search
Back to results

Study of Dupilumab in Adult Participants With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

Primary Purpose

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dupilumab
Placebo
Sponsored by
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key inclusion criteria:

  1. Documented diagnosis of EoE by endoscopy prior to or at screening
  2. History of on average at least 2 episodes of dysphagia (with intake of solids off anti-inflammatory therapy) per week in the 4 weeks prior to screening and on average at least 2 episodes of documented dysphagia per week in the weeks between screening and baseline; dysphagia is defined as trouble swallowing solid food, or having solid food stick, by participant report
  3. Must remain on a stabilized diet for at least 6 weeks prior to screening and during the course of the study; stable diet is defined as no initiation of single or multiple elimination diets or reintroduction of previously eliminated food groups
  4. Documented history of or presence of any of the following: allergic disease (e.g, allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis (AD), or food allergies), peripheral eosinophil counts ≥0.25 GI/L, or serum total Immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥100 kU/L

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior participation in a dupilumab (anti-IL-4R) clinical trial
  2. Other causes of esophageal eosinophilia or the following diseases: hypereosinophilic syndromes, Churg-Strauss vasculitis, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis
  3. History of achalasia, active Helicobacter pylori infection, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, and prior esophageal surgery prior to screening
  4. Any esophageal stricture unable to be passed with a standard, diagnostic, adult (9 to10 mm) upper endoscope or any critical esophageal stricture that requires dilation at screening
  5. History of bleeding disorders or esophageal varices
  6. Use of chronic aspirin, nonsteroidal agents, or anti-coagulants within 2 weeks prior to screening. Participants should not stop these agents solely to become eligible for entry into this study
  7. Treatment with an investigational drug within 2 months or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, prior to screening
  8. Use of systemic corticosteroids within 3 months or swallowed topical corticosteroids within 3 months prior to screening
  9. Use of inhaled (pulmonary or nasal) topical corticosteroids within 3 months prior to screening and during the study, except stable dose for at least 3 months prior to screening biopsy, which cannot be changed during the study
  10. Treatment with oral immunotherapy (OIT) within 6 months prior to screening
  11. Allergen immunotherapy unless on stable dose for at least 1 year prior to screening
  12. Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study

Note: The list of inclusion/ exclusion criteria provided above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in this clinical trial.

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Dupilumab 300 mg QW

Placebo

Arm Description

Participants received SC dupilumab 300 mg during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. Participants received 2 injections (300-mg initial dose, followed by a 300-mg loading dose) on day 1, followed by weekly injections.

Participants received matching placebo once weekly (qw) during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. Participants received 2 injections on day 1, followed by weekly injections.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Absolute Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 10
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 10
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Absolute Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 12
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Percent Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 12
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 3 Points in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score From Baseline at Week 10
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 3 Points in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score From Baseline at Week 12
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 10
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 10
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 12
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 12
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 40% Improvement in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score From Baseline at Week 10
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 40% Improvement in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score From Baseline at Week 12
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophils of 3 Esophageal Regions at Week 12
Peak eosinophils/high power field (eos/hpf) was determined by counting eosinophils in the most inflamed areas of each esophageal region sampled at each time point and calculating the change in the peak count at each site.
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference Score (EoE-EREFS) by Feature at Week 12
The EoE-EREFS includes a total of 6 major items related to the presence/ severity of esophageal features. Specific features scored by the investigator include rings (absent[0], mild[1], moderate[2], severe[3], not applicable); stricture (yes[1], no[0], not applicable); diameter of the stricture (if applicable; measurement not scored); exudates (absent[0], mild [1], severe[2]); furrows (absent[0], present[1]); edema (absent[0], present[1]). The total score of the 5 scored items ranges from 0 to 8 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Change From Baseline in Adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (EoE-QOL-A) Score at Week 12
The EoE-QOL-A questionnaire includes 30 items related to 5 established domains (eating/diet impact, social impact, emotional impact, disease anxiety, and swallowing anxiety) of daily life experiences. The EoE-QOL-A has a 1-week recall period. The items are graded on a 5-point scale: 1 (Not at All), 2 (Slightly), 3 (Moderately), 4 (Quite a bit), and 5 (Extremely). The EoE-QOL-A score is the average obtained by dividing the total score by the number of questions (for participants without disease, 120/30 = 4). Total scores range from 1 to 5 (higher scores indicate worsening symptoms).
Percentage of Participants With Use of Rescue Medication or Procedure (e.g., Esophageal Dilation) Through Week 12
Percent of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during the on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study (Week 28). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.

Full Information

First Posted
February 27, 2015
Last Updated
February 13, 2020
Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Sanofi
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02379052
Brief Title
Study of Dupilumab in Adult Participants With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel, Placebo-Controlled Study of the Efficacy, Safety and Tolerability of Dupilumab in Adult Patients With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 12, 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 17, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 10, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Sanofi

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to assess the clinical efficacy of repeat subcutaneous (SC) doses of dupilumab, compared with placebo, to relieve symptoms in adult participants with active, moderate to severe Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE). The secondary objectives of the study are: To assess the safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity of SC doses of dupilumab in adult participants with active, moderate to severe EoE To assess the effect of dupilumab on esophageal eosinophilic infiltration To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) of dupilumab in adult participants with EoE

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Eosinophilic Esophagitis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
47 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dupilumab 300 mg QW
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received SC dupilumab 300 mg during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. Participants received 2 injections (300-mg initial dose, followed by a 300-mg loading dose) on day 1, followed by weekly injections.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received matching placebo once weekly (qw) during the 12-week double-blind treatment phase. Participants received 2 injections on day 1, followed by weekly injections.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dupilumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
DUPIXENT®, REGN668(SAR231893)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Absolute Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 10
Description
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 10
Description
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10
Title
Absolute Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 12
Description
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score at Week 12
Description
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 3 Points in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score From Baseline at Week 10
Description
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving a Reduction of ≥ 3 Points in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Total Score From Baseline at Week 12
Description
The SDI is a PRO used to determine frequency/ intensity of dysphagia (recall period 1-wk). Frequency of dysphagia events is graded on a 5-pt scale: 0=none, 1=1x/wk, 2=several/wk, 3=1x/day, 4=several/day; intensity is graded on a 6-pt scale: 0=swallowing unrestricted, 1=slight sensation of resistance, 2=slight retching with delay, 3=short period of obstruction necessitating intervention, 4=longer-lasting period of obstruction removable by vomiting, 5=long-lasting complete obstruction requiring endoscopic intervention. Total score ranges from 0-9 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 10
Description
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10
Title
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 10
Description
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 12
Description
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Absolute Change From Baseline in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score at Week 12
Description
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 40% Improvement in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score From Baseline at Week 10
Description
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 10
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving ≥ 40% Improvement in Weekly Reported Eosinophilic Esophagitis Activity Index (EEsAI) Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) Score From Baseline at Week 12
Description
The EEsAI PRO questionnaire includes items related to the intensity and frequency of dysphagia, the influence of specific food groups on dysphagia symptoms, and other symptoms independent of eating or drinking (ie, heartburn, acid regurgitation, and chest pain). The total EEsAI PRO score ranges from 0 to 100 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms). The EEsAI PRO utilizes 24-hour and 1-week recall periods.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline in Peak Esophageal Intraepithelial Eosinophils of 3 Esophageal Regions at Week 12
Description
Peak eosinophils/high power field (eos/hpf) was determined by counting eosinophils in the most inflamed areas of each esophageal region sampled at each time point and calculating the change in the peak count at each site.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Absolute Change From Baseline in Eosinophilic Esophagitis-Endoscopic Reference Score (EoE-EREFS) by Feature at Week 12
Description
The EoE-EREFS includes a total of 6 major items related to the presence/ severity of esophageal features. Specific features scored by the investigator include rings (absent[0], mild[1], moderate[2], severe[3], not applicable); stricture (yes[1], no[0], not applicable); diameter of the stricture (if applicable; measurement not scored); exudates (absent[0], mild [1], severe[2]); furrows (absent[0], present[1]); edema (absent[0], present[1]). The total score of the 5 scored items ranges from 0 to 8 (higher score indicates worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Adult Eosinophilic Esophagitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (EoE-QOL-A) Score at Week 12
Description
The EoE-QOL-A questionnaire includes 30 items related to 5 established domains (eating/diet impact, social impact, emotional impact, disease anxiety, and swallowing anxiety) of daily life experiences. The EoE-QOL-A has a 1-week recall period. The items are graded on a 5-point scale: 1 (Not at All), 2 (Slightly), 3 (Moderately), 4 (Quite a bit), and 5 (Extremely). The EoE-QOL-A score is the average obtained by dividing the total score by the number of questions (for participants without disease, 120/30 = 4). Total scores range from 1 to 5 (higher scores indicate worsening symptoms).
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 12
Title
Percentage of Participants With Use of Rescue Medication or Procedure (e.g., Esophageal Dilation) Through Week 12
Time Frame
Baseline through Week 12
Title
Percent of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) During the Study
Description
Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as adverse events (AEs) that developed or worsened or became serious during the on-treatment period (time from the first dose of study drug up to the end of study (Week 28). A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-participant hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious AEs.
Time Frame
Baseline through Week 28

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key inclusion criteria: Documented diagnosis of EoE by endoscopy prior to or at screening History of on average at least 2 episodes of dysphagia (with intake of solids off anti-inflammatory therapy) per week in the 4 weeks prior to screening and on average at least 2 episodes of documented dysphagia per week in the weeks between screening and baseline; dysphagia is defined as trouble swallowing solid food, or having solid food stick, by participant report Must remain on a stabilized diet for at least 6 weeks prior to screening and during the course of the study; stable diet is defined as no initiation of single or multiple elimination diets or reintroduction of previously eliminated food groups Documented history of or presence of any of the following: allergic disease (e.g, allergic asthma, allergic rhinitis, atopic dermatitis (AD), or food allergies), peripheral eosinophil counts ≥0.25 GI/L, or serum total Immunoglobulin E (IgE) ≥100 kU/L Key Exclusion Criteria: Prior participation in a dupilumab (anti-IL-4R) clinical trial Other causes of esophageal eosinophilia or the following diseases: hypereosinophilic syndromes, Churg-Strauss vasculitis, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis History of achalasia, active Helicobacter pylori infection, Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, celiac disease, and prior esophageal surgery prior to screening Any esophageal stricture unable to be passed with a standard, diagnostic, adult (9 to10 mm) upper endoscope or any critical esophageal stricture that requires dilation at screening History of bleeding disorders or esophageal varices Use of chronic aspirin, nonsteroidal agents, or anti-coagulants within 2 weeks prior to screening. Participants should not stop these agents solely to become eligible for entry into this study Treatment with an investigational drug within 2 months or within 5 half-lives (if known), whichever is longer, prior to screening Use of systemic corticosteroids within 3 months or swallowed topical corticosteroids within 3 months prior to screening Use of inhaled (pulmonary or nasal) topical corticosteroids within 3 months prior to screening and during the study, except stable dose for at least 3 months prior to screening biopsy, which cannot be changed during the study Treatment with oral immunotherapy (OIT) within 6 months prior to screening Allergen immunotherapy unless on stable dose for at least 1 year prior to screening Pregnant or breastfeeding women, or women planning to become pregnant or breastfeed during the study Note: The list of inclusion/ exclusion criteria provided above is not intended to contain all considerations relevant to a participant's potential participation in this clinical trial.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trial Management
Organizational Affiliation
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
Country
United States
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Urbana
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
Country
United States
City
Chevy Chase
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
Country
United States
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
Country
United States
City
Fairfax
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35636689
Citation
Wechsler ME, Klion AD, Paggiaro P, Nair P, Staumont-Salle D, Radwan A, Johnson RR, Kapoor U, Khokhar FA, Daizadeh N, Chen Z, Laws E, Ortiz B, Jacob-Nara JA, Mannent LP, Rowe PJ, Deniz Y. Effect of Dupilumab on Blood Eosinophil Counts in Patients With Asthma, Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps, Atopic Dermatitis, or Eosinophilic Esophagitis. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2022 Oct;10(10):2695-2709. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2022.05.019. Epub 2022 May 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34037993
Citation
Hamilton JD, Harel S, Swanson BN, Brian W, Chen Z, Rice MS, Amin N, Ardeleanu M, Radin A, Shumel B, Ruddy M, Patel N, Pirozzi G, Mannent L, Graham NMH. Dupilumab suppresses type 2 inflammatory biomarkers across multiple atopic, allergic diseases. Clin Exp Allergy. 2021 Jul;51(7):915-931. doi: 10.1111/cea.13954. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31593702
Citation
Hirano I, Dellon ES, Hamilton JD, Collins MH, Peterson K, Chehade M, Schoepfer AM, Safroneeva E, Rothenberg ME, Falk GW, Assouline-Dayan Y, Zhao Q, Chen Z, Swanson BN, Pirozzi G, Mannent L, Graham NMH, Akinlade B, Stahl N, Yancopoulos GD, Radin A. Efficacy of Dupilumab in a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Adults With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis. Gastroenterology. 2020 Jan;158(1):111-122.e10. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.09.042. Epub 2019 Oct 5.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study of Dupilumab in Adult Participants With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis (EoE)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs