search
Back to results

Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Cethromycin to Clarithromycin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Primary Purpose

Pneumonia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cethromycin
Clarithromycin
Sponsored by
Advanced Life Sciences, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pneumonia focused on measuring Pneumonia, Respiratory, Infection, Infectious, Advanced, Life, Sciences, Lung, Pulmonary, Cethromycin, Clarithromycin, Biaxin

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Ambulatory male or female, 18 years of age or older If female, non-lactating and at no risk or pregnancy (post-menopausal or must use adequate birth control) Positive Chest X-ray consistent with diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia Must be a suitable candidate for oral antibiotic therapy and must be able to swallow capsules intact Recent history of respiratory illness consistent with the clinical signs and symptoms of bacterial CAP Must be able to produce sputum Exclusion Criteria: Prior hospitalization within previous 4 weeks Residence at a chronic care facility Active tuberculosis (or other mycobacterial infection, empyema, lung abscess, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary edema, cystic fibrosis, tumor (primary or metastatic) involving the lung, bronchial obstruction, a history of post-obstructive pneumonia (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD] is not exclusionary), known or suspected Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia Treatment with long-acting antimicrobial agents within the last 4 weeks, treatment with ceftriaxone, azithromycin or dirithromycin antibiotic within the last 7 days, or subjects who have received more than 24 hours of treatment with other antibiotics within 7 days prior to study drug administration Any infection which requires the use of a concomitant antimicrobial agent History of hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to macrolide, ketolide, quinolone, azalide or streptogramin antimicrobials Treatment with another investigational drug within the last 4 weeks Females who are pregnant or lactating Subjects with known significant renal or hepatic impairment or disease Subjects with a history of impaired renal function Evidence of uncontrolled clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, gastrointestinal, neurological or endocrine disease, malignancy, or other abnormality (other than the disease being studied) Subjects who would require parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of pneumonia Any underlying disease or condition that would interfere with the completion of the study procedures and evaluations or absorption of the study drug Currently receiving or are likely to require any of the following medications during the period between 2 weeks prior to Evaluation 1 and within 24 hours after the last dose of study drug: astemizol (Hismanal®) or pimozide (Orap®) Currently receiving or are likely to require any of the following during the period from Evaluation 1 and within 24 hours after the last dose of study drug: theophylline or theophylline analogues (unless adequately monitored), carbamazepine, dexamethasone, phenobarbital, phenytoin, St. John's Wort, lamotrigine, troglitazone, warfarin and digitalis glycoside. Other barbiturates may be used with careful monitoring Subjects who are currently receiving or who are likely to require any of the following medications during the period between Evaluation 1 and 4: other systemic antibiotic therapy, rifampin or rifabutin Immunocompromised subjects, subjects receiving immunosuppressive agents, subjects with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections and history of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining conditions or CD4+ T-lymphocyte count <200. Subject with known or suspected central nervous system (CNS) disorder that predisposes them to seizures/lower seizure threshold (e.g., severe cerebral arteriosclerosis, epilepsy) Previous treatment with cethromycin Subjects with signs of septic shock (e.g., mental confusion, severe hypoxemia, severe hypotension, any other condition requiring intensive care unit [ICU] admission)

Sites / Locations

  • ARGENTINA - Advanced Life Sciences
  • BULGARIA - Advanced Life Sciences
  • CHILE - Advanced Life Sciences
  • CROATIA - Advanced Life Sciences
  • ESTONIA - Advanced Life Sciences
  • GERMANY - Advanced Life Sciences
  • HUNGARY - Advanced Life Sciences
  • ISRAEL - Advanced Life Sciences
  • PERU - Advanced Life Sciences
  • POLAND - Advanced Life Sciences
  • ROMANIA - Advanced Life Sciences
  • THE NETHERLANDS - Advanced Life Sciences
  • UKRAINE - Advanced Life Sciences

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Cethromycin

Clarithromycin

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Clinical Cures in the Intent to Treat Population
Investigators evaluated subjects for a clinical response of cure, failure, or indeterminate. Cure: Improvement or return to preinfection state or lack of progression of all pulmonary infiltrates, and resolution of all signs/symptoms present at enrollment. Failure: Persistence or worsening of signs/symptoms, the need for additional antibiotic, new pulmonary infection, progression of the chest radiograph, or death due to pneumonia. Indeterminate: Evaluation was not possible (lost to follow up, adverse event, major protocol violation). Indeterminates default to failure for analysis.
Clinical Cures in the Per Protocol Clinically Evaluable Population
Investigators evaluated subjects for a clinical response of cure, failure, or indeterminate. Cure: Improvement or return to preinfection state or lack of progression of all pulmonary infiltrates, and resolution of all signs/symptoms present at enrollment. Failure: Persistence or worsening of signs/symptoms, the need for additional antibiotic, new pulmonary infection, progression of the chest radiograph, or death due to pneumonia. Indeterminate: Evaluation was not possible (lost to follow up, adverse event, major protocol violation). Indeterminates default to failure for analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Bacteriologic Cures in the Intent to Treat Population
All bacteriologically evaluable subjects (ie., the subject had at least one, protocol-defined evaluable pathogen) who demonstrated eradication of all evaluable pathogens (S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila).
Bacteriologic Cures in the Per Protocol Clinically Evaluable Population
All bacteriologically evaluable subjects (ie., the subject had at least one, protocol-defined evaluable pathogen) who demonstrated eradication of all evaluable pathogens (S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila).

Full Information

First Posted
June 9, 2006
Last Updated
January 29, 2010
Sponsor
Advanced Life Sciences, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00336544
Brief Title
Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Cethromycin to Clarithromycin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia
Official Title
A Double-Blinded, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multi-Center, Multi-National Comparative Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Cethromycin 300 mg QD to Clarithromycin 250 mg BID for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia in Adults
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2010
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2007 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
Advanced Life Sciences, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of cethromycin to clarithromycin for the treatment of mild to moderate community-acquired pneumonia (CAP).
Detailed Description
Lower respiratory tract infections remain one of the leading causes of death worldwide. Increasing rates of antibiotic resistance and newer, more pervasive pneumonia-causative pathogens contribute to this statistic. Currently available macrolide antibiotics for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia are slowly losing effectiveness, resulting in the need to develop newer drugs to fight resistant infections. In this study, we compare the safety and efficacy of a common macrolide, clarithromycin, to a new ketolide, cethromycin.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pneumonia
Keywords
Pneumonia, Respiratory, Infection, Infectious, Advanced, Life, Sciences, Lung, Pulmonary, Cethromycin, Clarithromycin, Biaxin

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
522 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cethromycin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Clarithromycin
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cethromycin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Restanza, ABT-773
Intervention Description
Cethromycin 300 mg once per day (QD) for 7 days, administered orally
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Clarithromycin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Biaxin, Klacid, Klaracid
Intervention Description
Clarithromycin 250 mg twice per day (BID) for 7 days, administered orally
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical Cures in the Intent to Treat Population
Description
Investigators evaluated subjects for a clinical response of cure, failure, or indeterminate. Cure: Improvement or return to preinfection state or lack of progression of all pulmonary infiltrates, and resolution of all signs/symptoms present at enrollment. Failure: Persistence or worsening of signs/symptoms, the need for additional antibiotic, new pulmonary infection, progression of the chest radiograph, or death due to pneumonia. Indeterminate: Evaluation was not possible (lost to follow up, adverse event, major protocol violation). Indeterminates default to failure for analysis.
Time Frame
Test of Cure Visit, defined as 14-22 days after the first dose of study
Title
Clinical Cures in the Per Protocol Clinically Evaluable Population
Description
Investigators evaluated subjects for a clinical response of cure, failure, or indeterminate. Cure: Improvement or return to preinfection state or lack of progression of all pulmonary infiltrates, and resolution of all signs/symptoms present at enrollment. Failure: Persistence or worsening of signs/symptoms, the need for additional antibiotic, new pulmonary infection, progression of the chest radiograph, or death due to pneumonia. Indeterminate: Evaluation was not possible (lost to follow up, adverse event, major protocol violation). Indeterminates default to failure for analysis.
Time Frame
Test of Cure Visit, defined as 14-22 days after the first dose of study
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Bacteriologic Cures in the Intent to Treat Population
Description
All bacteriologically evaluable subjects (ie., the subject had at least one, protocol-defined evaluable pathogen) who demonstrated eradication of all evaluable pathogens (S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila).
Time Frame
Test of Cure Visit, defined as 14-22 days after the first dose of study
Title
Bacteriologic Cures in the Per Protocol Clinically Evaluable Population
Description
All bacteriologically evaluable subjects (ie., the subject had at least one, protocol-defined evaluable pathogen) who demonstrated eradication of all evaluable pathogens (S. pneumoniae, S. aureus, H. influenzae, M. catarrhalis, M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae, L. pneumophila).
Time Frame
Test of Cure Visit, defined as 14-22 days after the first dose of study

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Ambulatory male or female, 18 years of age or older If female, non-lactating and at no risk or pregnancy (post-menopausal or must use adequate birth control) Positive Chest X-ray consistent with diagnosis of bacterial pneumonia Must be a suitable candidate for oral antibiotic therapy and must be able to swallow capsules intact Recent history of respiratory illness consistent with the clinical signs and symptoms of bacterial CAP Must be able to produce sputum Exclusion Criteria: Prior hospitalization within previous 4 weeks Residence at a chronic care facility Active tuberculosis (or other mycobacterial infection, empyema, lung abscess, pulmonary embolism, pulmonary edema, cystic fibrosis, tumor (primary or metastatic) involving the lung, bronchial obstruction, a history of post-obstructive pneumonia (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease [COPD] is not exclusionary), known or suspected Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia Treatment with long-acting antimicrobial agents within the last 4 weeks, treatment with ceftriaxone, azithromycin or dirithromycin antibiotic within the last 7 days, or subjects who have received more than 24 hours of treatment with other antibiotics within 7 days prior to study drug administration Any infection which requires the use of a concomitant antimicrobial agent History of hypersensitivity or allergic reactions to macrolide, ketolide, quinolone, azalide or streptogramin antimicrobials Treatment with another investigational drug within the last 4 weeks Females who are pregnant or lactating Subjects with known significant renal or hepatic impairment or disease Subjects with a history of impaired renal function Evidence of uncontrolled clinically significant cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, gastrointestinal, neurological or endocrine disease, malignancy, or other abnormality (other than the disease being studied) Subjects who would require parenteral antimicrobial therapy for the treatment of pneumonia Any underlying disease or condition that would interfere with the completion of the study procedures and evaluations or absorption of the study drug Currently receiving or are likely to require any of the following medications during the period between 2 weeks prior to Evaluation 1 and within 24 hours after the last dose of study drug: astemizol (Hismanal®) or pimozide (Orap®) Currently receiving or are likely to require any of the following during the period from Evaluation 1 and within 24 hours after the last dose of study drug: theophylline or theophylline analogues (unless adequately monitored), carbamazepine, dexamethasone, phenobarbital, phenytoin, St. John's Wort, lamotrigine, troglitazone, warfarin and digitalis glycoside. Other barbiturates may be used with careful monitoring Subjects who are currently receiving or who are likely to require any of the following medications during the period between Evaluation 1 and 4: other systemic antibiotic therapy, rifampin or rifabutin Immunocompromised subjects, subjects receiving immunosuppressive agents, subjects with known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infections and history of acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS) defining conditions or CD4+ T-lymphocyte count <200. Subject with known or suspected central nervous system (CNS) disorder that predisposes them to seizures/lower seizure threshold (e.g., severe cerebral arteriosclerosis, epilepsy) Previous treatment with cethromycin Subjects with signs of septic shock (e.g., mental confusion, severe hypoxemia, severe hypotension, any other condition requiring intensive care unit [ICU] admission)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David A. Eiznhamer, PhD.
Organizational Affiliation
Advanced Life Sciences
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
ARGENTINA - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
BULGARIA - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
CHILE - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
CROATIA - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
ESTONIA - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
GERMANY - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
HUNGARY - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
ISRAEL - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
PERU - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
POLAND - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
ROMANIA - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
THE NETHERLANDS - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States
Facility Name
UKRAINE - Advanced Life Sciences
City
Woodridge
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60517
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study Comparing the Safety and Efficacy of Cethromycin to Clarithromycin for the Treatment of Community-Acquired Pneumonia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs