search
Back to results

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Rotigotine on Parkinson's Disease-Associated Pain (DOLORES)

Primary Purpose

Advanced Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Rotigotine
Placebo
Sponsored by
UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Advanced Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease focused on measuring Parkinson's Disease, Rotigotine, Chronic Pain, Nonmotor symptoms

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient has advanced idiopathic Parkinson's Disease associated chronic pain assessed by a Likert Pain Scale
  • Patient is taking Levodopa with a stable daily dose of at least 200 mg for at least 21 days prior to start
  • Hoehn and Yahr stage score of II to IV
  • Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 25
  • If an antidepressant drug is taken, the dose must be stable for at least 21 days

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Therapy with a Dopamine Agonist within 21 days prior to start
  • Discontinuation from previous Dopamine Agonist Therapy due to lack of efficacy
  • Therapy with Dopamine-modulating substances 21 days prior to start
  • Therapy with analgesics for the treatment for pain, unless the dose has been stable
  • Chronic alcohol or drug abuse
  • Medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the patient's ability to participate in this study
  • Hypersensitivity to any components of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) or comparative drugs
  • Atypical Parkinson's Disease Syndrome due to drugs
  • History of deep brain stimulation
  • Significant skin disease that would make transdermal drug use inappropriate
  • Electroconvulsive therapy within 12 weeks prior to start
  • Evidence of an Impulse Control Disorder
  • Previous diagnosis of severe Restless Legs Syndrome
  • Chronic Migraine
  • Severe Depression
  • Symptomatic Orthostatic Hypotension

Sites / Locations

  • 2113
  • 2120
  • 2109
  • 2107
  • 2102
  • 2118
  • 2117
  • 2103
  • 2101
  • 2104
  • 1204
  • 1607
  • 1603
  • 1609
  • 1804
  • 1805

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Rotigotine

Placebo

Arm Description

Rotigotine Transdermal Patches

Placebo Transdermal Patches

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in Pain Severity Assessed Using an 11-point Likert Pain Scale
An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The subject rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The average pain experienced in the last 7 days was calculated by the mean of the daily Likert Pain Scores within the 7 days prior to the respective visit (ie, Likert Pain Scores with a date of assessment before the date of visit and on or after the date of visit - 7 days). A negative value indicates an improvement.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Responders at the End of the Maintenance Period
Responders are defined as patients experiencing a 2-Point or more Reduction on an 11-Point Likert Pain Scale from Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period. An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The patient rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Sum Score of the 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)
The 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) (Peto et al, 1998) is a self-administered questionnaire that provides a reliable measure of overall health status. The PDQ-8 contains 8 items of daily living, with 1 item selected from each of the following 8 scales: mobility, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), emotional well being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communication, and bodily discomfort. The total PDQ-8 score is the sum of all the individual items converted to a summary index score between 0 and 100, with lower scores indicating better health. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Depression Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Anxiety Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Combined Score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] Subscale) and III (Motor Subscale)
Part II of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the subject's activities of daily living. Part III assesses motor function. The UPDRS is completed by questioning the subject about his/her general state in conjunction with any observations made by the investigator (or designee) since the previous visit. Part II is subject-rated and Part III is physician-rated. The UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) consists of 13 items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as the sum of these 13 individual scores. The UPDRS Part III (motor subscale) consists of 27 items and sub items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as sum of these 27 individual scores. The sum score of UPDRS Parts II and III is the sum of the corresponding single sum scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7 Domain Scores of Classification of Pain in Parkinson's Disease
The classification of pain in Parkinson's disease scale classifies pain in the following domains: musculoskeletal pain (item 1), chronic pain (items 2 and 3), fluctuation related pain (items 4, 5 and 6), nocturnal pain (items 7 and 8), oro-facial pain (items 9, 10 and 11), discoloration; edema/swelling (items 12 and 13), and radicular pain (item 14). Severity of the pain is measured on a scale from none (0) to severe (3) and frequency is measured on a scale from never (0) to very frequent (4). A score of a single item was calculated by multiplying severity with frequency. A domain score was calculated as the sum of every individual score related to the respective domain. A negative value indicates an improvement.

Full Information

First Posted
December 5, 2012
Last Updated
April 9, 2015
Sponsor
UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01744496
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Rotigotine on Parkinson's Disease-Associated Pain
Acronym
DOLORES
Official Title
A Multicenter, Multinational, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, 2-Arm Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Rotigotine on Parkinson's Disease-Associated Pain
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
UCB BIOSCIENCES GmbH

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This trial is being conducted to compare the impact of Rotigotine and Placebo on Chronic Pain associated with Parkinson's Disease among patients with advanced stages of the disease.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Advanced Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease
Keywords
Parkinson's Disease, Rotigotine, Chronic Pain, Nonmotor symptoms

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
68 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Rotigotine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Rotigotine Transdermal Patches
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo Transdermal Patches
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Rotigotine
Other Intervention Name(s)
(6S)-6-propyl-[2 (2 thienyl)ethyl]amino-5,6,7,8-tetrahydro-1-naphthalenol
Intervention Description
Patches will contain 4 mg / 24 h (20 cm^2), 6 mg/ 24 h (30 cm^2), or 8 mg /24 h (40 cm^2) of Rotigotine. Application of study medication starts at the Baseline Visit. Rotigotine will be administered once daily starting at 4 mg / 24 h. Doses will then be up-titrated in weekly increments of 2 mg / 24 h until optimal or maximum dose (16 mg / 24 h) is reached and the Maintenance Period can be started. The duration of the Titration Period will vary from 1 to 7 weeks ± 3 days. The Maintenance Period will last 12 weeks ± 5 days. Thereafter, during the De-escalation Period, the dose of study medication will be decreased by 2 mg / 24 h every other day. The De-escalation Period may last up to 12 days.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo patches match the size of active patches 20 cm^2, 30 cm^2, or 40 cm^2 and will contain Placebo. Application of Placebo patches starts at the Baseline Visit. Placebo patches will be administered once daily starting with the equivalent of 4 mg / 24 h. Doses will then be up-titrated in weekly equivalents to 2 mg / 24 h until either optimal dose or maximum dose is reached. The maximum dose is the equivalent to 16 mg / 24 h. The duration of the Titration Period will vary from 1 to 7 weeks. The Maintenance Period will last 12 weeks ± 5 days. During the De-escalation Period, the dose of Placebo will be decreased by the equivalent to 2 mg / 24 h every other day. The De-escalation Period may last up to 12 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in Pain Severity Assessed Using an 11-point Likert Pain Scale
Description
An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The subject rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced). The average pain experienced in the last 7 days was calculated by the mean of the daily Likert Pain Scores within the 7 days prior to the respective visit (ie, Likert Pain Scores with a date of assessment before the date of visit and on or after the date of visit - 7 days). A negative value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after an up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Responders at the End of the Maintenance Period
Description
Responders are defined as patients experiencing a 2-Point or more Reduction on an 11-Point Likert Pain Scale from Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period. An 11-Point Likert Scale was used to assess patients' average daily pain. The patient rated his/her average pain from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain ever experienced).
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Title
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Sum Score of the 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8)
Description
The 8-Item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-8) (Peto et al, 1998) is a self-administered questionnaire that provides a reliable measure of overall health status. The PDQ-8 contains 8 items of daily living, with 1 item selected from each of the following 8 scales: mobility, Activities of Daily Living (ADL), emotional well being, stigma, social support, cognitions, communication, and bodily discomfort. The total PDQ-8 score is the sum of all the individual items converted to a summary index score between 0 and 100, with lower scores indicating better health. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Title
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Depression Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Title
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7-Item Anxiety Subscore of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) (Zigmond and Snaith, 1983) is a 14-item self-assessment scale for detecting states of depression and anxiety in the setting of a hospital medical outpatient clinic. It comprises a 7-item anxiety subscale and a 7-item depressive subscale that are also measures of severity of the emotional disorder. The 14 items are scored between 0 and 3. The 7-item depression subscore and 7-item anxiety subscore were calculated as the sum of the 7 corresponding individual scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Title
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the Combined Score of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Parts II (Activities of Daily Living [ADL] Subscale) and III (Motor Subscale)
Description
Part II of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) assesses the subject's activities of daily living. Part III assesses motor function. The UPDRS is completed by questioning the subject about his/her general state in conjunction with any observations made by the investigator (or designee) since the previous visit. Part II is subject-rated and Part III is physician-rated. The UPDRS Part II (Activities of Daily Living) consists of 13 items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as the sum of these 13 individual scores. The UPDRS Part III (motor subscale) consists of 27 items and sub items scored between 0 and 4. The sum score was calculated as sum of these 27 individual scores. The sum score of UPDRS Parts II and III is the sum of the corresponding single sum scores. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)
Title
Change From Baseline to the End of the Maintenance Period in the 7 Domain Scores of Classification of Pain in Parkinson's Disease
Description
The classification of pain in Parkinson's disease scale classifies pain in the following domains: musculoskeletal pain (item 1), chronic pain (items 2 and 3), fluctuation related pain (items 4, 5 and 6), nocturnal pain (items 7 and 8), oro-facial pain (items 9, 10 and 11), discoloration; edema/swelling (items 12 and 13), and radicular pain (item 14). Severity of the pain is measured on a scale from none (0) to severe (3) and frequency is measured on a scale from never (0) to very frequent (4). A score of a single item was calculated by multiplying severity with frequency. A domain score was calculated as the sum of every individual score related to the respective domain. A negative value indicates an improvement.
Time Frame
Baseline (Visit 2) until End of the Maintenance Period (Maintenance Period lasts 12 weeks ± 5 days after up to 7 weeks Titration Period)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient has advanced idiopathic Parkinson's Disease associated chronic pain assessed by a Likert Pain Scale Patient is taking Levodopa with a stable daily dose of at least 200 mg for at least 21 days prior to start Hoehn and Yahr stage score of II to IV Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score ≥ 25 If an antidepressant drug is taken, the dose must be stable for at least 21 days Exclusion Criteria: Therapy with a Dopamine Agonist within 21 days prior to start Discontinuation from previous Dopamine Agonist Therapy due to lack of efficacy Therapy with Dopamine-modulating substances 21 days prior to start Therapy with analgesics for the treatment for pain, unless the dose has been stable Chronic alcohol or drug abuse Medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, could jeopardize or would compromise the patient's ability to participate in this study Hypersensitivity to any components of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) or comparative drugs Atypical Parkinson's Disease Syndrome due to drugs History of deep brain stimulation Significant skin disease that would make transdermal drug use inappropriate Electroconvulsive therapy within 12 weeks prior to start Evidence of an Impulse Control Disorder Previous diagnosis of severe Restless Legs Syndrome Chronic Migraine Severe Depression Symptomatic Orthostatic Hypotension
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
UCB Clinical Trial Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
+1 877 822 9493 (UCB)
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
2113
City
Gilbert
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
2120
City
Sunnyvale
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
2109
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
2107
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
2102
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
Country
United States
Facility Name
2118
City
Advance
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
2117
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
2103
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
Country
United States
Facility Name
2101
City
Roanoke
State/Province
Virginia
Country
United States
Facility Name
2104
City
Milwaukee
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States
Facility Name
1204
City
Gera
Country
Germany
Facility Name
1607
City
Gdansk
Country
Poland
Facility Name
1603
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
1609
City
Olsztyn
Country
Poland
Facility Name
1804
City
Bratislava
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
1805
City
Dubnica Nad Vahom
Country
Slovakia

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/SafetyInformation/default.htm
Description
FDA Safety Alerts and Recalls

Learn more about this trial

Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of Rotigotine on Parkinson's Disease-Associated Pain

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs