search
Back to results

SpotCheck: Comparison of Enhanced Telemedicine Versus In-person Evaluation for the Diagnosis of Skin Cancer

Primary Purpose

Skin Cancer

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nevisense 3.0
Dermlite Cam
Skin biopsy
Sponsored by
NYU Langone Health
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Skin Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 89 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Be 18 years of age or older
  • Have 1-3 lesions for evaluation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions of the hair-bearing scalp, in the mouth, on the lips, genitalia, nails, on/around the eyes, inside the ear

Sites / Locations

  • NYU Langone Health

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Participants with skin lesions

Arm Description

Participants who have up to 3 concerning skin lesions will be evaluated by both an in-person dermatologist and a team of three teledermatologists(board-certified dermatologists). The teledermatoogy team will deliver a consensus recommendation. If either the in-person dermatologist or teledermatologists are concerned that the skin spot(s) may be a skin cancer, a biopsy will be recommended and can be performed at no charge. Or if both agree that the spot(s) are not concerning for skin cancer, no biopsy will be needed.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Agreement Between Telemedicine and In-Person Treatment Recommendation
To determine the agreement between in-person recommendation and the telemedicine (tele) recommendation, the number of discordant benign vs. malignant diagnoses will be calculated; specifically, the number of subjects that were recommended a biopsy from the in-person dermatologist but were recommended no biopsy from the teledermatology team, and the number of subjects that were recommended no biopsy from the in-person dermatologist but biopsy by the teledermatologist team.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Sensitivity of Telemedicine Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who has skin cancer as "positive" using the telemedicine platform.
Sensitivity of In-Person Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who has skin cancer as "positive" during in-person evaluations.
Specificity of Telemedicine Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who does not have skin cancer as "negative" using the telemedicine platform.
Specificity of In-Person Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who does not have skin cancer as "negative" during in-person evaluations.
False-Positive Rate of Telemedicine Evaluation
The number of false-positives (i.e., diagnosing a patient with skin cancer when no skin cancer is present) out of the total number of telemedicine evaluations.
False-Positive Rate of In-Person Evaluation
The number of false-positives (i.e., diagnosing a patient with skin cancer when no skin cancer is present) out of the total number of in-person evaluations.
False-Negative Rate of Telemedicine Evaluation
The number of false-negatives (i.e., indicating a patient does not have skin cancer when skin cancer is present) out of the total number of telemedicine evaluations.
False-Negative Rate of In-Person Evaluation
The number of false-negatives (i.e., indicating a patient does not have skin cancer when skin cancer is present) out of the total number of in-person evaluations.
Positive Predictive Value of Telemedicine Evaluation
The probability that a patient with a positive (abnormal) test result via telemedicine evaluation actually has skin cancer.
Positive Predictive Value of In-Person Evaluation
The probability that a patient with a positive (abnormal) test result via in-person evaluation actually has skin cancer.
Negative Predictive Value of Telemedicine Evaluation
The probability that a person with a negative (normal) test result via telemedicine evaluation is truly free of disease.
Negative Predictive Value of In-Person Evaluation
The probability that a person with a negative (normal) test result via in-person evaluation is truly free of disease.

Full Information

First Posted
May 28, 2020
Last Updated
August 28, 2023
Sponsor
NYU Langone Health
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04411810
Brief Title
SpotCheck: Comparison of Enhanced Telemedicine Versus In-person Evaluation for the Diagnosis of Skin Cancer
Official Title
SpotCheck: Comparison of Enhanced Telemedicine Versus In-person Evaluation for the Diagnosis of Skin Cancer
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 20, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 3, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
NYU Langone Health

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The overall goal of this research is to develop a platform that can increase patient access to expert skin cancer diagnostic services via telemedicine. This is especially important for medically underserved areas where melanoma outcomes are worse than in areas with greater access to in-person evaluations. If successful, the widespread availability of such services would be combined with public education efforts to encourage individuals with changing skin lesions to seek evaluation. With decreased travel times to high quality diagnostic services, such efforts may decrease the diagnosis of more advanced melanomas (with a concomitant increase in the diagnosis of earlier stage tumors), and potentially decrease melanoma mortality.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective pilot study of a store-and-forward telemedicine diagnostic assessment of participant-selected skin lesions concerning for skin cancer, controlled against an in-person dermatologist assessment (gold standard evaluation). The study will be a single arm design with each participant undergoing telemedicine data acquisition (i.e. clinical and dermoscopic imaging and Nevisense measurement), immediately followed by the in-person dermatologist assessment. The in-person dermatologist will be blinded to the Nevisense score at the time of the visit. Using the telemedicine data, the teledermatology team will render a biopsy/no-biopsy recommendation within 3 business days of the participant evaluation. They will be blinded to the results of the in-person dermatologist's diagnostic evaluation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Skin Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
149 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Participants with skin lesions
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants who have up to 3 concerning skin lesions will be evaluated by both an in-person dermatologist and a team of three teledermatologists(board-certified dermatologists). The teledermatoogy team will deliver a consensus recommendation. If either the in-person dermatologist or teledermatologists are concerned that the skin spot(s) may be a skin cancer, a biopsy will be recommended and can be performed at no charge. Or if both agree that the spot(s) are not concerning for skin cancer, no biopsy will be needed.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Nevisense 3.0
Intervention Description
Nevisense, an AI-based point-of-care system for the non-invasive evaluation of irregular moles remains the only FDA approved system available for melanoma detection in the US. Nevisense 3.0 will be used as a one-time exposure of <8 seconds per lesion. Disposable electrodes that contact the participant are 5mm x 5mm in size. Nevisense 3.0 measures electrical impedance of skin lesions and provides an output called the electrical impedence spectroscopy (EIS) score. Electrical impedance is a measure of a material's overall resistance to the flow of alternating electric currents of various frequencies. The principle is that electrical impedance is different in normal versus abnormal tissue.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Dermlite Cam
Intervention Description
Dermlite Cam is a digital camera that captures images of the skin under cross-polarized and non-polarized light and is 510(k) exempt. The DermLite Cam device appears as a single piece camera with a charging cable and USB computer cable. As part of the camera unit, an extensor arm exists to allow for the capture of standardized clinical images. The DermLite Cam will be used to acquire 3 images of <5 seconds per lesion (one clinical, one polarized dermoscopic, and one non-polarized dermoscopic).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Skin biopsy
Intervention Description
A skin biopsy is a small procedure that removes a sample of skin from the surface of the body. The method utilized will be either a shave or punch technique. The maximum size of a punch biopsy will be 6mm and these wounds are generally closed with no more than 2-3 sutures. A skin biopsy takes <15 minutes including preparation time, administration of intradermal anesthesia using lidocaine 1% with epinephrine 1:100,000, removal of the skin sample, achievement of hemostasis, dressing the wound, and providing instructions for home care. Samples will be placed formalin for routine processing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Agreement Between Telemedicine and In-Person Treatment Recommendation
Description
To determine the agreement between in-person recommendation and the telemedicine (tele) recommendation, the number of discordant benign vs. malignant diagnoses will be calculated; specifically, the number of subjects that were recommended a biopsy from the in-person dermatologist but were recommended no biopsy from the teledermatology team, and the number of subjects that were recommended no biopsy from the in-person dermatologist but biopsy by the teledermatologist team.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sensitivity of Telemedicine Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Description
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who has skin cancer as "positive" using the telemedicine platform.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
Sensitivity of In-Person Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Description
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who has skin cancer as "positive" during in-person evaluations.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
Specificity of Telemedicine Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Description
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who does not have skin cancer as "negative" using the telemedicine platform.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
Specificity of In-Person Evaluation in Diagnosing Skin Cancer
Description
Assessment of the dermatologist's ability to designate an individual who does not have skin cancer as "negative" during in-person evaluations.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
False-Positive Rate of Telemedicine Evaluation
Description
The number of false-positives (i.e., diagnosing a patient with skin cancer when no skin cancer is present) out of the total number of telemedicine evaluations.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
False-Positive Rate of In-Person Evaluation
Description
The number of false-positives (i.e., diagnosing a patient with skin cancer when no skin cancer is present) out of the total number of in-person evaluations.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
False-Negative Rate of Telemedicine Evaluation
Description
The number of false-negatives (i.e., indicating a patient does not have skin cancer when skin cancer is present) out of the total number of telemedicine evaluations.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
False-Negative Rate of In-Person Evaluation
Description
The number of false-negatives (i.e., indicating a patient does not have skin cancer when skin cancer is present) out of the total number of in-person evaluations.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
Positive Predictive Value of Telemedicine Evaluation
Description
The probability that a patient with a positive (abnormal) test result via telemedicine evaluation actually has skin cancer.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
Positive Predictive Value of In-Person Evaluation
Description
The probability that a patient with a positive (abnormal) test result via in-person evaluation actually has skin cancer.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
Negative Predictive Value of Telemedicine Evaluation
Description
The probability that a person with a negative (normal) test result via telemedicine evaluation is truly free of disease.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)
Title
Negative Predictive Value of In-Person Evaluation
Description
The probability that a person with a negative (normal) test result via in-person evaluation is truly free of disease.
Time Frame
End of the study (4 weeks)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
89 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Be 18 years of age or older Have 1-3 lesions for evaluation Exclusion Criteria: Lesions of the hair-bearing scalp, in the mouth, on the lips, genitalia, nails, on/around the eyes, inside the ear
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Polsky, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
NYU Langone Health
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
NYU Langone Health
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
IPD Sharing Time Frame
Beginning 9 months and ending 36 months following article publication or as required by a condition of awards and agreements supporting the research.
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
The investigator who proposed to use the data.Upon reasonable request. Requests should be directed to David.Polsky@nyulangone.org To gain access, data requestors will need to sign a data access agreement.

Learn more about this trial

SpotCheck: Comparison of Enhanced Telemedicine Versus In-person Evaluation for the Diagnosis of Skin Cancer

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs