Spaulding-Harvard Model System: Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Chronic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
Primary Purpose
Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Pain, Neuropathic Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Cord Injury focused on measuring transcranial stimulation, direct current
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Over 18 years of age
- History of moderate to severe sublesional pain
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active alcohol or drug dependence, as self-reported
- A history of bipolar disorder or psychosis, as self-reported
- Inability to travel to the study site,
- Current use of any of the following anti-epileptic medications or dopaminergic medications known to reduce or inhibit the benefits of tDCS treatment [53]: carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, ropinirole (Requip), pramipexole (Mirapex), and cabergoline (Dostinex),
- The following contradictions to tDCS: implanted metal plates in the head, or deep brain stimulator (spinal cord implants, including baclofen pumps, are not a contraindication as cranial currents do not reach the spinal cord [24]).
- Pregnancy at time of enrollment
- Current use of ventilator.
Sites / Locations
- Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Active tDCS
Sham tDCS
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo 20 minutes active tDCS.
Subjects will undergo 20 minutes of sham stimulation.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Pain Scale
Determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in reducing pain in subjects with chronic sublesional neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury, as measured by changes in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from baseline to follow-up (up to 2 months after the final stimulation session).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Changes in Quality of Life Scale
Determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in increasing quality of life in subjects with chronic neuropathic sublesional pain due to spinal cord injury, as measured by changes in the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), from baseline to follow-up (up to 2 months after the final stimulation session).
Changes in Mood Scale
Determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in improving mood in subjects with chronic neuropathic sublesional pain due to spinal cord injury, as measured by changes in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9), from baseline to follow-up (up to 2 months after the final stimulation session).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01599767
First Posted
February 8, 2012
Last Updated
April 23, 2020
Sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Collaborators
U.S. Department of Education
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01599767
Brief Title
Spaulding-Harvard Model System: Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Chronic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
Official Title
Spaulding-Harvard Spinal Cord Injury (SH-SCI) Study: Effects of tDCS on Chronic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Collaborators
U.S. Department of Education
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to see the effects of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) on the pain associated with spinal cord injury. This study is part of the Spaulding-Harvard Model System. The investigators hypothesize that there will be a decrease in pain levels with active stimulation, when compared to sham stimulation, using a 3 week stimulation schedule- 1 week of stimulation (5 consecutive days) followed by 2 weeks of stimulation (10 consecutive days) after a 3-month follow up visit. The subject will also have follow ups at 2, 4 and 8 weeks after the second course of stimulation.
If a subject receives sham during the experiment, he/she may enroll in an open-label portion of the study and receive 10 days of active stimulation.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injury, Chronic Pain, Neuropathic Pain
Keywords
transcranial stimulation, direct current
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Active tDCS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo 20 minutes active tDCS.
Arm Title
Sham tDCS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will undergo 20 minutes of sham stimulation.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
1x1 low-intensity direct current stimulator, Soterix Medical
Intervention Description
Subjects will undergo 15 sessions of tDCS stimulation (either active or sham), 1x per day at 20 minutes per session.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Pain Scale
Description
Determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in reducing pain in subjects with chronic sublesional neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury, as measured by changes in the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) from baseline to follow-up (up to 2 months after the final stimulation session).
Time Frame
Measured for approximately 6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Changes in Quality of Life Scale
Description
Determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in increasing quality of life in subjects with chronic neuropathic sublesional pain due to spinal cord injury, as measured by changes in the Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), from baseline to follow-up (up to 2 months after the final stimulation session).
Time Frame
Measured for approximately 6 months
Title
Changes in Mood Scale
Description
Determine whether anodal transcranial direct current stimulation is effective in improving mood in subjects with chronic neuropathic sublesional pain due to spinal cord injury, as measured by changes in the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ9), from baseline to follow-up (up to 2 months after the final stimulation session).
Time Frame
Measured for approximately 6 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Over 18 years of age
History of moderate to severe sublesional pain
Exclusion Criteria:
Active alcohol or drug dependence, as self-reported
A history of bipolar disorder or psychosis, as self-reported
Inability to travel to the study site,
Current use of any of the following anti-epileptic medications or dopaminergic medications known to reduce or inhibit the benefits of tDCS treatment [53]: carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, phenytoin, ropinirole (Requip), pramipexole (Mirapex), and cabergoline (Dostinex),
The following contradictions to tDCS: implanted metal plates in the head, or deep brain stimulator (spinal cord implants, including baclofen pumps, are not a contraindication as cranial currents do not reach the spinal cord [24]).
Pregnancy at time of enrollment
Current use of ventilator.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Felipe Fregni, MD PHD MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28822837
Citation
Thibaut A, Carvalho S, Morse LR, Zafonte R, Fregni F. Delayed pain decrease following M1 tDCS in spinal cord injury: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Neurosci Lett. 2017 Sep 29;658:19-26. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2017.08.024. Epub 2017 Aug 16.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.sh-sci.org
Description
Spaulding-Harvard SCI Model System Website
Learn more about this trial
Spaulding-Harvard Model System: Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Chronic Pain in Spinal Cord Injury
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs