search
Back to results

Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain (TEP-LICH)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Pain, Sexual Dysfunction

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Sweden
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Total Extraperitoneal repair (TEP)
Lichtenstein
Sponsored by
Skane University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Pain focused on measuring Inguinal hernia, TEP, Lichtenstein, Mesh, Randomized, Chronic pain, Sexual dysfunction

Eligibility Criteria

30 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • men between 30-75 years of age
  • ASA class I-II
  • primary unilateral inguinal hernia

Exclusion Criteria:

  • lower midline incision below linea arcuate
  • large scrotal hernia
  • previously or current abuse,mental disease
  • obesity BMI > 35
  • another simultaneous operation
  • nonreducible hernia
  • severe pain in the groin without nonrelated to hernia
  • contraindications to general anesthesia
  • need of language translator
  • liver cirrhosis or ascites
  • spread cancer disease
  • previously irradiation in the area
  • lack of operations indication

Sites / Locations

  • Regionala etikprövningsnämden i Lund, avd 2

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Lichtenstein

Total Extraperitoneal repair (TEP)

Arm Description

Open operation with onlay light weight polypropylene mesh

Laparoscopic operation with preperitoneal nonfixated mesh

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Chronic pain during the last week (IPQ2) 1 year postoperatively measured using question 2 of the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ).
The worst pain last week one year postoperatively. Measured using question 2 of IPQ-questionaire with the cutoff for pain set between grade 2 (pain present but could easily be ignored) and grade 3 (pain present but does not interfere with everyday activities)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Quality of life measured using the SF-36 questionnaire
SF-36 is composed of eight sub-scales and the composite scores for physical and mental health. Norm-based scores were calculated using the Swedish age and gender specific means and standard deviations. The norm data have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A 5-point difference corresponds to an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.5 SD, which was regarded as a medium-sized clinical difference.
Chronic pain right now and during the last week (IPQ1 and IPQ2) measured using question 1 and 2 of the inguinal pain questionnaire.
Chronic pain was measured using IPQ with the following cutoffs. "Any pain last week" (IPQ2 grade 2-7) and "any pain right now" (IPQ2 grade 2-7) at 1 and 3 years. "Pain right now" (IPQ1 grade 3-7) at 1 and 3 years and "pain last week" (IPQ2 grade 3-7) at 3 years
Clinical exam assessing groin complaints
Clinical examination was performed assessing groin complaints were reported in six dimensions (no complaints, tenderness, decreased sensation to touch, decreased sensation to pricking, increased sensation to touch or pricking, radiation of pain) in five defined locations in the groin/scrotum area.
A newly developed SexIHS questionnaire designed to specifically address sexual dysfunction associated with a diagnosed inguinal hernia or following inguinal hernia surgery.
The first 2 questions adressing whether the patient is sexually active and if they have pain during intercourse. The following questions address pain-related sexual dysfunction by describing pain frequency, pain intensity, erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction and symptoms of depression. Two additional questions aimed to describe localisation and type of pain. Scores in the questionnaire vary between 0-12.
Physical function score measuring the ability to perform common daily activities
Physical function was measured using a functional score that was created by assessing three daily activities. Climbing stairs, squatting and raising from bed Each activity was graded from 0-2 points (0 = no discomfort, 1 = mild/moderate discomfort, and 2 = severe discomfort in need of support) with a sum of all scores between 0-6.
Number of patients with a recurrence after TEP and Lichtenstein surgery
Recurrence after TEP and Lichtenstein repair.
Number patients with a harmful event during surgery after TEP and Lichtenstein
A harmful event was defined as an unplanned chronic inconvenient condition beyond therapy following surgery (e.g. testicular atrophy or pain that did not exist before operation).
Number of patients with a adverse events after TEP and Lichtenstein surgery
An adverse event was defined as either a reoperation due to a postoperative complication within 3 years or severe pain defined as IPQ2 grade 5-7

Full Information

First Posted
December 5, 2008
Last Updated
December 18, 2018
Sponsor
Skane University Hospital
Collaborators
Region Skane
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00803985
Brief Title
Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain
Acronym
TEP-LICH
Official Title
A Randomised Controlled Trial Comparing Total Extra-Peritoneal (TEP) to Lichtenstein Inguinal Hernia Repair Concerning Physical Sequelae and Quality of Life at One and Three Years - the TEPLICH Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2008 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Skane University Hospital
Collaborators
Region Skane

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to se if there is a difference regarding chronic pain and sexual dysfunction one and tree years after laparoscopic un fixated preperitoneal mesh versus gold standard open fixated on lay mesh in inguinal hernia surgery. Long term cross-sectional follow-up comparing different instruments for measurement of chronic pain.
Detailed Description
Prospective randomized study comparing total extraperitoneal patch TEP versus open onlay mesh according to Lichtenstein in primary unilateral inguinal hernias in men between 30 to 75 years of age. Non fixated polypropylene mesh is used in the TEP operation and fixated light weight polypropylene mesh is used in the Lichtenstein procedure. The aim is to study chronical pain and sexual dysfunction. Clinical examination according nerve function, hernia status and genital findings are performed together with a questionnaire including SF36, Inguinal Pain Questionnaire(IPQ), sexual function are registered preoperatively, one and tree years postoperatively. Cross-sectional follow-up in median 7.5 years using enquiries for comparison of different pain instruments to evaluate the effect of chronic pain on physical activity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Pain, Sexual Dysfunction
Keywords
Inguinal hernia, TEP, Lichtenstein, Mesh, Randomized, Chronic pain, Sexual dysfunction

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
416 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lichtenstein
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Open operation with onlay light weight polypropylene mesh
Arm Title
Total Extraperitoneal repair (TEP)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laparoscopic operation with preperitoneal nonfixated mesh
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Total Extraperitoneal repair (TEP)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Total extraperitoneal patch, Laparoscopic hernia operation, Hernia mesh operation
Intervention Description
Operation for primary inguinal hernias i men
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Lichtenstein
Other Intervention Name(s)
Open on lay mesh repair, Anterior mesh repair
Intervention Description
Operation for primary inguinal hernias i men
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Chronic pain during the last week (IPQ2) 1 year postoperatively measured using question 2 of the Inguinal Pain Questionnaire (IPQ).
Description
The worst pain last week one year postoperatively. Measured using question 2 of IPQ-questionaire with the cutoff for pain set between grade 2 (pain present but could easily be ignored) and grade 3 (pain present but does not interfere with everyday activities)
Time Frame
One year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Quality of life measured using the SF-36 questionnaire
Description
SF-36 is composed of eight sub-scales and the composite scores for physical and mental health. Norm-based scores were calculated using the Swedish age and gender specific means and standard deviations. The norm data have a mean of 50 and a standard deviation (SD) of 10. A 5-point difference corresponds to an effect size (Cohen's d) of 0.5 SD, which was regarded as a medium-sized clinical difference.
Time Frame
one and three years
Title
Chronic pain right now and during the last week (IPQ1 and IPQ2) measured using question 1 and 2 of the inguinal pain questionnaire.
Description
Chronic pain was measured using IPQ with the following cutoffs. "Any pain last week" (IPQ2 grade 2-7) and "any pain right now" (IPQ2 grade 2-7) at 1 and 3 years. "Pain right now" (IPQ1 grade 3-7) at 1 and 3 years and "pain last week" (IPQ2 grade 3-7) at 3 years
Time Frame
IPQ1 grade 2-7, IPQ1 grade 3-7 and IPQ2 grade 2-7 measured at one and three years. IPQ2 grad 3-7 measured at three years.
Title
Clinical exam assessing groin complaints
Description
Clinical examination was performed assessing groin complaints were reported in six dimensions (no complaints, tenderness, decreased sensation to touch, decreased sensation to pricking, increased sensation to touch or pricking, radiation of pain) in five defined locations in the groin/scrotum area.
Time Frame
Exams were performed preoperatively, at one and three years
Title
A newly developed SexIHS questionnaire designed to specifically address sexual dysfunction associated with a diagnosed inguinal hernia or following inguinal hernia surgery.
Description
The first 2 questions adressing whether the patient is sexually active and if they have pain during intercourse. The following questions address pain-related sexual dysfunction by describing pain frequency, pain intensity, erectile or ejaculatory dysfunction and symptoms of depression. Two additional questions aimed to describe localisation and type of pain. Scores in the questionnaire vary between 0-12.
Time Frame
Mean 33 months after surgery
Title
Physical function score measuring the ability to perform common daily activities
Description
Physical function was measured using a functional score that was created by assessing three daily activities. Climbing stairs, squatting and raising from bed Each activity was graded from 0-2 points (0 = no discomfort, 1 = mild/moderate discomfort, and 2 = severe discomfort in need of support) with a sum of all scores between 0-6.
Time Frame
The functional score was measured preoperatively, at one and three years
Title
Number of patients with a recurrence after TEP and Lichtenstein surgery
Description
Recurrence after TEP and Lichtenstein repair.
Time Frame
After one and three years
Title
Number patients with a harmful event during surgery after TEP and Lichtenstein
Description
A harmful event was defined as an unplanned chronic inconvenient condition beyond therapy following surgery (e.g. testicular atrophy or pain that did not exist before operation).
Time Frame
After one and three years
Title
Number of patients with a adverse events after TEP and Lichtenstein surgery
Description
An adverse event was defined as either a reoperation due to a postoperative complication within 3 years or severe pain defined as IPQ2 grade 5-7
Time Frame
After one and three years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: men between 30-75 years of age ASA class I-II primary unilateral inguinal hernia Exclusion Criteria: lower midline incision below linea arcuate large scrotal hernia previously or current abuse,mental disease obesity BMI > 35 another simultaneous operation nonreducible hernia severe pain in the groin without nonrelated to hernia contraindications to general anesthesia need of language translator liver cirrhosis or ascites spread cancer disease previously irradiation in the area lack of operations indication
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Agneta Montgomery, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Lund
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Regionala etikprövningsnämden i Lund, avd 2
City
Lund
ZIP/Postal Code
221 00
Country
Sweden

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31162663
Citation
Gutlic N, Gutlic A, Petersson U, Rogmark P, Montgomery A. Randomized clinical trial comparing total extraperitoneal with Lichtenstein inguinal hernia repair (TEPLICH trial). Br J Surg. 2019 Jun;106(7):845-855. doi: 10.1002/bjs.11230.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study Comparing Total Extraperitoneal Patch "TEP" Versus Lichtenstein According Chronic Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs