Study Comparing The Effect On Disease Activity When Reducing Or Discontinuing Etanercept In Subjects With RA (DOSERA)
Primary Purpose
Rheumatoid Arthritis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Etanercept
Etanercept
Placebo
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
- Subject has a current DAS28 equal to or less than 3.2.
- Subject is currently receiving treatment with etanercept, either 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly, for a minimum of 14 months at baseline
- Subject is currently receiving oral, sc or intramuscular methotrexate once weekly, 7.5 mg/week to 25 mg/week and at a stable dose for a minimum of 4 months at baseline.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has earlier had an attempt of discontinuing etanercept for reasons of remission or low disease activity state.
- Subject has received any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, other than methotrexate, within one month before baseline.
- Subject has had a dose of prednisone (or equivalent) >7.5 mg/day or has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous corticosteroid within one month of baseline.
Sites / Locations
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
- Pfizer Investigational Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
1
2
3
Arm Description
50mg once weekly + methotrexate
25mg once weekly + methotrexate
once weekly + methotrexate
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participant Who Were Non-Failures
A participant was considered as non-failure if the calculated DAS28 <=3.2 at all visits or if the calculated DAS28 >3.2, the increase of calculated DAS28 from randomization (Week 0): was <0.6 at all visit or was >=0.6 but <1.2 on no more than 1 consecutive visit. Percentage of participants who were non-failures calculated based on DAS28 and disease progression as determined by investigator or participant.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
TTF (in weeks): (date of failure minus date of randomization) divided by 7. Date of failure was ordinary visit date or extra visit date in case of failure (extra visit was within 2 weeks from the date a participant experienced significant disease progression between visits and wanted to withdraw from Period 2), or date of withdrawal due to disease progression. Participants who did not have a treatment failure were censored at their last evaluation visit. Participants who withdrew from the study prematurely and did not have a treatment failure were censored on the date of their withdrawal.
Percentage of Participants With Remission or Low Disease Activity (LDA)
Participants who had DAS28 less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state.
Percentage of Visits During Which Participants Were in Remission or Low Disease Activity State
Participants who had DAS28 <=3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state. Percentage of visits during which a participant was in remission or LDA state was calculated as number of visits in which participant was in remission or LDA divided by total number of visits multiplied by 100.
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Randomization
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and less than (<) 2.6=remission.
Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
DAS28 calculated from SJC and PJC using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6=remission.
Change From Randomization in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.
Change From Randomization in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.
Change From Randomization in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
PGA of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.
Change From Randomization in Participant Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Participants assessed the overall activity of their rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.
Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.
Change From Randomization in Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.
Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.
Change From Randomization in Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.
Change From Randomization in Morning Stiffness Duration at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Duration of morning stiffness: Time elapsed when participant woke up in morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. The duration of morning stiffness was determined by asking the following questions: 1) Over the last 2 days, when did you wake in the morning? 2) Over the last 2 days, when were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Increase in stiffness duration from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Change From Randomization in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter per hour (mm/hour). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Change From Randomization in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is <10 milligram per liter (mg/L). A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Change From Randomization in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48
mTSS = sum of erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). Change: scores at observation minus score at randomization. An increase in mTSS from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings at Randomization
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema(O-score), bone erosions (E-score) as per outcome measures in RA clinical trials (OMERACT). S-score:0(normal)-3(severe) for distal radioulnar,radiocarpal,intercarpal-carpometacarpal,second-fifth metacarpophalangeal joints, total score(TS)0-21, higher score(HS)=severe synovitis. O-score:0(no volume increment)-3(100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-69, HS=more edema. E-score:0(no volume occupied by erosion)-10(100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-230, HS=more erosion.
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (S-Score) at Week 12
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. S-score: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) for each of distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, intercarpal-carpometacarpal, second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints; total score 0 to 21, higher score=severe synovitis.
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (O-Score, E-Score) at Week 12
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. O-score: 0 (no volume increment) to 3 (100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 69, higher scores=more edema. E-score: 0 (no volume occupied by erosion) to 10 (100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 230, higher scores=more erosion.
Percentage of Participants in Treatment Failure for Each Potentially Predictor Variable at Randomization
Percentage of participants who were treatment failure over 48 weeks as per potentially predictor variables (at randomization) are reported: number of swollen joints/tender joints, DAS28, PGA, PtGA, participant general health VAS, participant pain VAS, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), ESR (mm/hour), plasma CRP (mg/L), sensitive serum CRP (mg/L), anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti CCP, units/mL), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP, units/liter), S-score, O-score, E-score, Joint space narrowing score, erosion score, and mTSS.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00858780
Brief Title
Study Comparing The Effect On Disease Activity When Reducing Or Discontinuing Etanercept In Subjects With RA
Acronym
DOSERA
Official Title
Dose Reduction or Discontinuation of Etanercept in Methotrexate-Treated Rheumatoid Arthritis Subjects Who Have Achieved a Stable Low Disease Activity-state (DOSERA)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study involves Rheumatoid Arthritis patients in regular clinical setting who are already on etanercept treatment and are in remission or in a low disease activity (LDA) state, and is intended to identify parameters that can serve as guidance in clinical settings. This study will consider the clinical and radiographic course in subjects when etanercept treatment is tapered or discontinued, and analyze the subjects' experience of disease worsening and the predictive values of clinical parameters, serum biomarkers and imaging on the clinical and radiographic course in different treatment groups. The effect of re-treatment with etanercept at treatment failure will also be studied.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
91 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
50mg once weekly + methotrexate
Arm Title
2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
25mg once weekly + methotrexate
Arm Title
3
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
once weekly + methotrexate
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Etanercept
Intervention Description
50 mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Etanercept
Intervention Description
25mg etanercept once weekly + methotrexate
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo comparator once weekly + methotrexate
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participant Who Were Non-Failures
Description
A participant was considered as non-failure if the calculated DAS28 <=3.2 at all visits or if the calculated DAS28 >3.2, the increase of calculated DAS28 from randomization (Week 0): was <0.6 at all visit or was >=0.6 but <1.2 on no more than 1 consecutive visit. Percentage of participants who were non-failures calculated based on DAS28 and disease progression as determined by investigator or participant.
Time Frame
Week 48
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Treatment Failure (TTF)
Description
TTF (in weeks): (date of failure minus date of randomization) divided by 7. Date of failure was ordinary visit date or extra visit date in case of failure (extra visit was within 2 weeks from the date a participant experienced significant disease progression between visits and wanted to withdraw from Period 2), or date of withdrawal due to disease progression. Participants who did not have a treatment failure were censored at their last evaluation visit. Participants who withdrew from the study prematurely and did not have a treatment failure were censored on the date of their withdrawal.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0) up to date of failure, withdrawal due to disease progression or last evaluation visit (Week 48)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Remission or Low Disease Activity (LDA)
Description
Participants who had DAS28 less than or equal to (<=) 3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state.
Time Frame
Baseline (Week -8), Week -4, Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Percentage of Visits During Which Participants Were in Remission or Low Disease Activity State
Description
Participants who had DAS28 <=3.2 were considered in remission or LDA state. Percentage of visits during which a participant was in remission or LDA state was calculated as number of visits in which participant was in remission or LDA divided by total number of visits multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48
Title
Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Randomization
Description
DAS28 calculated from the number of swollen joints (SJC) and painful joints (PJC) using the 28 joints count, the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) (millimeters per hour [mm/hour]) and patient's global assessment (PtGA) of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 implied low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and less than (<) 2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0)
Title
Change From Randomization in Disease Activity Score Based on 28-Joint Count (DAS28) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
DAS28 calculated from SJC and PJC using the 28 joints count, the ESR (mm/hour) and PtGA of disease activity (participant rated arthritis activity assessment with transformed scores ranging 0 to 10; higher scores indicated greater affectation due to disease activity). DAS28 <=3.2 = low disease activity, DAS28 >3.2 to 5.1 = moderate to high disease activity and <2.6=remission.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in Tender Joints Count (TJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
Number of tender joints was determined by examining 28 joints and identified the joints that were painful under pressure or to passive motion. The number of tender joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no tenderness = 0, tenderness = 1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in Swollen Joints Count (SJC) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
Number of swollen joints was determined by examination of 28 joints and identifying when swelling was present. The number of swollen joints was recorded on the joint assessment form at each visit, no swelling = 0, swelling =1. A negative value in change from randomization indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in Physician Global Assessment (PGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
PGA of disease activity was measured on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in Participant Global Assessment (PtGA) of Disease Activity at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
Participants assessed the overall activity of their rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = no disease activity and 100 mm = extreme disease activity.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Description
Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0)
Title
Change From Randomization in Participant General Health Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
Participants answered "in general how would you rate your health over the last 2-3 weeks?" Participants responded by using a 0 to 100 mm VAS, where 0 mm = very well and 100 mm = extremely bad.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Randomization
Description
Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0)
Title
Change From Randomization in Participant Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
Participants indicated the amount of pain experience during the last 2-3 days by marking a vertical line on 100 mm VAS. Intensity of pain range: 0 = no pain to 100 = pain as bad as it could be.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in Morning Stiffness Duration at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
Duration of morning stiffness: Time elapsed when participant woke up in morning and was able to resume normal activities without stiffness in minutes. The duration of morning stiffness was determined by asking the following questions: 1) Over the last 2 days, when did you wake in the morning? 2) Over the last 2 days, when were you able to resume your normal activities without stiffness? Increase in stiffness duration from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
ESR is a laboratory test that provides a non-specific measure of inflammation. The test assesses the rate at which red blood cells fall in a test tube. Normal range is 0-30 millimeter per hour (mm/hour). A higher rate is consistent with inflammation.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) Level at Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, and 48
Description
The test for CRP is a laboratory measurement for evaluation of an acute phase reactant of inflammation through the use of an ultrasensitive assay. Normal range of CRP is <10 milligram per liter (mg/L). A decrease in the level of CRP indicates reduction in inflammation and therefore improvement.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 6, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36, 42, 48
Title
Change From Randomization in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Week 48
Description
mTSS = sum of erosion and Joint Space Narrowing (JSN) scores for 44 joints (16 per hand and 6 per foot). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 448 (worst possible total score). Change: scores at observation minus score at randomization. An increase in mTSS from randomization represented disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represented halting of disease progression, and a decrease represented improvement.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 48
Title
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings at Randomization
Description
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema(O-score), bone erosions (E-score) as per outcome measures in RA clinical trials (OMERACT). S-score:0(normal)-3(severe) for distal radioulnar,radiocarpal,intercarpal-carpometacarpal,second-fifth metacarpophalangeal joints, total score(TS)0-21, higher score(HS)=severe synovitis. O-score:0(no volume increment)-3(100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-69, HS=more edema. E-score:0(no volume occupied by erosion)-10(100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints, TS 0-230, HS=more erosion.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0)
Title
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (S-Score) at Week 12
Description
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. S-score: 0 (normal) to 3 (severe) for each of distal radioulnar, radiocarpal, intercarpal-carpometacarpal, second to fifth metacarpophalangeal joints; total score 0 to 21, higher score=severe synovitis.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 12
Title
Change From Randomization in Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Findings (O-Score, E-Score) at Week 12
Description
MRI of hand/wrist of dominant hand was scored for signs of synovitis (S-score), bone edema (O-score), and bone erosions (E-score) as per OMERACT. O-score: 0 (no volume increment) to 3 (100% volume increment) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 69, higher scores=more edema. E-score: 0 (no volume occupied by erosion) to 10 (100% volume occupied by erosion) in 23 hand/wrist joints; total score 0 to 230, higher scores=more erosion.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0), Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants in Treatment Failure for Each Potentially Predictor Variable at Randomization
Description
Percentage of participants who were treatment failure over 48 weeks as per potentially predictor variables (at randomization) are reported: number of swollen joints/tender joints, DAS28, PGA, PtGA, participant general health VAS, participant pain VAS, clinical disease activity index (CDAI), simplified disease activity index (SDAI), ESR (mm/hour), plasma CRP (mg/L), sensitive serum CRP (mg/L), anti- cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti CCP, units/mL), cartilage oligomeric matrix protein (COMP, units/liter), S-score, O-score, E-score, Joint space narrowing score, erosion score, and mTSS.
Time Frame
Randomization (Week 0) up to Week 48
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria:
Subject has a current DAS28 equal to or less than 3.2.
Subject is currently receiving treatment with etanercept, either 25 mg twice weekly or 50 mg once weekly, for a minimum of 14 months at baseline
Subject is currently receiving oral, sc or intramuscular methotrexate once weekly, 7.5 mg/week to 25 mg/week and at a stable dose for a minimum of 4 months at baseline.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has earlier had an attempt of discontinuing etanercept for reasons of remission or low disease activity state.
Subject has received any disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug, other than methotrexate, within one month before baseline.
Subject has had a dose of prednisone (or equivalent) >7.5 mg/day or has received intra-articular, intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous corticosteroid within one month of baseline.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Glostrup
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2600
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Hellerup
ZIP/Postal Code
2900
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Helsinki
ZIP/Postal Code
FI-00029 HUS
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Jyvaskyla
ZIP/Postal Code
40620
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Gyula
ZIP/Postal Code
5701
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Szombathely
ZIP/Postal Code
9700
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Veszprem
ZIP/Postal Code
8200
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Reykjavik
ZIP/Postal Code
108
Country
Iceland
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Bergen
ZIP/Postal Code
5021
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Lillehammer
ZIP/Postal Code
2609
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Oslo
ZIP/Postal Code
0319
Country
Norway
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
221 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Malmo
ZIP/Postal Code
SE-205 02
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
14186
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
17176
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Pfizer Investigational Site
City
Uppsala
ZIP/Postal Code
751 85
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25873634
Citation
van Vollenhoven RF, Ostergaard M, Leirisalo-Repo M, Uhlig T, Jansson M, Larsson E, Brock F, Franck-Larsson K. Full dose, reduced dose or discontinuation of etanercept in rheumatoid arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2016 Jan;75(1):52-8. doi: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205726. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=0881K1-4500&StudyName=Study%20Comparing%20The%20Effect%20On%20Disease%20Activity%20When%20Reducing%20Or%20Discontinuing%20Etanercept%20In%20Subjects%20With%20RA
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.
Learn more about this trial
Study Comparing The Effect On Disease Activity When Reducing Or Discontinuing Etanercept In Subjects With RA
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs