search
Back to results

Study of Sulphonylurea Synergy With Incretins (LOGIC)

Primary Purpose

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gliclazide
Sponsored by
University of Dundee
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional basic science trial for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 40 - 80,
  • Age of Diabetes Diagnoses ≥ 35
  • T2DM on no treatment or metformin monotherapy
  • White British
  • HbA1c ≤ 8% (64mmol/mol)
  • eGFR ≥ 50ml/min-1
  • ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN
  • Able to consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus
  • HbA1c > 8.0% (> 64mmol/mol)
  • eGFR <50ml/min-1
  • ALT >2.5 x ULN
  • Anaemia (Haemoglobin <12.0 g/dL for women, <13.0 g/dL for men)
  • Pregnancy, lactation or a female planning to conceive within the study period
  • Established pancreatic disease
  • Participating in clinical phase of another interventional trial/study or have done so within the last 30 days
  • Any other significant medical reason for exclusion as determined by the investigator

Sites / Locations

  • Ninewells Hospital and Medical School

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

No Intervention

Low Dose Gliclazide

Arm Description

All participants in study will complete two matched clamp studies (OGTT + IGII). The first matched clamp without any intervention the second matched clamp with low dose gliclazide

The first 8 participants will complete the dose-ranging phase of LOGIC study. Low dose gliclazide is being used a physiological stimulus. In the dose-ranging phase, 4 participants will receive 10mg gliclazide, the remaining 4 will receive 20mg gliclazide. The allocation to 10mg or 20mg will be randomised and unblinded. The study will analyse after the first 8 participants to assess which dose produces the greatest augmentation of insulin secretion when acting synergistically with the incretin effect. The further 12 participants will complete the study with the identified best dose.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference in insulin secretion and incretin effect between two matched clamps (presence and absence of low dose gliclazide)
Comparison of two matched clamps (oral glucose tolerance test + isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion). Matched clamp 1 - control. Matched clamp 2 - low dose gliclazide. Levels of insulin/c-peptide, incretin hormones and plasma glucose will be compared in the presence and absence of low dose gliclazide

Secondary Outcome Measures

Insulin secretory response analysed by KCNJ11 Genotype (E23K, E23E, K23K)
Difference in insulin secretory response to low dose gliclazide calculated by insulin/cpeptide levels in matched clamp(gliclazide). Differences will then be compared by participants genotype e.g. insulin secretory response for E23K, E23E, K23K variants.

Full Information

First Posted
July 3, 2018
Last Updated
February 20, 2020
Sponsor
University of Dundee
Collaborators
NHS Tayside
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03705195
Brief Title
Study of Sulphonylurea Synergy With Incretins
Acronym
LOGIC
Official Title
Study of Sulphonylurea Synergy With Incretins
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 3, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 26, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 26, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Dundee
Collaborators
NHS Tayside

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Study of Sulphonylurea Synergy with Incretins (LOGIC) is a Proof-of-Concept Physiological study in the form of two matched isoglycaemic clamps. A matched clamp consists of an of oral glucose tolerance test followed by an isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion (IGII). The study will investigate whether there is synergy between a physiological sulphonylurea (SU) stimulus and the incretin effect, causing augmentation of insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The study will take place at The Clinical Research Centre at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee over five visits. It will evaluate 20 patients with T2DM on no diabetes therapy, or metformin monotherapy. All participants will undergo two matched clamps. The first matched clamp will be with no intervention. The second intervention matched clamp, low-dose liquid gliclazide will be administered 1-hour prior to each test. The sulphonylurea, Gliclazide, in this this instance will be used as a physiological stimulus and will only be given on two occasions as part of the second matched clamp. The first eight participants will participate in the dose-ranging phase. They will receive either 10mg or 20mg gliclazide as a stimulus to augment the incretin effect. A further twelve participants will then be recruited to complete the study utilising the dose which caused the greatest increment in insulin secretion. LOGIC will also evaluate the cohort for effect of KCNJ11 genotype on physiological response.
Detailed Description
The Study of Sulphonylurea Synergy with Incretins (LOGIC) is a Proof-of-Concept Physiological study in the form of two matched isoglycaemic clamps. A matched clamp consists of an of oral glucose bolus test followed by an isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion (IGII) the next day. The study will investigate whether there is synergy between a physiological sulphonylurea (SU) stimulus and the incretin effect, causing augmentation of insulin secretion in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The study will take place at The Clinical Research Centre at Ninewells Hospital in Dundee over five visits. It will evaluate 20 patients with T2DM on no diabetes therapy, or metformin monotherapy. The first visit is a screening visit to ensure the participant meets inclusion and exclusion criteria, and, if so, to obtain written informed consent for study. Visits 2-5 will all occur following an overnight 10-hour fast at home. The second and third visits will make up the first matched clamp. In visit 2, the participant will undergo a 75-gram oral glucose bolus with frequent blood sampling to assess the glucose variance, insulin secretion and incretin hormone response from an oral glucose stimulus. Blood glucose level (BGL) will be sampled every 5 minutes along with hormone biochemical analysis at regular defined time points. The third visit consists of an IGII to replicate the glucose curve from the OGTT to allow measurement of incretin effect. BGL will again be sampled every 5 minutes with regular biochemical analysis of hormones. The investigators aim to establish whether a low-dose of sulphonylurea will have a synergistic role on insulin secretion with endogenously secreted GLP-1 and GIP, therefore visits four and five will complete the same matched clamp, however, low-dose liquid gliclazide will be administered 1-hour prior to each test. The sulphonylurea, Gliclazide, in this this instance will be used as a physiological stimulus and will only be given on two occasions as part of the second matched clamp. The first eight participants will receive either 10mg or 20mg gliclazide as a stimulus to augment the incretin effect. A further twelve patients will then be recruited to complete the study utilising the dose which caused the greatest increment in insulin secretion. The comparison of these tests will investigate the hypothesis that there is a synergistic effect between low-dose sulphonylurea and augmentation of the incretin effect on the beta cell. LOGIC will also evaluate the cohort for effect of KCNJ11 genotype on physiological response. Participants will be consented for genotyping as part of this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Proof-of-Concept Physiological Study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
No Intervention
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
All participants in study will complete two matched clamp studies (OGTT + IGII). The first matched clamp without any intervention the second matched clamp with low dose gliclazide
Arm Title
Low Dose Gliclazide
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The first 8 participants will complete the dose-ranging phase of LOGIC study. Low dose gliclazide is being used a physiological stimulus. In the dose-ranging phase, 4 participants will receive 10mg gliclazide, the remaining 4 will receive 20mg gliclazide. The allocation to 10mg or 20mg will be randomised and unblinded. The study will analyse after the first 8 participants to assess which dose produces the greatest augmentation of insulin secretion when acting synergistically with the incretin effect. The further 12 participants will complete the study with the identified best dose.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Gliclazide
Other Intervention Name(s)
Diamicron, Zicron
Intervention Description
Low dose liquid gliclazide will be used with the second matched clamp (OGTT/IGII) in visits 4 & 5.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in insulin secretion and incretin effect between two matched clamps (presence and absence of low dose gliclazide)
Description
Comparison of two matched clamps (oral glucose tolerance test + isoglycaemic intravenous glucose infusion). Matched clamp 1 - control. Matched clamp 2 - low dose gliclazide. Levels of insulin/c-peptide, incretin hormones and plasma glucose will be compared in the presence and absence of low dose gliclazide
Time Frame
Through four study visits completed over 4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Insulin secretory response analysed by KCNJ11 Genotype (E23K, E23E, K23K)
Description
Difference in insulin secretory response to low dose gliclazide calculated by insulin/cpeptide levels in matched clamp(gliclazide). Differences will then be compared by participants genotype e.g. insulin secretory response for E23K, E23E, K23K variants.
Time Frame
Through four study visits completed over 4 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age 40 - 80, Age of Diabetes Diagnoses ≥ 35 T2DM on no treatment or metformin monotherapy White British HbA1c ≤ 8% (64mmol/mol) eGFR ≥ 50ml/min-1 ALT ≤ 2.5 x ULN Able to consent Exclusion Criteria: Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus HbA1c > 8.0% (> 64mmol/mol) eGFR <50ml/min-1 ALT >2.5 x ULN Anaemia (Haemoglobin <12.0 g/dL for women, <13.0 g/dL for men) Pregnancy, lactation or a female planning to conceive within the study period Established pancreatic disease Participating in clinical phase of another interventional trial/study or have done so within the last 30 days Any other significant medical reason for exclusion as determined by the investigator
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ewan R Pearson
Organizational Affiliation
University of Dundee
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ninewells Hospital and Medical School
City
Dundee
ZIP/Postal Code
DD1 9SY
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19050053
Citation
Aaboe K, Knop FK, Vilsboll T, Volund A, Simonsen U, Deacon CF, Madsbad S, Holst JJ, Krarup T. KATP channel closure ameliorates the impaired insulinotropic effect of glucose-dependent insulinotropic polypeptide in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009 Feb;94(2):603-8. doi: 10.1210/jc.2008-1731. Epub 2008 Dec 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15115830
Citation
Gloyn AL, Pearson ER, Antcliff JF, Proks P, Bruining GJ, Slingerland AS, Howard N, Srinivasan S, Silva JM, Molnes J, Edghill EL, Frayling TM, Temple IK, Mackay D, Shield JP, Sumnik Z, van Rhijn A, Wales JK, Clark P, Gorman S, Aisenberg J, Ellard S, Njolstad PR, Ashcroft FM, Hattersley AT. Activating mutations in the gene encoding the ATP-sensitive potassium-channel subunit Kir6.2 and permanent neonatal diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 29;350(18):1838-49. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa032922. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2004 Sep 30;351(14):1470.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10809901
Citation
Fritsche A, Stefan N, Hardt E, Schutzenauer S, Haring H, Stumvoll M. A novel hyperglycaemic clamp for characterization of islet function in humans: assessment of three different secretagogues, maximal insulin response and reproducibility. Eur J Clin Invest. 2000 May;30(5):411-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2362.2000.00649.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18786605
Citation
Holst JJ, Vilsboll T, Deacon CF. The incretin system and its role in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Mol Cell Endocrinol. 2009 Jan 15;297(1-2):127-36. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2008.08.012. Epub 2008 Aug 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19288076
Citation
Henquin JC. Regulation of insulin secretion: a matter of phase control and amplitude modulation. Diabetologia. 2009 May;52(5):739-51. doi: 10.1007/s00125-009-1314-y. Epub 2009 Mar 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
33693776
Citation
Cordiner RLM, Mari A, Tura A, Pearson ER. The Impact of Low-dose Gliclazide on the Incretin Effect and Indices of Beta-cell Function. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Jun 16;106(7):2036-2046. doi: 10.1210/clinem/dgab151.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Study of Sulphonylurea Synergy With Incretins

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs