search
Back to results

Evaluation of Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins. (RCMIGI)

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Calypso beacon implant
moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy
Sponsored by
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Localized prostate cancer, histologically proven.
  • No evidence of metastases (M0). No evidence of lymph nodes involvement (N0) (bilateral lymph node dissection is not mandatory if lymph node involvement risk is low according to the Partin tables).
  • Low-risk or intermediate clinical stage according to the D'Amico classification (T1-T2 and Gleason < 8 and PSA < 20 ng/ml) (appendix 3).
  • No grade > 2 urinary or rectal clinical sign or symptom according to the CTCAE V4.03 scale.
  • Performance status ECOG ≤ 1.
  • No hip prosthesis or metallic vascular graft near the prostate.
  • No endopenian stent.
  • No pace maker, implanted defibrillator or neurostimulator.
  • No allergy to local anesthetics.
  • No irreversible anticoagulation or antiplatelet treatment for the implantation period.
  • Pelvic and abdominal anatomy compatible with the use of the Calypso® system (predictive detector to fiducials distance less than 19 cm, evaluated on planning CT-scan) (distance from skin surface to prostate center less than 17 cm).
  • Patient aged ≥ 18 and less than 80 years old.
  • Dated and signed written informed consent available.
  • Patients must be affiliated to a French Social Security System.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Indication of pelvic nodes irradiation.
  • Prior pelvic irradiation.
  • Biopsy-proven seminal vesicle invasion.
  • Prior bilateral orchiectomy.
  • Prior radical prostatectomy.
  • Other malignancy except adequately-treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or other malignancy from which the patient has been disease-free for at least 5 years.
  • Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial.
  • Other uncontrolled systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, liver, pulmonary embolism, etc.).
  • Known VIH positive patients (no specific test needed).
  • Known homozygote ATM Mutation (Ataxia telengiectasia).

Sites / Locations

  • Institut regional du Cancer - Val d Aurelle

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with standard margins

Calypso tracking system with margin reduction

Arm Description

moderate hypofractionation during 4 weeks

moderate hypofractionation during 4 weeks after calypso beacon implant 10 days before

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

assessment of grade > 2 late pelvic toxicities
assessment of grade > 2 late pelvic toxicities between 3 months and 2 years after radiation period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
August 16, 2017
Last Updated
June 6, 2023
Sponsor
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03254420
Brief Title
Evaluation of Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins.
Acronym
RCMIGI
Official Title
Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins. (RCMIGI)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 30, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2028 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2028 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Institut du Cancer de Montpellier - Val d'Aurelle

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Calypso® System (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) is a recent technology using electromagnetic transponders implanted within the prostate. It is a real-time target tracking system that takes into account both inter- and intrafractional target motion. So the exact position and movement of the prostate can be determined during radiation therapy treatment. The aim of this study is to assess pelvic late toxicity rate after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) when using the Calypso® System with a reduction of treatment margins. In this randomized study, patients will receive IGRT treatment using the Calypso system or a conventional IGRT treatment.
Detailed Description
Prostate cancer is the most frequent cancer in men. Radiotherapy is one of the reference treatments for localized prostate cancer. Prostate was initially thought to be a non-moving target, but the newest reports have raised the contrary as evidence. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is a current standard treatment for localized prostate cancer which enables to take into account interfractional prostate motion before treatment. The Calypso® System (Varian Medical Systems, Inc., Palo Alto, CA) is a recent technology using electromagnetic transponders implanted within the prostate. It is a real-time target tracking system that takes into account both inter- and intrafractional target motion. So the exact position and movement of the prostate can be determined during radiation therapy treatment. As Planned Target Volume (PTV) margins integrate set-up margins and the management of organ motion, margin reduction can reasonably be considered in case of target motion management improvement. To date, no prospective randomized clinical data is available using this technique for the treatment of low- or intermediate-risk prostate cancer patients with modern standard fractionation radiotherapy and image guidance. The aim of this study is to assess pelvic late toxicity rate after intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) when using the Calypso® System with a reduction of treatment margins. In this randomized study, patients will receive IGRT treatment using the Calypso system or a conventional IGRT treatment.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
74 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) with standard margins
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
moderate hypofractionation during 4 weeks
Arm Title
Calypso tracking system with margin reduction
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
moderate hypofractionation during 4 weeks after calypso beacon implant 10 days before
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Calypso beacon implant
Intervention Description
Calypso beacon implant before radiotherapy
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy
Intervention Description
moderate hypofractionation Radiotherapy
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
assessment of grade > 2 late pelvic toxicities
Description
assessment of grade > 2 late pelvic toxicities between 3 months and 2 years after radiation period
Time Frame
up to 2 years post treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Localized prostate cancer, histologically proven. No evidence of metastases (M0). No evidence of lymph nodes involvement (N0) (bilateral lymph node dissection is not mandatory if lymph node involvement risk is low according to the Partin tables). Low-risk or intermediate clinical stage according to the D'Amico classification (T1-T2 and Gleason < 8 and PSA < 20 ng/ml) (appendix 3). No grade > 2 urinary or rectal clinical sign or symptom according to the CTCAE V4.03 scale. Performance status ECOG ≤ 1. No hip prosthesis or metallic vascular graft near the prostate. No endopenian stent. No pace maker, implanted defibrillator or neurostimulator. No allergy to local anesthetics. No irreversible anticoagulation or antiplatelet treatment for the implantation period. Pelvic and abdominal anatomy compatible with the use of the Calypso® system (predictive detector to fiducials distance less than 19 cm, evaluated on planning CT-scan) (distance from skin surface to prostate center less than 17 cm). Patient aged ≥ 18 and less than 80 years old. Dated and signed written informed consent available. Patients must be affiliated to a French Social Security System. Exclusion Criteria: Indication of pelvic nodes irradiation. Prior pelvic irradiation. Biopsy-proven seminal vesicle invasion. Prior bilateral orchiectomy. Prior radical prostatectomy. Other malignancy except adequately-treated basal cell carcinoma of the skin or other malignancy from which the patient has been disease-free for at least 5 years. Psychological, familial, sociological or geographical condition potentially hampering compliance with the study protocol and follow-up schedule; those conditions should be discussed with the patient before registration in the trial. Other uncontrolled systemic disease (cardiovascular, renal, liver, pulmonary embolism, etc.). Known VIH positive patients (no specific test needed). Known homozygote ATM Mutation (Ataxia telengiectasia).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Riou Olivier
Organizational Affiliation
Institut régional du Cancer de Montpellier
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institut regional du Cancer - Val d Aurelle
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34298
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17532494
Citation
Jereczek-Fossa BA, Orecchia R. Evidence-based radiation oncology: definitive, adjuvant and salvage radiotherapy for non-metastatic prostate cancer. Radiother Oncol. 2007 Aug;84(2):197-215. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.04.013. Epub 2007 May 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24018567
Citation
Zaorsky NG, Harrison AS, Trabulsi EJ, Gomella LG, Showalter TN, Hurwitz MD, Dicker AP, Den RB. Evolution of advanced technologies in prostate cancer radiotherapy. Nat Rev Urol. 2013 Oct;10(10):565-79. doi: 10.1038/nrurol.2013.185. Epub 2013 Sep 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22001105
Citation
Budaus L, Bolla M, Bossi A, Cozzarini C, Crook J, Widmark A, Wiegel T. Functional outcomes and complications following radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a critical analysis of the literature. Eur Urol. 2012 Jan;61(1):112-27. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2011.09.027. Epub 2011 Oct 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22892261
Citation
Ohri N, Dicker AP, Showalter TN. Late toxicity rates following definitive radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Can J Urol. 2012 Aug;19(4):6373-80.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20921463
Citation
Pardo Y, Guedea F, Aguilo F, Fernandez P, Macias V, Marino A, Hervas A, Herruzo I, Ortiz MJ, Ponce de Leon J, Craven-Bratle J, Suarez JF, Boladeras A, Pont A, Ayala A, Sancho G, Martinez E, Alonso J, Ferrer M. Quality-of-life impact of primary treatments for localized prostate cancer in patients without hormonal treatment. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Nov 1;28(31):4687-96. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3245. Epub 2010 Oct 4. Erratum In: J Clin Oncol. 2011 Feb 20;29(6):779.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20797890
Citation
de Crevoisier R, Fiorino C, Dubray B. [Dosimetric factors predictive of late toxicity in prostate cancer radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother. 2010 Oct;14(6-7):460-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.07.225. Epub 2010 Aug 24. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19544543
Citation
Valdagni R, Rancati T, Fiorino C. Predictive models of toxicity with external radiotherapy for prostate cancer: clinical issues. Cancer. 2009 Jul 1;115(13 Suppl):3141-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24356.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28355114
Citation
Yu JB. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Further Evidence to Tip the Scales. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1867-1869. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2017.72.7016. Epub 2017 Mar 29. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27339115
Citation
Dearnaley D, Syndikus I, Mossop H, Khoo V, Birtle A, Bloomfield D, Graham J, Kirkbride P, Logue J, Malik Z, Money-Kyrle J, O'Sullivan JM, Panades M, Parker C, Patterson H, Scrase C, Staffurth J, Stockdale A, Tremlett J, Bidmead M, Mayles H, Naismith O, South C, Gao A, Cruickshank C, Hassan S, Pugh J, Griffin C, Hall E; CHHiP Investigators. Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: 5-year outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1047-1060. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30102-4. Epub 2016 Jun 20. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17 (8):e321.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27044935
Citation
Lee WR, Dignam JJ, Amin MB, Bruner DW, Low D, Swanson GP, Shah AB, D'Souza DP, Michalski JM, Dayes IS, Seaward SA, Hall WA, Nguyen PL, Pisansky TM, Faria SL, Chen Y, Koontz BF, Paulus R, Sandler HM. Randomized Phase III Noninferiority Study Comparing Two Radiotherapy Fractionation Schedules in Patients With Low-Risk Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2016 Jul 10;34(20):2325-32. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.0448. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27339116
Citation
Incrocci L, Wortel RC, Alemayehu WG, Aluwini S, Schimmel E, Krol S, van der Toorn PP, Jager H, Heemsbergen W, Heijmen B, Pos F. Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with localised prostate cancer (HYPRO): final efficacy results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016 Aug;17(8):1061-1069. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30070-5. Epub 2016 Jun 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28355113
Citation
Arcangeli G, Saracino B, Arcangeli S, Gomellini S, Petrongari MG, Sanguineti G, Strigari L. Moderate Hypofractionation in High-Risk, Organ-Confined Prostate Cancer: Final Results of a Phase III Randomized Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1891-1897. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.70.4189. Epub 2017 Mar 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
28296582
Citation
Catton CN, Lukka H, Gu CS, Martin JM, Supiot S, Chung PWM, Bauman GS, Bahary JP, Ahmed S, Cheung P, Tai KH, Wu JS, Parliament MB, Tsakiridis T, Corbett TB, Tang C, Dayes IS, Warde P, Craig TK, Julian JA, Levine MN. Randomized Trial of a Hypofractionated Radiation Regimen for the Treatment of Localized Prostate Cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2017 Jun 10;35(17):1884-1890. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.7397. Epub 2017 Mar 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33172724
Citation
Mottet N, van den Bergh RCN, Briers E, Van den Broeck T, Cumberbatch MG, De Santis M, Fanti S, Fossati N, Gandaglia G, Gillessen S, Grivas N, Grummet J, Henry AM, van der Kwast TH, Lam TB, Lardas M, Liew M, Mason MD, Moris L, Oprea-Lager DE, van der Poel HG, Rouviere O, Schoots IG, Tilki D, Wiegel T, Willemse PM, Cornford P. EAU-EANM-ESTRO-ESUR-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer-2020 Update. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent. Eur Urol. 2021 Feb;79(2):243-262. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.09.042. Epub 2020 Nov 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33453312
Citation
Rodin D, Tawk B, Mohamad O, Grover S, Moraes FY, Yap ML, Zubizarreta E, Lievens Y. Hypofractionated radiotherapy in the real-world setting: An international ESTRO-GIRO survey. Radiother Oncol. 2021 Apr;157:32-39. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2021.01.003. Epub 2021 Jan 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25752385
Citation
Chapet O, Decullier E, Bin S, Faix A, Ruffion A, Jalade P, Fenoglietto P, Udrescu C, Enachescu C, Azria D. Prostate hypofractionated radiation therapy with injection of hyaluronic acid: acute toxicities in a phase 2 study. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2015 Mar 15;91(4):730-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.11.027.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22472040
Citation
Palombarini M, Mengoli S, Fantazzini P, Cadioli C, Degli Esposti C, Frezza GP. Analysis of inter-fraction setup errors and organ motion by daily kilovoltage cone beam computed tomography in intensity modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Apr 2;7:56. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-56.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20472357
Citation
Tanyi JA, He T, Summers PA, Mburu RG, Kato CM, Rhodes SM, Hung AY, Fuss M. Assessment of planning target volume margins for intensity-modulated radiotherapy of the prostate gland: role of daily inter- and intrafraction motion. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010 Dec 1;78(5):1579-85. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.02.001. Epub 2010 May 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25699239
Citation
Nguyen NP, Davis R, Bose SR, Dutta S, Vinh-Hung V, Chi A, Godinez J, Desai A, Woods W, Altdorfer G, D'Andrea M, Karlsson U, Vo RA, Sroka T; International Geriatric Radiotherapy Group. Potential applications of image-guided radiotherapy for radiation dose escalation in patients with early stage high-risk prostate cancer. Front Oncol. 2015 Feb 2;5:18. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2015.00018. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22921961
Citation
Crehange G, Martin E, Supiot S, Chapet O, Mazoyer F, Naudy S, Maingon P. [Image-guided radiotherapy in prostate cancer: concepts and implications]. Cancer Radiother. 2012 Sep;16(5-6):430-8. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.07.183. Epub 2012 Aug 23. French.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23244674
Citation
Bernchou U, Agergaard SN, Brink C. Radiopaque marker motion during pre-treatment CBCT as a predictor of intra-fractional prostate movement. Acta Oncol. 2013 Aug;52(6):1168-74. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2012.747698. Epub 2012 Dec 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24023358
Citation
Badakhshi H, Wust P, Budach V, Graf R. Image-guided radiotherapy with implanted markers and kilovoltage imaging and 6-dimensional position corrections for intrafractional motion of the prostate. Anticancer Res. 2013 Sep;33(9):4117-21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26103174
Citation
Tong X, Chen X, Li J, Xu Q, Lin MH, Chen L, Price RA, Ma CM. Intrafractional prostate motion during external beam radiotherapy monitored by a real-time target localization system. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2015 Mar 8;16(2):5013. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v16i2.5013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23428948
Citation
Das S, Liu T, Jani AB, Rossi P, Shelton J, Shi Z, Khan MK. Comparison of image-guided radiotherapy technologies for prostate cancer. Am J Clin Oncol. 2014 Dec;37(6):616-23. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e31827e4eb9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22720845
Citation
Foster RD, Pistenmaa DA, Solberg TD. A comparison of radiographic techniques and electromagnetic transponders for localization of the prostate. Radiat Oncol. 2012 Jun 21;7:101. doi: 10.1186/1748-717X-7-101.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20153908
Citation
Korreman S, Rasch C, McNair H, Verellen D, Oelfke U, Maingon P, Mijnheer B, Khoo V. The European Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology-European Institute of Radiotherapy (ESTRO-EIR) report on 3D CT-based in-room image guidance systems: a practical and technical review and guide. Radiother Oncol. 2010 Feb;94(2):129-44. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Feb 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18262100
Citation
Santanam L, Malinowski K, Hubenshmidt J, Dimmer S, Mayse ML, Bradley J, Chaudhari A, Lechleiter K, Goddu SK, Esthappan J, Mutic S, Low DA, Parikh P. Fiducial-based translational localization accuracy of electromagnetic tracking system and on-board kilovoltage imaging system. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Mar 1;70(3):892-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.10.005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18280057
Citation
Langen KM, Willoughby TR, Meeks SL, Santhanam A, Cunningham A, Levine L, Kupelian PA. Observations on real-time prostate gland motion using electromagnetic tracking. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008 Jul 15;71(4):1084-90. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2007.11.054. Epub 2008 Feb 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16690435
Citation
Willoughby TR, Kupelian PA, Pouliot J, Shinohara K, Aubin M, Roach M 3rd, Skrumeda LL, Balter JM, Litzenberg DW, Hadley SW, Wei JT, Sandler HM. Target localization and real-time tracking using the Calypso 4D localization system in patients with localized prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jun 1;65(2):528-34. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.01.050.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23556877
Citation
Mayyas E, Chetty IJ, Chetvertkov M, Wen N, Neicu T, Nurushev T, Ren L, Lu M, Stricker H, Pradhan D, Movsas B, Elshaikh MA. Evaluation of multiple image-based modalities for image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) of prostate carcinoma: a prospective study. Med Phys. 2013 Apr;40(4):041707. doi: 10.1118/1.4794502.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18692324
Citation
Noel C, Parikh PJ, Roy M, Kupelian P, Mahadevan A, Weinstein G, Enke C, Flores N, Beyer D, Levine L. Prediction of intrafraction prostate motion: accuracy of pre- and post-treatment imaging and intermittent imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2009 Mar 1;73(3):692-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.04.076. Epub 2008 Aug 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23021439
Citation
Zhu M, Bharat S, Michalski JM, Gay HA, Hou WH, Parikh PJ. Adaptive radiation therapy for postprostatectomy patients using real-time electromagnetic target motion tracking during external beam radiation therapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Mar 15;85(4):1038-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.08.001. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20934274
Citation
Su Z, Zhang L, Murphy M, Williamson J. Analysis of prostate patient setup and tracking data: potential intervention strategies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Nov 1;81(3):880-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.1978. Epub 2010 Oct 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17187940
Citation
Kupelian P, Willoughby T, Mahadevan A, Djemil T, Weinstein G, Jani S, Enke C, Solberg T, Flores N, Liu D, Beyer D, Levine L. Multi-institutional clinical experience with the Calypso System in localization and continuous, real-time monitoring of the prostate gland during external radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2007 Mar 15;67(4):1088-98. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2006.10.026. Epub 2006 Dec 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22330987
Citation
Klayton T, Price R, Buyyounouski MK, Sobczak M, Greenberg R, Li J, Keller L, Sopka D, Kutikov A, Horwitz EM. Prostate bed motion during intensity-modulated radiotherapy treatment. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.11.041. Epub 2012 Feb 11.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25452933
Citation
Mantz C. A Phase II Trial of Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Low-Risk Prostate Cancer Using a Non-Robotic Linear Accelerator and Real-Time Target Tracking: Report of Toxicity, Quality of Life, and Disease Control Outcomes with 5-Year Minimum Follow-Up. Front Oncol. 2014 Nov 14;4:279. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2014.00279. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20153881
Citation
Sandler HM, Liu PY, Dunn RL, Khan DC, Tropper SE, Sanda MG, Mantz CA. Reduction in patient-reported acute morbidity in prostate cancer patients treated with 81-Gy Intensity-modulated radiotherapy using reduced planning target volume margins and electromagnetic tracking: assessing the impact of margin reduction study. Urology. 2010 May;75(5):1004-8. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2009.10.072. Epub 2010 Feb 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16243816
Citation
Ozsahin M, Crompton NE, Gourgou S, Kramar A, Li L, Shi Y, Sozzi WJ, Zouhair A, Mirimanoff RO, Azria D. CD4 and CD8 T-lymphocyte apoptosis can predict radiation-induced late toxicity: a prospective study in 399 patients. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 Oct 15;11(20):7426-33. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2634.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20869261
Citation
Azria D, Betz M, Bourgier C, Jeanneret Sozzi W, Ozsahin M. Identifying patients at risk for late radiation-induced toxicity. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2012 Dec;84 Suppl 1:e35-41. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2010.08.003. Epub 2010 Sep 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8433390
Citation
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, Filiberti A, Flechtner H, Fleishman SB, de Haes JC, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993 Mar 3;85(5):365-76. doi: 10.1093/jnci/85.5.365.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9187685
Citation
Rosen RC, Riley A, Wagner G, Osterloh IH, Kirkpatrick J, Mishra A. The international index of erectile function (IIEF): a multidimensional scale for assessment of erectile dysfunction. Urology. 1997 Jun;49(6):822-30. doi: 10.1016/s0090-4295(97)00238-0.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25810908
Citation
Nyaga VN, Arbyn M, Aerts M. Metaprop: a Stata command to perform meta-analysis of binomial data. Arch Public Health. 2014 Nov 10;72(1):39. doi: 10.1186/2049-3258-72-39. eCollection 2014.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Late Toxicity Following Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy and Two Image-Guided Strategies With Corresponding Treatment Margins.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs