as CR or PR recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v 1.0 criteria. For target lesions (TLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline (BL) sum of longest diameters. For non-target lesions (NTLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of CR or PR Using RECIST v 1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Duration of response for participants with confirmed CR or PR was the period of time measured between the date that the criteria for objective CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met, and the first date that recurrent or PD was objectively documented (or death if before progression). PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or initiation of confounding anticancer therapy, duration of response was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST v 1.0 - Melanoma Extension Cohort
PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was defined according to the RECIST criteria (v 1.0) as increase by at least 20% in the sum of the longest diameters of each TL, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters, reported since the start of treatment, or appearance of one or more new lesions. For Non-TLs, PD was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
PFS Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E Positive Melanoma
PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). For Non-TLs, disease progression was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or start of confounding anticancer therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Percentage of Participants Who Died - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Overall Survival (OS) - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
OS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the death. In the event of no death prior to study termination or analysis data cutoff, OS was censored at the last known date that the patient was alive as documented on the follow-up case report form. If this date was not available, then the last known alive date from the database was used.
Time to CR or PR Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Time to CR or PR was defined as the interval between the date of the first treatment to the date of the first documentation of confirmed CR or PR whichever occurred first, and not the date of confirmation at the subsequent tumor assessment. Time to response = Date of first response - initial dose date + 1.
Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State AUC of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State Cmax of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Decrease in Tumor Uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)
Tumor uptake of FDG was assessed by means of positron-emission tomography (PET)
Cmax of RO5185426 - Food Effect
Tumor Levels of Phosphorylated Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinapse (ERK), Cyclin D1, and Ki-67
The immunohisto-chemical analyses of the expression of phosphorylated ERK, cyclin D1, and Ki-67 in tumor-biopsy specimens was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining.

Full Information

First Posted
November 28, 2006
Last Updated
August 18, 2017
Sponsor
Plexxikon
Collaborators
Roche Pharma AG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00405587
Brief Title
Safety Study of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors
Official Title
A Study to Assess Safety, Pharmacokinetics, and Pharmacodynamics of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Plexxikon
Collaborators
Roche Pharma AG

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this FIH study is to assess the safety and pharmacokinetics of PLX4032 in patients with solid tumors. The secondary objective is to assess the pharmacodynamic activity in paired biopsy specimens obtained from patients with malignant melanoma who have the V600E BRAF oncogenic mutation.
Detailed Description
Activating mutations of the BRAF gene have been observed in a variety of cancers, including 55-68% of malignant melanomas. In general, oncogenic mutations of BRAF correlate with a poor outcome. PLX4032 is a compound that selectively inhibits oncogenic B-Raf kinase. Two extension cohorts of patients with confirmed V600E mutations will be recruited, consisting of advanced melanoma and metastatic colorectal carcinoma.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Malignant Melanoma, Colorectal Carcinoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
109 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
PLX4032
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Open-label, sequential dose escalation
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
PLX4032
Intervention Description
Oral capsules administered BID
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Description
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Title
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Description
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Title
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Title
Peak Concentration (Cmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose on Day 15, pre-morning dose on Day 16
Title
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Title
Time to Peak Concentration (Tmax) of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, pre-morning dose on Day 16
Title
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Description
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Title
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Description
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Title
Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Description
Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.
Time Frame
Day 1 and Day 15: pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose
Title
Mean RO5185426 Accumulation Ratios - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Description
Accumulation ratio is the ratio of AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 15 / AUC (0-8 hour) on Day 1.
Time Frame
Day 1 and Day 15: pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours post-morning dose
Title
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Title
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Title
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Title
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Title
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Description
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals zero (0) to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Title
AUC of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Description
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Title
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Title
Cmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15 and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Title
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 1 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8
Title
Tmax of RO5185426 on Day 15 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma and BRAFV600E- CRC
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 15, and pre-morning dose on Day 16
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Confirmed and an Unconfirmed Best Overall Response (BOR) of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR) According to RECIST Version (v) 1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Description
BOR of confirmed /unconfirmed (total) response was defined as CR or PR recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) v 1.0 criteria. For target lesions (TLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the baseline (BL) sum of longest diameters. For non-target lesions (NTLs), CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive CRC
Description
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Confirmed responses were those which were confirmed by repeat assessments performed no less than four weeks after the criteria for response are first met Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: Original Formulation
Description
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants With BOR of CR or PR According to RECIST v1.0 - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation
Description
BOR of CR or PR was recorded from baseline until disease progression/recurrence according to RECIST v 1.0 criteria. For TLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all TLs, and PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of longest diameters of the TLs, taking as a reference the BL sum of longest diameters. For NTLs, CR was defined as the disappearance of all NTLs and normalization of tumor marker levels. Percentage of participants with best overall response rate was calculated as the (number of participants with CR or PR) divided by (total number of participants in the cohort), and then multiplied by 100. The 95% Cl was determined using the Pearson-Clopper method.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of CR or PR Using RECIST v 1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Description
Duration of response for participants with confirmed CR or PR was the period of time measured between the date that the criteria for objective CR or PR (whichever status was recorded first) was met, and the first date that recurrent or PD was objectively documented (or death if before progression). PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or initiation of confounding anticancer therapy, duration of response was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 337 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Using RECIST v 1.0 - Melanoma Extension Cohort
Description
PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was defined according to the RECIST criteria (v 1.0) as increase by at least 20% in the sum of the longest diameters of each TL, taking as a reference the smallest sum of the longest diameters, reported since the start of treatment, or appearance of one or more new lesions. For Non-TLs, PD was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs.
Time Frame
Month 1, 3, 4, 6, 9, and Last event (350) days
Title
PFS Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension BRAFV600E Positive Melanoma
Description
PFS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the appearance of new metastatic lesions, objective tumor progression, or death if before progression. PD was at least a 20% increase in the sum of longest diameters of TLs taking as reference the smallest sum of longest diameters recorded since the baseline measurements, or the appearance of one or more new lesion(s). For Non-TLs, disease progression was defined as the appearance of one or more new lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-TLs. In the event of no disease progression or documented death prior to study termination, analysis cutoff, or start of confounding anticancer therapy, PFS was censored at the date of the last evaluable tumor assessment.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to data cutoff (up to 421 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Died - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to 444 days
Title
Overall Survival (OS) - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Description
OS was the period of time measured from the date of initiation of therapy to the date of the death. In the event of no death prior to study termination or analysis data cutoff, OS was censored at the last known date that the patient was alive as documented on the follow-up case report form. If this date was not available, then the last known alive date from the database was used.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, until PD, or end of efficacy follow-up, up to 444 days
Title
Time to CR or PR Using RECIST v1.0 - Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Description
Time to CR or PR was defined as the interval between the date of the first treatment to the date of the first documentation of confirmed CR or PR whichever occurred first, and not the date of confirmation at the subsequent tumor assessment. Time to response = Date of first response - initial dose date + 1.
Time Frame
Screening, BL, and up to 168 days
Title
Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State AUC of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Description
AUC (0-8 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 8 hours post-dose. AUC (0-24 hour) was defined as the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time equals 0 to 24 hours post-dose. AUC (0-8 hour) and AUC (0-24 hour) were computed using the linear trapezoidal rule.
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8, and 24 hours post-morning dose
Title
Mean Dose-Normalized Steady-State Cmax of RO5185426 80 mg and 120 mg Capsules - Dose Escalation: MBP Formulation and Extension: BRAFV600E- Positive Melanoma
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1 and 15, pre-morning dose on Day 2 and Day 8, and Day 16
Title
Decrease in Tumor Uptake of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)
Description
Tumor uptake of FDG was assessed by means of positron-emission tomography (PET)
Time Frame
BL and Day 15
Title
Cmax of RO5185426 - Food Effect
Time Frame
Pre-morning dose, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, and 8 hour post-morning dose on Day 1 and 15, pre-morning dose on Day 2, Day 8, and Day 16
Title
Tumor Levels of Phosphorylated Extracellular Signal-Regulated Kinapse (ERK), Cyclin D1, and Ki-67
Description
The immunohisto-chemical analyses of the expression of phosphorylated ERK, cyclin D1, and Ki-67 in tumor-biopsy specimens was performed using hematoxylin and eosin staining.
Time Frame
BL and Day 15

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Solid tumors confirmed histologically whose tumors are refractory to standard therapy, or for whom standard or curative therapy does not exist Patients from whom paired melanoma biopsies are planned must have a V600E+ BRAF mutation confirmed prior to the administration of PLX4032 Previous chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or radiation therapy must have been completed at least 2 weeks prior to starting PLX4032 therapy, and all associated toxicity must be resolved prior to administration of PLX4032 Patients in the Extension cohorts (melanoma or adenocarcinoma of the colon or rectum) must have both a V600E+ BRAF mutation and measurable disease (by RECIST V 1.0 criteria) prior to the administration of PLX4032. All patients enrolled must provide archival or fresh melanoma tumor biopsy for confirmation of V600E+ BRAF mutation status by TaqMan assay ECOG performance status 0 or 1 Life expectancy ≥ 3 months Adequate hematologic, hepatic, and renal function Exclusion Criteria: Brain metastases that are progressing or have been documented to be stable for less than 3 months, or for which systemic corticosteroids are required Investigational drug use within 28 days of the first dose of PLX4032 Uncontrolled intercurrent illness Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, or significant bowel resection that would preclude adequate absorption
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Henry Hsu, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Plexxikon
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California Los Angeles
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10021
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
MD Anderson Cancer Center
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
City
East Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3002
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Royal Melbourne Hospital
City
Parkville
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20818844
Citation
Flaherty KT, Puzanov I, Kim KB, Ribas A, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, O'Dwyer PJ, Lee RJ, Grippo JF, Nolop K, Chapman PB. Inhibition of mutated, activated BRAF in metastatic melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2010 Aug 26;363(9):809-19. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1002011.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
26460303
Citation
Kopetz S, Desai J, Chan E, Hecht JR, O'Dwyer PJ, Maru D, Morris V, Janku F, Dasari A, Chung W, Issa JP, Gibbs P, James B, Powis G, Nolop KB, Bhattacharya S, Saltz L. Phase II Pilot Study of Vemurafenib in Patients With Metastatic BRAF-Mutated Colorectal Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2015 Dec 1;33(34):4032-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.2497. Epub 2015 Oct 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25980594
Citation
Puzanov I, Amaravadi RK, McArthur GA, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Sosman JA, Ribas A, Shackleton M, Hwu P, Chmielowski B, Nolop KB, Lin PS, Kim KB. Long-term outcome in BRAF(V600E) melanoma patients treated with vemurafenib: Patterns of disease progression and clinical management of limited progression. Eur J Cancer. 2015 Jul;51(11):1435-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.04.010. Epub 2015 May 13.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
22256804
Citation
Su F, Viros A, Milagre C, Trunzer K, Bollag G, Spleiss O, Reis-Filho JS, Kong X, Koya RC, Flaherty KT, Chapman PB, Kim MJ, Hayward R, Martin M, Yang H, Wang Q, Hilton H, Hang JS, Noe J, Lambros M, Geyer F, Dhomen N, Niculescu-Duvaz I, Zambon A, Niculescu-Duvaz D, Preece N, Robert L, Otte NJ, Mok S, Kee D, Ma Y, Zhang C, Habets G, Burton EA, Wong B, Nguyen H, Kockx M, Andries L, Lestini B, Nolop KB, Lee RJ, Joe AK, Troy JL, Gonzalez R, Hutson TE, Puzanov I, Chmielowski B, Springer CJ, McArthur GA, Sosman JA, Lo RS, Ribas A, Marais R. RAS mutations in cutaneous squamous-cell carcinomas in patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. N Engl J Med. 2012 Jan 19;366(3):207-15. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105358.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Safety Study of PLX4032 in Patients With Solid Tumors

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs