Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access (SFERA)
Primary Purpose
Ischemic Stroke, Acute
Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
thrombectomy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Ischemic Stroke, Acute focused on measuring Radial access, Femoral access, Thrombectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with high suspicion of ischemic stroke due to large cerebral vessel occlusion defined by NIHSS> 10.
- Immediate availability of the entire team responsible for endovascular treatment (Neurologist, Neurointerventional physician, Anesthetist, Nursing, Technicians ...)
- Radial artery diameter ≥2.5 mm
- Presence of femoral pulse or patency by ultrasonography in its defect.
- Previous functional independence (mRS 0-2).
Exclusion Criteria:
- Life expectancy of less than 6 months.
- Intracranial hemorrhage
- Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric pathology that may confuse future evaluations.
- No availability for follow-up after 90 days.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de BarcelonaRecruiting
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'HebronRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Radial access
Femoral access
Arm Description
The ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the radial artery (as first option)
The ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the femoral artery (as first option)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
No inferiority of radial access in the recanalization rate
To demonstrate the non-inferiority of radial access with respect to femoral access in the recanalization rate (% mTICI 2b-3 in 3 or fewer passes) obtained in patients with large vessel occlusion treated by mechanical thrombectomy.
Secondary Outcome Measures
No differences in complications in vascular access
Comparison in frequency of access vessel occlusion, bleeding or presence of pseudoaneurysm
Grades of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction
Grade of recanalization after first pass, third pass and at the end of the procedure
Change of artery access
Rate of need to change from radial to femoral access and from femoral to radial access
Patient Reported Outcomes
PROMS Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Patient experience
PREMS Patient Reported Experience Measures
Degree of disability/dependence after a stroke
modified rankin scale (from 0 to 6, being 0 best and 6 worst)
Times during hospitalization
Beginning of sitting, ambulation, rehabilitation and total time of hospital admission, need for urinary catheter
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT05225636
First Posted
August 27, 2021
Last Updated
February 3, 2022
Sponsor
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT05225636
Brief Title
Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access
Acronym
SFERA
Official Title
Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
September 15, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 15, 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 28, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
In patients with suspected acute stroke due to large vessel occlusion with indication for endovascular treatment, radial access is just as safe, fast, and effective as femoral access, and it improves the entire stroke treatment process.
Detailed Description
Investigators will compare the procedure times, angiographic results as well as the clinical evolution and the patient's experience during their hospital stay and after discharge, depending on the arterial access practiced for mechanical thrombectomy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Ischemic Stroke, Acute
Keywords
Radial access, Femoral access, Thrombectomy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized, prospective clinical trial, under conditions of routine, open-label clinical practice, with the main objective evaluated by an independent investigator who was not blinded to the treatment received. The study will be single-center.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Radial access
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the radial artery (as first option)
Arm Title
Femoral access
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The ischemic stroke treatment will be performed through the femoral artery (as first option)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
thrombectomy
Intervention Description
Extraction of intracranial thrombus in an acute large vessel occlusion
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
No inferiority of radial access in the recanalization rate
Description
To demonstrate the non-inferiority of radial access with respect to femoral access in the recanalization rate (% mTICI 2b-3 in 3 or fewer passes) obtained in patients with large vessel occlusion treated by mechanical thrombectomy.
Time Frame
Immediate after treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
No differences in complications in vascular access
Description
Comparison in frequency of access vessel occlusion, bleeding or presence of pseudoaneurysm
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Grades of modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction
Description
Grade of recanalization after first pass, third pass and at the end of the procedure
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Change of artery access
Description
Rate of need to change from radial to femoral access and from femoral to radial access
Time Frame
24 hours
Title
Patient Reported Outcomes
Description
PROMS Patient Reported Outcomes Measures
Time Frame
5 days
Title
Patient experience
Description
PREMS Patient Reported Experience Measures
Time Frame
5 days
Title
Degree of disability/dependence after a stroke
Description
modified rankin scale (from 0 to 6, being 0 best and 6 worst)
Time Frame
24 hours and at 90 days
Title
Times during hospitalization
Description
Beginning of sitting, ambulation, rehabilitation and total time of hospital admission, need for urinary catheter
Time Frame
At 24 hours and during first 5 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with high suspicion of ischemic stroke due to large cerebral vessel occlusion defined by NIHSS> 10.
Immediate availability of the entire team responsible for endovascular treatment (Neurologist, Neurointerventional physician, Anesthetist, Nursing, Technicians ...)
Radial artery diameter ≥2.5 mm
Presence of femoral pulse or patency by ultrasonography in its defect.
Previous functional independence (mRS 0-2).
Exclusion Criteria:
Life expectancy of less than 6 months.
Intracranial hemorrhage
Patients with pre-existing neurological or psychiatric pathology that may confuse future evaluations.
No availability for follow-up after 90 days.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
DAVID HERNANDEZ, MD
Phone
+34934893000
Ext
6441
Email
dhm050780@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
DAVID HERNANDEZ, MD
Phone
+34636965667
Email
david.hernandez.idi@gencat.cat
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
ALEJANDRO TOMASELLO, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron. Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alejandro Tomasello, MD
Phone
934893000
Ext
6441
Email
alejandrotomasello@gmail.com
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08035
Country
Spain
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alejandro Tomasello, MD
Phone
93489300
Ext
6441
Email
alejandrotomasello@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Hernandez, MD
Phone
93489300
Ext
6748
Email
dhm050780@gmail.com
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
After finishing the study we will share all the data if a collaboration is proposed
IPD Sharing Time Frame
After publishing our paper
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
We will share the data for collaborate with other institutions.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26898852
Citation
Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Davalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, Donnan GA, Roos YB, Bonafe A, Jahan R, Diener HC, van den Berg LA, Levy EI, Berkhemer OA, Pereira VM, Rempel J, Millan M, Davis SM, Roy D, Thornton J, Roman LS, Ribo M, Beumer D, Stouch B, Brown S, Campbell BC, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Saver JL, Hill MD, Jovin TG; HERMES collaborators. Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016 Apr 23;387(10029):1723-31. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(16)00163-X. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27673305
Citation
Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, Campbell BC, Nogueira RG, Demchuk AM, Tomasello A, Cardona P, Devlin TG, Frei DF, du Mesnil de Rochemont R, Berkhemer OA, Jovin TG, Siddiqui AH, van Zwam WH, Davis SM, Castano C, Sapkota BL, Fransen PS, Molina C, van Oostenbrugge RJ, Chamorro A, Lingsma H, Silver FL, Donnan GA, Shuaib A, Brown S, Stouch B, Mitchell PJ, Davalos A, Roos YB, Hill MD; HERMES Collaborators. Time to Treatment With Endovascular Thrombectomy and Outcomes From Ischemic Stroke: A Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1279-88. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23671178
Citation
Mazighi M, Chaudhry SA, Ribo M, Khatri P, Skoloudik D, Mokin M, Labreuche J, Meseguer E, Yeatts SD, Siddiqui AH, Broderick J, Molina CA, Qureshi AI, Amarenco P. Impact of onset-to-reperfusion time on stroke mortality: a collaborative pooled analysis. Circulation. 2013 May 14;127(19):1980-5. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.112.000311.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19081409
Citation
Jolly SS, Amlani S, Hamon M, Yusuf S, Mehta SR. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography or intervention and the impact on major bleeding and ischemic events: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials. Am Heart J. 2009 Jan;157(1):132-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2008.08.023. Epub 2008 Nov 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25791214
Citation
Valgimigli M, Gagnor A, Calabro P, Frigoli E, Leonardi S, Zaro T, Rubartelli P, Briguori C, Ando G, Repetto A, Limbruno U, Cortese B, Sganzerla P, Lupi A, Galli M, Colangelo S, Ierna S, Ausiello A, Presbitero P, Sardella G, Varbella F, Esposito G, Santarelli A, Tresoldi S, Nazzaro M, Zingarelli A, de Cesare N, Rigattieri S, Tosi P, Palmieri C, Brugaletta S, Rao SV, Heg D, Rothenbuhler M, Vranckx P, Juni P; MATRIX Investigators. Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes undergoing invasive management: a randomised multicentre trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 20;385(9986):2465-76. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60292-6. Epub 2015 Mar 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18332059
Citation
Chase AJ, Fretz EB, Warburton WP, Klinke WP, Carere RG, Pi D, Berry B, Hilton JD. Association of the arterial access site at angioplasty with transfusion and mortality: the M.O.R.T.A.L study (Mortality benefit Of Reduced Transfusion after percutaneous coronary intervention via the Arm or Leg). Heart. 2008 Aug;94(8):1019-25. doi: 10.1136/hrt.2007.136390. Epub 2008 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22520530
Citation
Bertrand OF, Belisle P, Joyal D, Costerousse O, Rao SV, Jolly SS, Meerkin D, Joseph L. Comparison of transradial and femoral approaches for percutaneous coronary interventions: a systematic review and hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis. Am Heart J. 2012 Apr;163(4):632-48. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2012.01.015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
29665617
Citation
Kolkailah AA, Alreshq RS, Muhammed AM, Zahran ME, Anas El-Wegoud M, Nabhan AF. Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD012318. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012318.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33194486
Citation
Ghani MR, Busa V, Dardeir A, Marudhai S, Patel M, Abdelmoneim YM, Jan A, Eskander N. Mechanical Thrombectomy in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison of Transradial Versus Transfemoral Cerebral Angiography. Cureus. 2020 Oct 12;12(10):e10919. doi: 10.7759/cureus.10919.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33199413
Citation
Phillips TJ, Crockett MT, Selkirk GD, Kabra R, Chiu AHY, Singh T, Phatouros C, McAuliffe W. Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: analysis of 375 consecutive cases. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021 Jun;6(2):207-213. doi: 10.1136/svn-2020-000624. Epub 2020 Nov 16.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30670623
Citation
Chen SH, Snelling BM, Sur S, Shah SS, McCarthy DJ, Luther E, Yavagal DR, Peterson EC, Starke RM. Transradial versus transfemoral access for anterior circulation mechanical thrombectomy: comparison of technical and clinical outcomes. J Neurointerv Surg. 2019 Sep;11(9):874-878. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014485. Epub 2019 Jan 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32411415
Citation
Khanna O, Mouchtouris N, Sweid A, Chalouhi N, Ghosh R, Al Saiegh F, Gooch MR, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser RH, Romo V, Jabbour P. Transradial approach for acute stroke intervention: technical procedure and clinical outcomes. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2019 Nov 27;5(1):103-106. doi: 10.1136/svn-2019-000263. eCollection 2020.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32336634
Citation
Crockett MT, Selkirk GD, Chiu AHY, Singh TP, McAuliffe W, Phillips TJ. First line transradial access for posterior circulation stroke intervention; initial 12-month experience at a high volume thrombectomy center. J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Aug;78:194-197. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.069. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31308872
Citation
Maud A, Khatri R, Chaudhry MRA, Vellipuram A, Cruz-Flores S, Rodriguez GJ. Transradial Access Results in Faster Skin Puncture to Reperfusion Time than Transfemoral Access in Posterior Circulation Mechanical Thrombectomy. J Vasc Interv Neurol. 2019 May;10(3):53-57.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31311466
Citation
Khanna O, Sweid A, Mouchtouris N, Shivashankar K, Xu V, Velagapudi L, Stricsek G, Amllay A, Texakalidis P, Gooch MR, Tjoumakaris S, Rosenwasser RH, Jabbour PM. Radial Artery Catheterization for Neuroendovascular Procedures. Stroke. 2019 Sep;50(9):2587-2590. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.025811. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15914085
Citation
Amoroso G, Sarti M, Bellucci R, Puma FL, D'Alessandro S, Limbruno U, Canova A, Petronio AS. Clinical and procedural predictors of nurse workload during and after invasive coronary procedures: the potential benefit of a systematic radial access. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2005 Sep;4(3):234-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcnurse.2005.03.005.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Stroke Process in FEmoral Versus Radial Access
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs