search
Back to results

Study Comparing Outcomes Between Conventional IVF and a "Freeze-all"-Strategy in Assisted Reproductive Technology

Primary Purpose

Infertility

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Denmark
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Freeze all
Sponsored by
Anja Bisgaard Pinborg
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Infertility focused on measuring Assisted reproduction, In vitro fertilisation, Frozen embryo transfer (FET)

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 39 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • AMH (Anti-Müllerian hormone) > 6.28 pmol/L (Roche Elecsys assay)
  • Female age 18 years to less than 40 years
  • 1, 2 or 3 IVF/ICSI cycle with oocyte aspiration
  • Regular menstrual cycle between 24 and 35 days
  • BMI between 18 and 35
  • Two ovaries
  • Can and will sign informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Women who do not fulfil the inclusion criteria
  • Endometriosis stage III to IV
  • Ovarian cysts with diameter > 30 mm at day of start of stimulation
  • Submucosal fibroids
  • Women with severe co-morbidity (IDDM, NIDDM, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, liver or kidney disease)
  • Dysregulation of thyroid disease
  • Not danish or English speaking women
  • Contraindications or allergies to use of Gonadotrophins or GnRH antagonists
  • TESA (testicular sperm aspiration)
  • OD (oocyte donation)
  • Previous inclusion in the study

Sites / Locations

  • RigshospitaletRecruiting
  • University Hospital HvidovreRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Freeze all

Fresh embryo transfer

Arm Description

Transfer of a frozen, thawed blastocyst in a subsequent natural menstrual cycle

Standard procedure

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ongoing pregnancy rates
Outcome measured per transfer of the first blastocyst, per oocyte pick-up, per start of ovarian stimulation and per randomized patient.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Live birth rates
Outcome measured after the first blastocyst transfer calculated per randomized patient, per started ovarian stimulation, per oocyte pick-up and per transfer
Cumulative live birth rates
Measured after one stimulated cycle with oocyte retrieval and after use of all frozen blastocysts or after at least 1 year of follow-up
Number of cycles with no embryo transfer
Time-to-pregnancy
From start of ovarian stimulation to positive hCG
Time-to-delivery
Preterm birth
Low birth weight
Small-for-gestational age (SGA)
Large-for-gestational age (LGA)
Perinatal mortality
Preeclampsia
Placental rupture
Positive hCG 11 days post embryo transfer
Miscarriages, biochemical pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies
Quality of life for female and partner
Cost-effectiveness

Full Information

First Posted
April 18, 2016
Last Updated
April 1, 2019
Sponsor
Anja Bisgaard Pinborg
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Holbaek Sygehus, Skane University Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, Regional Hospital Skive, Dexeus University Hospital Barcelona
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02746562
Brief Title
Study Comparing Outcomes Between Conventional IVF and a "Freeze-all"-Strategy in Assisted Reproductive Technology
Official Title
A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial of a "Freeze All and Transfer Later" Versus a Conventional "Fresh Embryo Transfer" Strategy for Assisted Reproductive Technology (ART) in Women With a Regular Menstrual Cycle
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
May 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Anja Bisgaard Pinborg
Collaborators
Rigshospitalet, Denmark, Herlev Hospital, Holbaek Sygehus, Skane University Hospital, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Sweden, Regional Hospital Skive, Dexeus University Hospital Barcelona

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare conventional fresh embryo transfer with a "freeze all and transfer later strategy" in assisted reproductive technology in terms of ongoing pregnancy rates, live birth rates as well as perinatal outcomes.
Detailed Description
The study is a multicentre randomized controlled double-blinded trial with the purpose to investigate if pregnancy- and live birth rates can be improved by a "freeze all and transfer later"-strategy with transfer of the best quality, frozen, thawed embryo in a subsequent natural cycle compared with conventional fresh embryo transfer with transfer of the embryo in the stimulated cycle. In total 5 clinics in Denmark and Sweden will be participating in the recruitment of patients for the study. The patients will be screened and randomized computerized on cycle day 2 or 3 and allocated to one of the two study arms: I: hCG (human chorion gonadotrophin) arm with traditional hCG triggering and fresh blastocyst transfer II: GnRH (gonadotropin-releasing hormone)- agonist triggering arm with blastocyst cryopreservation and subsequent transfer in a subsequent natural cycle. The randomization will be done after the decision of gonadotrophin (rFSH/hMG) starting dose, and both doctor and patient will be blinded to the randomization until the day of hCG/agonist trigger. Both groups will be stimulated in a short GnRH antagonist protocol. The ovarian stimulation The gonadotrophin stimulation is performed according to the general standards in each of the clinics and can be altered according to the ovarian response with a maximum of 300 IU. Blood samples are collected at baseline before the first gonadotrophin injection and at day of hCG injection and further blood samples in the luteal phase will be collected for a small subgroup of patients. All blood samples will be kept at the Biobank for the study at Hvidovre Hospital. Women in both arms will furthermore be requested to fill out a physical discomfort and a quality of life questionnaire at two different visits. Additionally the men will be asked to fill out quality of life questionnaires. Comprehensive sonography will be performed at the start of ovulation with details on each ovary. Ultrasound examination is performed on cycle day 2-3, at stimulation day 6 and thereafter every 2-3 days until ovulation is inducted. On the day of oocyte retrieval the randomization is unblinded. The oocytes are fertilized by either IVF or ICSI and cultured individually according to the normal procedures in the clinics. If the patient is allocated to the "Fresh embryo transfer"-group the best quality blastocyst will be transferred on day five after oocyte pick-up, if a blastocyst is developed. Surplus good quality blastocysts are vitrified on day five or six. For patients in the "Freeze all" group all embryos of good quality are vitrified at the blastocyst stage day 5 in the stimulated cycle according to the criteria for freezing blastocysts in each clinic. The highest quality embryo is selected and marked and will be the first one to be thawed after at least one mentrual cycle that is considered as a wash out period. Embryo transfer is performed 6-7 days after hCG injection in the blastocyst transfer cycle in this group. A serum beta-hCG test is performed 11 days after blastocyst transfer, and clinical pregnancy is confirmed by transvaginal ultrasound 3 to 4 weeks after a positive serum-hCG test. A follow-up of all pregnancies will be performed within three months after delivery or termination of pregnancy on predefined information sheets. All pregnancies resulting from blastocysts retrieved and thawed according to this study protocol will be followed from study inclusion and one year onwards. All data will be collected in a single database and all participants will be anonymized by way of an identificationcode. The biobank will be closed and all samples destroyed after 5 years of the conclusion of the study at the latest. The study is a superiority study with 424 (212 in each arm) patients required to have an 80 % chance of detecting, as significant at the 5 % level, a decrease in the primary outcome measure from 30 % in the control group to 43 % in the experimental group.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Infertility
Keywords
Assisted reproduction, In vitro fertilisation, Frozen embryo transfer (FET)

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
424 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Freeze all
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Transfer of a frozen, thawed blastocyst in a subsequent natural menstrual cycle
Arm Title
Fresh embryo transfer
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard procedure
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Freeze all
Intervention Description
Freezing of all blastocyst stage embryos with thawing and transfer in a subsequent natural cycle
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ongoing pregnancy rates
Description
Outcome measured per transfer of the first blastocyst, per oocyte pick-up, per start of ovarian stimulation and per randomized patient.
Time Frame
Two years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Live birth rates
Description
Outcome measured after the first blastocyst transfer calculated per randomized patient, per started ovarian stimulation, per oocyte pick-up and per transfer
Time Frame
Two years
Title
Cumulative live birth rates
Description
Measured after one stimulated cycle with oocyte retrieval and after use of all frozen blastocysts or after at least 1 year of follow-up
Time Frame
Two years
Title
Number of cycles with no embryo transfer
Time Frame
Two years
Title
Time-to-pregnancy
Description
From start of ovarian stimulation to positive hCG
Time Frame
Two years
Title
Time-to-delivery
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Preterm birth
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Low birth weight
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Small-for-gestational age (SGA)
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Large-for-gestational age (LGA)
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Perinatal mortality
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Preeclampsia
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Placental rupture
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Positive hCG 11 days post embryo transfer
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Miscarriages, biochemical pregnancies, ectopic pregnancies
Time Frame
Three years
Title
Quality of life for female and partner
Time Frame
Two years
Title
Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame
Three years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
39 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: AMH (Anti-Müllerian hormone) > 6.28 pmol/L (Roche Elecsys assay) Female age 18 years to less than 40 years 1, 2 or 3 IVF/ICSI cycle with oocyte aspiration Regular menstrual cycle between 24 and 35 days BMI between 18 and 35 Two ovaries Can and will sign informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Women who do not fulfil the inclusion criteria Endometriosis stage III to IV Ovarian cysts with diameter > 30 mm at day of start of stimulation Submucosal fibroids Women with severe co-morbidity (IDDM, NIDDM, gastrointestinal, cardiovascular, pulmonary, liver or kidney disease) Dysregulation of thyroid disease Not danish or English speaking women Contraindications or allergies to use of Gonadotrophins or GnRH antagonists TESA (testicular sperm aspiration) OD (oocyte donation) Previous inclusion in the study
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Sacha Stormlund, MD
Email
sacha.stormlund.01@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anja Bisgaard Pinborg, MD, DMSc
Email
anja.bisgaard.pinborg@regionh.dk
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anja Bisgaard Pinborg, MD, DMSc
Organizational Affiliation
Fertility Clinic, Obstetrical and Gynecological department, Hvidovre Hospital
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rigshospitalet
City
Copenhagen
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sacha Stormlund, MD
Email
sacha.stormlund.01@regionh.dk
Facility Name
University Hospital Hvidovre
City
Hvidovre
Country
Denmark
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sacha Stormlund, MD
Email
sacha.stormlund.01@regionh.dk
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anja Pinborg, MD, DMSc
Email
anja.bisgaard.pinborg@regionh.dk

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33847977
Citation
Alexopoulou E, Stormlund S, Lossl K, Praetorius L, Sopa N, Bogstad JW, Mikkelsen AL, Forman J, la Cour Freiesleben N, Vikkelso Jeppesen J, Bergh C, Al Humaidan PSH, Grondahl ML, Zedeler A, Pinborg AB. Embryo Morphokinetics and Blastocyst Development After GnRH Agonist versus hCG Triggering in Normo-ovulatory Women: a Secondary Analysis of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. Reprod Sci. 2021 Oct;28(10):2972-2981. doi: 10.1007/s43032-021-00564-9. Epub 2021 Apr 13.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33539543
Citation
Zaat T, Zagers M, Mol F, Goddijn M, van Wely M, Mastenbroek S. Fresh versus frozen embryo transfers in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Feb 4;2(2):CD011184. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011184.pub3.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32759285
Citation
Stormlund S, Sopa N, Zedeler A, Bogstad J, Praetorius L, Nielsen HS, Kitlinski ML, Skouby SO, Mikkelsen AL, Spangmose AL, Jeppesen JV, Khatibi A, la Cour Freiesleben N, Ziebe S, Polyzos NP, Bergh C, Humaidan P, Andersen AN, Lossl K, Pinborg A. Freeze-all versus fresh blastocyst transfer strategy during in vitro fertilisation in women with regular menstrual cycles: multicentre randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2020 Aug 5;370:m2519. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2519.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28760794
Citation
Stormlund S, Lossl K, Zedeler A, Bogstad J, Praetorius L, Nielsen HS, Bungum M, Skouby SO, Mikkelsen AL, Andersen AN, Bergh C, Humaidan P, Pinborg A. Comparison of a 'freeze-all' strategy including GnRH agonist trigger versus a 'fresh transfer' strategy including hCG trigger in assisted reproductive technology (ART): a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2017 Jul 31;7(7):e016106. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016106.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study Comparing Outcomes Between Conventional IVF and a "Freeze-all"-Strategy in Assisted Reproductive Technology

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs