search
Back to results

Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury

Primary Purpose

Spinal Cord Injuries

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Acoustic stimuli (Startle)
Sponsored by
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Spinal Cord Injuries focused on measuring Spinal cord injury, Spasticity, TMS

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria for individuals with SCI

  • Chronic SCI (≥1 year of injury)
  • Incomplete spinal cord injury at T12 or above
  • Males and Females
  • Ages 18-75 years

Inclusion criteria for non-spastic individuals with SCI

-MAS scores of 0 and 1

Inclusion criteria for spastic individuals with SCI

  • MAS scores of 2, 3 and 4
  • The ability to perform a voluntary flexion and extension of the elbow and/or knee or ankle
  • The ability to reach and grasp an object

Inclusion criteria for health controls

  • Males and females
  • Ages 18-75 years
  • Right-handed
  • Able to perform elbow and/or knee or ankle flexion and extension

Exclusion Criteria for individuals with SCI and healthy controls:

  • Uncontrolled medical problems including pulmonary, cardiovascular, or orthopedic disease
  • Any debilitating disease prior to the SCI that caused exercise intolerance
  • Premorbid, ongoing major depression or psychosis, altered cognitive status
  • History of head injury or stroke
  • Pacemaker
  • Metal plate in skull
  • History of seizures
  • Receiving drugs acting primarily on the central nervous system, which lower the seizure threshold such as antipsychotic drugs (chlorpromazine, clozapine) or tricyclic antidepressants
  • Pregnant females
  • Ongoing cord compression or a syrinx in the spinal cord or who suffer from a spinal cord disease such as spinal stenosis, spina bifida, or herniated cervical disk

Sites / Locations

  • Shirley Ryan AbilityLabRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Aim 1

Aim 2

Arm Description

To accomplish this aim, we will conduct one experiment in two sessions separated by 2- 3 days using a crossover design. Participants will be assigned into one of three groups: spastic SCI, non-spastic SCI, and controls. We expect that people enrolled in Aim 1 will complete 2 visits within 1 week. Visit 1 Measurements: MVCs MEP Recruitment Curves iMEPs StartReact Visit 2 Measurements: Participant Reported Spasticity MAS PSAD KINARM MRI of brain and spinal cord

To accomplish this aim, we will use a randomized crossover design study with spastic SCI participants receiving a single intervention combining non-invasive acoustic stimuli (Startle) or sham-Startle with motor training to enhance cortico- and reticulo-spinal contribution, separated by ~2 weeks. Visit 1 and Visit 2 Single intervention of: Startle + exercise training OR sham-Startle + exercise training Pre and post measurements: MVCs MEP recruitment curves iMEPs StartReact Participant reported spasticity MAS PSAD KINARM Neuromechanical hand and/or leg testing GRASSP TRI-HFT 10-meter walk test Pendulum Test

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

MEP recruitment curves
Ten stimuli (0.2 Hz) will be delivered at each intensity to plot the mean peak-to-peak amplitude of the MEP from the non-rectified response against the TMS intensity in each subject (MEP recruitment curve).
Ipsilateral MEPs (iMEPs)
Ten stimuli will be delivered during head straight and ten stimuli will be delivered during lateral head rotation, randomly alternated (0.2 Hz).
StartReact
Here, participants will be asked to observe a light-emitting diode (LED) located in front of their head. When the LED will illuminate, individuals will be asked to move their arm or leg. In some trials, the LED will be presented with either a quiet acoustic stimulus (80 dB, 500 Hz, 50 ms) or a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS, 120 dB, 500 Hz, 50 ms) delivered through a headphone.
Participant reported spasticity
Spasticity questionnaire
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
This scale measures resistance encountered during manual passive muscle stretching using a six-point ordinal scale.
Portable Spasticity Assessment Device (PSAD)'
The PSAD combine biomechanical and electrophysiological measurements for an objective quantification of active and passive component of muscle stiffness
Pendulum Test
As part of the physical exam, we will use the pendulum test to measure muscle tone at the knee by using gravity to provoke muscle stretch reflexes during passive swinging of the lower limb.
10-meter walk test
10-meter walk test will be used to assess walking speed
Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP).
This exam measures clinical impairment that incorporates three domains vital to upper-limb function: sensation, strength, and prehension.
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Hand Function Test (TRI-HFT)
This exam measures gross motor function frequently used to manipulate objects that participants may encounter in their daily lives.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
May 14, 2020
Last Updated
June 20, 2022
Sponsor
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04393922
Brief Title
Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury
Official Title
Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
May 13, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 18, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 18, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Very often, people who have a SCI have difficulty doing things with their arms or hands as a result of muscle stiffness , or spasticity. Spastacity can cause problems performing even the simplest of everyday tasks. This research will help us understand how the body recovers and changes neurologically after SCI.
Detailed Description
After spinal cord injury (SCI), damage to descending motor pathways has been associated with the development of spasticity (Frigon and Rossignol, 2006; Trompetto et al., 2014). Self-reported questionnaires and clinical exams indicate that individuals with incomplete SCI, who showed residual descending connectivity, have a high prevalence of spasticity compared to individuals with complete SCI (Little et al., 1989; Holtz et al., 2017). In agreement, our recent electrophysiological and spinal cord imaging data in humans with a diagnosis of a clinically motor complete SCI showed the presence of descending motor pathway connectivity in individuals with spasticity compared to those without spasticity (Sangari et al., 2019). However, which descending motor pathways influence spasticity following SCI, and to what extent, remains poorly understood. This proposal has two main goals: 1) to examine the contribution of cortico- and reticulo-spinal pathways to spasticity in upper and lower limb muscles, and 2) to develop strategies to promote functional recovery of upper and lower limb spastic muscles in humans with chronic incomplete SCI. The aims below will test two main hypotheses. In Aim 1, we will use transcranial magnetic stimulation and startle acoustic stimuli to examine the contribution of the cortico- and reticulo-spinal pathway to upper and/or lower limb muscles electromyographic activity. Spinal cord atrophy and morphological characterization of cortico- and reticulo-spinal pathways will be assessed with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Physiological and neuroimaging outcomes will be associated with clinical assessment of spasticity. In Aim 2, we propose to enhance cortico- and reticulo-spinal contribution to upper and/or lower limb function in spastic muscles by using a novel intervention combining startle acoustic stimuli with motor training. This research will provide new knowledge about the contribution of descending motor pathways to the control of spasticity in upper and lower limb muscles following incomplete cervical SCI (Aim1) and might lead to the development of a novel rehabilitation intervention to improve upper and lower limb motor function recovery by enhancing residual descending control over spinal networks (Aim 2).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injuries
Keywords
Spinal cord injury, Spasticity, TMS

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Aim 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
To accomplish this aim, we will conduct one experiment in two sessions separated by 2- 3 days using a crossover design. Participants will be assigned into one of three groups: spastic SCI, non-spastic SCI, and controls. We expect that people enrolled in Aim 1 will complete 2 visits within 1 week. Visit 1 Measurements: MVCs MEP Recruitment Curves iMEPs StartReact Visit 2 Measurements: Participant Reported Spasticity MAS PSAD KINARM MRI of brain and spinal cord
Arm Title
Aim 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
To accomplish this aim, we will use a randomized crossover design study with spastic SCI participants receiving a single intervention combining non-invasive acoustic stimuli (Startle) or sham-Startle with motor training to enhance cortico- and reticulo-spinal contribution, separated by ~2 weeks. Visit 1 and Visit 2 Single intervention of: Startle + exercise training OR sham-Startle + exercise training Pre and post measurements: MVCs MEP recruitment curves iMEPs StartReact Participant reported spasticity MAS PSAD KINARM Neuromechanical hand and/or leg testing GRASSP TRI-HFT 10-meter walk test Pendulum Test
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Acoustic stimuli (Startle)
Intervention Description
A startle stimulus (120 dB, 500 Hz, 50 ms) will be delivered through headphones
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
MEP recruitment curves
Description
Ten stimuli (0.2 Hz) will be delivered at each intensity to plot the mean peak-to-peak amplitude of the MEP from the non-rectified response against the TMS intensity in each subject (MEP recruitment curve).
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
Ipsilateral MEPs (iMEPs)
Description
Ten stimuli will be delivered during head straight and ten stimuli will be delivered during lateral head rotation, randomly alternated (0.2 Hz).
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
StartReact
Description
Here, participants will be asked to observe a light-emitting diode (LED) located in front of their head. When the LED will illuminate, individuals will be asked to move their arm or leg. In some trials, the LED will be presented with either a quiet acoustic stimulus (80 dB, 500 Hz, 50 ms) or a startling acoustic stimulus (SAS, 120 dB, 500 Hz, 50 ms) delivered through a headphone.
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
Participant reported spasticity
Description
Spasticity questionnaire
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS)
Description
This scale measures resistance encountered during manual passive muscle stretching using a six-point ordinal scale.
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
Portable Spasticity Assessment Device (PSAD)'
Description
The PSAD combine biomechanical and electrophysiological measurements for an objective quantification of active and passive component of muscle stiffness
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
Pendulum Test
Description
As part of the physical exam, we will use the pendulum test to measure muscle tone at the knee by using gravity to provoke muscle stretch reflexes during passive swinging of the lower limb.
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
10-meter walk test
Description
10-meter walk test will be used to assess walking speed
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
Graded and Redefined Assessment of Strength, Sensibility and Prehension (GRASSP).
Description
This exam measures clinical impairment that incorporates three domains vital to upper-limb function: sensation, strength, and prehension.
Time Frame
3-4 hours
Title
Toronto Rehabilitation Institute-Hand Function Test (TRI-HFT)
Description
This exam measures gross motor function frequently used to manipulate objects that participants may encounter in their daily lives.
Time Frame
3-4 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria for individuals with SCI Chronic SCI (≥1 year of injury) Incomplete spinal cord injury at T12 or above Males and Females Ages 18-75 years Inclusion criteria for non-spastic individuals with SCI -MAS scores of 0 and 1 Inclusion criteria for spastic individuals with SCI MAS scores of 2, 3 and 4 The ability to perform a voluntary flexion and extension of the elbow and/or knee or ankle The ability to reach and grasp an object Inclusion criteria for health controls Males and females Ages 18-75 years Right-handed Able to perform elbow and/or knee or ankle flexion and extension Exclusion Criteria for individuals with SCI and healthy controls: Uncontrolled medical problems including pulmonary, cardiovascular, or orthopedic disease Any debilitating disease prior to the SCI that caused exercise intolerance Premorbid, ongoing major depression or psychosis, altered cognitive status History of head injury or stroke Pacemaker Metal plate in skull History of seizures Receiving drugs acting primarily on the central nervous system, which lower the seizure threshold such as antipsychotic drugs (chlorpromazine, clozapine) or tricyclic antidepressants Pregnant females Ongoing cord compression or a syrinx in the spinal cord or who suffer from a spinal cord disease such as spinal stenosis, spina bifida, or herniated cervical disk
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sina Sangari, PhD
Phone
312.238.1365
Email
ssangari@rsralab.org
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Shirley Ryan AbilityLab
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Monica A Perez, PhD, PT
Phone
312-238-2886
Email
mperez04@sralab.org

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Spasticity After Spinal Cord Injury

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs