Study on Safety and Performance of an Artificial Tear in Dry Eye Treatment in Subjects With Ocular Surface Inflammation
Primary Purpose
Dry Eye Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Artificial tear MDI - 101
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Dry Eye Disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects who gave their written consent for participation in the study and for personal data processing and willing to comply with all study procedures.
- Males or females 30-75 years old.
- Subjects who are familiar with the needs of the study in the use of mobile devices and internet.
- Subjects who successfully completed the electronic registration for the clinical trial using their own study electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) profile and completed the OSDI questionnaire.
Subjects who had been diagnosed as having dry eye symptoms for at least 3 months, fulfilling all the following four criteria:
i. OSDI score of >18 evaluated by the questionnaire of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI); ii. Non-invasive breakup time (NIBUT) ≤10 seconds at least in one eye; iii. Levels of MMP-9 in tears ≥ 40 ng/ml as assessed by the Inflammatory assay at least in one eye; iv. Cornea surface scores ≥1 and <4, based on Efron grading system. -
Exclusion Criteria:
- Contact lens wearers.
- Subjects who did use any artificial tear for at least 7 days before baseline.
- Severe corneal damage (cornea surface scores ≥4, based on Efron grading system) or cornea surface normal (scores <1 based on Efron grading system)
- Corneal abrasions or other corneal abnormalities, blepharitis, meibomitis, lid abnormalities.
- Conjunctivitis of infective or allergic origins, ongoing or resolved less than 4 weeks before baseline visit.
- Subjects participating in another clinical study, on-going or completed less than 4 weeks before.
- Subject using, or will use during the study, other artificial tear or other ophthalmic products including, but not limited, to: corticosteroids, antibiotics, vasoconstrictor agents.
Sites / Locations
- Ophthalmology unit
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
MDI - 101
Arm Description
Artificial tear containing arabinogalactan, trehalose and hyaluronic acid
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Efficacy - Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Change of OSDI score versus baseline at any study time-point. The main goal of the study is to gather information about the efficacy, assessed by OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, of artificial tear containing AG, trehalose and HA (MDI - 101) used in the treatment of symptoms of DE of various aetiology, with evidence of inflammation of the ocular surface. The OSDI score ranges from 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worst outcome)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Additional efficacy parameters: Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9)
Change of tear matrix metalloproteinase(MMP)-9 at T0 vs final assessment. The result of the MMP test could be NEGATIVE if the level of MMP-9 is < 40 ng/ml (better outcome) or POSITIVE if the level of MMP-9 is ≥ 40 ng/ml (worst outcome)
Additional Efficacy parameters: EFRON SCALE
Change of Efron Grading Scales at T0 vs final assessment. The Efron grading scale range from 0 (cornea surface normale) to 4 (severe corneal damage)
Additional Efficacy parameters: Corneal and Conjunctival Staining
Change of Corneal and Conjunctival Staining at T0 vs final assessment. The Staining scale ranges from 0 (better outcome) to 3 (worst outcome)
Additional Efficacy parameters: NIBUT
Change of NIBUT at T0 vs final assessment. The result of the Non-Invasive Break-Up Time (NIBUT) test could be >10 seconds (better outcome) or ≤10 seconds (worst outcome)
Additional Efficacy parameters: Osmolarity
Change of Osmolarity at T0 vs final assessment. The higher the tear film osmolarity, the greater the severity of the ocular surface damage.
Additional Efficacy parameters: Ocular Protection Index
Change of Ocular Protection Index (OPI) at T0 vs final assessment The principle of the test is that when BUT is shorter than the blink interval, the eyes are exposed to the risk of focal ocular surface damage.
Additional Efficacy parameters: meniscometry
Change of meniscometry at T0 vs final assessment. The lowest tear meniscus radius, the higher the severity of the ocular surface health
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Safety Adverse Event (AE) experienced with the artificial tear assessed by the patient, before the ocular examination or reported by the patient at any time during the study.
Incidence of change in the unaided and corrected visual acuity
Unaided and corrected visual acuity Snellen test will be performed to evaluate change in the unaided and corrected visual acuity at T0 vs final assessment.
Incidence of change in the Intraocular pressure
Change of Intraocular pressure at T0 vs final assessment.
Evaluation of the Tolerability Signs and symptoms of discomfort
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of instillations in the past 24 hours).
Treatment adherence (24 hours)
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of instillations in the past 24 hours)
Treatment adherence (total days)
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of days of product usage).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04633863
First Posted
November 6, 2020
Last Updated
December 1, 2021
Sponsor
MD Italy
Collaborators
Hippocrates Research, Nubilaria Srl
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04633863
Brief Title
Study on Safety and Performance of an Artificial Tear in Dry Eye Treatment in Subjects With Ocular Surface Inflammation
Official Title
Pilot Study on Safety and Performance of an Artificial Tear Containing Arabinogalactan, Trehalose and Hyaluronic Acid in the Treatment of Dry Eye in Subjects With Inflammation of the Ocular Surface
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 12, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 30, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 30, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
MD Italy
Collaborators
Hippocrates Research, Nubilaria Srl
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is post-market study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of MDI - 101 a novel tear substitute for the treatment of dry eye (DE) in subjects with evidence of inflammation of the ocular surface. In particular, this study intends to evaluate, in a cohort of 25 patients, the anti-inflammatory properties of the product under study over a period of 10 weeks
Detailed Description
DE is a common eye condition that affects 1 to 2 out of 10 persons in the world. Regardless of the underlying ethology, DE is associated with increased inflammation of conjunctiva, cornea and adnexa. As consequence of the recognized role of the inflammation in the etiopathogenesis of DE, direct and indirect anti-inflammatory treatments are currently the cornerstone for the management of DE, leading to the inhibition of the expression of inflammatory mediators on the ocular surface, therefore restoring the secretion of a healthy tear film and consequently reducing signs and symptoms of DE.
MDI - 101, the product under study containing arabinogalactan (AG), trehalose and hyaluronic acid (HA) ,is a medical device with European Conformity (CE) mark that, thanks to the muco-adhesive proprieties of AG enriches the natural mucous of the tear film providing enhanced lubrication and protection and anti-inflammatory properties, in combination with trehalose and HA. The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the reduced ocular discomfort and the improvement of the integrity of the ocular surface are due to the interruption of the "vicious cycle of inflammation".
This open-label study involves a cohort of 24 patients with clinical and instrumental signs of inflammation of the ocular surface and includes end-points of efficacy, safety and evaluation of inflammation markers. The study includes 6 visits over 10 weeks, 8 of which of active treatment. This study is conducted during the Covid-19 pandemic and for this reason, clinical assessments of all the 24 patients are carried out remotely, from patients' home, with the adoption of digital solutions that determine: reduction of 66% of physical contacts between investigator and patient, a total of 90% of efficacy and safety data collected remotely and a reduction of 100% of physical contacts between investigator and clinical monitor, keeping the study entirely within the Good Clinical Practice framework.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Dry Eye Disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Open label study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
24 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
MDI - 101
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Artificial tear containing arabinogalactan, trehalose and hyaluronic acid
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Artificial tear MDI - 101
Intervention Description
Medical device CE marked - artificial tears containing arabinogalactan, trehalose and hyaluronic acid - 10 weeks treatment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy - Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI)
Description
Change of OSDI score versus baseline at any study time-point. The main goal of the study is to gather information about the efficacy, assessed by OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index) questionnaire, of artificial tear containing AG, trehalose and HA (MDI - 101) used in the treatment of symptoms of DE of various aetiology, with evidence of inflammation of the ocular surface. The OSDI score ranges from 0 (better outcome) to 100 (worst outcome)
Time Frame
1 week - 2 weeks - 4 weeks - 6 weeks - 8 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Additional efficacy parameters: Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 (MMP-9)
Description
Change of tear matrix metalloproteinase(MMP)-9 at T0 vs final assessment. The result of the MMP test could be NEGATIVE if the level of MMP-9 is < 40 ng/ml (better outcome) or POSITIVE if the level of MMP-9 is ≥ 40 ng/ml (worst outcome)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Additional Efficacy parameters: EFRON SCALE
Description
Change of Efron Grading Scales at T0 vs final assessment. The Efron grading scale range from 0 (cornea surface normale) to 4 (severe corneal damage)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Additional Efficacy parameters: Corneal and Conjunctival Staining
Description
Change of Corneal and Conjunctival Staining at T0 vs final assessment. The Staining scale ranges from 0 (better outcome) to 3 (worst outcome)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Additional Efficacy parameters: NIBUT
Description
Change of NIBUT at T0 vs final assessment. The result of the Non-Invasive Break-Up Time (NIBUT) test could be >10 seconds (better outcome) or ≤10 seconds (worst outcome)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Additional Efficacy parameters: Osmolarity
Description
Change of Osmolarity at T0 vs final assessment. The higher the tear film osmolarity, the greater the severity of the ocular surface damage.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Additional Efficacy parameters: Ocular Protection Index
Description
Change of Ocular Protection Index (OPI) at T0 vs final assessment The principle of the test is that when BUT is shorter than the blink interval, the eyes are exposed to the risk of focal ocular surface damage.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Additional Efficacy parameters: meniscometry
Description
Change of meniscometry at T0 vs final assessment. The lowest tear meniscus radius, the higher the severity of the ocular surface health
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Description
Safety Adverse Event (AE) experienced with the artificial tear assessed by the patient, before the ocular examination or reported by the patient at any time during the study.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Incidence of change in the unaided and corrected visual acuity
Description
Unaided and corrected visual acuity Snellen test will be performed to evaluate change in the unaided and corrected visual acuity at T0 vs final assessment.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Incidence of change in the Intraocular pressure
Description
Change of Intraocular pressure at T0 vs final assessment.
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Evaluation of the Tolerability Signs and symptoms of discomfort
Description
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of instillations in the past 24 hours).
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Treatment adherence (24 hours)
Description
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of instillations in the past 24 hours)
Time Frame
8 weeks
Title
Treatment adherence (total days)
Description
Treatment adherence assessed by the patient at any study time-point (number of days of product usage).
Time Frame
8 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects who gave their written consent for participation in the study and for personal data processing and willing to comply with all study procedures.
Males or females 30-75 years old.
Subjects who are familiar with the needs of the study in the use of mobile devices and internet.
Subjects who successfully completed the electronic registration for the clinical trial using their own study electronic Patient Reported Outcome (ePRO) profile and completed the OSDI questionnaire.
Subjects who had been diagnosed as having dry eye symptoms for at least 3 months, fulfilling all the following four criteria:
i. OSDI score of >18 evaluated by the questionnaire of Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI); ii. Non-invasive breakup time (NIBUT) ≤10 seconds at least in one eye; iii. Levels of MMP-9 in tears ≥ 40 ng/ml as assessed by the Inflammatory assay at least in one eye; iv. Cornea surface scores ≥1 and <4, based on Efron grading system. -
Exclusion Criteria:
Contact lens wearers.
Subjects who did use any artificial tear for at least 7 days before baseline.
Severe corneal damage (cornea surface scores ≥4, based on Efron grading system) or cornea surface normal (scores <1 based on Efron grading system)
Corneal abrasions or other corneal abnormalities, blepharitis, meibomitis, lid abnormalities.
Conjunctivitis of infective or allergic origins, ongoing or resolved less than 4 weeks before baseline visit.
Subjects participating in another clinical study, on-going or completed less than 4 weeks before.
Subject using, or will use during the study, other artificial tear or other ophthalmic products including, but not limited, to: corticosteroids, antibiotics, vasoconstrictor agents.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ophthalmology unit
Organizational Affiliation
Lucca
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Ophthalmology unit
City
Lucca
Country
Italy
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24882753
Citation
Battelli MG, Bolognesi A, Polito L. Pathophysiology of circulating xanthine oxidoreductase: new emerging roles for a multi-tasking enzyme. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2014 Sep;1842(9):1502-17. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2014.05.022. Epub 2014 May 29.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
17417148
Citation
Baudouin C. [A new approach for better comprehension of diseases of the ocular surface]. J Fr Ophtalmol. 2007 Mar;30(3):239-46. doi: 10.1016/s0181-5512(07)89584-2. French.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28736340
Citation
Bron AJ, de Paiva CS, Chauhan SK, Bonini S, Gabison EE, Jain S, Knop E, Markoulli M, Ogawa Y, Perez V, Uchino Y, Yokoi N, Zoukhri D, Sullivan DA. TFOS DEWS II pathophysiology report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):438-510. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.05.011. Epub 2017 Jul 20. Erratum In: Ocul Surf. 2019 Oct;17(4):842.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18001233
Citation
Burgalassi S, Nicosia N, Monti D, Falcone G, Boldrini E, Chetoni P. Larch arabinogalactan for dry eye protection and treatment of corneal lesions: investigations in rabbits. J Ocul Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Dec;23(6):541-50. doi: 10.1089/jop.2007.0048.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
30623968
Citation
Cejka C, Kubinova S, Cejkova J. Trehalose in ophthalmology. Histol Histopathol. 2019 Jun;34(6):611-618. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-082. Epub 2019 Jan 9.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23638722
Citation
Choy CK, Cho P, Boost MV. Cytotoxicity of rigid gas-permeable lens care solutions. Clin Exp Optom. 2013 Sep;96(5):467-71. doi: 10.1111/cxo.12039. Epub 2013 May 3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
12162486
Citation
Efron N, Morgan PB, Jagpal R. Validation of computer morphs for grading contact lens complications. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2002 Jul;22(4):341-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1475-1313.2002.00049.x.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10231609
Citation
Kelly GS. Larch arabinogalactan: clinical relevance of a novel immune-enhancing polysaccharide. Altern Med Rev. 1999 Apr;4(2):96-103.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
25279127
Citation
Hessen M, Akpek EK. Dry eye: an inflammatory ocular disease. J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2014 Apr;9(2):240-50.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
10487426
Citation
Holden BA, Reddy MK, Sankaridurg PR, Buddi R, Sharma S, Willcox MD, Sweeney DF, Rao GN. Contact lens-induced peripheral ulcers with extended wear of disposable hydrogel lenses: histopathologic observations on the nature and type of corneal infiltrate. Cornea. 1999 Sep;18(5):538-43.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19177348
Citation
Jain NK, Roy I. Effect of trehalose on protein structure. Protein Sci. 2009 Jan;18(1):24-36. doi: 10.1002/pro.3.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
29033270
Citation
Li W, Sun X, Wang Z, Zhang Y. A survey of contact lens-related complications in a tertiary hospital in China. Cont Lens Anterior Eye. 2018 Apr;41(2):201-204. doi: 10.1016/j.clae.2017.10.007. Epub 2017 Oct 21.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
22703523
Citation
Pahuja P, Arora S, Pawar P. Ocular drug delivery system: a reference to natural polymers. Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2012 Jul;9(7):837-61. doi: 10.1517/17425247.2012.690733. Epub 2012 Jun 16.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28078849
Citation
Shi YH, Zhou LT, Zhang CX, Li YZ, Zhang JZ, Zhou HM, Li YG, Liu T, Zhang LL, Sun LN, Chen Z. Effects of carbomer eye drops in combination with orthokeratology lens in treating adolescent myopia. J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2016 Oct-Dec;30(4):1029-1033.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
32380019
Citation
Silvani L, Bedei A, De Grazia G, Remiddi S. Arabinogalactan and hyaluronic acid in ophthalmic solution: Experimental effect on xanthine oxidoreductase complex as key player in ocular inflammation (in vitro study). Exp Eye Res. 2020 Jul;196:108058. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2020.108058. Epub 2020 May 4.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
3873200
Citation
Stuart JC, Linn JG. Dilute sodium hyaluronate (Healon) in the treatment of ocular surface disorders. Ann Ophthalmol. 1985 Mar;17(3):190-2.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
28736336
Citation
Sullivan DA, Rocha EM, Aragona P, Clayton JA, Ding J, Golebiowski B, Hampel U, McDermott AM, Schaumberg DA, Srinivasan S, Versura P, Willcox MDP. TFOS DEWS II Sex, Gender, and Hormones Report. Ocul Surf. 2017 Jul;15(3):284-333. doi: 10.1016/j.jtos.2017.04.001. Epub 2017 Jul 20.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
15106919
Citation
Yokoi N, Komuro A. Non-invasive methods of assessing the tear film. Exp Eye Res. 2004 Mar;78(3):399-407. doi: 10.1016/j.exer.2003.09.020.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Study on Safety and Performance of an Artificial Tear in Dry Eye Treatment in Subjects With Ocular Surface Inflammation
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs