Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OR3O™ Dual Mobility System vs. Conventional Single Bearing Design Total Hip System (OR3O)
Primary Purpose
Degenerative Hip Joint Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Femoral Neck Fractures
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OR3O™ - Dual Mobility System
Conventional
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Degenerative Hip Joint Disease focused on measuring Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is a suitable candidate for implanting the OR3O™ Dual Mobility System or single-bearing design Total Hip System in primary total hip replacement in the Investigator's judgement.
- Subject is skeletally mature in the Investigator's judgement.
- Subject is 18 - 80 years old (inclusive).
- Subject is receiving total hip replacement for the first time on the affected hip.
Subject has any of the following conditions:
- Advanced degeneration of the hip joint as a result of degenerative, post-traumatic, or rheumatoid arthritis(RA);
- Fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head;
- All forms of osteoarthritis(OA);
- Patients with hips at risk of dislocation;
- Femoral neck fracture or proximal hip joint fracture.
- Subject provides written informed consent for study participation using an Ethical Committee (EC) approved consent form before any study procedures are performed, including pre-operative data review and/or collection of data on electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs).
- Subject is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits and is able to complete study activities.
- Subjects with preoperative HHS ≤ 79 (fair or worse category).
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has conditions that would eliminate or tend to eliminate adequate implant support or prevent the use of an appropriately-sized implant, e.g.:
- blood supply limitations;
- insufficient quantity or quality of bone support, e.g., osteoporosis, metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation, radioactive bone disease, tumor around hip joint, and osteomalacia;
- infections or other conditions which may lead to increased bone resorption.
- Subject has dysplasia of hip joint with CROWE Grade III, IV.
- Subject has weak constitution or failing to endure the surgery due to other diseases of the body.
- Subject has bodily disease(s) that may interfere with THA survival or outcome.
- Subject has life expectancy of less than 2 years.
- Subject has mental or neurological conditions which impair the subject's ability or willingness to restrict activities that may put the affected limb at risk.
- Subject has physical conditions or activities which tend to place extreme loads on implants, e.g., Charcot joints, muscle deficiencies, multiple joint disabilities.
- Subject has neuromuscular dysfunctions (paralysis, myolysis and abductor muscle weakness) which will cause unstable hip joint or abnormal gait after surgery.
- Subject has a mental or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, mental retardation, drug or alcohol abuse.
- Subject has an active infection - systemic or at the site of intended surgery.
- Subject has a Body Mass Index ≥ 40.0 kg/m².
- Subject has a known allergy to any component of the devices used in the study.
- Subject is pregnant or breast feeding.
- Subject is entered in another investigational drug, biologic, or device study within 30 days of active study participation.
- Subjects that are expected with poor compliance.
- Subjects with complications of other diseases are limited to participate in the research, not able to comply with the follow-up or have impact on scientific integrity.
- Subjects with preoperative HHS ≥ 80 (good to excellent category).
- Subject has other diseases or conditions that investigator considers not appropriate to participate in the study.
Sites / Locations
- The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University
- Peking University Third Hospital
- The Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical College
- The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Study Arm (dual mobility)
Controlled Arm (conventional)
Arm Description
OR3O™ Dual Mobility in subjects who undergo Primary THA.
A conventional, single-bearing design Total Hip System in subjects who undergo Primary THA.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 1 year
Proportion of excellent (≥ 90) or good (80-89) HHS scores at 12 month postoperative.
The Harris Hip Score is a joint specific score that consists of 10 items covering domains of pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), functional activities, absence of deformity (1 item, 0 or 4 points), and hip range of motion (2 items, 0-5 points). Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Survivorship After Surgery
Survivorship of the OR3O™ Dual Mobility System. Survivorship of controlled system is defined as no revision due to any reason.
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
The Harris Hip Score is a joint specific score that consists of 10 items covering domains of pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), functional activities, absence of deformity (1 item, 0 or 4 points), and hip range of motion (2 items, 0-5 points). Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
HHS scores for each subject will further be categorized as follows: Excellent (90-100); Good (80-89); Fair (70-79); Poor (60-69) and; Very poor (<60). Shift tables from the preoperative visit to all postoperative visits using these classifications will be generated.
EuroQol (European Quality of Life) Five-dimensional Five-level (EQ-5D-5L) Score
The EQ-5D-5L is composed of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension. For instance, 'slight problems' (e.g. 'I have slight problems in walking about') is always coded as '2'. The digits for the five dimensions are combined in a 5-digit code. The EQ- 5D-5L index value is derived by using the vendor supplied calculator to convert each 5-digit EQ-5D-5L profile. The EQ VAS corresponds to a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale ranging from 'the best health you can imagine' to 'the worst health you can imagine'. A higher number is a better outcome.
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR.)
The HOOS JR. is a short-form survey based on the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) that specifically focuses on the outcome after THA. HOOS JR. consists of 2 areas: pain (2 items) and function, daily living (4 items). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes - no, mild, moderate, severe, extreme) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. An interval score from 0-100 (0 indicating total hip disability and 100 indicating perfect hip health) is calculated (15).
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Position/Orientation: Depth
Implant position/orientation depth determined by Acetabular Cup Position. Depth will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Neutral: The acetabular cup is seated against the ilio-ischial line.
1. Medial: The acetabular cup is medial to the ilios-ischial line.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Position/Orientation: Height
Implant position/orientation height determined Acetabular Cup Position. Height will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Neutral: The inferior aspect of the acetabular cup is at the level of the teardrop.
1. Superior: The inferior aspect of the acetabular cup is superior to the level of the teardrop.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Subsidence/Migration
Acetabular Cup Migration will be graded for the shell and liner assembly, in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Absent: No evidence of acetabular cup migration ≥ 3 mm.
1. Present: Presence of acetabular cup migration ≥ 3 mm.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Heterotopic Ossification
Heterotopic Ossification will be classified based on the following:
Grade 0: None, no islands of bone
Grade I: Islands of bone within the soft tissues about the hip
Grade II: Bone spurs from the pelvis or proximal end of the femur, leaving at least 1 cm between opposing bone surfaces
Grade III: Bone spurs from the pelvis or proximal end of the femur, reducing the space between opposing bone surfaces to less than 1 cm
Grade IV: Apparent bone ankylosis of the hip
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Radiolucencies
Radiolucency - Acetabular Cup is defined as the presence of a linear gap or "halo" along the acetabular bone-implant interface and will be classified as:
0: None: no evidence of a linear ("double-line") periacetabular line or halo >1 mm along the acetabular bone-implant interface.
1: Present: Presence of a linear ("double-line") periacetabular line or halo >1 mm along the acetabular bone-implant interface.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Osteolysis
Osteolysis is classified as:
0. None: No evidence of a ballooning / scalloping, progressive,periacetabular, bony destructive lesion with a maximum dimension > 5mm.
1. Present: Presence of a ballooning / scalloping, progressive,periacetabular, bony destructive lesion with a maximum dimension > 5mm.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Loosening
Acetabular Cup Loosening will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Absent: No evidence of specific imaging features of loosening at the acetabular bone-implant interface including significant radiolucency or change in position of the acetabular cup indicating a loss of fixation.
1. Present: Presence of apparent imaging features of loosening at the acetabular bone-implant interface including significant radiolucency or change in position of the acetabular cup indicating a loss of fixation.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Stress Shielding
Image review by investigator to identify presence of medial stress shielding (yes/no).
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Radiographic Assessment - Periprosthetic Fractures
Image review by investigator to identify presence of periprosthetic fractures (yes/no).
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04941729
First Posted
May 13, 2021
Last Updated
August 23, 2023
Sponsor
Smith & Nephew Medical (Shanghai) Ltd
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04941729
Brief Title
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OR3O™ Dual Mobility System vs. Conventional Single Bearing Design Total Hip System
Acronym
OR3O
Official Title
A Prospective, Multi-center, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of the OR3O™ Dual Mobility System Versus Conventional Single Bearing Design Total Hip System in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA) Procedures.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Change on clinical and marketing strategy for the devices
Study Start Date
June 23, 2021 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 17, 2023 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 17, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Smith & Nephew Medical (Shanghai) Ltd
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare OR3O™ Dual Mobility System to a conventional, single-bearing design Total Hip System in subjects who undergo Primary THA. Data collected in this study will be used to support National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) regulatory approval of OR3O™ Dual Mobility System in China as well as to support and maintain product registration in global markets.
Primary Objective: Assess safety and efficacy of the OR3O™ Dual Mobility System in Primary THA at 1 year postoperative.
Secondary Objective(s): Assess safety and efficacy of the OR3O™ Dual Mobility System and compatible components in Primary THA up to 2 years after surgery.
Other Objective(s): Assess the hip dislocation and hospital readmission up to 2 years after device implantation.
4 study sites in China.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Degenerative Hip Joint Disease, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Femoral Neck Fractures, Avascular Necrosis of Femoral Head, Osteoarthritis (OA), Hip Dislocation, Hip Fractures
Keywords
Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA)
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
24 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Study Arm (dual mobility)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
OR3O™ Dual Mobility in subjects who undergo Primary THA.
Arm Title
Controlled Arm (conventional)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
A conventional, single-bearing design Total Hip System in subjects who undergo Primary THA.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
OR3O™ - Dual Mobility System
Intervention Description
OR3O™ Dual Mobility System is comprised of a diffusion-hardened, oxidized zirconium acetabular liner (OR3O™ Liner), and an insert of highly cross-linked polyethylene (OR3O™ XLPE Insert).
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Conventional
Intervention Description
A conventional, single-bearing design Total Hip System comprised of R3™ Acetabular Shell with XLPE liner and a Smith & Nephew Oxinium (Ox) femoral head.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Harris Hip Score (HHS) at 1 year
Description
Proportion of excellent (≥ 90) or good (80-89) HHS scores at 12 month postoperative.
The Harris Hip Score is a joint specific score that consists of 10 items covering domains of pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), functional activities, absence of deformity (1 item, 0 or 4 points), and hip range of motion (2 items, 0-5 points). Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Survivorship After Surgery
Description
Survivorship of the OR3O™ Dual Mobility System. Survivorship of controlled system is defined as no revision due to any reason.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Description
The Harris Hip Score is a joint specific score that consists of 10 items covering domains of pain (1 item, 0-44 points), function (7 items, 0-47 points), functional activities, absence of deformity (1 item, 0 or 4 points), and hip range of motion (2 items, 0-5 points). Scores range from 0 (worst) to 100 (best).
HHS scores for each subject will further be categorized as follows: Excellent (90-100); Good (80-89); Fair (70-79); Poor (60-69) and; Very poor (<60). Shift tables from the preoperative visit to all postoperative visits using these classifications will be generated.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
EuroQol (European Quality of Life) Five-dimensional Five-level (EQ-5D-5L) Score
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is composed of the EQ-5D-5L descriptive system and the EQ Visual Analogue scale (EQ VAS). The descriptive system comprises 5 dimensions (mobility, self care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression). Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, and extreme problems. Responses are coded as single-digit numbers expressing the severity level selected in each dimension. For instance, 'slight problems' (e.g. 'I have slight problems in walking about') is always coded as '2'. The digits for the five dimensions are combined in a 5-digit code. The EQ- 5D-5L index value is derived by using the vendor supplied calculator to convert each 5-digit EQ-5D-5L profile. The EQ VAS corresponds to a 20 cm vertical, visual analogue scale ranging from 'the best health you can imagine' to 'the worst health you can imagine'. A higher number is a better outcome.
Time Frame
Preoperative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR.)
Description
The HOOS JR. is a short-form survey based on the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) that specifically focuses on the outcome after THA. HOOS JR. consists of 2 areas: pain (2 items) and function, daily living (4 items). The last week is taken into consideration when answering the questions. Standardized answer options are given (5 Likert boxes - no, mild, moderate, severe, extreme) and each question gets a score from 0 to 4. An interval score from 0-100 (0 indicating total hip disability and 100 indicating perfect hip health) is calculated (15).
Time Frame
Preoperative, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Position/Orientation: Depth
Description
Implant position/orientation depth determined by Acetabular Cup Position. Depth will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Neutral: The acetabular cup is seated against the ilio-ischial line.
1. Medial: The acetabular cup is medial to the ilios-ischial line.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Position/Orientation: Height
Description
Implant position/orientation height determined Acetabular Cup Position. Height will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Neutral: The inferior aspect of the acetabular cup is at the level of the teardrop.
1. Superior: The inferior aspect of the acetabular cup is superior to the level of the teardrop.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Subsidence/Migration
Description
Acetabular Cup Migration will be graded for the shell and liner assembly, in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Absent: No evidence of acetabular cup migration ≥ 3 mm.
1. Present: Presence of acetabular cup migration ≥ 3 mm.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Heterotopic Ossification
Description
Heterotopic Ossification will be classified based on the following:
Grade 0: None, no islands of bone
Grade I: Islands of bone within the soft tissues about the hip
Grade II: Bone spurs from the pelvis or proximal end of the femur, leaving at least 1 cm between opposing bone surfaces
Grade III: Bone spurs from the pelvis or proximal end of the femur, reducing the space between opposing bone surfaces to less than 1 cm
Grade IV: Apparent bone ankylosis of the hip
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Radiolucencies
Description
Radiolucency - Acetabular Cup is defined as the presence of a linear gap or "halo" along the acetabular bone-implant interface and will be classified as:
0: None: no evidence of a linear ("double-line") periacetabular line or halo >1 mm along the acetabular bone-implant interface.
1: Present: Presence of a linear ("double-line") periacetabular line or halo >1 mm along the acetabular bone-implant interface.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Osteolysis
Description
Osteolysis is classified as:
0. None: No evidence of a ballooning / scalloping, progressive,periacetabular, bony destructive lesion with a maximum dimension > 5mm.
1. Present: Presence of a ballooning / scalloping, progressive,periacetabular, bony destructive lesion with a maximum dimension > 5mm.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Implant Loosening
Description
Acetabular Cup Loosening will be graded in accordance with the following definitions:
0. Absent: No evidence of specific imaging features of loosening at the acetabular bone-implant interface including significant radiolucency or change in position of the acetabular cup indicating a loss of fixation.
1. Present: Presence of apparent imaging features of loosening at the acetabular bone-implant interface including significant radiolucency or change in position of the acetabular cup indicating a loss of fixation.
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Stress Shielding
Description
Image review by investigator to identify presence of medial stress shielding (yes/no).
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Title
Radiographic Assessment - Periprosthetic Fractures
Description
Image review by investigator to identify presence of periprosthetic fractures (yes/no).
An AP and a lateral view radiograph are required to adequately assess the status of the study device. Radiographs will be performed with the subject in a supine position.
Time Frame
6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Dislocation Percentage
Description
Dislocation percentage of the hip up to 2 years after device implantation. The cumulative dislocation percentage at the interim visits up to 2 years after device implantation, will be compared to a literature specified percentage.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Hospital Readmission Percentage
Description
Hospital readmission percentage (cumulative) by 30, 60, 90 days of discharge due to any reason related to study device or study procedure.
Time Frame
30, 60, 90 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is a suitable candidate for implanting the OR3O™ Dual Mobility System or single-bearing design Total Hip System in primary total hip replacement in the Investigator's judgement.
Subject is skeletally mature in the Investigator's judgement.
Subject is 18 - 80 years old (inclusive).
Subject is receiving total hip replacement for the first time on the affected hip.
Subject has any of the following conditions:
Advanced degeneration of the hip joint as a result of degenerative, post-traumatic, or rheumatoid arthritis(RA);
Fracture or avascular necrosis of the femoral head;
All forms of osteoarthritis(OA);
Patients with hips at risk of dislocation;
Femoral neck fracture or proximal hip joint fracture.
Subject provides written informed consent for study participation using an Ethical Committee (EC) approved consent form before any study procedures are performed, including pre-operative data review and/or collection of data on electronic Case Report Forms (eCRFs).
Subject is willing and able to participate in required follow-up visits and is able to complete study activities.
Subjects with preoperative HHS ≤ 79 (fair or worse category).
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has conditions that would eliminate or tend to eliminate adequate implant support or prevent the use of an appropriately-sized implant, e.g.:
blood supply limitations;
insufficient quantity or quality of bone support, e.g., osteoporosis, metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation, radioactive bone disease, tumor around hip joint, and osteomalacia;
infections or other conditions which may lead to increased bone resorption.
Subject has dysplasia of hip joint with CROWE Grade III, IV.
Subject has weak constitution or failing to endure the surgery due to other diseases of the body.
Subject has bodily disease(s) that may interfere with THA survival or outcome.
Subject has life expectancy of less than 2 years.
Subject has mental or neurological conditions which impair the subject's ability or willingness to restrict activities that may put the affected limb at risk.
Subject has physical conditions or activities which tend to place extreme loads on implants, e.g., Charcot joints, muscle deficiencies, multiple joint disabilities.
Subject has neuromuscular dysfunctions (paralysis, myolysis and abductor muscle weakness) which will cause unstable hip joint or abnormal gait after surgery.
Subject has a mental or neurological condition that would pre-empt their ability or willingness to participate in the study including mental illness, mental retardation, drug or alcohol abuse.
Subject has an active infection - systemic or at the site of intended surgery.
Subject has a Body Mass Index ≥ 40.0 kg/m².
Subject has a known allergy to any component of the devices used in the study.
Subject is pregnant or breast feeding.
Subject is entered in another investigational drug, biologic, or device study within 30 days of active study participation.
Subjects that are expected with poor compliance.
Subjects with complications of other diseases are limited to participate in the research, not able to comply with the follow-up or have impact on scientific integrity.
Subjects with preoperative HHS ≥ 80 (good to excellent category).
Subject has other diseases or conditions that investigator considers not appropriate to participate in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Astrid Yung
Organizational Affiliation
Smith & Nephew Medical (Shanghai) Limited
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University
City
Shijiazhuang
State/Province
Hebei
ZIP/Postal Code
050051
Country
China
Facility Name
Peking University Third Hospital
City
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100191
Country
China
Facility Name
The Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University Medical College
City
Shanghai
ZIP/Postal Code
200011
Country
China
Facility Name
The First Affiliated Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University
City
Xinjiang
ZIP/Postal Code
830054
Country
China
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OR3O™ Dual Mobility System vs. Conventional Single Bearing Design Total Hip System
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs