search
Back to results

SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Primary Purpose

Renal Calculi

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Sponsored by
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Renal Calculi focused on measuring Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, SMP, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, RIRS, Randomized Controlled Trial, RCT

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 70 years
  2. Normal renal function
  3. Anesthesia rating(ASA) score 1 and 2
  4. Absence of congenital abnormalities
  5. Symptomatic lower pole calculi and diameter 10-20 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with solitary kidney
  2. Patients with congenital anomalies, e.g. ectopic kidney, polycystic horseshoe, or mal-rotated kidney
  3. Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion
  4. Uncorrected coagulopathy and active urinary tract infection(UTI)
  5. Patient undergoing any other surgical procedure during the same admission. (e.g. ureteroscopy)
  6. If patients undergoing RIRS/SMP have purulent urine, we will place D-J stent (for RIRS) or nephrostomy tube (for SMP) and postpone the procedure and excluded the patients from the study

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Other

Other

Arm Label

Group 1

Group 2

Arm Description

Patients in Group 1 undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy

Patients in Group 2 undergo Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Stone free rate (SFR)
Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Perioperative complications
Complication is defined as any adverse event occurred intraoperatively or ≤3 month postoperatively.
Operation time
The operating time for SMP was recorded from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to wound closure;For RIRS,The operating time was recorded from insertion of an endoscope into the urethra to the completion of stent placement.

Full Information

First Posted
August 3, 2015
Last Updated
March 30, 2020
Sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02519634
Brief Title
SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Official Title
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (SMP) Versus Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS) for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial (IAU-01)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 1, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 31, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Shock wave lithotripsy (SWL) is recommended for kidney stones < 20 mm. However, the stone clearance of lower pole calculi after SWL is limited, thus leading to an extended indication for mini-percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) even for stones between 10 and 20 mm in many centers. This trend is further promoted by introduction of super-mini PCNL (SMP), which is postulated to be less invasive compared to mini-PCNL due to the miniaturized instruments. However, this issue remains controversial. On the other hand, improvements in endoscopy technology have made retrograde stone removal more attractive. This has led to an increasing use of RIRS as a primary treatment although it is recommended only as 2nd-line option by current guidelines. However, the treatment of symptomatic lower pole calculi is a challenge for RIRS because of lower clearance rates. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMP and RIRS for the treatment for symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm.
Detailed Description
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of SMP and RIRS for the treatment for symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm.Investigators will do a multi-centers international randomized controlled trial(RCT),and investigators plan to perform this study in 10 hospitals,which are the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University of China, Department of Urology, Renmin Hospital, Wuhan University of China, Shenzhen People's Hospital of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University of China, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University of China, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University of China, Jiangsu Province hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital With Nanjing Medical University of China, Zhejiang provincial people's hospital of china, Dr. Lutfi Kirdar Training and Research Hospital of Turkey and Global Rainbow Healthcare of India respectively. Investigators plan to beginning their study at August in 2015 and end at July in 2017.One hundred and sixty patients with symptomatic lower pole calculi renal calculi measuring 10-20 mm will be enrolled in this study. By simple random sampling technique, patients will be assigned to two 80-patient groups.All the patients will be diagnosed definitely before operations with non-contrast CT.Patients with positive preoperative urine culture should be treated with suitable antibiotics based on the culture sensitivity result for at least 72h before SMP/RIRS. Patients who have negative urine culture should receive a single dose of broad spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis just prior to the procedure. Surgical technique SMP All the biochemistry tests and preoperative preparations are referenced to the mini-PCNL. Under general anesthesia a 6 French(Fr).Open end ureteral catheter is first inserted in to the relevant ureter. Patient is then turned into prone position and the desired calyx is punctured under fluoroscopic or sonographic guidance. Nephrostomy tract dilation is carried out using fascial dilators up to 12-14 Fr. as indicated. Corresponding size of suction-evacuation sheath was placed. The sheath is connected to the specimen collection bottle and the bottle then onto the aspirator. A rubber cap with a center aperture was placed at the proximal end of the sheath. The negative pressure aspirator was adjusted to a setting of 150-200 mm Hg. The miniature endoscope is inserted into the sheath through the cap. Stone is visualized and lithotripsy is performed using either Holmium-yttrium aluminum garnet(YAG) laser or pneumatic lithotripsy. At the end of procedure fluoroscopic images are obtained to assess stone clearance status. Double J ureteral stent is placed only in the presence of ureteral inflammatory polyp; evidence of ureteropelvic obstruction; presence of significant pyelocalyceal blood clots following lithotripsy; significant residual stones. Indications for nephrostomy tube placement included: significant residual stone fragments which would require a second look procedure; significant pyelocalyceal blood clots or bleeding after lithotripsy (because the nephrostomy tube could tamponade the access tract and drain the urine and clots). RIRS The patient is placed in the lithotomy position, Cystoscopy and retrograde pyelogram were preformed, and a 0.035'' flexible tip guidewire is placed into the renal pelvis. A 12 Fr/ 14 Fr ureteral access sheath (UAS) is advanced into the proximal ureter over the guidewire, and a P5 or P6 Olympus flexible ureteroscope is passed through the UAS. The stones are fragmented using a 200um holmium laser fibre at a 8-25 weeks energy setting. Some fragments are removed using a stone basket for stone analysis, and the remaining stone fragments smaller than 2 mm were left for spontaneous passage. A 5 Fr or 6Fr pigtail stent is placed at the conclusion of the procedure. Double J stents were removed post-operative 2 weeks. Data collection Data for the 2 groups-demographic characteristics,hemoglobin(HB) decrease, postoperative pain, duration of postoperative, hospital stay, complications (modified Clavien system), stone clearance (SFR after day 1 and final SFR) and the need for auxiliary treatment are compared. Mean study endpoint: The primary endpoint was the SFR at 3-months after surgery. Secondary endpoint: Complications, duration of postoperative and hospital stay. re-SMP, ureteroscopy and SWL are considered as auxiliary treatments. Demographic characteristics include age, sex, BMI, stone size and location, etc… The stone size is defined as the maximum diameter as determined by CT scans. Degree of hydronephrosis are assigned as follow: none (no calyx or pelvic dilation), mild (pelvic dilatation alone), moderate (mild calyx dilation), or severe (severe calyx dilation or calyx dilation accompanied by renal parenchyma atrophy). Definition of operation time: For SMP: recorded from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to the completion of the stone removal. For RIRS: recorded from insertion of an endoscope into the urethra to the completion of stent placement. Hospital stay are rounded to the nearest whole day and calculated from the day of surgery to the day of discharge. Postoperative pain (visual analogue scale(VAS), use of analgesics) and Postoperative comfort scores (Bruggrmann comfort scale,BCS) will be recorded. The rate of hemoglobin decrease is assessed by comparing the preoperative Hb level with 24-hour postoperative Hb level. SFR is assessed by KUB and ultrasound at 1-day after operation. Non-contrast CT is obtained for all patients at 3 month after the operation to evaluate the final SFR, allowing time for the spontaneous passage of stone fragments. Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles. If the procedure is considered as successful, the pigtail stent is removed as outpatient after 2 weeks. Follow-up including non-contrast CT will be generally scheduled in 3 month. Bleeding severity is judged by the treating physician, and transfusions are administered according to local practice guideline. Complications of all patients are recorded according to modified Clavien classification system.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Renal Calculi
Keywords
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy, SMP, Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery, RIRS, Randomized Controlled Trial, RCT

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
160 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients in Group 1 undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Arm Title
Group 2
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients in Group 2 undergo Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Intervention Description
Patients undergo Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Intervention Description
Patients undergo Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stone free rate (SFR)
Description
Stone-free status are defined as either the absence of any residual stone fragments or the presence of clinically insignificant residual stone fragments in the kidney which were defined as ≦ 3mm, asymptomatic, non-obstructive and non-infectious stone particles.
Time Frame
The primary endpoint was the SFR at 3-months after surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Perioperative complications
Description
Complication is defined as any adverse event occurred intraoperatively or ≤3 month postoperatively.
Time Frame
intraoperatively or ≤ 3 month postoperatively
Title
Operation time
Description
The operating time for SMP was recorded from the time of the first percutaneous renal puncture to wound closure;For RIRS,The operating time was recorded from insertion of an endoscope into the urethra to the completion of stent placement.
Time Frame
intraoperatively

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 18 to 70 years Normal renal function Anesthesia rating(ASA) score 1 and 2 Absence of congenital abnormalities Symptomatic lower pole calculi and diameter 10-20 mm Exclusion Criteria: Patients with solitary kidney Patients with congenital anomalies, e.g. ectopic kidney, polycystic horseshoe, or mal-rotated kidney Patients who underwent transplant or urinary diversion Uncorrected coagulopathy and active urinary tract infection(UTI) Patient undergoing any other surgical procedure during the same admission. (e.g. ureteroscopy) If patients undergoing RIRS/SMP have purulent urine, we will place D-J stent (for RIRS) or nephrostomy tube (for SMP) and postpone the procedure and excluded the patients from the study
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guohua Zeng, PH.D and M.D
Organizational Affiliation
The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University
City
Guangzhou
State/Province
Guangdong
ZIP/Postal Code
510230
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29873874
Citation
Zeng G, Zhang T, Agrawal M, He X, Zhang W, Xiao K, Li H, Li X, Xu C, Yang S, de la Rosette JJ, Fan J, Zhu W, Sarica K. Super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) vs retrograde intrarenal surgery for the treatment of 1-2 cm lower-pole renal calculi: an international multicentre randomised controlled trial. BJU Int. 2018 Dec;122(6):1034-1040. doi: 10.1111/bju.14427. Epub 2018 Jul 26.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

SMP vs RIRS for Symptomatic Lower Pole Renal Calculi of 10-20 mm Size: a Randomized Controlled Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs