search
Back to results

Sensory-driven Motor Recovery in Poorly Recovered Subacute Stroke Patients

Primary Purpose

Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies
Sponsored by
Lumy Sawaki
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring motor recovery, neuroplasticity, subacute, human, sensory, nerve stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Having sustained a single ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke during the 3- to 12-month period preceding enrollment
  • Single stroke
  • Inability at the time of screening to demonstrate active extension of the affected metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints at least 10°; and the wrist, 20° (ie, level of impairment that would preclude participation in constraint-induced therapy)
  • Score of 47 or lower on the modified 30-item Fugl-Meyer Assessment of UE motor function
  • Participants NOT able to extend the affected metacarpophalangeal joints at least 10° and the wrist 20°.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of carpal tunnel syndrome and conditions that commonly cause peripheral neuropathy, including diabetes, uremia, or associated nutritional deficiencies
  • History of head injury with loss of consciousness, severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illness
  • Within 3 months of recruitment, use of drugs known to exert detrimental effects on motor recovery
  • Cognitive deficit severe enough to preclude informed consent
  • Positive pregnancy test or being of childbearing age and not using appropriate contraception
  • Participants with history of untreated depression.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Active stimulation with motor training

    Sham stimulation with motor training

    Arm Description

    2 hours of active peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.

    2 hours of sham peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in Fugl Meyer Assessment
    The upper extremity FMA is a quantitative measure of motor recovery, sensation, coordination, and speed.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in Action Arm Research Test (ARAT)
    The ARAT was developed specifically to measure UE changes and consists of 4 specific tests to measure grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.
    Change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
    The WMFT is a time- and function-based evaluation encompassing a battery of 17 tasks
    Change in Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
    The SIS is a self-report measure that includes 64 items assessing 8 domains including strength, hand function, ADL/IADL, mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 18, 2017
    Last Updated
    September 8, 2023
    Sponsor
    Lumy Sawaki
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03124186
    Brief Title
    Sensory-driven Motor Recovery in Poorly Recovered Subacute Stroke Patients
    Official Title
    Sensory-driven Motor Recovery in Poorly Recovered Subacute Stroke Patients
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2023
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    April 1, 2008 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 30, 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    June 30, 2013 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor-Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Lumy Sawaki

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This research project addresses a scientifically important question that cannot be answered by other means. The use of peripheral nerve stimulation has the potential to enhance recovery in subacute stroke patients with poor functional recovery. The primary objective of this proposal is to demonstrate that peripheral nerve stimulation combined with intensive motor training has the ability to further improve hand motor function when compared to intensive training alone or nerve stimulation alone. The results from this study have the potential to develop new strategies in neurorehabilitation.
    Detailed Description
    Stroke is the leading cause of long-term disability in the United States. Approximately 70-88% of persons with ischemic stroke have some degree of motor impairment. A major goal of research in stroke rehabilitation is to harness the ability of the brain to reorganize after neurologic damage has occurred and thus ultimately lead to successful recovery of function. Data from animal and human models have suggested that sensory input plays an important role in motor output, possibly by influencing cortical plasticity. However, in spite of the advances to date, little is known about the extent to which sensory input in the form of peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) can be successfully combined to physical training, especially in poorly recovered subacute stroke patients. The proposed study will evaluate the effectiveness of sustained PNS coupled with motor training, to improve hand motor function in subacute stroke patients with severe motor deficit. Our preliminary data in chronic stroke patients with severe motor deficit demonstrate that motor function can be substantially enhanced when PNS is paired with motor training. In addition, a separate study in patients with mild motor deficit receiving motor training alone suggests that the optimal therapeutic time window to deliver motor training is within the first year after stroke. The improvement of behavioral motor function was associated with corticomotor reorganization. Therefore, this study proposes to evaluate the effectiveness of sustained PNS paired with motor training, to promote functional motor recovery in subacute stroke patients with severe motor deficit. The central hypothesis is that subacute stroke patients with severe motor deficit receiving PNS and intensive task-oriented therapy will have improved motor function compared to patients receiving sham-PNS and task-oriented therapy, and the degree of this behaviorally-measured effect will correlate with the neurophysiological effect measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation. The investigators plan to accept or reject the central hypothesis by accomplishing two Specific Aims: 1) test the effect of PNS preceding task-oriented therapy on hand motor function, and 2) test the effect of PNS preceding task-oriented therapy on motor map measured by transcranial magnetic stimulation. The long-range goals are: a) to maximize the restoration of hand motor function after stroke, b) to determine the impact of this intervention in activities of daily living, and c) collect solid data to prepare for a future multicenter randomized clinical trial.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Stroke, Cerebrovascular Accident
    Keywords
    motor recovery, neuroplasticity, subacute, human, sensory, nerve stimulation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    73 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Active stimulation with motor training
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    2 hours of active peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.
    Arm Title
    Sham stimulation with motor training
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    2 hours of sham peripheral nerve stimulation (intervention) paired with 4 hours of intensive task-oriented upper extremity training. Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy. Peripheral nerve stimulation will be delivered using a S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    S88 Dual Output Stimulator by Grass Technologies
    Intervention Description
    Peripheral nerve stimulation of Erb's point, radial and median nerves paired with task-oriented therapy
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Fugl Meyer Assessment
    Description
    The upper extremity FMA is a quantitative measure of motor recovery, sensation, coordination, and speed.
    Time Frame
    Score change after 18 days of intervention compared to baseline; Score change after 1- and 4-month after the intervention compared to baseline
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in Action Arm Research Test (ARAT)
    Description
    The ARAT was developed specifically to measure UE changes and consists of 4 specific tests to measure grasp, grip, pinch, and gross movement.
    Time Frame
    Score change after 18 days of intervention compared to baseline; Score change after 1- and 4-month after the intervention compared to baseline
    Title
    Change in Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT)
    Description
    The WMFT is a time- and function-based evaluation encompassing a battery of 17 tasks
    Time Frame
    Score change after 18 days of intervention compared to baseline; Score change after 1- and 4-month after the intervention compared to baseline
    Title
    Change in Stroke Impact Scale (SIS)
    Description
    The SIS is a self-report measure that includes 64 items assessing 8 domains including strength, hand function, ADL/IADL, mobility, communication, emotion, memory and thinking, and participation.
    Time Frame
    Score change after 18 days of intervention compared to baseline; Score change after 1- and 4-month after the intervention compared to baseline

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Having sustained a single ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke during the 3- to 12-month period preceding enrollment Single stroke Inability at the time of screening to demonstrate active extension of the affected metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints at least 10°; and the wrist, 20° (ie, level of impairment that would preclude participation in constraint-induced therapy) Score of 47 or lower on the modified 30-item Fugl-Meyer Assessment of UE motor function Participants NOT able to extend the affected metacarpophalangeal joints at least 10° and the wrist 20°. Exclusion Criteria: History of carpal tunnel syndrome and conditions that commonly cause peripheral neuropathy, including diabetes, uremia, or associated nutritional deficiencies History of head injury with loss of consciousness, severe alcohol or drug abuse, psychiatric illness Within 3 months of recruitment, use of drugs known to exert detrimental effects on motor recovery Cognitive deficit severe enough to preclude informed consent Positive pregnancy test or being of childbearing age and not using appropriate contraception Participants with history of untreated depression.

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    29794530
    Citation
    Carrico C, Westgate PM, Salmon Powell E, Chelette KC, Nichols L, Pettigrew LC, Sawaki L. Nerve Stimulation Enhances Task-Oriented Training for Moderate-to-Severe Hemiparesis 3-12 Months After Stroke: A Randomized Trial. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Nov;97(11):808-815. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000971.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Sensory-driven Motor Recovery in Poorly Recovered Subacute Stroke Patients

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs