Study of Intra-articular Injections vs Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee (MOZArT)
Primary Purpose
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria (Screening Visit 1):
- Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee by American College of Rheumatology criteria
- Men or women between 45-80 years of age.
- Have documented diagnosis of primary OA of the target knee based on clinical and radiographic criteria (Kellgren-Lawrence Numerical Grading System of Grade 2-3) in the tibial-femoral compartment of the target knee confirmed by standard post-anterior weightbearing X-ray of the knee in full extension taken </= 6 months prior to Visit 1.
- Currently taking an Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), or acetaminophen on a regular basis (4-7 days/ week) over last 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and has experienced amelioration of pain on these medications.
- Must have a 50-foot walk test pain score of less than 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS in the target knee at screening
- Pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must not be greater than 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS on 50-foot walk test, and the target knee must be more symptomatic.
- Willingness to stop all OA treatments.
- Fully informed of the risks of entering the study and willing to provide written consent to enter the study.
- Able to understand and be willing to comply with all study requirements, particularly the weekly injection regimen for administration of study drug.
Primary complaint is pain immediately following an unassisted 50-foot walk. They must show:
- moderate to severe pain score in the target knee as demonstrated by 40 - 90 mm recorded on a 100 mm VAS, and
- 20 mm increase in pain from their screening visit pain score (a "flare")
- pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must </= 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS
Exclusion Criteria:
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the components of Traumeel or Zeel
- Known hypersensitivity or allergy to acetaminophen.
- Has body mass index (BMI) >38 kg/m2.
- Avoidance of, or aversion to, nonprescription medications.
- Clinical symptoms of meniscal instability or significant valgus/ varus that requires corrective osteotomy
- Any major injury or surgery to the target knee in the prior 12 months.
One or a combination of the following co-morbidities:
- other inflammatory arthropathies, gout or pseudogout within previous 6 months
- avascular necrosis
- severe bone or joint deformity in target knee
- osteonecrosis of either knee
- fibromyalgia
- pes anserine bursitis
- lumbar radiculopathy with referred pain to either knee
- neurogenic or vascular claudication
- significant anterior knee pain due to diagnosed isolated patella-femoral syndrome in the target knee
- target knee joint infection or skin disorder/infection to the area surrounding the knee within previous 6 months
- current treatment or treatment of cancer within the previous 2 years (excluding basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
- Participated in any experimental drug or device study within the prior one (1) month and/or IA injections six (6) months.
- Referred pain from other joints
- Significantly debilitating concurrent infection(s)
- Significant ligamentous instability
- Any prior viscosupplementation therapy (in target knee) within 6 months prior to Screening
- Systemic or IA injection of corticosteroids in any joint within 3 months of enrollment
- Therapy with oral hyaluronic acid products, and/or oral pharmaceutical products containing glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulphate and/or diacerein
- Therapy with opioids within the last 90 days including intra-dermal delivery systems (patches)
- Therapy with autologous stem cells
- Therapy with coumarins such as warfarin, Coumadin; heparin and derivative substances including low molecular weight heparin, synthetic pentasaccharide inhibitors of factor Xa such as fondaparinux and idraparinux; direct factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban; direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin, lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban and dabigatran.
- Concomitant inflammatory or other rheumatologic, neurological or cardiovascular diseases which could affect the evaluation of knee pain
- Ongoing litigation for workers compensation for musculoskeletal injuries or disorders
- Use of alcohol of more than 4 drinks per day
- Clinically important axial deviation (varus, valgus) greater than 15 degrees
- Concomitant severe OA of the hip or other joints, which might interfere with the assessments required by the study
- Painful knee conditions other than OA (e.g., Paget's disease)
- Hemiparesis of lower limbs
- Significant planned surgery to lower limbs, which might interfere with the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
- Presence of serious gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurological disease that might interfere with the outcome of the study or the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
- Presence of infections and/or skin diseases in the area of the injection site such as psoriasis
- Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding or not using recognized effective contraceptive measures. Females of childbearing potential (including those less than one year post-menopausal) must agree to maintain reliable birth control throughout the study.
- Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values.
- Patients who are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study.
Sites / Locations
- Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II
- Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
- Universal BioPharma Research Inc.
- Providence Clinical Research
- Hans Richard Barthel, M.D., Inc.
- Westlake Medical Research
- Radiant Research Inc. - Denver
- Riverside Clinical Research
- AppleMed Research, Inc.
- Radiant Research Inc.
- Injury Care Medical Center
- Global Scientific Innovations
- Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
- Manhattan Medical Research
- Research Across America - NY
- PMG Cary Medical Research
- New Hope Clinical Research
- PMG Research of Charlotte
- PMG Research of Raleigh
- PMG Research of Salisbury
- Radiant Research Inc. - Akron
- Sterling Research Group, Ltd
- Clinical Inquest Center Ltd.
- Hillcrest Clinical Research
- Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc.
- Clinical Research Solutions
- PMG Research of Knoxville
- PMG Research of Knoxville
- Clinical Research Solutions
- Radiant Research Inc. - Salt Lake City
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
Placebo injectable solution
Arm Description
Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one intra articular (IA) injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Injection volume of placebo is 4.2 mL as well (taken from the 10.0 mL vial by unblinded staff member, rest to be kept for drug accountability)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Knee Pain as Measured by the WOMAC Osteoarthritis (OA) Index Pain Subscale (Section A, Items #1-5) Measured by 100 mm VAS
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess pain, scores from WOMAC Section A, items 1 to 5 are averaged to yield the Pain Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. A two-sided test of equality of the study drug (Traumeel®-Zeel®) and Placebo at level 0.05 was computed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and the corresponding Baseline value of the primary efficacy variable as a covariate. The test decision was based on the (two-sided) p-value for the corresponding test of no treatment difference.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain Subscore (WOMAC Section A, Items #1-5) Measured by 100 mm VAS
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess pain, scores from WOMAC Section A, items 1 to 5 are averaged to yield the Pain Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in pain subscore were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Stiffness Subscore (WOMAC Section B, Items #6-7) Measured by 100 mm VAS
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess stiffness, scores from WOMAC Section B, items 6 to 7 are averaged to yield the Stiffness Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in stiffness score were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Physical Function Bubscore (WOMAC Section C, Items #8-24) Recorded on 100 mm VAS
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess physical function, scores from WOMAC Section C, items 8 to 24 are averaged to yield the Physical Function Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in Physical Function subscore were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Total WOMAC Score (All Subscales) Recorded on 100 mm VAS
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. A total WOMAC score was computed by averaging all 24 possible responses. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in total WOMAC score were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
Patients made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
Patients made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Physician Global Assessment (PhGA)
Study Physicians made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Physician Global Assessment (PhGA)
Study Physicians made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Pain Immediately Following the 50-foot Walk (100 mm VAS)
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'.
Time to Walking (50-foot Walk Test)
Changes in time to walk 50 feet (seconds)
Time to 50% Pain Relief (Study Population Measure Statistically Derived)
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. The time to 50% pain relief were statistical exercises and were analyzed for each individual patient from their self-assessment.
Patients Achieving 100% Pain Relief
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. The time to 100% pain relief were statistical exercises and were analyzed for each individual patient from their self-assessment, however, the prevalence of 100% pain relief did not support an estimate for the median time. The number of patients who reached 100% pain relief is reported and the log rank test for difference in time to 100% pain relief was calculated for each injection.
Time to and Use of Rescue Medication (Acetaminophen up to 3000 mg Per Day for Breakthrough Pain) (Study Population Measure Statistically Derived) - Patients Use
Time to and use of rescue medication (acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day for breakthrough pain) as reported by the patients. Patients who used any rescue medication during the study.
Time to and Use of Rescue Medication (Acetaminophen up to 3000 mg Per Day for Breakthrough Pain) (Study Population Measure Statistically Derived). Tablets Taken.
Time to and use of rescue medication (acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day for breakthrough pain) (study population measure statistically derived). Total number of tablets taken as reported by patient.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01887678
First Posted
June 14, 2013
Last Updated
March 6, 2018
Sponsor
Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01887678
Brief Title
Study of Intra-articular Injections vs Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Acronym
MOZArT
Official Title
Multi-center Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Co-administered Traumeel® / Zeel® Intra-articular Injections vs Placebo in Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Pain With Osteoarthritis of the Knee
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Biologische Heilmittel Heel GmbH
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a combined Traumeel® / Zeel® injection against placebo (saline) in patients with moderate-to-severe pain associated with osteoarthritis of the knee.
Detailed Description
The primary objective is to demonstrate the superiority of Traumeel® and Zeel® co-administered intra-articular (IA) injections vs placebo IA injections on the change in knee pain in patients with moderate to severe knee pain associated with osteoarthritis.
The secondary objectives are to evaluate reduction of pain and stiffness and change in physical function.
Safety is evaluated by the incidence of treatment emergent adverse events during the treatment period and follow up period for all randomized patients.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Knee
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
287 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one intra articular (IA) injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Arm Title
Placebo injectable solution
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Injection volume of placebo is 4.2 mL as well (taken from the 10.0 mL vial by unblinded staff member, rest to be kept for drug accountability)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Traumeel® / Zeel® Injectable Solution
Other Intervention Name(s)
Traumeel, Zeel
Intervention Description
Injection volume is 4.2 mL for active study medication (2.0 mL Zeel plus 2.2 mL Traumeel in one IA injection) on treatment days 1, 8 and 15.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
Saline
Intervention Description
Placebo is an injection of Saline
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Knee Pain as Measured by the WOMAC Osteoarthritis (OA) Index Pain Subscale (Section A, Items #1-5) Measured by 100 mm VAS
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess pain, scores from WOMAC Section A, items 1 to 5 are averaged to yield the Pain Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. A two-sided test of equality of the study drug (Traumeel®-Zeel®) and Placebo at level 0.05 was computed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and the corresponding Baseline value of the primary efficacy variable as a covariate. The test decision was based on the (two-sided) p-value for the corresponding test of no treatment difference.
Time Frame
from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Subscore (WOMAC Section A, Items #1-5) Measured by 100 mm VAS
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess pain, scores from WOMAC Section A, items 1 to 5 are averaged to yield the Pain Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in pain subscore were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time Frame
from Baseline to post-Baseline visits except End of Study Visit (up to day 105)
Title
Stiffness Subscore (WOMAC Section B, Items #6-7) Measured by 100 mm VAS
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess stiffness, scores from WOMAC Section B, items 6 to 7 are averaged to yield the Stiffness Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in stiffness score were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time Frame
from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Title
Physical Function Bubscore (WOMAC Section C, Items #8-24) Recorded on 100 mm VAS
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. To assess physical function, scores from WOMAC Section C, items 8 to 24 are averaged to yield the Physical Function Subscale total score. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in Physical Function subscore were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time Frame
from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Title
Total WOMAC Score (All Subscales) Recorded on 100 mm VAS
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee were assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index version 3.1 (WOMAC OA) whereby patients self-assessed 24 parameters on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. A total WOMAC score was computed by averaging all 24 possible responses. At Study Days 1, 8 and 15 where injections were administered, this was to be done before injection. Changes in total WOMAC score were analyzed by using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment group as qualitative factor and Baseline value as a covariate.
Time Frame
from Baseline (Day 1, predose) to End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Title
Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
Description
Patients made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time Frame
from Baseline (Day 1, predose)
Title
Patient Global Assessment (PGA)
Description
Patients made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time Frame
End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Title
Physician Global Assessment (PhGA)
Description
Study Physicians made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, predose)
Title
Physician Global Assessment (PhGA)
Description
Study Physicians made an overall Global Assessment of the knee osteoarthritis with the assessment stages "Very good", "Good", "Fair", "Poor" and "Very poor".
Time Frame
End of Study Visit (up to Day 119)
Title
Pain Immediately Following the 50-foot Walk (100 mm VAS)
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, predose) to post-Baseline visits (up to day 119)
Title
Time to Walking (50-foot Walk Test)
Description
Changes in time to walk 50 feet (seconds)
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1, predose) to post-Baseline visits (up to day 119)
Title
Time to 50% Pain Relief (Study Population Measure Statistically Derived)
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. The time to 50% pain relief were statistical exercises and were analyzed for each individual patient from their self-assessment.
Time Frame
Statistically derived
Title
Patients Achieving 100% Pain Relief
Description
Changes of the target (treated) knee pain following a 50 feet walk self-assessed by the patients on a 0 to 100 millimeter (mm) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) where 0 corresponded to 'None' and 100 to 'Extreme'. The time to 100% pain relief were statistical exercises and were analyzed for each individual patient from their self-assessment, however, the prevalence of 100% pain relief did not support an estimate for the median time. The number of patients who reached 100% pain relief is reported and the log rank test for difference in time to 100% pain relief was calculated for each injection.
Time Frame
Statistically derived
Title
Time to and Use of Rescue Medication (Acetaminophen up to 3000 mg Per Day for Breakthrough Pain) (Study Population Measure Statistically Derived) - Patients Use
Description
Time to and use of rescue medication (acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day for breakthrough pain) as reported by the patients. Patients who used any rescue medication during the study.
Time Frame
Statistically derived
Title
Time to and Use of Rescue Medication (Acetaminophen up to 3000 mg Per Day for Breakthrough Pain) (Study Population Measure Statistically Derived). Tablets Taken.
Description
Time to and use of rescue medication (acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day for breakthrough pain) (study population measure statistically derived). Total number of tablets taken as reported by patient.
Time Frame
Statistically derived
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Serious Adverse Events
Description
Total number of patients affected.
Time Frame
Start of Lead-In period until individual study end, up to 16 weeks.
Title
Each Adverse Event (AE)
Description
Total number of patients affected.
Time Frame
Starting at Visit 2/ Start of Lead-In period (Day 7 up to day 119)
Title
Incidence of Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description
Total number of patients affected.
Time Frame
during the treatment period and follow up period (Days 11 to 119)
Title
Proportion of Patients Who Discontinued Due to an AE
Description
Total number of patients affected.
Time Frame
All visits (Days 1 up to 119)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria (Screening Visit 1):
Osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee by American College of Rheumatology criteria
Men or women between 45-80 years of age.
Have documented diagnosis of primary OA of the target knee based on clinical and radiographic criteria (Kellgren-Lawrence Numerical Grading System of Grade 2-3) in the tibial-femoral compartment of the target knee confirmed by standard post-anterior weightbearing X-ray of the knee in full extension taken </= 6 months prior to Visit 1.
Currently taking an Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID), or acetaminophen on a regular basis (4-7 days/ week) over last 2 weeks prior to Visit 1 and has experienced amelioration of pain on these medications.
Must have a 50-foot walk test pain score of less than 40 mm on a 100 mm VAS in the target knee at screening
Pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must not be greater than 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS on 50-foot walk test, and the target knee must be more symptomatic.
Willingness to stop all OA treatments.
Fully informed of the risks of entering the study and willing to provide written consent to enter the study.
Able to understand and be willing to comply with all study requirements, particularly the weekly injection regimen for administration of study drug.
Primary complaint is pain immediately following an unassisted 50-foot walk. They must show:
moderate to severe pain score in the target knee as demonstrated by 40 - 90 mm recorded on a 100 mm VAS, and
20 mm increase in pain from their screening visit pain score (a "flare")
pain in the non-target (contralateral) knee must </= 30 mm on a 100 mm VAS
Exclusion Criteria:
Known hypersensitivity or allergy to any of the components of Traumeel or Zeel
Known hypersensitivity or allergy to acetaminophen.
Has body mass index (BMI) >38 kg/m2.
Avoidance of, or aversion to, nonprescription medications.
Clinical symptoms of meniscal instability or significant valgus/ varus that requires corrective osteotomy
Any major injury or surgery to the target knee in the prior 12 months.
One or a combination of the following co-morbidities:
other inflammatory arthropathies, gout or pseudogout within previous 6 months
avascular necrosis
severe bone or joint deformity in target knee
osteonecrosis of either knee
fibromyalgia
pes anserine bursitis
lumbar radiculopathy with referred pain to either knee
neurogenic or vascular claudication
significant anterior knee pain due to diagnosed isolated patella-femoral syndrome in the target knee
target knee joint infection or skin disorder/infection to the area surrounding the knee within previous 6 months
current treatment or treatment of cancer within the previous 2 years (excluding basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin)
Participated in any experimental drug or device study within the prior one (1) month and/or IA injections six (6) months.
Referred pain from other joints
Significantly debilitating concurrent infection(s)
Significant ligamentous instability
Any prior viscosupplementation therapy (in target knee) within 6 months prior to Screening
Systemic or IA injection of corticosteroids in any joint within 3 months of enrollment
Therapy with oral hyaluronic acid products, and/or oral pharmaceutical products containing glucosamine and/or chondroitin sulphate and/or diacerein
Therapy with opioids within the last 90 days including intra-dermal delivery systems (patches)
Therapy with autologous stem cells
Therapy with coumarins such as warfarin, Coumadin; heparin and derivative substances including low molecular weight heparin, synthetic pentasaccharide inhibitors of factor Xa such as fondaparinux and idraparinux; direct factor Xa inhibitors such as rivaroxaban and apixaban; direct thrombin inhibitors such as hirudin, lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban and dabigatran.
Concomitant inflammatory or other rheumatologic, neurological or cardiovascular diseases which could affect the evaluation of knee pain
Ongoing litigation for workers compensation for musculoskeletal injuries or disorders
Use of alcohol of more than 4 drinks per day
Clinically important axial deviation (varus, valgus) greater than 15 degrees
Concomitant severe OA of the hip or other joints, which might interfere with the assessments required by the study
Painful knee conditions other than OA (e.g., Paget's disease)
Hemiparesis of lower limbs
Significant planned surgery to lower limbs, which might interfere with the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
Presence of serious gastrointestinal, renal, hepatic, pulmonary, cardiovascular, neurological disease that might interfere with the outcome of the study or the patient's ability to comply with study requirements
Presence of infections and/or skin diseases in the area of the injection site such as psoriasis
Females who are pregnant or breast-feeding or not using recognized effective contraceptive measures. Females of childbearing potential (including those less than one year post-menopausal) must agree to maintain reliable birth control throughout the study.
Clinically significant abnormal laboratory values.
Patients who are likely to be non-compliant or uncooperative during the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nebojsa Skrepnik, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Royal Anspach, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hans Barthel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Hans Richard Barthel, M.D., Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shariar Cohen-Gadol, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Westlake Medical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David Bolshoun, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Radiant Research Inc. - Denver
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Linda Murray, DO
Organizational Affiliation
Radiant Research Inc
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Susan Hole, DO
Organizational Affiliation
Riverside Clinical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Agustin Latorre, MD
Organizational Affiliation
AppleMed Research, Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Radnovich, DO
Organizational Affiliation
Injury Care Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Moges Sisay, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Global Scientific Innovations
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Larkin T Wadsworth, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kurian Abraham, MD
Organizational Affiliation
New Hope Clinical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rakesh Patel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PMG Research of Salisbury
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
George Raad, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PMG Research of Charlotte
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Martin VanCleeff, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PMG Cary Medical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Rubino, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PMG Research of Raleigh
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Howard R Adelglass, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Research Across America - NY
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Louis Re, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Manhattan Medical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Daniel Whitmer, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Clinical Inquest Center Ltd.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey Klein, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Radiant Research Inc. - Akron
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rakesh Davit, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Sterling Research Group, Ltd.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Glenn Smith, DO
Organizational Affiliation
Hillcrest Clinical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shawn Saylor, DO
Organizational Affiliation
Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alex Slandzicki, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Clinical Research Solutions
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sadia Dar, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Clinical Research Solutions
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rickey Manning, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PMG Research of Knoxville
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Wakefield, MD
Organizational Affiliation
PMG Research of Knoxville
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael R Adams, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Radiant Research Inc. - Salt Lake City
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Teresa Sligh, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Providence Clinical Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David. Cardona, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Universal BioPharma Research Inc.
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinical Research Advantage - Arizona II
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85050
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85712
Country
United States
Facility Name
Universal BioPharma Research Inc.
City
Dinuba
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93618
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence Clinical Research
City
North Hollywood
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hans Richard Barthel, M.D., Inc.
City
Santa Barbara
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93108
Country
United States
Facility Name
Westlake Medical Research
City
Westlake Village
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91361
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research Inc. - Denver
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Riverside Clinical Research
City
Edgewater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32132
Country
United States
Facility Name
AppleMed Research, Inc.
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research Inc.
City
Pinellas Park
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33781
Country
United States
Facility Name
Injury Care Medical Center
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83713
Country
United States
Facility Name
Global Scientific Innovations
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47714
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sundance Clinical Research, LLC
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Manhattan Medical Research
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Across America - NY
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10022
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Cary Medical Research
City
Cary
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27518
Country
United States
Facility Name
New Hope Clinical Research
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28204
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Charlotte
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28209
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Raleigh
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27609
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Salisbury
City
Salisbury
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research Inc. - Akron
City
Akron
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44311
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sterling Research Group, Ltd
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45246
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Inquest Center Ltd.
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45431
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hillcrest Clinical Research
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73119
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc.
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16602
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions
City
Franklin
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37064
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Knoxville
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37912
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Knoxville
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37938
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Solutions
City
Smyrna
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37167
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research Inc. - Salt Lake City
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84123
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
Citation
Lozada CJ, del Rio E, Reitberg DP, Smith RA, Kahn CB, Moskowitz RW. A double-blind, randomized, saline-controlled study of the efficacy and safety of co-administered intra-articular injections of Tr14 and Ze14 for treatment of painful osteoarthritis of the knee: The MOZArT trial. Eur J Integr Med 2017;13:54-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.eujim.2017.07.005;
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Study of Intra-articular Injections vs Placebo in Patients With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs