search
Back to results

Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia in Laparotomic Liver Surgery

Primary Purpose

Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver, Liver Diseases, Liver Neoplasms

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Spinal analgesia
Epidural analgesia
Transversus Abdominis Plane block
Surgical wound infiltration
Acetaminophen
Ketorolac
Ropivacaine
Sufentanil
Ropivacaine
Ropivacaine
Sponsored by
Ospedale San Raffaele
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver focused on measuring spinal analgesia, epidural analgesia, laparotomic liver resection, ERAS, length of stay

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years old
  • Hospitalized patients
  • Surgical indication for minor laparotomic anterior liver resection (II, III, IV and V hepatic segment resection)
  • Surgical indication for laparotomic liver metastasectomy
  • Ability to provide an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal to provide informed consent
  • Chronical therapy with opioids
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Alcohol or drug abuse
  • Planned or unplanned post-operative intensive care unit admission
  • Contraindication to spinal/epidural analgesia
  • Severe liver or renal failure
  • Cognitive disorders, mental retard or psychiatric disorders
  • Allergy to any drug used

Sites / Locations

  • Ospedale San Raffaele

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Spinal

Epidural

Arm Description

Patients will receive spinal analgesia (morphine 0.2 mg) before general anesthesia for minor laparotomic liver resection.

Patients will receive epidural analgesia (bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% 4-6 mL followed by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 99 mL + sufentanil 50 mcg/mL 1 mL) before general anesthesia for minor laparotomic liver resection.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale early after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale six hours after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale one day after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale two days after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale three days after surgery
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale at hospital discharge
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Ready to discharge status
The postoperative day in which patients reach the "ready to discharge" status will be recorded and compared between the two groups.

Full Information

First Posted
December 15, 2015
Last Updated
January 5, 2016
Sponsor
Ospedale San Raffaele
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02647047
Brief Title
Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia in Laparotomic Liver Surgery
Official Title
Spinal Analgesia Versus Epidural Analgesia in Minor Laparotomic Liver Surgery in an Enhanced Recovery Programme: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2016 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ospedale San Raffaele

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of spinal analgesia for minor laparotomic hepatectomy compared with epidural analgesia, monitoring visual analog scale (VAS). The investigators expect at least the same post-operative pain control in the two groups (non inferiority of pain control with spinal analgesia compared to epidural analgesia). Second endpoint is to verify whether after spinal analgesia there is a decrease in patient's length of hospitalization according to enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) principles.
Detailed Description
Liver surgery is performed under general anesthesia. Loco-regional analgesia is generally performed before general anesthesia induction to obtain the best post-operative pain control,in association with intravenous analgesic drug administration. For minor laparotomic surgery (defined as the resection of up to three hepatic segments), if not contraindicated, in our hospital loco-regional analgesia is performed through the placement of a thoracic (T7-T8 or T8-T9) epidural catheter in which a local anesthetic (usually ropivacaine) and an opioid (usually sufentanil) are administered for the first three post-operative days. This is still considered the gold-standard for pain management in this surgery. In our institute, there is a dedicated acute pain service (APS) for pain management in the post-operative period. APS is also responsible for monitoring, registering and treating all side effects related to both the procedure and the drugs used. In laparoscopic abdominal surgery, instead of epidural analgesia, if not contraindicated, spinal analgesia with low dose morphine before general anesthesia induction is performed. This technique is actually considered efficacy and safe in these type of surgeries. The investigators therefore decided to test the efficacy of spinal analgesia versus epidural analgesia for minor liver surgery since anterior hepatic segments resection is less painful than major liver surgery because it requires less liver manipulation without significant involvement of the Glisson's capsule. This might imply a less incidence of procedure-related side effects such as post-dural puncture headache or site infections. Moreover, spinal analgesia may allow a earlier post-operative patients mobilization and thus a earlier hospital discharge. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators therefore aim to randomize 40 consecutive patients into 2 arms. The experimental group will receive spinal analgesia (morphine 0.2 mg) for post-operative pain control while the control group will receive epidural analgesia (bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% 4-6 mL followed by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2%: 99 mL + sufentanil 50 mcg/mL: 1 mL). Randomization will be performed with closed opaque envelopes. During surgery, patients will be monitored as usual. Intraoperative blood losses and fluids administration will be recorded. Patients randomized into the epidural group will not receive local anesthetic administration through the epidural catheter during the hepatic resection phase to avoid hemodynamic instability. Once the hepatic resection phase is finished and euvolemic status is recovered, epidural analgesia will be administered as mentioned before. In patients in the spinal group, transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block with ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL bilaterally or surgical wound infiltration with ropivacaine 0.75% 10- 20 mL will also be performed before anesthesia recovery. In both groups, post-operative pain control will be managed with intravenous acetaminophen 1000 mg 40 minutes before ending of surgery followed by intravenous administration of acetaminophen 1000 mg every 8 hours and a non-steroidal antinflammatory drug (ketorolac 30 mg) as a rescue therapy in the post-operative period if not contraindicated. Patients will be monitored every 24 hours until the achievement of the "ready to discharge" status defined as: appropriate oral alimentation; optimal pain control with drugs administered orally; adequate ability in walking and personal care; clinical, laboratory and instrumental absence of any post-operative complication; intestinal function recovery; patient consent to discharge.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Secondary Malignant Neoplasm of Liver, Liver Diseases, Liver Neoplasms
Keywords
spinal analgesia, epidural analgesia, laparotomic liver resection, ERAS, length of stay

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Spinal
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will receive spinal analgesia (morphine 0.2 mg) before general anesthesia for minor laparotomic liver resection.
Arm Title
Epidural
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients will receive epidural analgesia (bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% 4-6 mL followed by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 99 mL + sufentanil 50 mcg/mL 1 mL) before general anesthesia for minor laparotomic liver resection.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Spinal analgesia
Intervention Description
Administration of morphine 0.2 mg in subarachnoid space.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Epidural analgesia
Intervention Description
Bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% 4-6 mL followed by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 99 mL + sufentanil 50 mcg/mL 1 mL in epidural space
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Transversus Abdominis Plane block
Intervention Description
Administration of ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL in the plane between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, bilaterally
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Surgical wound infiltration
Intervention Description
Infiltration of the surgical wound with ropivacaine 0.75% 10- 20 mL
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Acetaminophen
Intervention Description
Administration of 1000 mg of acetaminophen 40 minutes before ending of surgery followed by intravenous administration of 1000 mg every 8 hours
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketorolac
Intervention Description
Administration of a non-steroidal antinflammatory drug (ketorolac 30 mg) as a rescue therapy
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ropivacaine
Intervention Description
Epidural bolus of ropivacaine 0.2% 4-6 mL followed by continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine 0.2% 99 mL
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sufentanil
Intervention Description
Epidural continuous epidural infusion of sufentanil 50 mcg/mL 1 mL
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ropivacaine
Intervention Description
Administration of ropivacaine 0.375% 20 mL in the plane between the internal oblique and the transversus abdominis muscles, bilaterally to obtain the transversus abdominis plane block
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ropivacaine
Intervention Description
Infiltration of the surgical wound with ropivacaine 0.75% 10- 20 mL
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale early after surgery
Description
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Time Frame
Within 1 hour after surgery
Title
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale six hours after surgery
Description
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Time Frame
6 hours after surgery
Title
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale one day after surgery
Description
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Time Frame
24 hours after surgery
Title
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale two days after surgery
Description
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Time Frame
48 hours after surgery
Title
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale three days after surgery
Description
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Time Frame
72 hours after surgery
Title
Assessment of postoperative pain control by mean of the visual analog scale at hospital discharge
Description
Visual analog scale (VAS) will be assessed and compared between the two groups.
Time Frame
Up to 30 days after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ready to discharge status
Description
The postoperative day in which patients reach the "ready to discharge" status will be recorded and compared between the two groups.
Time Frame
Up to 30 days after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age > 18 years old Hospitalized patients Surgical indication for minor laparotomic anterior liver resection (II, III, IV and V hepatic segment resection) Surgical indication for laparotomic liver metastasectomy Ability to provide an informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patient refusal to provide informed consent Chronical therapy with opioids Pregnancy or breastfeeding Alcohol or drug abuse Planned or unplanned post-operative intensive care unit admission Contraindication to spinal/epidural analgesia Severe liver or renal failure Cognitive disorders, mental retard or psychiatric disorders Allergy to any drug used
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Elena Bignami, M.D.
Phone
+39.02.2643.4524
Email
bignami.elena@hsr.it
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Raffaella Reineke, M.D.
Email
reineke.raffaella@hsr.it
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Raffaella Reineke, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Ospedale San Raffaele
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ospedale San Raffaele
City
Milano
State/Province
MI
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Elena Bignami, MD
Phone
+39.02.2643.4524
Email
bignami.elena@hsr.it

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23662750
Citation
Tzimas P, Prout J, Papadopoulos G, Mallett SV. Epidural anaesthesia and analgesia for liver resection. Anaesthesia. 2013 Jun;68(6):628-35. doi: 10.1111/anae.12191.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21309939
Citation
Revie EJ, Massie LJ, McNally SJ, McKeown DW, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Effectiveness of epidural analgesia following open liver resection. HPB (Oxford). 2011 Mar;13(3):206-11. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2010.00274.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24467320
Citation
Kasivisvanathan R, Abbassi-Ghadi N, Prout J, Clevenger B, Fusai GK, Mallett SV. A prospective cohort study of intrathecal versus epidural analgesia for patients undergoing hepatic resection. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Aug;16(8):768-75. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12222. Epub 2014 Jan 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23924906
Citation
Ntinas A, Kardassis D, Konstantinopoulos I, Kottos P, Manias A, Kyritsi M, Zilianiaki D, Vrochides D. Duration of the thoracic epidural catheter in a fast-track recovery protocol may decrease the length of stay after a major hepatectomy: a case control study. Int J Surg. 2013;11(9):882-5. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Aug 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20029637
Citation
Koea JB, Young Y, Gunn K. Fast track liver resection: the effect of a comprehensive care package and analgesia with single dose intrathecal morphine with gabapentin or continuous epidural analgesia. HPB Surg. 2009;2009:271986. doi: 10.1155/2009/271986. Epub 2009 Dec 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24661306
Citation
Hughes MJ, McNally S, Wigmore SJ. Enhanced recovery following liver surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford). 2014 Aug;16(8):699-706. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12245. Epub 2014 Mar 24.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Spinal Versus Epidural Analgesia in Laparotomic Liver Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs