search
Back to results

Silicone Gel in the Treatment of Cleft Lip Scars

Primary Purpose

Cleft Lip

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Silicone Gels
Sponsored by
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cleft Lip focused on measuring Cleft lip, Scar, Silicone sheet, Silicone gel

Eligibility Criteria

1 Month - 12 Months (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Baby born with cleft lip planned for primary lip repair around 3 months of age,
  • Written informed consent for the study provided by the parent/guardian

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of other craniofacial anomalies;
  • lack of signed informed consent from the parent/guardian.

Sites / Locations

  • Chang Chun Shin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Silicone Gel Group

Arm Description

Intervention: Silicone gel (Dermatix Ultra, Menarini, Singapore) was applied twice per day (BID). The amount being similar in size to a grain of rice.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Vacouver scar scale
Pigmentation: 0 normal; 1 hypopigmentation; 2 Hyperpigmentation Vascularity: 0 normal; 1. pink; 2. red; 3. purple Pliability: 0 normal; 1. supple, flexible with minimal resistance; 2. Yielding, giving way to pressure; 3. firm, inflexible, not easily moved, resistant to manual pressure; 4. banding, rope-like tissue that blanches with extension of the scar; 5. contracture, permanent shortening of the scar producing deformity or distortion. Height: 0. normal; 1. less than 2 mm; 2. less than 5 mm; 3. more than 5 mm The sum of each item give the total scores. The score range from 0-13; with minimum of 0 being the best scar and maximum13 the worst scar
Visual Analogue Scale
VAS with 10 grades: 0 represented the worst possible scar outcome and 10 the best possible scar outcome.
Scar width
A standard frontally oriented photograph was taken with a surgical ruler placed on the lower lip at the six-month follow up clinic. The scar width measurements were obtained from the photographs (using the surgical ruler as the reference) by two independent raters and means calculated. A commercial photograph program for scar width measurement was utilized (Photoshop CS5 extended version 12.0; Adobe Systems Inc, San Jose, California). Scars were measured at two points: the First Point was 1 mm above the white roll; the Second Point was 1 mm below the C-flap suture line.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
October 16, 2017
Last Updated
October 22, 2017
Sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03314090
Brief Title
Silicone Gel in the Treatment of Cleft Lip Scars
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of Silicone Gel in the Treatment of Cleft Lip Scars
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 28, 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 29, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 12, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Cleft lip / palate is the most common craniofacial anomaly in humans. Lip repair is one of the most important reconstructions for these patients, and is performed at around 3 months of age. Although the cheiloplasty scar is unavoidable and permanent, every possible measure should be considered to optimize its functional and aesthetic outcome, since the scar can be a lifelong social stigma of a cleft lip operation. Hypertrophic scarring can highlight the scar even further, and is a recognized negative outcome for cheiloplasty. Moreover, with an incidence as high as 36.3% , hypertrophic scars are more common in Asian-Orientals compared to Caucasians. The population treated at investigator's institution is almost entirely Oriental (Taiwanese). Patients' intrinsic higher risk of hypertrophic scarring has led investigators continuously to try to improve scar quality for them. In 2011, investigator started a double-blinded, randomized, vehicle-controlled, prospective clinical trial to evaluate whether the injection of botulinum toxin A into the orbicularis oris muscle could improve the quality of the cleft lip scar . The results revealed that botulinum toxin injections into the subjacent orbicularis oris muscle produced narrower cheiloplasty scars, but provided no additional benefits in terms of scar pigmentation, vascularity, pliability or height. During that study, the parents of 14% (4/29) of the babies within the control group reported that participant baby had tried, albeit unsuccessfully, to ingest the silicone sheet at night. This caused investigator to question the safety of silicone sheeting on the upper lip in babies. Silicone is known to be effective for treating and/or preventing hypertrophic scarring . Silicone gel has been shown to prevent hypertrophic scars in median sternotomy wounds 8. Investigators therefore conducted this clinical trial to evaluate whether post-operative use of silicone gel was non-inferior to silicone sheet for preventing hypertrophy of unilateral cleft lip repair scars.
Detailed Description
The control group consisted of 29 patients who were recruited and became controls for a previous study (Botulinum Toxin to Improve Results in Cleft Lip Repair; IRB No 101-3009C) who were treated using the current established protocol for scar care following cheiloplasty 2. This involved microporous tape placed across both cheeks and spanning the upper lip during daytime, and silicone sheets fixed with a shorter length of microporous tape (that did not span the cheeks) at night. This continued strictly for 6 months. The Study group consisted of another 33 consecutive age-matched patients with unilateral cleft lip, whose postoperative scar care was exactly the same except the silicone sheet was replaced with silicone gel (Dermatix Ultra, Menarini, Singapore), which was applied twice per day. The parents (or caregivers) were instructed to apply silicone gel (the amount being similar in size to a grain of rice) along the upper lip scar from the nostril base to the vermillion, avoiding the wet mucosa. Inclusion criteria were: 1. Baby born with cleft lip planned for primary lip repair around 3 months of age, . Written informed consent for the study provided by the parent/guardian. Exclusion criteria were: 1. presence of other craniofacial anomalies; 2. lack of signed informed consent from the parent/guardian.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cleft Lip
Keywords
Cleft lip, Scar, Silicone sheet, Silicone gel

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Testing silicone gel in the treatment of upper lip scar
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
33 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Silicone Gel Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Intervention: Silicone gel (Dermatix Ultra, Menarini, Singapore) was applied twice per day (BID). The amount being similar in size to a grain of rice.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Silicone Gels
Other Intervention Name(s)
Dermatix Ultra
Intervention Description
silicone gel (Dermatix Ultra, Menarini, Singapore) was applied twice per day. The amount used being similar in size to a grain of rice.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Vacouver scar scale
Description
Pigmentation: 0 normal; 1 hypopigmentation; 2 Hyperpigmentation Vascularity: 0 normal; 1. pink; 2. red; 3. purple Pliability: 0 normal; 1. supple, flexible with minimal resistance; 2. Yielding, giving way to pressure; 3. firm, inflexible, not easily moved, resistant to manual pressure; 4. banding, rope-like tissue that blanches with extension of the scar; 5. contracture, permanent shortening of the scar producing deformity or distortion. Height: 0. normal; 1. less than 2 mm; 2. less than 5 mm; 3. more than 5 mm The sum of each item give the total scores. The score range from 0-13; with minimum of 0 being the best scar and maximum13 the worst scar
Time Frame
Six months after surgery
Title
Visual Analogue Scale
Description
VAS with 10 grades: 0 represented the worst possible scar outcome and 10 the best possible scar outcome.
Time Frame
Six months after surgery
Title
Scar width
Description
A standard frontally oriented photograph was taken with a surgical ruler placed on the lower lip at the six-month follow up clinic. The scar width measurements were obtained from the photographs (using the surgical ruler as the reference) by two independent raters and means calculated. A commercial photograph program for scar width measurement was utilized (Photoshop CS5 extended version 12.0; Adobe Systems Inc, San Jose, California). Scars were measured at two points: the First Point was 1 mm above the white roll; the Second Point was 1 mm below the C-flap suture line.
Time Frame
Six months after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Month
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
12 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Baby born with cleft lip planned for primary lip repair around 3 months of age, Written informed consent for the study provided by the parent/guardian Exclusion Criteria: presence of other craniofacial anomalies; lack of signed informed consent from the parent/guardian.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Chang Chun Shin
City
Taoyuan
ZIP/Postal Code
333
Country
Taiwan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25506542
Citation
Lin TM, Lin TY, Chou CK, Lai CS, Lin SD. Application of microautologous fat transplantation in the correction of sunken upper eyelid. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2014 Dec 5;2(11):e259. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000000141. eCollection 2014 Nov.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25541942
Citation
Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair: a double-blinded, randomized, vehicle-controlled clinical trial. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 26;9(12):e115690. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115690. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25158709
Citation
Chang CS, Wallace CG, Hsiao YC, Chang CJ, Chen PK. Botulinum toxin to improve results in cleft lip repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Sep;134(3):511-516. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000416.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17700980
Citation
Chernoff WG, Cramer H, Su-Huang S. The efficacy of topical silicone gel elastomers in the treatment of hypertrophic scars, keloid scars, and post-laser exfoliation erythema. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Sep-Oct;31(5):495-500. doi: 10.1007/s00266-006-0218-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17171514
Citation
Signorini M, Clementoni MT. Clinical evaluation of a new self-drying silicone gel in the treatment of scars: a preliminary report. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2007 Mar-Apr;31(2):183-7. doi: 10.1007/s00266-005-0122-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24281584
Citation
Kim S, Choi TH, Liu W, Ogawa R, Suh JS, Mustoe TA. Update on scar management: guidelines for treating Asian patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Dec;132(6):1580-1589. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a8070c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12028528
Citation
Borgognoni L. Biological effects of silicone gel sheeting. Wound Repair Regen. 2002 Mar-Apr;10(2):118-21. doi: 10.1046/j.1524-475x.2002.00205.x. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Silicone Gel in the Treatment of Cleft Lip Scars

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs