Stem Cell Injection in Cancer Survivors (SENECA)
Primary Purpose
Cardiomyopathy Due to Anthracyclines
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Allo-MSCs
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cardiomyopathy Due to Anthracyclines focused on measuring Cardiomyopathy, AIC, Anthracyclines, Chemotherapy, Allogeneic, Mesenchymal stem cells, MSCs, Cancer survivors, Breast Cancer, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Sarcoma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
To participate, a subject MUST:
- Be ≥ 18 and < 80 years of age
- Be a cancer survivor with diagnosis of AIC
- Have an LVEF ≤ 45% by cMRI
- Be in NYHA class II-III
- Have received the initial diagnosis of AIC at least six months earlier and be on stable, optimally-tolerated therapy with beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, and/or aldosterone antagonists for 3 months, unless contraindicated
- Have a period of at least two years of clinical cancer-free state* and low likelihood of recurrence (a five-year risk of recurrence estimated at 30% or less), as determined by an oncologist, based on tumor type, response to therapy, and negative metastatic work-up at the time of diagnosis (*exceptions to this are carcinoma in situ or fully resected basal and squamous cell cancer of the skin.)
- Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization
Exclusion Criteria
To participate, a subject MUST NOT HAVE:
- A life expectancy <12 months
- A CT scan or baseline cardiac MRI showing new tumor or suspicious lymphadenopathy raising concern of malignancy
- Presence of obstructive CAD as determined via imaging within 5 years prior to study enrollment provided there have been no symptoms or evidence of CAD since the test
- Had a previous myocardial infarction
- A history of radiation therapy AND evidence of constrictive physiology and/or evidence of other patterns of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy on cardiac MRI (e.g., amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, pure radiation-induced cardiomyopathy, etc.) not consistent with AIC being the dominant etiology of heart failure
- Valvular heart disease including 1) mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve; or 2) severe valvular (any valve) insufficiency/regurgitation within 12 months of consent.
- Aortic stenosis with valve area ≤ 1.5cm2
- A history of LV reduction surgery or cardiomyoplasty
- Evidence of cardiogenic shock
- A history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 90 days of baseline testing
- Liver dysfunction during baseline testing, as evidenced by enzymes (e.g., AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase) greater than 3 times upper limit of normal
- Diabetes with poorly controlled blood glucose levels (HbA1c > 8.5%)
- An underlying autoimmune disorder or current immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., chronic corticosteroid, rheumatologic or immune modulating therapy) or likelihood of use of immunosuppressive therapy during participation in the trial (medications will be considered on a case by case basis)
- A baseline eGFR <35 ml/min/1.73m2
- A contrast allergy that cannot adequately be managed by premedication
- Received gene or cell-based therapy from any source within the previous 12 months
- A hematologic abnormality during baseline testing as evidenced by hemoglobin < 9 g/dl; hematocrit < 30%; absolute neutrophil count < 2,000 or total WBC count more than 2 times upper limit of normal; or platelet values < 100,000/ul
- Evidence of active systemic infection at time of study product delivery
- HIV and/or active HBV or HCV
- Coagulopathy (INR > 1.5) not due to a reversible cause (e.g., warfarin and/or Factor Xa inhibitors) (see Section 6.4 re: injection procedure and anticoagulation therapy) Note: Subjects who cannot be withdrawn from anticoagulation will be excluded.
- Presence of LV thrombus
Presence of a pacemaker and/or ICD generator with any of the following limitations/conditions:
- manufactured before the year 2000
- leads implanted < 6 weeks prior to consent
- non-transvenous epicardial or abandoned leads
- subcutaneous ICDs
- leadless pacemakers
- any other condition that, in the judgment of device-trained staff, would deem an MRI contraindicated
- Pacemaker-dependence with an ICD (Note: pacemaker-dependent candidates without an ICD are not excluded)
- A cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implanted < 3 months prior to consent
- Other MRI contraindications (e.g. patient body habitus incompatible with MRI)
- An appropriate ICD firing or anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia within 30 days of consent
- Ventricular tachycardia ≥ 20 consecutive beats without an ICD within 3 months of consent, or symptomatic Mobitz II or higher degree atrioventricular block without a functioning pacemaker within 3 months of consent
- A history of drug abuse (use of illegal "street" drugs except marijuana, or prescription medications not being used appropriately for a pre-existing medical condition) or alcohol abuse (≥ 5 drinks/day for ˃ 3 months), or documented medical, occupational, or legal problems arising from the use of alcohol or drugs within the past 24 months
- Cognitive or language barriers that prohibit obtaining informed consent or any study elements (interpreter permitted)
- Participation (currently or within the previous 30 days) in a cardiac related investigational therapeutic (including stem cell based therapies) or device trial
- Pregnancy, lactation, plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months, or is unwilling to use acceptable forms of birth control during study participation
- Any other condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator or Sponsor, would be a contraindication to enrollment, study product administration, or follow-up
Sites / Locations
- Stanford University School of Medicine
- University of Florida-Department of Medicine
- University of Miami-Interdiciplinary Stem Cell Institute
- Indiana Center for Vascular Biology and Medicine
- University of Louisville
- Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
- Texas Heart Institute
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Allo-MSCs
Placebo
Arm Description
Target dose of 100 million allo-MSCs
Buminate solution
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Proportion of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Proportion of adjudicated events including death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and/or other exacerbation of heart failure (non-hospitalization).
Proportion of Other Significant Clinical Events
Proportion of other significant adjudicated clinical events including: non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, coronary artery revascularization, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, pericardial tamponade, infectious myocarditis, hypersensitivity reaction, neoplasm, and/or other potential deleterious late effects.
Subjects With Events Precluding Their Receipt of Product
Number and percent of subjects with events between randomization and study product injection (SPI) that preclude the subject from receiving product.
Subjects Who Receive Less Than 20 Injections During SPI
Number and percent of subjects who receive less than 20 injections during SPI
Subjects Who Did Not Receive the Study Product (Either 100 Million Cells or Placebo)
Number and percent of subjects who did not receive the study product (either 100 million cells or placebo)
Subjects Who Have at Least One Cardiac MRI Endpoint Measure That is Uninterpretable
Number and percent of subjects who have at least one cardiac MRI endpoint measure that is uninterpretable due to issues related to the device, including, but not limited to, inability to undergo the procedure.
Subjects Who Fail to Complete Follow-up
Number and percent of subjects who fail to complete follow up
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed via cardiac MRI.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)
Change in global circumferential strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)
Change in regional longitudinal strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)
Change in left ventricular end diastolic volume index as measured via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)
Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index as assessed via cardiac MRI
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index
Change in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index as assessed by cardiac MRI. Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Change From Baseline in Area of Injury
Change in the scar percent (scar mass normalized to left ventricular mass) as assessed via cardiac MRI.
Change From Baseline in Area of Injury-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)
Change in the distance walked (in meters) as measured by the six minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 min). The average distance of the two walk tests will be used for analysis.
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)-Trajectory
Change in the distance walked (in feet) as measured by the six minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 min). The average distance of the two walk tests will be used for analysis. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire Score
Change in the quality of life summary score as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Minimum and maximum scores for scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcome.
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire Score-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Minimum and maximum scores for scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcome.
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Change in N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) as measured via laboratory blood draw
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-Trajectory
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Cumulative Days Alive and Out of Hospital for Heart Failure
Days alive and out of hospital for heart failure during the study evaluation period. Subjects were allotted a visit window extending 30 days past their anticipated 12-month visit (i.e., 395 days).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02509156
First Posted
July 23, 2015
Last Updated
October 13, 2020
Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02509156
Brief Title
Stem Cell Injection in Cancer Survivors
Acronym
SENECA
Official Title
A Phase I, First-in-Human, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Cancer Survivors With Anthracycline-Induced Cardiomyopathy
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 20, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of this study is to examine the safety and feasibility of delivering allogeneic human mesenchymal stem cells (allo-MSCs) by transendocardial injection to cancer survivors with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction secondary to anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC).
The secondary purpose of this study is to obtain preliminary evidence for therapeutic efficacy of allo-MSCs delivered by transendocardial injection to cancer survivors with LV dysfunction secondary to AIC.
Detailed Description
This phase I, randomized, placebo-controlled, trial will evaluate the safety and feasibility of allo-MSCs administered by transendocardial injection in thirty-seven subjects with anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy (AIC). The first six subjects received allo-MSC therapy (open label) and were assessed for safety and feasibility of the study procedures. Following 1 month data review of each of the six subjects by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Gene and Cell Therapy Data Safety Monitoring Board; this was followed by a randomized, double-blind clinical trial enrolling thirty-one subjects. These subjects were randomized 1:1 to receive allo-MSCs or placebo. All subjects underwent cardiac catheterization and study product administration using the NOGA Myostar catheter injection system. Subjects are being followed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 6 months, and 12 months post study product injection. All endpoints are assessed at the 6 and 12 month visits which will occur 180 ±30 days and 365 ±30 days, respectively, after the day of study product injection (Day 0). For the purpose of the safety evaluations and endpoint analysis, the Investigators will utilize an "intention-to-treat" study population. In addition, because this phase I study is the first cell therapy study in this population, at 12 months available standard-of-care medical records for cancer surveillance will be reviewed for cancer recurrence.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cardiomyopathy Due to Anthracyclines
Keywords
Cardiomyopathy, AIC, Anthracyclines, Chemotherapy, Allogeneic, Mesenchymal stem cells, MSCs, Cancer survivors, Breast Cancer, Leukemia, Lymphoma, Sarcoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
46 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Allo-MSCs
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Target dose of 100 million allo-MSCs
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Buminate solution
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Allo-MSCs
Other Intervention Name(s)
Allogeneic Mesenchymal Stem Cells
Intervention Description
20 transendocardial injections of 0.4ml allo-MSCs administered to the left ventricle via NOGA Myostar injection catheter (single procedure)
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Buminate solution
Intervention Description
20 transendocardial injections of 0.4ml Buminate solution administered to the left ventricle via NOGA Myostar injection catheter (single procedure)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Description
Proportion of adjudicated events including death, hospitalization for worsening heart failure, and/or other exacerbation of heart failure (non-hospitalization).
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Proportion of Other Significant Clinical Events
Description
Proportion of other significant adjudicated clinical events including: non-fatal stroke, non-fatal MI, coronary artery revascularization, ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation, pericardial tamponade, infectious myocarditis, hypersensitivity reaction, neoplasm, and/or other potential deleterious late effects.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Subjects With Events Precluding Their Receipt of Product
Description
Number and percent of subjects with events between randomization and study product injection (SPI) that preclude the subject from receiving product.
Time Frame
Randomization to SPI
Title
Subjects Who Receive Less Than 20 Injections During SPI
Description
Number and percent of subjects who receive less than 20 injections during SPI
Time Frame
During SPI procedure
Title
Subjects Who Did Not Receive the Study Product (Either 100 Million Cells or Placebo)
Description
Number and percent of subjects who did not receive the study product (either 100 million cells or placebo)
Time Frame
During SPI procedure
Title
Subjects Who Have at Least One Cardiac MRI Endpoint Measure That is Uninterpretable
Description
Number and percent of subjects who have at least one cardiac MRI endpoint measure that is uninterpretable due to issues related to the device, including, but not limited to, inability to undergo the procedure.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Subjects Who Fail to Complete Follow-up
Description
Number and percent of subjects who fail to complete follow up
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Description
Change in left ventricular ejection fraction as assessed via cardiac MRI.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)
Description
Change in global circumferential strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Global Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)
Description
Change in regional longitudinal strain as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Regional Strain (HARP MRI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)
Description
Change in left ventricular end diastolic volume index as measured via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume Index (LVEDVI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)
Description
Change in left ventricular end systolic volume index as assessed via cardiac MRI
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume Index (LVESVI)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index
Description
Change in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index as assessed by cardiac MRI. Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Left Ventricular Sphericity Index-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Sphericity index is the ratio of the long and short axis measurements of the left ventricle.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Area of Injury
Description
Change in the scar percent (scar mass normalized to left ventricular mass) as assessed via cardiac MRI.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Area of Injury-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)
Description
Change in the distance walked (in meters) as measured by the six minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 min). The average distance of the two walk tests will be used for analysis.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Exercise Tolerance (Six Minute Walk Test)-Trajectory
Description
Change in the distance walked (in feet) as measured by the six minute walk test. Two walk tests were completed at each endpoint visit (separated by 30 min). The average distance of the two walk tests will be used for analysis. The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire Score
Description
Change in the quality of life summary score as measured by the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire. Minimum and maximum scores for scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcome.
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire Score-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Minimum and maximum scores for scale are 0 and 105 respectively. Lower scores indicative of better outcome.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)
Description
Change in N-Terminal pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) as measured via laboratory blood draw
Time Frame
Baseline to 12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in N-Terminal Pro-Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP)-Trajectory
Description
The change in this measure over time is assessed using a repeated measures linear regression model of trajectory (change over time). If there is no interaction between change over time and treatment a single calculated value is the slope (the change per six months) from the model. If there is an interaction, the p-value for interaction is presented along with two calculated values representing the slope (the change per six months) for each treatment arm from the model.
Time Frame
Assessed as a trajectory (baseline, 6 months, and 12 months)
Title
Cumulative Days Alive and Out of Hospital for Heart Failure
Description
Days alive and out of hospital for heart failure during the study evaluation period. Subjects were allotted a visit window extending 30 days past their anticipated 12-month visit (i.e., 395 days).
Time Frame
Baseline to End of 12 Month Visit Window (i.e. 395 days after intervention)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
79 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
To participate, a subject MUST:
Be ≥ 18 and < 80 years of age
Be a cancer survivor with diagnosis of AIC
Have an LVEF ≤ 45% by cMRI
Be in NYHA class II-III
Have received the initial diagnosis of AIC at least six months earlier and be on stable, optimally-tolerated therapy with beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors/ARBs, and/or aldosterone antagonists for 3 months, unless contraindicated
Have a period of at least two years of clinical cancer-free state* and low likelihood of recurrence (a five-year risk of recurrence estimated at 30% or less), as determined by an oncologist, based on tumor type, response to therapy, and negative metastatic work-up at the time of diagnosis (*exceptions to this are carcinoma in situ or fully resected basal and squamous cell cancer of the skin.)
Be a candidate for cardiac catheterization
Exclusion Criteria
To participate, a subject MUST NOT HAVE:
A life expectancy <12 months
A CT scan or baseline cardiac MRI showing new tumor or suspicious lymphadenopathy raising concern of malignancy
Presence of obstructive CAD as determined via imaging within 5 years prior to study enrollment provided there have been no symptoms or evidence of CAD since the test
Had a previous myocardial infarction
A history of radiation therapy AND evidence of constrictive physiology and/or evidence of other patterns of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy on cardiac MRI (e.g., amyloidosis, sarcoidosis, hemochromatosis, pure radiation-induced cardiomyopathy, etc.) not consistent with AIC being the dominant etiology of heart failure
Valvular heart disease including 1) mechanical or bioprosthetic heart valve; or 2) severe valvular (any valve) insufficiency/regurgitation within 12 months of consent.
Aortic stenosis with valve area ≤ 1.5cm2
A history of LV reduction surgery or cardiomyoplasty
Evidence of cardiogenic shock
A history of ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke within 90 days of baseline testing
Liver dysfunction during baseline testing, as evidenced by enzymes (e.g., AST, ALT, alkaline phosphatase) greater than 3 times upper limit of normal
Diabetes with poorly controlled blood glucose levels (HbA1c > 8.5%)
An underlying autoimmune disorder or current immunosuppressive therapy (e.g., chronic corticosteroid, rheumatologic or immune modulating therapy) or likelihood of use of immunosuppressive therapy during participation in the trial (medications will be considered on a case by case basis)
A baseline eGFR <35 ml/min/1.73m2
A contrast allergy that cannot adequately be managed by premedication
Received gene or cell-based therapy from any source within the previous 12 months
A hematologic abnormality during baseline testing as evidenced by hemoglobin < 9 g/dl; hematocrit < 30%; absolute neutrophil count < 2,000 or total WBC count more than 2 times upper limit of normal; or platelet values < 100,000/ul
Evidence of active systemic infection at time of study product delivery
HIV and/or active HBV or HCV
Coagulopathy (INR > 1.5) not due to a reversible cause (e.g., warfarin and/or Factor Xa inhibitors) (see Section 6.4 re: injection procedure and anticoagulation therapy) Note: Subjects who cannot be withdrawn from anticoagulation will be excluded.
Presence of LV thrombus
Presence of a pacemaker and/or ICD generator with any of the following limitations/conditions:
manufactured before the year 2000
leads implanted < 6 weeks prior to consent
non-transvenous epicardial or abandoned leads
subcutaneous ICDs
leadless pacemakers
any other condition that, in the judgment of device-trained staff, would deem an MRI contraindicated
Pacemaker-dependence with an ICD (Note: pacemaker-dependent candidates without an ICD are not excluded)
A cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device implanted < 3 months prior to consent
Other MRI contraindications (e.g. patient body habitus incompatible with MRI)
An appropriate ICD firing or anti-tachycardia pacing (ATP) for ventricular fibrillation or ventricular tachycardia within 30 days of consent
Ventricular tachycardia ≥ 20 consecutive beats without an ICD within 3 months of consent, or symptomatic Mobitz II or higher degree atrioventricular block without a functioning pacemaker within 3 months of consent
A history of drug abuse (use of illegal "street" drugs except marijuana, or prescription medications not being used appropriately for a pre-existing medical condition) or alcohol abuse (≥ 5 drinks/day for ˃ 3 months), or documented medical, occupational, or legal problems arising from the use of alcohol or drugs within the past 24 months
Cognitive or language barriers that prohibit obtaining informed consent or any study elements (interpreter permitted)
Participation (currently or within the previous 30 days) in a cardiac related investigational therapeutic (including stem cell based therapies) or device trial
Pregnancy, lactation, plans to become pregnant in the next 12 months, or is unwilling to use acceptable forms of birth control during study participation
Any other condition that, in the judgment of the Investigator or Sponsor, would be a contraindication to enrollment, study product administration, or follow-up
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Simari, MD
Organizational Affiliation
CCTRN Steering Committee Chair
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Stanford University School of Medicine
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Florida-Department of Medicine
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami-Interdiciplinary Stem Cell Institute
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana Center for Vascular Biology and Medicine
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Louisville
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minneapolis Heart Institute Foundation
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55407
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Heart Institute
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20850099
Citation
Psaltis PJ, Carbone A, Nelson AJ, Lau DH, Jantzen T, Manavis J, Williams K, Itescu S, Sanders P, Gronthos S, Zannettino AC, Worthley SG. Reparative effects of allogeneic mesenchymal precursor cells delivered transendocardially in experimental nonischemic cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2010 Sep;3(9):974-83. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2010.05.016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19121814
Citation
Nazarian S, Halperin HR. How to perform magnetic resonance imaging on patients with implantable cardiac arrhythmia devices. Heart Rhythm. 2009 Jan;6(1):138-43. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2008.10.021. Epub 2008 Oct 22. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29910056
Citation
Bolli R, Hare JM, Henry TD, Lenneman CG, March KL, Miller K, Pepine CJ, Perin EC, Traverse JH, Willerson JT, Yang PC, Gee AP, Lima JA, Moye L, Vojvodic RW, Sayre SL, Bettencourt J, Cohen M, Ebert RF, Simari RD; Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network (CCTRN). Rationale and Design of the SENECA (StEm cell iNjECtion in cAncer survivors) Trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Jul;201:54-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.02.009. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
Results Reference
background
Links:
URL
http://www.cctrn.org
Description
Cardiovascular Cell Therapy Research Network
URL
http://www.nhlbi.nih.gov
Description
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute
Learn more about this trial
Stem Cell Injection in Cancer Survivors
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs