search
Back to results

Study of the Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter in Bifurcated Coronary Lesions (BABILON)

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Balloon angioplasty
Stent implantation
Sponsored by
B.Braun Surgical SA
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Coronary stenosis, Bifurcation, Drug-eluting balloon, Drug-eluting stent, Angiographic follow-up, Late Lumen Loss, Restenosis

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

PATIENTS

  • Patients with stable angina (1-3) or unstable angina (1-3 A-C) or documented silent ischemia
  • Patients with mental and logistic conditions for the follow-up
  • Patients should accept an angiographic follow-up at 9 months, a clinical follow-up at 3 years and sign the consent

LESIONS

  • De-novo lesions in the bifurcations of DA/Diag either CX/OM or CD/DP with diameters in the main vessel of 2,5 to 3,8/ 2 to 3,5 and lengths < 22 mm
  • The left main lesions in bifurcation are also accepted but with another independent randomization list (specify at randomization)
  • The diameter of the stenoses should be >50% in any branch with documented ischemia or more than 70% in absence of an ischemia test
  • Single vessel or multivessel disease
  • In case of a PTCA of more than one lesion, the non included lesion should be treated previously to the included lesion

Exclusion Criteria:

PATIENTS

  • Patients with STEMI < 72 hours
  • Patients with congestive heart failure or NYHA IV, shock or severe valvular heart disease
  • Patients with short life expectancy, or with problems for platelet antiaggregation
  • Patients in treatment with hyperthyroidism, in treatment with immunosuppression or anticoagulants, or with alcohol or drug addiction
  • Patients included in other trials
  • Patients with a stroke 6 months before
  • Patients with a surgery one week before
  • Severe renal failure calculated as GF < 30 ml/min "Cockcroft Gault"
  • Women of childbearing age, with probability to become pregnant during the first year of follow-up

LESIONS

  • Evidence of important thrombus within the vessel to treat
  • Patients with another stent previously implanted at ≤ 15 mm from the current lesion of the study
  • Lesions affecting bypass
  • Chronic occlusions to treat
  • Restenosis in-stent or of a segment in 4 mm close to the target lesion
  • Severe calcification not totally dilatable with the balloon

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real
  • Hospital Universitari Son Dureta
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
  • Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina
  • Complejo Hospitalario San Pedro de Alcantara
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
  • Hospital Virgen de la Salud

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Paclitaxel-eluting balloon

Paclitaxel-eluting stent

Arm Description

Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter (SeQuent Please, B. Braun)

Paclitaxel-eluting stent

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Late Lumen Loss (LLL)
Assessment of the difference between both groups regarding the Late Lumen Loss (LLL) in main vessel and side branch, measured at late angiographic follow-up at 9 months
Restenosis
Assessment of the difference between both groups regarding the Restenosis in both branches (proximal part of the main vessel, distal part of the main vessel and side branch), measured at late angiographic follow-up at 9 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Thrombosis rate
Assesment of the thrombosis rate
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Assessment of the Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at late angiographic follow-up (9 months) if dilatation by restenosis or previous angiography due to angina
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Assessment of the rate of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE): death, AMI, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) - due to angina pectoris or angiographic restenosis-

Full Information

First Posted
January 14, 2011
Last Updated
July 16, 2012
Sponsor
B.Braun Surgical SA
Collaborators
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01278186
Brief Title
Study of the Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter in Bifurcated Coronary Lesions
Acronym
BABILON
Official Title
Prospective Randomized Study of the Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter in Bifurcated Coronary Lesions / BABILON Study (Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon in Bifurcated Lesions)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2012 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
B.Braun Surgical SA
Collaborators
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study in bifurcated coronary lesions compares the new technology of the paclitaxel-eluting balloon with the usual technique until now of "provisional stenting" with the paclitaxel-eluting stent in the main branch.
Detailed Description
The bifurcated coronary lesions are still a challenge for interventional cardiologists, since there is no suitable technique or strategy to manage such lesions. This multicenter randomized prospective trial in bifurcated coronary lesions will compare the new technology of the paclitaxel-eluting balloon with the until now "gold standard" technique of the "provisional stenting" with the paclitaxel DES in the main branch.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords
Coronary stenosis, Bifurcation, Drug-eluting balloon, Drug-eluting stent, Angiographic follow-up, Late Lumen Loss, Restenosis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
190 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Paclitaxel-eluting balloon catheter (SeQuent Please, B. Braun)
Arm Title
Paclitaxel-eluting stent
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Paclitaxel-eluting stent
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Balloon angioplasty
Other Intervention Name(s)
SeQuent Please
Intervention Description
Coronary angioplasty using the paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Stent implantation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Paclitaxel-eluting stent
Intervention Description
Coronary angioplasty using the paclitaxel-eluting stent
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Late Lumen Loss (LLL)
Description
Assessment of the difference between both groups regarding the Late Lumen Loss (LLL) in main vessel and side branch, measured at late angiographic follow-up at 9 months
Time Frame
Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)
Title
Restenosis
Description
Assessment of the difference between both groups regarding the Restenosis in both branches (proximal part of the main vessel, distal part of the main vessel and side branch), measured at late angiographic follow-up at 9 months
Time Frame
Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Thrombosis rate
Description
Assesment of the thrombosis rate
Time Frame
Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)
Title
Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR)
Description
Assessment of the Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) at late angiographic follow-up (9 months) if dilatation by restenosis or previous angiography due to angina
Time Frame
Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)
Title
Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE)
Description
Assessment of the rate of Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE): death, AMI, Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) - due to angina pectoris or angiographic restenosis-
Time Frame
Late angiographic follow-up (9 months)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: PATIENTS Patients with stable angina (1-3) or unstable angina (1-3 A-C) or documented silent ischemia Patients with mental and logistic conditions for the follow-up Patients should accept an angiographic follow-up at 9 months, a clinical follow-up at 3 years and sign the consent LESIONS De-novo lesions in the bifurcations of DA/Diag either CX/OM or CD/DP with diameters in the main vessel of 2,5 to 3,8/ 2 to 3,5 and lengths < 22 mm The left main lesions in bifurcation are also accepted but with another independent randomization list (specify at randomization) The diameter of the stenoses should be >50% in any branch with documented ischemia or more than 70% in absence of an ischemia test Single vessel or multivessel disease In case of a PTCA of more than one lesion, the non included lesion should be treated previously to the included lesion Exclusion Criteria: PATIENTS Patients with STEMI < 72 hours Patients with congestive heart failure or NYHA IV, shock or severe valvular heart disease Patients with short life expectancy, or with problems for platelet antiaggregation Patients in treatment with hyperthyroidism, in treatment with immunosuppression or anticoagulants, or with alcohol or drug addiction Patients included in other trials Patients with a stroke 6 months before Patients with a surgery one week before Severe renal failure calculated as GF < 30 ml/min "Cockcroft Gault" Women of childbearing age, with probability to become pregnant during the first year of follow-up LESIONS Evidence of important thrombus within the vessel to treat Patients with another stent previously implanted at ≤ 15 mm from the current lesion of the study Lesions affecting bypass Chronic occlusions to treat Restenosis in-stent or of a segment in 4 mm close to the target lesion Severe calcification not totally dilatable with the balloon
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jose Ramon Lopez-Minguez, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina de Badajoz
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario de Puerto Real
City
Puerto Real
State/Province
Cadiz
ZIP/Postal Code
11510
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Son Dureta
City
Palma de Mallorca
State/Province
Illes Balears
ZIP/Postal Code
07014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
City
Majadahonda
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28222
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Infanta Cristina
City
Badajoz
ZIP/Postal Code
06080
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Complejo Hospitalario San Pedro de Alcantara
City
Caceres
ZIP/Postal Code
10001
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Puerta del Mar
City
Cadiz
ZIP/Postal Code
11009
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
City
Malaga
ZIP/Postal Code
29010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Virgen de la Salud
City
Toledo
ZIP/Postal Code
45004
Country
Spain

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16226167
Citation
Iakovou I, Ge L, Colombo A. Contemporary stent treatment of coronary bifurcations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Oct 18;46(8):1446-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.05.080. Epub 2005 Sep 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10700058
Citation
Lefevre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, Dumas P, Loubeyre C, Benslimane A, Premchand RK, Guillard N, Piechaud JF. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: classification, treatments, and results. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2000 Mar;49(3):274-83. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1522-726x(200003)49:33.0.co;2-n.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16098427
Citation
Koo BK, Kang HJ, Youn TJ, Chae IH, Choi DJ, Kim HS, Sohn DW, Oh BH, Lee MM, Park YB, Choi YS, Tahk SJ. Physiologic assessment of jailed side branch lesions using fractional flow reserve. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Aug 16;46(4):633-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.04.054.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10758954
Citation
Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG, Briguori C, Vaghetti M, Corvaja N, Albiero R, Finci L, Di Mario C, Tobis JM, Colombo A. Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent--immediate and follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000 Apr;35(5):1145-51. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00534-9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14981005
Citation
Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, Louvard Y, Desmedt B, Di Mario C, Leon MB. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation. 2004 Mar 16;109(10):1244-9. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000118474.71662.E3. Epub 2004 Feb 23.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15523318
Citation
Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, Romero M, Segura J, Pavlovic D, Delgado A, Ojeda S, Melian F, Herrador J, Urena I, Burgos L. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J. 2004 Nov;148(5):857-64. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2004.05.029.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17060387
Citation
Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Narbute I, Gunnes P, Mannsverk J, Meyerdierks O, Rotevatn S, Niemela M, Kervinen K, Jensen JS, Galloe A, Nikus K, Vikman S, Ravkilde J, James S, Aaroe J, Ylitalo A, Helqvist S, Sjogren I, Thayssen P, Virtanen K, Puhakka M, Airaksinen J, Lassen JF, Thuesen L; Nordic PCI Study Group. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation. 2006 Oct 31;114(18):1955-61. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.664920. Epub 2006 Oct 23.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Hildick-Smith D, The BBC ONE (British Bifurcation Coronary study: Old, New and Evolving strategies). Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2008; Oct 12-17. 2008. Washington DC. TCT 2008
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16324581
Citation
Pan M, Suarez de Lezo J, Medina A, Romero M, Delgado A, Segura J, Ojeda S, Pavlovic D, Ariza J, Fernandez-Duenas J, Herrador J, Urena I. [Six-month intravascular ultrasound follow-up of coronary bifurcation lesions treated with rapamycin-eluting stents: technical considerations]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2005 Nov;58(11):1278-86. Spanish.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Suárez de Lezo J, Medina A, Martín P, Amador C, Delgado A, Suárez de Lezo J et al. Hallazgos ultrasónicos durante el tratamiento percutáneo de lesiones coronarias en bifurcaciones. Rev Esp Cardiol 2008;61:930-5
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16540043
Citation
Medina A, Suarez de Lezo J, Pan M. [A new classification of coronary bifurcation lesions]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2006 Feb;59(2):183. No abstract available. Spanish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16996856
Citation
Dzavik V, Kharbanda R, Ivanov J, Ing DJ, Bui S, Mackie K, Ramsamujh R, Barolet A, Schwartz L, Seidelin PH. Predictors of long-term outcome after crush stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions: importance of the bifurcation angle. Am Heart J. 2006 Oct;152(4):762-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2006.04.033.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15963413
Citation
Ong AT, McFadden EP, Regar E, de Jaegere PP, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. Late angiographic stent thrombosis (LAST) events with drug-eluting stents. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Jun 21;45(12):2088-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2005.02.086.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15870416
Citation
Iakovou I, Schmidt T, Bonizzoni E, Ge L, Sangiorgi GM, Stankovic G, Airoldi F, Chieffo A, Montorfano M, Carlino M, Michev I, Corvaja N, Briguori C, Gerckens U, Grube E, Colombo A. Incidence, predictors, and outcome of thrombosis after successful implantation of drug-eluting stents. JAMA. 2005 May 4;293(17):2126-30. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.17.2126.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14563585
Citation
Scheller B, Speck U, Schmitt A, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Addition of paclitaxel to contrast media prevents restenosis after coronary stent implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003 Oct 15;42(8):1415-20. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(03)01056-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15302790
Citation
Scheller B, Speck U, Abramjuk C, Bernhardt U, Bohm M, Nickenig G. Paclitaxel balloon coating, a novel method for prevention and therapy of restenosis. Circulation. 2004 Aug 17;110(7):810-4. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000138929.71660.E0. Epub 2004 Aug 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9244237
Citation
Axel DI, Kunert W, Goggelmann C, Oberhoff M, Herdeg C, Kuttner A, Wild DH, Brehm BR, Riessen R, Koveker G, Karsch KR. Paclitaxel inhibits arterial smooth muscle cell proliferation and migration in vitro and in vivo using local drug delivery. Circulation. 1997 Jul 15;96(2):636-45. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.96.2.636.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18480668
Citation
Posa A, Hemetsberger R, Petnehazy O, Petrasi Z, Testor M, Glogar D, Gyongyosi M. Attainment of local drug delivery with paclitaxel-eluting balloon in porcine coronary arteries. Coron Artery Dis. 2008 Jun;19(4):243-7. doi: 10.1097/MCA.0b013e3283030b26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8782834
Citation
Nikol S, Huehns TY, Hofling B. Molecular biology and post-angioplasty restenosis. Atherosclerosis. 1996 Jun;123(1-2):17-31. doi: 10.1016/0021-9150(96)05807-8. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Scheller B. Drug-Eluting Balloons: The B.BRAUN Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Program: Device Characteristics, Experimental Findings, and Clinical. Outcomes in Patients with In-Stent Restenosis and for Small Vessels (PEPCAD I and II). Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2008; Oct 12-17
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17101615
Citation
Scheller B, Hehrlein C, Bocksch W, Rutsch W, Haghi D, Dietz U, Bohm M, Speck U. Treatment of coronary in-stent restenosis with a paclitaxel-coated balloon catheter. N Engl J Med. 2006 Nov 16;355(20):2113-24. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa061254. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Additional Ongoing BRAUN Paclitaxel-Eluting Balloon Clinical Trials in Diabetics,Bifurcations and Chronic Total Occlusions (Other PEPCAD Studies). Mathey DG. Transcatheter Cardiovascular Therapeutics 2008;October 12-17, 2008 • Washington, DC.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18360855
Citation
Fanggiday JC, Stella PR, Guyomi SH, Doevendans PA. Safety and efficacy of drug-eluting balloons in percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions: the DEBIUT (drug-eluting balloon in bifurcation Utrecht) registry. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2008 Apr 1;71(5):629-35. doi: 10.1002/ccd.21452.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18779447
Citation
Werk M, Langner S, Reinkensmeier B, Boettcher HF, Tepe G, Dietz U, Hosten N, Hamm B, Speck U, Ricke J. Inhibition of restenosis in femoropopliteal arteries: paclitaxel-coated versus uncoated balloon: femoral paclitaxel randomized pilot trial. Circulation. 2008 Sep 23;118(13):1358-65. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.735985. Epub 2008 Sep 8. Erratum In: Circulation. 2008 Oct 14;118(16):e670.
Results Reference
background
Citation
Ferrerio JL, Cequier A, Gómez JA, Maristany J, Fernández F, Gómez M et al. Contraindicaciones al inicio o interrupción precoz de la doble antiagregación en pacientes con indicación de intervencionismo coronario percutáneo. Rev Esp Cardiol 2007;60 Supl 2:1-192 pag 149.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Study of the Paclitaxel-Coated Balloon Catheter in Bifurcated Coronary Lesions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs