search
Back to results

Study of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Women With Hot Flashes

Primary Purpose

Vasomotor Symptoms; Hot Flashes

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Erenumab
Placebo
Sponsored by
Amgen
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Vasomotor Symptoms; Hot Flashes focused on measuring Vasomotor symptoms; Hot Flashes; Menopause

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • female subjects with hot flashes associated with menopause between 45 and 65 years of age, inclusive, with no history or evidence of clinically relevant medical disorders as determined by the investigator in consultation with the Amgen physician.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History or evidence of clinically significant disorder (including psychiatric), condition or disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Amgen physician would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion.

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Eugene Andruczyk
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Placebo

Erenumab

Arm Description

Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection.

Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes
The severity of hot flashes was assessed by participants based on the following categories: Mild: sensation of heat without sweating, mild flushing; Moderate: sensation of heat, face flushed, slightly clammy, some sweating, able to continue activity, may want to remove layers of clothing or covers at night; Severe: sensation of heat with more severe sweating, have to stop current activity, may have to change clothing. Baseline (BL) number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day -7 to day 1 predose based on geometric mean, and the week 4 number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day 21 to day 27 based on geometric mean. The ratio of week 4 to BL was used to assess change from BL to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[BL]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity Score
The daily severity score was calculated according to the following: (Number of mild hot flashes * 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes * 2) + (number of severe hot flashes * 3). The baseline daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day -7 to day 1 predose, and the week 4 daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day 21 to day 27. The ratio of week 4 to baseline (week 4 / baseline) was used to assess change from baseline to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[baseline]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
A treatment-emergent adverse event is any adverse event that began or worsened after the initial dose of study drug and before the end of study. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: fatal life threatening required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect. other medically important serious event A treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) is any treatment-emergent adverse event that per investigator review had a reasonable possibility of being caused by the study drug.
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab After a Single Dose
Blood samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated analytical procedure.
Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Erunumab After a Single Dose
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Erenumab
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for Erenumab
Terminal Half-life (T1/2) of Erenumab
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to assess suicidal ideation during the study based on the following Yes/No questions: Have you wished you were dead or wished you could go to sleep and not wake up? Have you actually had any thoughts of killing yourself?
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies After a Single Dose
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging immunoassay was used to detect antibodies capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. A participant was defined as positive for developing anti-erenumab antibodies if they were binding antibody positive postbaseline with a negative or no result at baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.

Full Information

First Posted
May 13, 2013
Last Updated
January 11, 2019
Sponsor
Amgen
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01890109
Brief Title
Study of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Women With Hot Flashes
Official Title
Randomized, Stratified, Parallel-group, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Study to Evaluate the Efficacy, Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics of AMG 334 in Women With Hot Flashes Associated With Menopause
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 13, 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 11, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 11, 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Amgen

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study was to evaluate the frequency of moderate to severe daily hot flashes 4 weeks after a single dose of erenumab (AMG 334) in women with hot flashes associated with menopause.
Detailed Description
This study will test the hypothesis that the vasodilation associated with capsaicin-induced dermal blood flow (DBF) provides a good model for the vasodilation associated with hot flashes; therefore erenumab doses that cause DBF inhibition will be safe and well tolerated, and will be effective in the reduction of the frequency and/or severity of HFs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Vasomotor Symptoms; Hot Flashes
Keywords
Vasomotor symptoms; Hot Flashes; Menopause

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
103 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received a single dose of placebo administered by subcutaneous injection.
Arm Title
Erenumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received a single dose of 70 mg erenumab administered by subcutaneous injection.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Erenumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
AMG 334, Aimovig™
Intervention Description
Administered via subcutaneous injection.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Administered via subcutaneous injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Average Number of Daily Moderate to Severe Hot Flashes
Description
The severity of hot flashes was assessed by participants based on the following categories: Mild: sensation of heat without sweating, mild flushing; Moderate: sensation of heat, face flushed, slightly clammy, some sweating, able to continue activity, may want to remove layers of clothing or covers at night; Severe: sensation of heat with more severe sweating, have to stop current activity, may have to change clothing. Baseline (BL) number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day -7 to day 1 predose based on geometric mean, and the week 4 number of hot flashes is the average number of moderate or severe hot flashes per 24 hours from day 21 to day 27 based on geometric mean. The ratio of week 4 to BL was used to assess change from BL to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[BL]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
Time Frame
Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ratio of Week 4 to Baseline Daily Hot Flash Severity Score
Description
The daily severity score was calculated according to the following: (Number of mild hot flashes * 1) + (number of moderate hot flashes * 2) + (number of severe hot flashes * 3). The baseline daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day -7 to day 1 predose, and the week 4 daily hot flash severity score is the geometric mean daily hot flash severity score from day 21 to day 27. The ratio of week 4 to baseline (week 4 / baseline) was used to assess change from baseline to week 4 via a log transformation (log[week4/BL] = log[week4] - log[baseline]), which was estimated using a repeated measures analysis. The ratio was obtained via an exponential back-transformation.
Time Frame
Baseline (days -7 to day 1 predose) and week 4 (days 21 to 27)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events
Description
A treatment-emergent adverse event is any adverse event that began or worsened after the initial dose of study drug and before the end of study. A serious adverse event is an adverse event that met at least 1 of the following serious criteria: fatal life threatening required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity congenital anomaly/birth defect. other medically important serious event A treatment-related adverse event (TRAE) is any treatment-emergent adverse event that per investigator review had a reasonable possibility of being caused by the study drug.
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
Maximum Observed Concentration (Cmax) of Erenumab After a Single Dose
Description
Blood samples were analyzed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) following a validated analytical procedure.
Time Frame
Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Title
Time to Maximum Observed Concentration (Tmax) of Erunumab After a Single Dose
Time Frame
Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Title
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Quantifiable Concentration (AUClast) for Erenumab
Time Frame
Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Title
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Infinity (AUCinf) for Erenumab
Time Frame
Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Title
Terminal Half-life (T1/2) of Erenumab
Time Frame
Predose and 4 hours, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 15, 22, 29, 43, 50, 57, 64, 78, 85, and 113 days post-dose
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Suicidal Ideation
Description
The Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) was used to assess suicidal ideation during the study based on the following Yes/No questions: Have you wished you were dead or wished you could go to sleep and not wake up? Have you actually had any thoughts of killing yourself?
Time Frame
16 weeks
Title
Number of Participants Who Developed Anti-erenumab Antibodies After a Single Dose
Description
Two validated assays were used to detect the presence of anti-erenumab antibodies. First, an electrochemiluminescent (ECL) bridging immunoassay was used to detect antibodies capable of binding erenumab. Second, a cell based bioassay was used to test positive binding antibody samples for neutralizing activity against erenumab. A participant was defined as positive for developing anti-erenumab antibodies if they were binding antibody positive postbaseline with a negative or no result at baseline. If a sample was positive for binding antibodies and demonstrated neutralizing activity at the same time point, the participant was defined as positive for neutralizing antibodies.
Time Frame
16 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: female subjects with hot flashes associated with menopause between 45 and 65 years of age, inclusive, with no history or evidence of clinically relevant medical disorders as determined by the investigator in consultation with the Amgen physician. Exclusion Criteria: History or evidence of clinically significant disorder (including psychiatric), condition or disease that, in the opinion of the Investigator or Amgen physician would pose a risk to subject safety or interfere with the study evaluation, procedures, or completion.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
MD
Organizational Affiliation
Amgen
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33186
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eugene Andruczyk
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mount Pleasant
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29464
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98105
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.amgentrials.com
Description
AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Learn more about this trial

Study of Erenumab (AMG 334) in Women With Hot Flashes

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs