search
Back to results

Study of Lemborexant for Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder and Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia

Primary Purpose

Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lemborexant 2.5 mg
Lemborexant 5 mg
Lemborexant 10 mg
Lemborexant 15 mg
Lemborexant-matched placebo
Sponsored by
Eisai Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder focused on measuring Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia, sleep, circadian rhythms

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria (Core Study):

  • Male or female, age 60 to 90 years at the time of informed consent
  • Able to provide informed consent. If a participant lacks capacity to consent in the investigator's opinion, the participant's assent should be obtained, if required in accordance with local laws, regulations and customs, and the written informed consent of a legal representative should be obtained (capacity to consent and definition of legal representative should be determined in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations).
  • Documentation of diagnosis with Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD-D) on the basis of the National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association Diagnostic Guidelines
  • Mini Mental State Examination 10 to 26 at Screening
  • Meets criteria for Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder, Irregular Sleep-Wake Type (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition) and the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, as follows: Complaint by the participant or caregiver of difficulty sleeping during the night and/or excessive daytime sleepiness associated with multiple irregular sleep bouts during a 24-hour period
  • Frequency of complaint of sleep and wake fragmentation ≥3 days per week
  • Duration of complaint of sleep and wake fragmentation ≥3 months
  • During the Screening Period, mean actigraphy-derived sleep efficiency (aSE) <87.5% within the defined nocturnal sleep period and mean actigraphy-derived wake efficiency (aWE) <87.5% during the defined wake period
  • Confirmation by actigraphy of a combination of sleep bouts of >10 minutes during the wake period plus wake bouts of >10 minutes during the sleep period, totaling at least 4 bouts per 24 hours period, ≥ 3 days per week
  • Ambulatory and living in the community or in a residence not classified as a skilled nursing facility (an assisted living facility with separate living quarters where participants and their caregivers reside is acceptable)
  • Willing not to start a behavioral or other treatment program for sleep or wake difficulties and not to start a new treatment for other symptoms of AD-D during participation in the study
  • Has a reliable and competent caregiver (or caregiver and informants) who can accompany the participant to study visits, administer study medication on a nightly basis and provide information on the status of the participant
  • For participants taking a cholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine, dosing regimen must have been stable for at least 3 months

Inclusion Criteria (Extension Phase):

  • Completed the Core Study (End of Study [EOS] Visit). Participants who participated in the Core Study and completed the EOS Visit within 30 days may return to participate in the Extension Phase as long as there are no contraindications due to ongoing adverse events or prohibited medications.

Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers:

  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Spends at least 10 hours per week with the participant
  • Able to meet caregiver requirements
  • Willing to provide information on himself/herself regarding sleep quality and caregiver Burden

Exclusion Criteria:

  • A diagnosis of vascular dementia, dementia following multiple strokes, or any synucleinopathy / Lewy body disorder. This includes Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Parkinson's disease with or without dementia.
  • A current diagnosis of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or central sleep apnea, or current use of continuous positive airways pressure even if mild severity of OSA, restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement disorder (with awakenings), or narcolepsy
  • An Apnea-Hypopnea Index or equivalent ≥15 events/hour on diagnostic sleep study conducted prior to Baseline or within 6 months of Screening
  • A clinically significant movement disorder that would affect the differentiation of sleep and wake by the actigraphy analytic algorithm
  • Current symptoms or history during the past year of Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder or sleep-related violent behavior
  • Probable Major Depression, as evidenced by score >10 on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia at Screening
  • Unable to tolerate wearing the actigraph. At a minimum, participants must be able to wear the actigraph for 5 complete days out of 7 days' data. A day will be considered complete as long as data from 90% of the 24-hour period are able to be scored.
  • Excessive caffeine use that in the opinion of the investigator contributes to the participant's Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (ISWRD)
  • History of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the previous 2 years
  • Reports habitually consuming more than 14 drinks containing alcohol per week or habitually consumes alcohol within 3 hours before bedtime and unwilling to limit alcohol intake to 2 or fewer drinks per day or forego having alcohol within 3 hours before bedtime for the duration of his/her participation in the study
  • Known to be human immunodeficiency virus positive
  • Active viral hepatitis (B or C) as demonstrated by positive serology at Screening
  • A prolonged QTcF interval (QTcF >450 milliseconds[ms]) as demonstrated by a repeated electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening (repeated only if initial ECG indicates a QTcF interval >450 ms) (participants with evidence of bundle branch block are not excluded if the block is not clinically significant, as documented by the investigator in the source document)
  • Current evidence of clinically significant disease that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments
  • Any history of a medical or psychiatric condition other than Alzheimer's Disease dementia that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments
  • History of malignancy within the previous 5 years except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ
  • Any suicidal ideation with intent with or without a plan, at the time of or within 6 months of Screening, as indicated by answering "Yes" to questions 4 and 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the electronic version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS)
  • Any suicidal behavior within the past 10 years based on the eC-SSRS
  • History of violence toward the caregiver or others
  • Scheduled for surgery using general anesthesia during the study
  • Used any prohibited prescription or over-the-counter concomitant medications within 1 week or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before starting actigraphy during Screening
  • Used any modality of treatment for ISWRD between Screening and Randomization based on approaches related to circadian rhythms, including phototherapy (light therapy), melatonin and melatonin agonists
  • Failed treatment with Belsomra (efficacy and/or safety) following treatment with an appropriate dose and of adequate duration in the opinion of the investigator
  • Transmeridian travel across more than 3 time zones between Screening and Randomization, or plans to travel across more than 3 time zones during the study
  • Hypersensitivity to lemborexant or to its excipients
  • Currently enrolled in another clinical trial, except for observational studies with no treatment component
  • Used any investigational drug or device before informed consent (ie, within 30 days or 5× the investigational drug half-life whichever is longer or 6 months for potential disease-modifying drugs)
  • Previously participated in any clinical trial of lemborexant

Sites / Locations

  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #2
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #2
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Nevada Senior Services (NSS) Adult Day Care Center
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #2
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #2
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Facility #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Eisai Trial Site #1
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School
  • Cognitive Treatment and Research Unit
  • University of Edinburgh - PPDS

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Lemborexant 2.5 milligrams (mg)

Lemborexant 5 mg

Lemborexant 10 mg

Lemborexant 15 mg

Lemborexant-matched placebo

Arm Description

Participants will take one lemborexant 2.5 mg tablet and one lemborexant-matched placebo tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.

Participants will take one lemborexant 5 mg tablet and one lemborexant-matched placebo tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.

Participants will take one lemborexant 10 mg tablet and one lemborexant-matched placebo tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.

Participants will take one lemborexant 5 mg tablet and one lemborexant 10 mg tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.

Participants will take two lemborexant-matched placebo tablets orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of Treatment
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of Treatment
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of Treatment
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of Treatment
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of Treatment
The SFI was defined as the sum of a movement index (MI) and a fragmentation index (FI) during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per time in bed (TBI) multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of less than or equal to (<=) 1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (%) (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of Treatment
The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number <=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of Treatment
The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number <=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of Treatment
The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number <=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of Treatment
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of Treatment
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of Treatment
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of Treatment
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of Treatment
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of Treatment
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of Treatment
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of Treatment
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of Treatment
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an immobility index (II) and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of Treatment
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of Treatment
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of Treatment
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of Treatment
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of Treatment
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of Treatment
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of Treatment
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of Treatment
Intradaily variability gives an indication of irregular sleep-wake rhythm disorder (ISWRD) by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of Treatment
Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of Treatment
Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of Treatment
Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of Treatment
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of Treatment
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of Treatment
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of Treatment
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of Treatment
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of Treatment
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of Treatment
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of Treatment
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of Treatment
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of Treatment
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of Treatment
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of Treatment
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of Treatment
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of Treatment
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of Treatment
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of Treatment
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of Treatment
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of Treatment
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of Treatment
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of Treatment
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
November 16, 2016
Last Updated
April 14, 2021
Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Purdue Pharma LP
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03001557
Brief Title
Study of Lemborexant for Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder and Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia
Official Title
A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study With Open-Label Extension Phase of the Efficacy and Safety of Lemborexant in Subjects With Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder and Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 20, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 26, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 17, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Purdue Pharma LP

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will be conducted to determine the dose response of lemborexant (LEM) on the change from baseline in actigraphy-derived sleep-related parameters, wake-related parameters, and circadian-rhythm related parameters. Following the eligibility screening period, eligible participants will be assigned at random to 1 of 4 doses of LEM or to placebo for 4 weeks. After a 2-week follow-up period, eligible participants may enter an open-label extension period for up to 30 months or until the program discontinuation.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder
Keywords
Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia, sleep, circadian rhythms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
63 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lemborexant 2.5 milligrams (mg)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will take one lemborexant 2.5 mg tablet and one lemborexant-matched placebo tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.
Arm Title
Lemborexant 5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will take one lemborexant 5 mg tablet and one lemborexant-matched placebo tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.
Arm Title
Lemborexant 10 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will take one lemborexant 10 mg tablet and one lemborexant-matched placebo tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.
Arm Title
Lemborexant 15 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will take one lemborexant 5 mg tablet and one lemborexant 10 mg tablet orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.
Arm Title
Lemborexant-matched placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will take two lemborexant-matched placebo tablets orally each night for 28 consecutive nights immediately (i.e., within 5 minutes) before the time the participant intends to try to sleep.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lemborexant 2.5 mg
Intervention Description
Lemborexant 2.5 mg tablets
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lemborexant 5 mg
Intervention Description
Lemborexant 5 mg tablets
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lemborexant 10 mg
Intervention Description
Lemborexant 10 mg tablets
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lemborexant 15 mg
Intervention Description
Lemborexant 5 mg and 10 mg tablets
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lemborexant-matched placebo
Intervention Description
Lemborexant-matched placebo tablets
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Sleep Efficiency (aSE) With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 1 of Treatment
Description
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 2 of Treatment
Description
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 3 of Treatment
Description
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aSE With Lemborexant Compared to Placebo During Week 4 of Treatment
Description
aSE was defined as the percentage of time spent in bed nocturnal sleeping, as measured by actigraphy. Sleep efficiency was calculated as the total duration of sleep epochs during the predefined 8-hour nocturnal sleep period divided by 8 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Sleep Fragmentation Index (SFI) During Week 1 of Treatment
Description
The SFI was defined as the sum of a movement index (MI) and a fragmentation index (FI) during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per time in bed (TBI) multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of less than or equal to (<=) 1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (%) (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 2 of Treatment
Description
The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number <=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 3 of Treatment
Description
The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number <=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean SFI During Week 4 of Treatment
Description
The SFI was defined as the sum of a MI and a FI during the logged sleep period. The MI was equal to the epochs of wake per TBI multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number <=1-minute periods of immobility/total number of periods of immobility of all durations during the defined nocturnal sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). SFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Wake Bouts (aMeanDurWB) During Week 1 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 2 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 3 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurWB During Week 4 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurWB was defined as an average duration of all wake bouts that occurred during the defined nocturnal predefined sleep period. The wake bout was defined as continuous wake of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurWB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Actigraphy Wake Efficiency (aWE) During Week 1 of Treatment
Description
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 2 of Treatment
Description
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 3 of Treatment
Description
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean aWE During Week 4 of Treatment
Description
aWE was defined as the percentage of time spent awake in bed during defined wake period, as measured by actigraphy. Wake efficiency was calculated as the total duration of wake epochs during 16 hours outside of the predefined sleep period divided by 16 hours and multiplied by 100. Higher values were better. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Wake Fragmentation Index (WFI) During Week 1 of Treatment
Description
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an immobility index (II) and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100 percent (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 2 of Treatment
Description
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 3 of Treatment
Description
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean WFI During Week 4 of Treatment
Description
The WFI were calculated as the sum of an II and a FI during the logged wake period. The II was equal to the epochs of immobility per the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. The FI was equal to the number of <=1-minute periods of mobility/total number of periods of mobility the 16 hours outside of the defined sleep period multiplied by 100. Value ranges from 0-100% (lower values were better). The WFI was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Mean Duration of Sleep Bouts (aMeanDurSB) During Week 1 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 2 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 3 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the aMeanDurSB During Week 4 of Treatment
Description
aMeanDurSB was defined as an average duration of all sleep bouts that occurred during the 16 hours outside of the predefined nocturnal sleep period. The sleep bout was defined as the continuous sleep of 10 minutes or longer. Lower values were better. aMeanDurSB was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 1 of Treatment
Description
Intradaily variability gives an indication of irregular sleep-wake rhythm disorder (ISWRD) by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 2 of Treatment
Description
Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 3 of Treatment
Description
Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Intradaily Variability Over Week 4 of Treatment
Description
Intradaily variability gives an indication of ISWRD by quantifying the number and strength of transitions between rest and activity bouts, derived by the ratio of the mean squares of the difference between all successive hours (first derivative) and the mean squares around the grand mean (overall variance). The variable has a theoretical range of 0 to 2, with higher values indicating higher fragmentation. Intradaily variability was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean Interdaily Stability (IS) Over Week 1 of Treatment
Description
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 2 of Treatment
Description
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 3 of Treatment
Description
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Mean IS Over Week 4 of Treatment
Description
IS gives an indication of the stability of the sleep-wake rhythm across days, and varies from zero (low stability) to 1 (high stability). IS was derived by the ratio between the variance of the average 24-hour pattern around the mean and the overall variance. Higher values indicated stable rhythm. IS was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across Least Active 5-hour Period (L5) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of Treatment
Description
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of Treatment
Description
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of Treatment
Description
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Average Activity Counts Across L5 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of Treatment
Description
L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. This value provides an indication of how restful (inactive) and regular the sleep periods are. L5 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the Most Active 10-hour Period (M10) Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 1 of Treatment
Description
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 2 of Treatment
Description
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 3 of Treatment
Description
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Average Activity Count During the M10 Per 24-Hour Period Over Week 4 of Treatment
Description
M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. M10 was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Amplitude of the Rest-activity Rhythm (AMP) Over Week 1 of Treatment
Description
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 2 of Treatment
Description
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 3 of Treatment
Description
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in AMP Over Week 4 of Treatment
Description
AMP was amplitude of rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. AMP was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in Relative Amplitude in the Rest-activity Rhythm (RA) Over Week 1 of Treatment
Description
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average first 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 1
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 2 of Treatment
Description
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average second 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 3 of Treatment
Description
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average third 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 3
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in RA Over Week 4 of Treatment
Description
RA was relative amplitude of the rest-activity rhythm calculated as the difference between M10 and L5 divided by M10 plus L5. L5 was defined as the average activity across the least active 5-hour period per 24-hour period, with high values indicating restlessness. M10 was defined as the average activity during the most active 10-hour period per 24-hour period with low levels indicating inactivity. RA was determined by Actigraphy. Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the wrist like a watch. It was programmed to monitor degree and intensity of movements while the device was being worn. Change from baseline to average last 7 nights of treatment was reported.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 4
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Time Frame
First dose of study drug (Day 1) to 14 days after last dose of study drug (approximately up to 2 years 7 months)
Title
Core Phase: Number of Participants in Each Category With Clinician's Global Impression of Change-Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (CGIC-ISWRD) Global Score at Day 29
Description
The CGIC-ISWRD scale is a validated categorical measure of change in the participant's clinical condition between baseline and follow-up visits. It relies on both direct examination of the participant and an interview of the informant. The instrument consisted of 3 parts: a guided baseline interview administered to the participant and an informant, a follow-up interview administered to the participant and an informant, and a clinician's rating review. The baseline interview served as a reference for future ratings. During the baseline interview, the rater evaluated participant regarding domains of (1) sleep and wake symptoms; (2) mood and behavioral symptoms; (3) attention/arousal; and (4) social functioning. In the follow-up interview, a 7-pointscale was used, from 1 = marked improvement, 4 = no change, to 7 = marked worsening, to score each of the 4 domains and to provide a global score (1 [marked improvement] to 7 [marked worsening]).
Time Frame
Day 29
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI-10) Total Score at Day 29
Description
The NPI-10 assessed a wide range of behaviors seen in dementia for both frequency and severity. It is a 10 item questionnaire with the following domains: delusions, hallucinations, agitation/aggression, depression/dysphoria, anxiety, elation/euphoria, apathy/indifference, disinhibition, irritability/liability and aberrant motor behavior. The total score was summarized and analyzed. This scale was administered with the caregiver as proxy for the participant. The total score was a sum of the 10 domains, where the score of each domain was calculated as frequency (scale: 1=occasionally to 4=very frequently) * Severity (scale: 1=Mild to 3=Severe). Each domain has a maximum score of 12 and all domains were equally weighted for total score, thus the range for the total score is 0 to 120 with 0 being completely healthy to 120 which is the worse score participant could get.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 29
Title
Core Phase: Change From Baseline in the Sleep Disorders Inventory (SDI) Score at Day 29
Description
The SDI is an expanded version of one item of the NPI. It described the frequency, severity, and caregiver burden of sleep-disturbed behaviors during a period prior to its administration. The SDI consists of the 7 sub questions relating to sleep from the NPI sleep disturbance item. Each of the sub questions is a separate question with frequency, severity, and caregiver distress rated by the caregiver with respect to the patient-participant for the 2 weeks prior to the visit. The SDI score is derived as the product of the average of the frequency ratings and the average of the severity ratings (range: 0-12 [worst]).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 29
Title
Extension Phase: Change From Baseline in SDI Total Score.
Description
The SDI is an expanded version of one item of the NPI. It described the frequency, severity, and caregiver burden of sleep-disturbed behaviors during a period prior to its administration. The SDI consists of the 7 sub questions relating to sleep from the NPI sleep disturbance item. Each of the sub questions is a separate question with frequency, severity, and caregiver distress rated by the caregiver with respect to the patient-participant for the 2 weeks prior to the visit. The SDI score is derived as the product of the average of the frequency ratings and the average of the severity ratings (range: 0-12 [worst]).
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 133, 223, 313, 343, 373, 403, 493, 583, 673, and 763

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria (Core Study): Male or female, age 60 to 90 years at the time of informed consent Able to provide informed consent. If a participant lacks capacity to consent in the investigator's opinion, the participant's assent should be obtained, if required in accordance with local laws, regulations and customs, and the written informed consent of a legal representative should be obtained (capacity to consent and definition of legal representative should be determined in accordance with applicable local laws and regulations). Documentation of diagnosis with Alzheimer's disease dementia (AD-D) on the basis of the National Institute on Aging/Alzheimer's Association Diagnostic Guidelines Mini Mental State Examination 10 to 26 at Screening Meets criteria for Circadian Rhythm Sleep Disorder, Irregular Sleep-Wake Type (Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders - 5th edition) and the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases, as follows: Complaint by the participant or caregiver of difficulty sleeping during the night and/or excessive daytime sleepiness associated with multiple irregular sleep bouts during a 24-hour period Frequency of complaint of sleep and wake fragmentation ≥3 days per week Duration of complaint of sleep and wake fragmentation ≥3 months During the Screening Period, mean actigraphy-derived sleep efficiency (aSE) <87.5% within the defined nocturnal sleep period and mean actigraphy-derived wake efficiency (aWE) <87.5% during the defined wake period Confirmation by actigraphy of a combination of sleep bouts of >10 minutes during the wake period plus wake bouts of >10 minutes during the sleep period, totaling at least 4 bouts per 24 hours period, ≥ 3 days per week Ambulatory and living in the community or in a residence not classified as a skilled nursing facility (an assisted living facility with separate living quarters where participants and their caregivers reside is acceptable) Willing not to start a behavioral or other treatment program for sleep or wake difficulties and not to start a new treatment for other symptoms of AD-D during participation in the study Has a reliable and competent caregiver (or caregiver and informants) who can accompany the participant to study visits, administer study medication on a nightly basis and provide information on the status of the participant For participants taking a cholinesterase inhibitor and/or memantine, dosing regimen must have been stable for at least 3 months Inclusion Criteria (Extension Phase): Completed the Core Study (End of Study [EOS] Visit). Participants who participated in the Core Study and completed the EOS Visit within 30 days may return to participate in the Extension Phase as long as there are no contraindications due to ongoing adverse events or prohibited medications. Inclusion Criteria for Caregivers: Able to provide informed consent Spends at least 10 hours per week with the participant Able to meet caregiver requirements Willing to provide information on himself/herself regarding sleep quality and caregiver Burden Exclusion Criteria: A diagnosis of vascular dementia, dementia following multiple strokes, or any synucleinopathy / Lewy body disorder. This includes Dementia with Lewy Bodies and Parkinson's disease with or without dementia. A current diagnosis of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) or central sleep apnea, or current use of continuous positive airways pressure even if mild severity of OSA, restless legs syndrome, periodic limb movement disorder (with awakenings), or narcolepsy An Apnea-Hypopnea Index or equivalent ≥15 events/hour on diagnostic sleep study conducted prior to Baseline or within 6 months of Screening A clinically significant movement disorder that would affect the differentiation of sleep and wake by the actigraphy analytic algorithm Current symptoms or history during the past year of Rapid Eye Movement Behavior Disorder or sleep-related violent behavior Probable Major Depression, as evidenced by score >10 on the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia at Screening Unable to tolerate wearing the actigraph. At a minimum, participants must be able to wear the actigraph for 5 complete days out of 7 days' data. A day will be considered complete as long as data from 90% of the 24-hour period are able to be scored. Excessive caffeine use that in the opinion of the investigator contributes to the participant's Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder (ISWRD) History of drug or alcohol dependency or abuse within approximately the previous 2 years Reports habitually consuming more than 14 drinks containing alcohol per week or habitually consumes alcohol within 3 hours before bedtime and unwilling to limit alcohol intake to 2 or fewer drinks per day or forego having alcohol within 3 hours before bedtime for the duration of his/her participation in the study Known to be human immunodeficiency virus positive Active viral hepatitis (B or C) as demonstrated by positive serology at Screening A prolonged QTcF interval (QTcF >450 milliseconds[ms]) as demonstrated by a repeated electrocardiogram (ECG) at Screening (repeated only if initial ECG indicates a QTcF interval >450 ms) (participants with evidence of bundle branch block are not excluded if the block is not clinically significant, as documented by the investigator in the source document) Current evidence of clinically significant disease that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments Any history of a medical or psychiatric condition other than Alzheimer's Disease dementia that in the opinion of the investigator(s) could affect the participant's safety or interfere with the study assessments History of malignancy within the previous 5 years except for adequately treated basal cell or squamous cell skin cancer or cervical carcinoma in situ Any suicidal ideation with intent with or without a plan, at the time of or within 6 months of Screening, as indicated by answering "Yes" to questions 4 and 5 on the Suicidal Ideation section of the electronic version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (eC-SSRS) Any suicidal behavior within the past 10 years based on the eC-SSRS History of violence toward the caregiver or others Scheduled for surgery using general anesthesia during the study Used any prohibited prescription or over-the-counter concomitant medications within 1 week or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer, before starting actigraphy during Screening Used any modality of treatment for ISWRD between Screening and Randomization based on approaches related to circadian rhythms, including phototherapy (light therapy), melatonin and melatonin agonists Failed treatment with Belsomra (efficacy and/or safety) following treatment with an appropriate dose and of adequate duration in the opinion of the investigator Transmeridian travel across more than 3 time zones between Screening and Randomization, or plans to travel across more than 3 time zones during the study Hypersensitivity to lemborexant or to its excipients Currently enrolled in another clinical trial, except for observational studies with no treatment component Used any investigational drug or device before informed consent (ie, within 30 days or 5× the investigational drug half-life whichever is longer or 6 months for potential disease-modifying drugs) Previously participated in any clinical trial of lemborexant
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Rogers
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72758
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Costa Mesa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92626
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Fullerton
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92835
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Glendale
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91206
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Irvine
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92618
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037-0949
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Santa Monica
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90404
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Bradenton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Brooksville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Hallandale Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33009
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Miami Springs
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33137
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33165
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #2
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Sunrise
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33351
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #2
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30331
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Columbus
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31909
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Macon
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Belmont
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02478
Country
United States
Facility Name
Nevada Senior Services (NSS) Adult Day Care Center
City
Henderson
State/Province
Nevada
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Toms River
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08755
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #2
City
Toms River
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08755
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28270
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #2
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Norristown
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Willow Grove
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Facility #1
City
Columbia
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
451-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Fujisawa
State/Province
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
251-0038
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Kawasaki-shi
State/Province
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
210-0852
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Wako
State/Province
Saitama
ZIP/Postal Code
351-0111
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Kodaira
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
187-8551
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Setagaya
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
156-0041
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Shinjuku
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
169-0073
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Eisai Trial Site #1
City
Tachikawa-shi
State/Province
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
190-8531
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Brighton and Sussex Medical School
City
Brighton
State/Province
East Sussex
ZIP/Postal Code
BN1 9PX
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Cognitive Treatment and Research Unit
City
Crowborough
State/Province
East Sussex
ZIP/Postal Code
TN6 1NY
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
University of Edinburgh - PPDS
City
Edinburgh
ZIP/Postal Code
EH1 64UX
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study of Lemborexant for Irregular Sleep-Wake Rhythm Disorder and Mild to Moderate Alzheimer's Disease Dementia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs