Spinal Cord Stimulation With Precision® System Versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (Evidence)
Primary Purpose
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Pain, Back Pain
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator
Back Surgery
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome focused on measuring Spinal Cord Stimulation, Decompression, Fusion with or without instrumentation, Discectomy, Laminectomy, Laminotomy, Foraminotomy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Primary pain type - neuropathic with concordant radicular or neurological findings
- Significant complaint of persistent or recurrent radicular leg pain, with or without low back pain
- One or more prior lumbosacral surgical procedures (no upper limit)
- At least 6 months duration of persistent or recurrent radicular leg pain, with or without low back pain
- Study candidates meet the criteria for a specific surgical intervention as recorded by a surgeon: pain refractory to conservative care, with concordant neurologic, tension, and/or mechanical signs and imaging findings of surgically remediable neural compression
- MRI or CT myelogram of the lumbar and thoracic spine (within 12 months prior to screening) that rules out pathology that might compromise SCS electrode placement or pathology, in addition to neural compression, that might contribute to the subject's pain
- All study candidates must pass study site's routine psychological/psychiatric evaluation for SCS before randomization to SCS or reoperation
- At least 18 years of age
- Subject signs informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Chief complaint of mechanical low back pain (e.g. pain that a recumbent position relieves completely)
- Pain intensity of always 10 on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale over the past 6 months based on subject recall
- Radiographic evidence of frank instability (grossly mobile spondylolisthesis or abnormal subluxation) requiring fusion, calcific arachnoiditis, or severe thoracic stenosis
- Radiographically demonstrated (by myelographic block or its MRI equivalent) critical cauda equinal compression
- A disabling or potentially disabling neurologic deficit (e.g., foot drop, neurogenic bladder) in the distribution of a nerve root or roots caused by surgically remediable compression
- A predominance of non-organic signs on physical exam
- A concurrent clinically significant or disabling chronic pain problem or condition that is likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints (e.g., chronic migraine, significant arthrosis of the hip associated with groin pain as primary complaint)
- Significant substance abuse issues
- Major untreated psychiatric comorbidity
- Unresolved issues of secondary gain (e.g., litigation)
- Expected inability to report treatment outcome adequately
- Expected inability to operate SCS system
- Pregnancy (actual or planned)
- Life expectancy less than 3 years due to other serious medical condition(s)
- Active local or systemic infection
- Prior SCS procedure
- Presence of intrathecal drug pump
- Participation in another clinical study that would confound data of this study
- Occupational risk that would rule out SCS
- Medical or cardiac condition(s) or therapies, or foreseeable need for therapies or diagnostic tests (e.g., MRI), that preclude SCS and/or reoperation
Sites / Locations
- Scripps Clinic
- University of California San Diego
- Orthopedic Research Foundation
- Millenium Pain Center
- Northwestern Memorial Hospital
- The University of Illinois Medical Center
- Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
- St. Patrick Hospital
- The Center for Clinical Research, LLC
- Geisinger Medical Center
- Medical University of South Carolina
- Swedish Neuroscience Institute
- Pacific Medical Center
- Regina General Hospital
- Hopital de Enfant-Jesus
- CHU de Nantes-Hopital Laennec
- Frenchay Hospital
- James Cook University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator
Back Surgery
Arm Description
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Discectomy, laminotomy, laminectomy, foraminotomy, fusion with or without instrumentation
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Proportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01036529
First Posted
December 17, 2009
Last Updated
November 12, 2020
Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01036529
Brief Title
Spinal Cord Stimulation With Precision® System Versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Acronym
Evidence
Official Title
Spinal Cord Stimulation With Precision® Spinal Cord Stimulation System Versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Closed due to continued slow enrollment.
Study Start Date
February 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Boston Scientific Corporation
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The EVIDENCE trial is a randomized controlled trial comparing the therapeutic effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the Precision® Spinal Cord Stimulation with that of reoperation as a treatment of pain in patients with Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS). FBSS is defined as persistent or recurrent pain following one or more lumbosacral spine surgical procedures. Surgical procedures that can result in FBSS can be categorized as either decompression or decompression followed by fusion with or without instrumentation. The pain of FBSS is categorized as neuropathic, which involves pathological nerve activity and is commonly characterized by patients as shooting or burning and/or nociceptive, which signals actual or impending tissue damage or inflammation.
Detailed Description
The co-primary study endpoints are proportion of subjects with ≥50% leg pain relief without crossover at 6 and at 24 months.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome, Pain, Back Pain
Keywords
Spinal Cord Stimulation, Decompression, Fusion with or without instrumentation, Discectomy, Laminectomy, Laminotomy, Foraminotomy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
28 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Spinal Cord Stimulation
Arm Title
Back Surgery
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Discectomy, laminotomy, laminectomy, foraminotomy, fusion with or without instrumentation
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Precision Spinal Cord Stimulator
Intervention Description
Programming settings will be specific to the individual needs in accordance with the labeling
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Back Surgery
Other Intervention Name(s)
Discectomy, Laminotomy, Laminectomy, Foraminotomy, Foraminectomy, Fusion with or without instrumentation
Intervention Description
Different types of back surgery may be performed
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Subjects Showing ≥50% Self-reported Leg Pain Relief From Baseline Without Request for Crossover to the Other Treatment
Time Frame
3, 6- and 12- months post-index procedure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Primary pain type - neuropathic with concordant radicular or neurological findings
Significant complaint of persistent or recurrent radicular leg pain, with or without low back pain
One or more prior lumbosacral surgical procedures (no upper limit)
At least 6 months duration of persistent or recurrent radicular leg pain, with or without low back pain
Study candidates meet the criteria for a specific surgical intervention as recorded by a surgeon: pain refractory to conservative care, with concordant neurologic, tension, and/or mechanical signs and imaging findings of surgically remediable neural compression
MRI or CT myelogram of the lumbar and thoracic spine (within 12 months prior to screening) that rules out pathology that might compromise SCS electrode placement or pathology, in addition to neural compression, that might contribute to the subject's pain
All study candidates must pass study site's routine psychological/psychiatric evaluation for SCS before randomization to SCS or reoperation
At least 18 years of age
Subject signs informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Chief complaint of mechanical low back pain (e.g. pain that a recumbent position relieves completely)
Pain intensity of always 10 on a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale over the past 6 months based on subject recall
Radiographic evidence of frank instability (grossly mobile spondylolisthesis or abnormal subluxation) requiring fusion, calcific arachnoiditis, or severe thoracic stenosis
Radiographically demonstrated (by myelographic block or its MRI equivalent) critical cauda equinal compression
A disabling or potentially disabling neurologic deficit (e.g., foot drop, neurogenic bladder) in the distribution of a nerve root or roots caused by surgically remediable compression
A predominance of non-organic signs on physical exam
A concurrent clinically significant or disabling chronic pain problem or condition that is likely to confound evaluation of study endpoints (e.g., chronic migraine, significant arthrosis of the hip associated with groin pain as primary complaint)
Significant substance abuse issues
Major untreated psychiatric comorbidity
Unresolved issues of secondary gain (e.g., litigation)
Expected inability to report treatment outcome adequately
Expected inability to operate SCS system
Pregnancy (actual or planned)
Life expectancy less than 3 years due to other serious medical condition(s)
Active local or systemic infection
Prior SCS procedure
Presence of intrathecal drug pump
Participation in another clinical study that would confound data of this study
Occupational risk that would rule out SCS
Medical or cardiac condition(s) or therapies, or foreseeable need for therapies or diagnostic tests (e.g., MRI), that preclude SCS and/or reoperation
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard North, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
The Sandra and Malcolm Berman Brain & Spine Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Scripps Clinic
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California San Diego
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic Research Foundation
City
Savannah
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31405
Country
United States
Facility Name
Millenium Pain Center
City
Bloomington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Illinois Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sinai Hospital of Baltimore
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21209
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Patrick Hospital
City
Missoula
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59802
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Clinical Research, LLC
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Geisinger Medical Center
City
Danville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17822
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Neuroscience Institute
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Medical Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regina General Hospital
City
Regina
State/Province
Saskatchewan
ZIP/Postal Code
S4P 0W5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Hopital de Enfant-Jesus
City
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1J 1Z4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
CHU de Nantes-Hopital Laennec
City
Nantes Cedex
ZIP/Postal Code
44093
Country
France
Facility Name
Frenchay Hospital
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS16 1LE
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
James Cook University Hospital
City
Middlesbrough
ZIP/Postal Code
TS4 3BW
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Spinal Cord Stimulation With Precision® System Versus Reoperation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs