search
Back to results

Study Of The Efficacy Of Neurolysis In Functional Recovery From Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

Primary Purpose

Low Back Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Neurotome OFF
neurolysis
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Low Back Pain

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years.
  • present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more.
  • present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) > 4.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment.
  • patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time.
  • patients that develop an allergy to the medication used.

Sites / Locations

  • Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the U.S.PRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Neurolysis

Neurotome OFF

Arm Description

In this intervention the neurotome will be connected

neurotome not raised

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Pain Evaluation
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Medial Block Improvement
likert five-level scale is a scale for evaluation of improvement: 0-30% improvement - no improvement 30-50% improvement - moderate improvement 50-80% improvement - good improvement 80-100% improvement - no pain to evaluate the improvement after the medial branch block
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Disability evaluation
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Health Status
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.

Full Information

First Posted
August 5, 2010
Last Updated
March 22, 2013
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01190033
Brief Title
Study Of The Efficacy Of Neurolysis In Functional Recovery From Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Official Title
STUDY OF THE EFFICACY OF NEUROLYSIS IN FUNCTIONAL RECOVERY FROM CHRONIC NONSPECIFIC LOW BACK PAIN
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2013 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. In an initial phase, 100 patients with chronic low back pain will be included in this study. The patients will be recruited through magazines and newspapers to take part in a screening for treatment of low back pain. This screening will involve the evaluation of data such as history and physical examination to classify the patient in the group of nonspecific low back pain, excluding patients with neurological alterations and the so-called Red-Flags. Procedures After the initial screening the patients will undergo diagnostic blocks of the medial branch of lumbar vertebrae L2, L3, L4 , L5 and of the first sacral vertebra (S1) with lidocaine and control with distilled water. The patients that present more than 50% of pain improvement, evaluated by the Likert scale after 30 minutes will form the study group, while the patients that do not present pain improvement with lidocaine or that present pain improvement with distilled water will be excluded. The medial branch block consists of the insertion of a 90mm, 25-gauge needle through the skin with radioscopic control up to the medial branch topography. Infusion of 1ml of 2% lidocaine should be performed in each medial branch of the abovementioned vertebrae. Control is executed in the same manner yet with infusion of 1ml of distilled water. Through the use of the diagnostic block we will have 40 patients selected for the second phase of the study. Once defined the study group should be evaluated before the procedure through the Oswestry, Roland Morris, SF-36 and VAS questionnaires. In the second phase of the study the patients will be randomized. The random division into two groups will be performed through a computerized program of random numbers. The randomization result will be kept in matt sealed envelopes to guarantee secrecy of the allocation. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out in the first group, consisting of 20 patients, and the placebo or sham procedure with the second group, also with 20 patients. The neurolysis procedure will be carried out under sterile conditions, with the patient lying prone and with the neurotome insertion sites anesthetized with 2ml of 1% lidocaine. The neurotome (Smith & Nephew - RF) will be used for the procedure. The neurotome is a radiofrequency apparatus mounted on a 10cm electrode type 22 needle with a 5mm exposure tip. The neurotome should be introduced percutaneously in a manner similar to that adopted in the medial branch block through radioscopic control. The temperature of the electrode after its placement in the correct position is then raised to 80 °C for 90 seconds. Two neurotomies should be performed for each facet, one proximally and the other distally, due to double innervation of each facet. In the patients of the placebo group the procedure will be the same only the temperature of the neurotome will not be raised. This will be performed in a blind manner, as before starting the procedure, the surgeon will show the assistant who turns the device on or not the envelope containing the patient's group (placebo or neurotomy), yet the surgeon will not be informed whether the device has been turned on or not, having to perform the procedure in the same manner in both groups. The patients will then be reevaluated in the first month, 3 months after, 6 months after and 12 months after the procedure. The assessors will not be informed of the group to which the patient belongs, and the same scales performed in the preoperative period will be used here.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Low Back Pain

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Neurolysis
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
In this intervention the neurotome will be connected
Arm Title
Neurotome OFF
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
neurotome not raised
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Neurotome OFF
Intervention Description
In this intervention the neurotome will be unconnected.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
neurolysis
Intervention Description
In this procedure the neurotome will be connected
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain Evaluation
Description
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated 1 week before surgery
Title
Pain Evaluation
Description
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Title
Pain Evaluation
Description
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated three months after surgery
Title
Pain Evaluation
Description
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated six months after surgery
Title
Pain Evaluation
Description
Pain Scores on the Visual Analog Scale
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disability evaluation
Description
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Title
Medial Block Improvement
Description
likert five-level scale is a scale for evaluation of improvement: 0-30% improvement - no improvement 30-50% improvement - moderate improvement 50-80% improvement - good improvement 80-100% improvement - no pain to evaluate the improvement after the medial branch block
Time Frame
one day after the medial branch block
Title
Health Status
Description
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one week before surgery
Title
Disability evaluation
Description
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Title
Disability evaluation
Description
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Title
Disability evaluation
Description
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Title
Disability evaluation
Description
The Oswestry disability questionnaire has been designed to give us information as to how the back or leg pain is affecting the ability to manage in everyday life.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery
Title
Health Status
Description
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one month after surgery
Title
Health Status
Description
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated three month after surgery
Title
Health Status
Description
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated six month after surgery
Title
Health Status
Description
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is a self-administered disability measure in which greater levels of disability are reflected by higher numbers on a 24-point scale.
Time Frame
The Patients will be evaluated one year after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: clinical diagnosis of lumbar pain in a patient with age between 20 and 60 years. present clinical complaints of low back pain for 3 months or more. present pain of moderate to severe intensity: visual analogue scale (VAS) > 4. Exclusion Criteria: patients that develop a profile compatible with specific low back pain during treatment. patients that request their withdrawal from the study at any time. patients that develop an allergy to the medication used.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institute of Orthopedics and Traumatology of the U.S.P
City
Sao Paulo
State/Province
SP
ZIP/Postal Code
05403-010
Country
Brazil
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alexandre Cristante Fogaça
Phone
30696912
Email
idr_77@hotmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ivan Dias Rocha

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study Of The Efficacy Of Neurolysis In Functional Recovery From Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs