search
Back to results

Study Comparing Zevalin Regimen With no Further Treatment in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

Primary Purpose

Lymphoma, Large Cell, Diffuse

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Zevalin
Sponsored by
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Lymphoma, Large Cell, Diffuse

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria: Histologically confirmed, Ann Arbor stage II, III, or IV Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) according to the Revised European American Lymphoma(REAL)/World Health Organization (WHO) classification . Central pathology review confirming the DLBCL diagnosis and Cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) positivity, and no evidence of DLBCL in bone marrow First-line treatment of DLBCL must have been 6 or 8 cycles of standard CHOP chemotherapy in combination with rituximab . Complete remission(CR) or unconfirmed complete remission(CRu) according to the International Workshop Response Criteria for Non Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) described by Cheson et al and modified for this study after first-line treatment with CHOP-R. Computerised Tomography (CT) scans of chest, abdomen, pelvis, and neck (if applicable) must have been performed within 6 weeks after the last dose of the last course of CHOP-R. Applicability of the neck CT means that the patient had involvement of the neck region by palpation / physical examination at first diagnosis (pre-CHOP-R). Central radiographic review of the CT scans from before and after first-line treatment with CHOP-R fulfilling the radiological requirements for CR/CRu Patients 60 years of age or older at time of randomization WHO performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 within 1 week of randomization Absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10^9/L within 1 week of randomization Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10 g/dL within 1 week of randomization Platelets greater than or equal to 150 x 10^9/L within 1 week of randomization Life expectancy of 3 months or longer Written informed consent obtained according to local guidelines Exclusion Criteria: Presence of any other malignancy or history of prior malignancy except non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma Prior radioimmunotherapy, radiation therapy, or any other NHL therapy except first-line CHOP-R Presence of gastric, central nervous system or testicular lymphoma at first diagnosis Histological transformation of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) Known seropositivity for hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B surface antigen Known history of Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection Abnormal liver function: total bilirubin > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or Alanine Aminotransferase > 2.5 x ULN within 1 week of randomization Abnormal renal function: serum creatinine > 2.0 x ULN within 1 week of randomization Nonrecovery from the toxic effects of CHOP-R therapy Known hypersensitivity to murine or chimeric antibodies or proteins Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) or Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) therapy within two weeks (or four weeks if pegylated) prior to screening laboratory sampling Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes,congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months of study, unstable and uncontrolled hypertension, chronic renal disease, or active uncontrolled infection) which could compromise participation in the study Male and female patients of child-bearing potential unwilling to practice effective contraception during the study and unwilling or unable to continue contraception for 12 months after their last dose of study treatment Female patients who are pregnant or are currently breastfeeding Treatment with investigational drugs less than 4 weeks before the planned Day 1 or nonrecovery from the toxic effects of such therapy Surgery less than 4 weeks before the planned Day 1 or nonrecovery from the side effects of such surgery Concurrent systemic corticosteroid use for any reason except as premedication in case of known or suspected allergies to contrast media or as premedication for potential side effects of rituximab treatment Unwillingness or inability to comply with the protocol

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site, Cedax
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site, Yonsei
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Zevalin

Observational

Arm Description

Patients received Zevalin. Zevalin Therapeutic Regimen: Day 1: Initial administration of 250 mg/m^2 rituximab, followed immediately by administration of 185 MBq of [111In]-ibritumomab tiuxetan ,in centers where centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry had not been required, the first rituximab infusion was given alone. - Day 7-9: Rituximab 250 mg/m^2, followed immediately by [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg given as a slow intravenous push over 10 minutes. Two treatment days one week apart were followed by a 12-week safety period.

Patients in this arm did not receive any reference therapy; they remained free of any anti-lymphoma therapy and were observed for relapse. This was non-interventional Stage consisting of a longterm follow-up period (until completion of a median observation period of 5 years).

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS)
The primary analysis was based on the full analysis set (FAS). Actually, the prominent efficacy variable OS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol Set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group. "Overall survival" was defined as the median time interval (in months)from randomization to death from any cause.This time-to-event variable was censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of Participants With Disease Free Survival (DFS)
DFS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group.Disease-free survival was defined as the median time interval (in months) from randomization to the date of relapse (as assessed by the investigator) or death from any cause. This time-to-event variable was also censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time).
The Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL)
HRQL questionnaire consists of 27 questions each scores ranging from 0 - 4. The minimum score was 0 which is termed as 'worst imaginable health state' and the maximum score for a patient was 100 which is termed as 'best imaginable health state'. The descriptive classification defines health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is subdivided into 3 levels: no problem, some or moderate problems, unable or extreme problems.

Full Information

First Posted
May 4, 2006
Last Updated
January 17, 2022
Sponsor
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Collaborators
Bayer
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00322218
Brief Title
Study Comparing Zevalin Regimen With no Further Treatment in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.
Official Title
Phase III,Open-label,Prospective,Two-armed,Multicenter Study Comparing Zevalin Regimen With no Further Treatment in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
due to low recruitment rate that would have led to a long study duration.
Study Start Date
May 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2008 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2008 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Spectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc
Collaborators
Bayer

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study treats patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma whose disease is in complete remission due to previous treatment with Cyclophosphamide Doxorubicin hydrochloride Vincristine Prednisolone- Rituximab (CHOP-R). Half of the patients received Zevalin and the other half receive no further anti-cancer treatment. The two patient groups compared to determine if Zevalin given after CHOP-R therapy provides greater benefits than receiving no additional anti-cancer therapy after CHOP-R.
Detailed Description
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Zevalin study regimen compared with observation alone in patients with complete remission (CR or CRu) after first-line CHOP-R, the study was to include patients 60-years-of-age or older with histologically confirmed Ann Arbor stage II, III, or IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma End Points: Primary endpoint: Overall survival (OS) Secondary endpoints: Disease-free survival (DFS), health-related quality of life (HRQL) as assessed by the patient using standard questionnaires . Number of Patients : A total of 400 patients (200 per arm) were planned to be enrolled. - In fact, 68 randomized patients (full analysis set; FAS) were analysed; 34 patients per each arm. The per-protocol set (PPS; 65 patients) comprised 33 patients allocated to the Zevalin arm and 32 patients allocated to the observation control arm. Study Treatment : The combination regimen with rituximab was designed in 2 steps as follows: Day 1: Initial administration of 250 mg/m^2 rituximab, followed immediately by administration of 185 megabecquerel (MBq) (5 millicurie [mCi]) of [111In]-ibritumomab tiuxetan (the latter one only in centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry was compulsory according to local law). In centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry had not been required, the first rituximab infusion was given alone. Day 7-9: Rituximab 250 mg/m^2, followed immediately by [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 megabecquerel/kilograms (MBq/kg) (0.4 millicurie / kilogram [mCi/kg]) (maximum dose 1184 MBq) given as a slow intravenous (I.V.) push over 10 minutes. Two treatment days one week apart followed by a 12-week safety period. Duration of Patient Participation: Due to the sequential design, the total duration of this study was not fixed. Originally, the study was planned in a randomized, parallel-group, group sequential design. Objective : The primary objective of this study was an inferential comparison between the 2 randomized groups in terms of overall survival using a group sequential triangular test ,since the study was prematurely terminated the pre-planned group-sequential nature of the study design was not applicable statistical analyses. Actually, the prominent efficacy variables for the OS and DFS were analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and PPS using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group. Study Design : This study was designed as a prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized, two-armed, group-sequential Phase III study. The study was planned to consist of 2 stages: an interventional Stage 1 with Screening/Baseline, treatment, safety, and follow-up periods, and a non-interventional Stage 2 consisting of a long-term follow-up period (until completion of a median observation period of 5 years). This second stage of the study was to be started only if superiority of the Zevalin study regimen could be demonstrated in the preceding Stage 1. Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamic results: Not applicable Extent of exposure: All 34 patients randomized to the Zevalin arm were given 2 rituximab infusions(with a median dose of 425.0 mg at each of the 2 infusion time points).Three patients underwent radioimaging studies/dosimetry and therefore were administered [111In]-ibritumomab tiuxetan at Day 1. All but 1 patient received an infusion with [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan following the second infusion of rituximab. The mean dose ranged from 765.9 -1197.0 MBq.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lymphoma, Large Cell, Diffuse

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
68 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Zevalin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients received Zevalin. Zevalin Therapeutic Regimen: Day 1: Initial administration of 250 mg/m^2 rituximab, followed immediately by administration of 185 MBq of [111In]-ibritumomab tiuxetan ,in centers where centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry had not been required, the first rituximab infusion was given alone. - Day 7-9: Rituximab 250 mg/m^2, followed immediately by [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg given as a slow intravenous push over 10 minutes. Two treatment days one week apart were followed by a 12-week safety period.
Arm Title
Observational
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients in this arm did not receive any reference therapy; they remained free of any anti-lymphoma therapy and were observed for relapse. This was non-interventional Stage consisting of a longterm follow-up period (until completion of a median observation period of 5 years).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Zevalin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ibritumomab tiuxetan
Intervention Description
Zevalin study treatment regimen consisted of 2 rituximab i.v. infusions (Day 1 and Day 7-9) and one [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan infusion in connection with the second rituximab infusion. The core treatment regimen in the Zevalin arm was: Day 1: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m^2 Day 7-to 9: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m^2 immediately followed by [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg (0.4 mCi/kg) with a maximum dose of 1184 MBq (32 mCi),administered as slow intravenous push over 10 minutes.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
The primary analysis was based on the full analysis set (FAS). Actually, the prominent efficacy variable OS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol Set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group. "Overall survival" was defined as the median time interval (in months)from randomization to death from any cause.This time-to-event variable was censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time).
Time Frame
5 years or until patient dies or lost to follow up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of Participants With Disease Free Survival (DFS)
Description
DFS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group.Disease-free survival was defined as the median time interval (in months) from randomization to the date of relapse (as assessed by the investigator) or death from any cause. This time-to-event variable was also censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time).
Time Frame
5 years or until patient disease progresses or lost to follow up
Title
The Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL)
Description
HRQL questionnaire consists of 27 questions each scores ranging from 0 - 4. The minimum score was 0 which is termed as 'worst imaginable health state' and the maximum score for a patient was 100 which is termed as 'best imaginable health state'. The descriptive classification defines health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is subdivided into 3 levels: no problem, some or moderate problems, unable or extreme problems.
Time Frame
Up to Month 36

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically confirmed, Ann Arbor stage II, III, or IV Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) according to the Revised European American Lymphoma(REAL)/World Health Organization (WHO) classification . Central pathology review confirming the DLBCL diagnosis and Cluster of differentiation 20 (CD20) positivity, and no evidence of DLBCL in bone marrow First-line treatment of DLBCL must have been 6 or 8 cycles of standard CHOP chemotherapy in combination with rituximab . Complete remission(CR) or unconfirmed complete remission(CRu) according to the International Workshop Response Criteria for Non Hodgkins Lymphoma (NHL) described by Cheson et al and modified for this study after first-line treatment with CHOP-R. Computerised Tomography (CT) scans of chest, abdomen, pelvis, and neck (if applicable) must have been performed within 6 weeks after the last dose of the last course of CHOP-R. Applicability of the neck CT means that the patient had involvement of the neck region by palpation / physical examination at first diagnosis (pre-CHOP-R). Central radiographic review of the CT scans from before and after first-line treatment with CHOP-R fulfilling the radiological requirements for CR/CRu Patients 60 years of age or older at time of randomization WHO performance status (PS) of 0 to 2 within 1 week of randomization Absolute neutrophil count greater than or equal to 1.5 x 10^9/L within 1 week of randomization Hemoglobin greater than or equal to 10 g/dL within 1 week of randomization Platelets greater than or equal to 150 x 10^9/L within 1 week of randomization Life expectancy of 3 months or longer Written informed consent obtained according to local guidelines Exclusion Criteria: Presence of any other malignancy or history of prior malignancy except non-melanoma skin tumors or stage 0 (in situ) cervical carcinoma Prior radioimmunotherapy, radiation therapy, or any other NHL therapy except first-line CHOP-R Presence of gastric, central nervous system or testicular lymphoma at first diagnosis Histological transformation of low-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) Known seropositivity for hepatitis C virus or hepatitis B surface antigen Known history of Human Immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection Abnormal liver function: total bilirubin > 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or Alanine Aminotransferase > 2.5 x ULN within 1 week of randomization Abnormal renal function: serum creatinine > 2.0 x ULN within 1 week of randomization Nonrecovery from the toxic effects of CHOP-R therapy Known hypersensitivity to murine or chimeric antibodies or proteins Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF) or Granulocyte Macrophage Colony Stimulating Factor (GM-CSF) therapy within two weeks (or four weeks if pegylated) prior to screening laboratory sampling Concurrent severe and/or uncontrolled medical disease (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes,congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within 6 months of study, unstable and uncontrolled hypertension, chronic renal disease, or active uncontrolled infection) which could compromise participation in the study Male and female patients of child-bearing potential unwilling to practice effective contraception during the study and unwilling or unable to continue contraception for 12 months after their last dose of study treatment Female patients who are pregnant or are currently breastfeeding Treatment with investigational drugs less than 4 weeks before the planned Day 1 or nonrecovery from the toxic effects of such therapy Surgery less than 4 weeks before the planned Day 1 or nonrecovery from the side effects of such surgery Concurrent systemic corticosteroid use for any reason except as premedication in case of known or suspected allergies to contrast media or as premedication for potential side effects of rituximab treatment Unwillingness or inability to comply with the protocol
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mesa
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Bakersfield
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Berkeley
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Burbank
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Newport Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Vallejo
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Newark
State/Province
Delaware
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Saint Petersburg
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Coeur d'Alene
State/Province
Idaho
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Joliet
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Morris
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Shreveport
State/Province
Louisiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research site
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saint Louis Park
State/Province
Minnesota
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Commack
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
East Setauket
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Aberdeen
State/Province
South Dakota
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Innsbruck
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brugge
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Gent
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Helsinki
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Oulu
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Creteil
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dijon
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lille Cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Limoges
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site, Cedax
City
Lyon
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Paris Cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toulouse Cedex
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chemnitz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Jena
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Karlsruhe
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mainz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rostock
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wurzburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Budapest
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Debrecen
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Szeged
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Galway
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bologna
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Milan
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Perugia
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pisa
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Torino
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site, Yonsei
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Gdansk
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Poznan
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Warsaw
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Coimbra
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lisbon
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Porto
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Singapore
Country
Singapore
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pamplona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Salamanca
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Malmo
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Uddevalla
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Umea
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bern
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
St Gallen
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Leicester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
London
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study Comparing Zevalin Regimen With no Further Treatment in Patients With Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs