search
Back to results

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HX575 Hexal AG vs ERYPO® for the Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients

Primary Purpose

Anemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG
ERYPO®, Janssen-Cilag
Sponsored by
Sandoz
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anemia focused on measuring Treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Receiving dialysis for at least 6 months (3 times weekly) before screening
  • Age: >=18
  • Clinically stable, i.e. hemoglobin within the established range (10.0 to 13.0 g/dl) for at least 12 weeks before screening
  • Stable intravenous dosage of ERYPO® three times weekly for at least 8 weeks before screening and during screening with a maximal weekly dosage of 300 IU/kg body weight (stable is defined as <25% change (up or down) in weekly dose and no change in frequency over 8 weeks prior screening and 10 weeks prior randomisation)
  • Baseline hemoglobin concentration of 10.0 to 13.0 g/dl (mean of two pre-randomization pre-dialysis samples of Hb at visit -2 and visit 1)
  • Serum ferritin >=100 µg/l and/or saturated transferrin levels >=20%
  • C-reactive protein <15 mg/l (< 5 mg/l: normal; >= 5 mg/l < 10 mg/l: +; >=10mg/l < 100 mg/l: ++; >=100 mg/l: +++)
  • Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits
  • Written informed consent of the patient

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anemia of non-renal causes
  • Primary hematologic disorder (e.g. myelodysplastic syndrome, sickle cell anemia, hematological malignancy, hemolytic anemia)
  • Evidence of severe hepatic dysfunction (ALT and/or AST above 2 x upper limit of normal range; or gamma-GT above 3 x upper limit of normal range)
  • Clinical evidence of current uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism (serum parathyroid hormone >1500 pg/mL).
  • Known history of bone marrow disease
  • Any red blood cell transfusion(s) during the last 12 weeks before screening or during the screening/baseline period
  • Insufficient concomitant iron treatment during the last 2 months before Visit -2
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as a predialysis diastolic blood pressure measurement >=110 mmHg during the screening period
  • Congestive heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV]
  • Unstable angina pectoris, active cardiac disease, cardiac infarction during the last six months before screening
  • History of blood coagulation disease
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100.000/µl)
  • Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 2.000/µl)
  • Overt bleeding (acute or chronic bleeding within 2 months of inclusion) or hemolysis
  • Evidence of acute infectious disease or serious active inflammatory states within one months before screening (Visit -2) or during the screening/baseline period
  • Suspicion or known PRCA (pure red cell aplasia)
  • Previously diagnosed HIV or acute hepatitis infection
  • Treatment for epilepsy within the past 6 months
  • Planned surgery during the next 7 months (except vascular access surgery)
  • Any androgen therapy within 2 months before visit -2 and during the study
  • Therapy with immunosuppressants or any drug known to affect the hematocrit within 1 month before Visit -2 and during the study
  • Clinical evidence of malignant diseases
  • Pregnancy, breastfeeding women or women not using adequate birth control measures
  • Known history of severe drug related allergies
  • Known allergy to one of the ingredients of the test or reference products or hypersensitivity to mammalian-derived products
  • Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or participation in a study in the month preceding the start of this study or previously randomized in this study
  • Participation in an erythropoietin study in the 3 months preceding screening (visit -2)
  • Any other condition which at the investigator´s discretion may put the patient at risk or which may confound the study results

Sites / Locations

  • Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch
  • Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Graz
  • Dialyseinstitut Graz GmbH
  • Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen
  • Universitätsklinik Innsbruck, Klinische Abteilung für Nephrologie
  • Allgemeines Öffentliches Krankenhaus St. Pölten, I. Med. Abteilung
  • Allgemeines öffentliches Krankenhaus Wiener Neustadt , 2. Interne Abteilung
  • Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung der Stadt Wien, 3. Med. Abteilung
  • Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Abt. für Nephrologie und Dialyse
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • Dialysepraxis Bad Münder
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
  • Dialysepraxis Drs. Riedasch/Schreiber
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • Dialysepraxis
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • Dialysepraxis Dr. med. Stefan Holzmann
  • Dialysepraxis Dr. Möller, Dr. Knee
  • Dialysepraxis
  • Dialysezentrum
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • Praxis Dres. Sohn und Schaumann
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • Dialysepraxis Dr. med. Stefan Holzmann
  • Praxis Dr. Kienle
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH - Prof. Dr. med. Heide Sperschneider
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • Dialysepraxis Dr. med. Matthias Anders
  • Kfh Kuratorium für Dialyse & Nierentransplantation e.V., 2.Etage
  • KfH Kuratorium für Nierentranplantation und Dialyse e.V.
  • Dialysepraxis Prof. Rob, Dr. Wilhelm u. Dr. Schümann
  • Dialysepraxis Dr.med. H.-D. Hoffmann
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr.Steger, Dr.Böhmer, Dr.Kirpal
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
  • Dialysezentrum
  • Praxis Dres.Hartmann, Schiele
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
  • KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG

ERYPO®, Janssen-Cilag

Arm Description

Eligible patients were switched from the comparator ERYPO®, to epoetin alfa HX575 Hexal AG in ratio 2:1 to be intravenously treated with HX575 in pre-filled syringes for 24 weeks (solution for injection i.v.). The maximum weekly dose was 300 UI/kg body weight (given 1 to 3 times) to maintain hemoglobin levels between 10-13 g/dL.

Eligible patients were randomized and continued to be treated with ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag in pre-filled syringes intravenously (solution for injection i.v.) for 24 weeks. The maximum weekly dose was 300 UI/kg body weight (given 1 to 3 times) to maintain hemoglobin levels between 10-13 g/dL.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

To Compare the Efficacy of HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag.
Primary endpoint was the mean absolute change in Hb level between the screening/baseline and the evaluation period. A two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the difference in mean change (mean of evaluation period - mean of screening/baseline period) in Hb between epoetin alfa HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag was computed. The difference was estimated from an analysis of a co-variance model including factors treatment, center, mean baseline Hb (<11.5 and ≥11.5 g/dL) as factors and change of the mean weekly dose from screening/baseline to the evaluation period (of HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG or ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag) as a covariate. HX575 Hexal AG was considered at least as good as ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag if the 95 % confidence interval of the difference in mean changes in Hb levels between HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag lied entirely within the interval [-0.5 g/dL; 0.5 g/dL]. Primary Endpoint was analyzed based on intent-to-treat (ITT) population.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Absolute Change in Hemoglobin Level From the Screening/Baseline Period to the Evaluation Period - ITT Population
The mean absolute change in Hb levels between the screening/baseline period and the evaluation period was analyzed for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population in the same way as the primary efficacy endpoint. A two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the difference in mean change (mean of evaluation period - mean of screening/baseline period) in Hb between HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag was computed. The difference was estimated from an analysis of a co-variance model including factors treatment, center, mean baseline Hb (<11.5 and ≥11.5 g/dL) as factors and change of the mean weekly dose from screening/baseline to the evaluation period (of HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG or ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag) as a covariate. HX575 Hexal AG was considered at least as good as ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag if the 95 % confidence interval of the difference in mean changes in Hb levels between HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag lied entirely within the interval [-0.5 g/dL; 0.5 g/dL].

Full Information

First Posted
April 23, 2008
Last Updated
June 29, 2023
Sponsor
Sandoz
Collaborators
Hexal AG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT00666835
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HX575 Hexal AG vs ERYPO® for the Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients
Official Title
Randomized, Double-blind, Multicenter, Parallel-group, Equivalence Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HX575 Hexal AG vs ERYPO® for the Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2004 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 2006 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2006 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sandoz
Collaborators
Hexal AG

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a double-blind, randomized, multicenter, parallel-group, equivalence study involving about 462 clinically stable hemodialysis patients aged 18 years or above suffering from anemia and treated previously with a stable dose of ERYPO® intravenously.
Detailed Description
The primary objective of this Phase III study is the evaluation of therapeutic equivalence of HX575 Hexal AG and a comparator of epoetin alfa, ERYPO® in the maintenance intravenous treatment of renal anemia. Efficacy, dosage and safety of HX575 Hexal AG in the long-term treatment were assessed.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anemia
Keywords
Treatment of anemia in hemodialysis patients

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
478 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Eligible patients were switched from the comparator ERYPO®, to epoetin alfa HX575 Hexal AG in ratio 2:1 to be intravenously treated with HX575 in pre-filled syringes for 24 weeks (solution for injection i.v.). The maximum weekly dose was 300 UI/kg body weight (given 1 to 3 times) to maintain hemoglobin levels between 10-13 g/dL.
Arm Title
ERYPO®, Janssen-Cilag
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Eligible patients were randomized and continued to be treated with ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag in pre-filled syringes intravenously (solution for injection i.v.) for 24 weeks. The maximum weekly dose was 300 UI/kg body weight (given 1 to 3 times) to maintain hemoglobin levels between 10-13 g/dL.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG
Other Intervention Name(s)
Binocrit, Abseamed
Intervention Description
HX575 Solution for i.v. injection Containing 1000, 2000 and 4000 IU of rh erythropoietin
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ERYPO®, Janssen-Cilag
Other Intervention Name(s)
EPREX®, Solution for i.v. injection
Intervention Description
Solution for i.v. injection
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To Compare the Efficacy of HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag.
Description
Primary endpoint was the mean absolute change in Hb level between the screening/baseline and the evaluation period. A two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the difference in mean change (mean of evaluation period - mean of screening/baseline period) in Hb between epoetin alfa HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag was computed. The difference was estimated from an analysis of a co-variance model including factors treatment, center, mean baseline Hb (<11.5 and ≥11.5 g/dL) as factors and change of the mean weekly dose from screening/baseline to the evaluation period (of HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG or ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag) as a covariate. HX575 Hexal AG was considered at least as good as ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag if the 95 % confidence interval of the difference in mean changes in Hb levels between HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag lied entirely within the interval [-0.5 g/dL; 0.5 g/dL]. Primary Endpoint was analyzed based on intent-to-treat (ITT) population.
Time Frame
28 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Absolute Change in Hemoglobin Level From the Screening/Baseline Period to the Evaluation Period - ITT Population
Description
The mean absolute change in Hb levels between the screening/baseline period and the evaluation period was analyzed for the intent-to-treat (ITT) population in the same way as the primary efficacy endpoint. A two-sided 95 % confidence interval for the difference in mean change (mean of evaluation period - mean of screening/baseline period) in Hb between HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag was computed. The difference was estimated from an analysis of a co-variance model including factors treatment, center, mean baseline Hb (<11.5 and ≥11.5 g/dL) as factors and change of the mean weekly dose from screening/baseline to the evaluation period (of HX575 epoetin alfa Hexal AG or ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag) as a covariate. HX575 Hexal AG was considered at least as good as ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag if the 95 % confidence interval of the difference in mean changes in Hb levels between HX575 Hexal AG and ERYPO® Janssen-Cilag lied entirely within the interval [-0.5 g/dL; 0.5 g/dL].
Time Frame
28 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Receiving dialysis for at least 6 months (3 times weekly) before screening Age: >=18 Clinically stable, i.e. hemoglobin within the established range (10.0 to 13.0 g/dl) for at least 12 weeks before screening Stable intravenous dosage of ERYPO® three times weekly for at least 8 weeks before screening and during screening with a maximal weekly dosage of 300 IU/kg body weight (stable is defined as <25% change (up or down) in weekly dose and no change in frequency over 8 weeks prior screening and 10 weeks prior randomisation) Baseline hemoglobin concentration of 10.0 to 13.0 g/dl (mean of two pre-randomization pre-dialysis samples of Hb at visit -2 and visit 1) Serum ferritin >=100 µg/l and/or saturated transferrin levels >=20% C-reactive protein <15 mg/l (< 5 mg/l: normal; >= 5 mg/l < 10 mg/l: +; >=10mg/l < 100 mg/l: ++; >=100 mg/l: +++) Ability to follow study instructions and likely to complete all required visits Written informed consent of the patient Exclusion Criteria: Anemia of non-renal causes Primary hematologic disorder (e.g. myelodysplastic syndrome, sickle cell anemia, hematological malignancy, hemolytic anemia) Evidence of severe hepatic dysfunction (ALT and/or AST above 2 x upper limit of normal range; or gamma-GT above 3 x upper limit of normal range) Clinical evidence of current uncontrolled hyperparathyroidism (serum parathyroid hormone >1500 pg/mL). Known history of bone marrow disease Any red blood cell transfusion(s) during the last 12 weeks before screening or during the screening/baseline period Insufficient concomitant iron treatment during the last 2 months before Visit -2 Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as a predialysis diastolic blood pressure measurement >=110 mmHg during the screening period Congestive heart failure [New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and IV] Unstable angina pectoris, active cardiac disease, cardiac infarction during the last six months before screening History of blood coagulation disease Thrombocytopenia (platelet count <100.000/µl) Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 2.000/µl) Overt bleeding (acute or chronic bleeding within 2 months of inclusion) or hemolysis Evidence of acute infectious disease or serious active inflammatory states within one months before screening (Visit -2) or during the screening/baseline period Suspicion or known PRCA (pure red cell aplasia) Previously diagnosed HIV or acute hepatitis infection Treatment for epilepsy within the past 6 months Planned surgery during the next 7 months (except vascular access surgery) Any androgen therapy within 2 months before visit -2 and during the study Therapy with immunosuppressants or any drug known to affect the hematocrit within 1 month before Visit -2 and during the study Clinical evidence of malignant diseases Pregnancy, breastfeeding women or women not using adequate birth control measures Known history of severe drug related allergies Known allergy to one of the ingredients of the test or reference products or hypersensitivity to mammalian-derived products Simultaneous participation in another clinical study or participation in a study in the month preceding the start of this study or previously randomized in this study Participation in an erythropoietin study in the 3 months preceding screening (visit -2) Any other condition which at the investigator´s discretion may put the patient at risk or which may confound the study results
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marianne Haag-Weber, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Dialysezentrum Straubing, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Landeskrankenhaus Feldkirch
City
Feldkirch
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Allgemeines Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder Graz
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Dialyseinstitut Graz GmbH
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen
City
Graz
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Universitätsklinik Innsbruck, Klinische Abteilung für Nephrologie
City
Innsbruck
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Allgemeines Öffentliches Krankenhaus St. Pölten, I. Med. Abteilung
City
St. Poelten
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Allgemeines öffentliches Krankenhaus Wiener Neustadt , 2. Interne Abteilung
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Krankenanstalt Rudolfstiftung der Stadt Wien, 3. Med. Abteilung
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Wilhelminenspital der Stadt Wien, Abt. für Nephrologie und Dialyse
City
Vienna
Country
Austria
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Aschaffenburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Bad Münder
City
Bad Münder
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Bad Nauheim
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Bamberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Bayreuth
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Bergisch Gladbach
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
City
Bischofswerda
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
City
Bremerhaven
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
City
Coburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Drs. Riedasch/Schreiber
City
Coesfeld
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Deggendorf
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis
City
Donaueschingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Eberswalde
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Dr. med. Stefan Holzmann
City
Erkelenz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Dr. Möller, Dr. Knee
City
Essen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis
City
Freiberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysezentrum
City
Freiburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Fürstenzell
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Greifswald
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Guenzburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Gummersbach
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Dres. Sohn und Schaumann
City
Hameln
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Haßfurt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Dr. med. Stefan Holzmann
City
Heinsberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Dr. Kienle
City
Homberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Ingolstadt
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH - Prof. Dr. med. Heide Sperschneider
City
Jena
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Kronach
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Dr. med. Matthias Anders
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Kfh Kuratorium für Dialyse & Nierentransplantation e.V., 2.Etage
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Nierentranplantation und Dialyse e.V.
City
Lohr
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Prof. Rob, Dr. Wilhelm u. Dr. Schümann
City
Luebeck
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysepraxis Dr.med. H.-D. Hoffmann
City
Menden
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Muenchen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Neuried
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Noerdlingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Gemeinschaftspraxis Dr.Steger, Dr.Böhmer, Dr.Kirpal
City
Nuremberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Oberschleißheim
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V.
City
Plauen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Dialysezentrum
City
Potsdam
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Praxis Dres.Hartmann, Schiele
City
Saarbruecken
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Straubing
Country
Germany
Facility Name
KfH Kuratorium für Dialyse und Nierentransplantation e.V
City
Sulzbach-Rosenberg
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided

Learn more about this trial

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of HX575 Hexal AG vs ERYPO® for the Treatment of Anemia in Hemodialysis Patients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs