Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in SCI
Primary Purpose
Spinal Cord Injury
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Spinal Cord Injury focused on measuring Analyze clinical efficacy of subarachnoid administration of, autologous BMSC expanded "in vitro"
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Incomplete SCI
- Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
- Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
- The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
- Age between 18 and 70 years
- Thread Men and women will compromise to use anticonceptive issues from first cell´s extraction to 6 months after last cell´s administration.
- Ability to attend clinical follow-up and perform physical therapy through the treatment period.
- Written and signed informed consent, according to the local regulation.
- Hematologic and creatinin parameters, SGOT and SGPT, within the normal range, according to laboratory standards considering that small variations could be accepted based on clinical study team criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
- A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
- Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
- Age below 18 years or above 70.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
- Patients with systemic disease that represents and additional risk to treatment.
- Patients with uncertain commitment to follow the physical therapy and clinical visits as well as patient with a negative input in the previous phycological assessment.
- Inability to assess the SCI features through MRI either noise due to spinal stabilization systems or any other cause.
- Patients currently under hematopoietic growth factors treatment or who required or maintained anticoagulation.
- Neurodegenerative disease additional.
- History of substance abuse, psychiatric disease or allergy to the protein products used in the process of cell expansion.
- Positive serology for HIV and syphilis.
- Active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C.
- With other reason that would consider the patient ineligible for cell therapy according to the investigators judgment.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital Puerta de Hierro
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Arm Description
All patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score
Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.
Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scale
- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.
Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.
Efficacy-Change in Barthel Score
- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.
Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.
Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS Scale
-Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale
Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.
Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.
- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.
Changes in ASHWORTH Score
- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension
Efficacy-Changes in EVA Score
• Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.
Efficacy- Changes in Geffner Score
changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder
Efficacy- Changes in NBD Score
changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.
Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)
Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.
Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor Pressure
Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliance
Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling
. It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching.
It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric Capacity
Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity
Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Adverse Events .
- The safety will be valued with number of adverse events related with administration of subarachnoid autologous Bone Marrow Expanded Mesenchymal Cells in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) Samples
Changes in expression of neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) samples obtained previously to first administration of cell therapy, and previously to the last administration, at month 10, in order to study the variability in the expression of neurotrophins along time. The mean+SD (standard deviation) at each time point was obtained. The tested neurotrophins were: BDNF.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02165904
First Posted
May 6, 2014
Last Updated
May 14, 2019
Sponsor
Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02165904
Brief Title
Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in SCI
Official Title
Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in Patients Suffering Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Puerta de Hierro University Hospital
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The study goes on 24 months, with recruiting, treatment and follow period for all patients. The first day for each patient will be the first cellular administration. 3 doses will be administrated every 3 months from first dose.
When the clinical trial finishes, it will be done a completed check of all obtained parameters.
Detailed Description
It is a clinical trial phase I, single center, non-randomized, uncontrolled, open prospective follow-up of a cohort of patients with chronic spinal cord injury (SCI) .10 patients will be included with this injury.
Primary objective: Analyze the possible clinical efficacy of administration of main adult mesenchymal autologous cells expanded "in vitro" in patients with incomplete and chronically established SCI.
Secondary objectives: Confirm the safety of treatment, and study possible changes in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) levels (Brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), glial cell line-derived neurotrophic factor (GDNF), nerve growth factor (NGF), ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), Nerve Growth Factor 3 and 4(NT3 and NT4) after subarachnoid administration of BMMC.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spinal Cord Injury
Keywords
Analyze clinical efficacy of subarachnoid administration of, autologous BMSC expanded "in vitro"
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
10 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All patients will be treated with the same treatment: Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cell
Intervention Description
Diagnosed patients with incomplete spinal cord injury and chronically established SCI will be treated with Adult Autologous Mesenchymal Bone Marrow Cells.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Efficacy-Sensivity Improvement Using the ASIA Score
Description
Sensitivity improvement was measured using the ASIA (American Spinal Injury Association) scale to measure the Surface sensitivity (LTS), pain sensitivity (PPS), and the degree of motor function in key muscles (MS). The sum of MS, LTS, and PPS configure total ASIA score. A minimum possible score is 0 points. A maximum possible score is 224 points for a patient with normal sensation. ASIA score was obtained before surgery, and 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery. Mean and standard deviation for the 10 patients were obtained at all the time points and statistically analyzed.
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy- Changes in Functional Independence Measure Scale
Description
- Changes in Functional Independence Measure scale (NIF scale), score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.
Ranges score: 18 to 126. Being 18 total patient dependency and 126 total patient independence.
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy-Change in Barthel Score
Description
- Changes in Barthel score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment.
Ranges score: 0 to 100. Being 0 total patient dependency and 100 total patient independence.
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy-IANC-SCIFRS Scale
Description
-Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale
Ranges score: 0 to 48. Being 0 severe degree of disability and 48 normal value.
Time Frame
Changes in IANC-SCIFRS scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Title
Efficacy-Changes in PENN Score.
Description
- Changes in PENN score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 absence of spasms and 4 frequency greater than 10 spasms per hour.
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Changes in ASHWORTH Score
Description
- Changes in ASHWORTH score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 4. Being 0 when there isn´t increase in muscle tone when stretching, and 4 when there is rigid affected follow-up in flexion or extension
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy-Changes in EVA Score
Description
• Changes in EVA score at the beginning, through and the end of the treatment
Ranges score: 0 to 10. Being 0 absence of pain and 10 the worst pain.
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy- Changes in Geffner Score
Description
changes in Geffner score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Ranges score: 0 to 6. Being 0 absence of bladder control and 6 total control of bladder
Time Frame
Changes in Geffner scale before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Title
Efficacy- Changes in NBD Score
Description
changes in NBD score before surgery (baseline visit) and 3, 6, 9, 12 months after surgery (follow-up period)
Ranges score: 0 to 47. 0-6 is very minor dysfunction. 7-9 is minor dysfunction. 10-13 is moderate dysfunction; and 14 or more is severe dysfunction.
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 3, 6,9 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy-Changes in the Neurophysiological Parameters (SSEPs, Somatosensory Evoked Potentials)
Description
Changes in the neurophysiological parameters (SSEPs, somatosensory evoked potentials) measured as the number of patients that improved along the study.
Time Frame
Efficacy-measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6, and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy-Urodynammic in Terms of Detrusor Pressure
Description
Urodynamic studies in terms of detrusor pressure (decrease on detrusor pressure is considered a clinical improvement)
Time Frame
Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Title
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Bladder Compliance
Description
Urodynamic studies in terms of Bladder compliance. Bladder compliance is the result of a mathematical calculation of volume responsible for 1 cm H2O pressure rise measured during a cystometric filling
. It gives an indication on how the different mechanisms in the bladder wall react on stretching.
It is obvious that compliance figures can vary widely in groups which makes it difficult to define limits of normality.
Time Frame
measure before treatment (baseline visit), 6 and 12 months after surgery
Title
Efficacy-Urodynamic Studies Maximum Cystometric Capacity
Description
Urodynamic studies in terms of Maximum cystometric capacity
Time Frame
Urodynamic studies before surgery, and at 6 and 12 months after surgery (follow-up
Title
Efficacy-modification of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)
Description
Number of patients with changes in morphology of injury compared with basal images
Time Frame
before (baseline visit) and at 12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Adverse Events .
Description
- The safety will be valued with number of adverse events related with administration of subarachnoid autologous Bone Marrow Expanded Mesenchymal Cells in Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury (SCI).
Time Frame
Up to 12 months
Title
Efficacy- Expression of Neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) Samples
Description
Changes in expression of neurotrophins in CSF (CerebroSpinal Fluid) samples obtained previously to first administration of cell therapy, and previously to the last administration, at month 10, in order to study the variability in the expression of neurotrophins along time. The mean+SD (standard deviation) at each time point was obtained. The tested neurotrophins were: BDNF.
Time Frame
Basal and 10 months after the administration
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Incomplete SCI
Neurological deficit clinically stable at least 12 months prior to treatment, and with a minimum of one-year evolution after SCI.
Neurophysiological confirmation of incomplete SCI.
The MRI study that morphologically evaluate the SCI.
Age between 18 and 70 years
Thread Men and women will compromise to use anticonceptive issues from first cell´s extraction to 6 months after last cell´s administration.
Ability to attend clinical follow-up and perform physical therapy through the treatment period.
Written and signed informed consent, according to the local regulation.
Hematologic and creatinin parameters, SGOT and SGPT, within the normal range, according to laboratory standards considering that small variations could be accepted based on clinical study team criteria.
Exclusion Criteria:
A classification in ASIA and FRANKEL clinical scales to evaluate the SCI.
Neurophysiological records that confirm the complete SCI.
Age below 18 years or above 70.
Pregnancy or lactation.
Malignancy disease diagnosed or treated within the last 5 years.
Patients with systemic disease that represents and additional risk to treatment.
Patients with uncertain commitment to follow the physical therapy and clinical visits as well as patient with a negative input in the previous phycological assessment.
Inability to assess the SCI features through MRI either noise due to spinal stabilization systems or any other cause.
Patients currently under hematopoietic growth factors treatment or who required or maintained anticoagulation.
Neurodegenerative disease additional.
History of substance abuse, psychiatric disease or allergy to the protein products used in the process of cell expansion.
Positive serology for HIV and syphilis.
Active Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C.
With other reason that would consider the patient ineligible for cell therapy according to the investigators judgment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jesús JV Vaquero Crespo, M.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro-Majadahonda
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Puerta de Hierro
City
Majadahonda
State/Province
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28222
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Anonymized individual data of participants will be shared with Authorities at the end of the Clinical development plan by the CTD (Common Technical Document). Results will be published in a scientific publication
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
21163325
Citation
Vaquero J, Zurita M. Functional recovery after severe CNS trauma: current perspectives for cell therapy with bone marrow stromal cells. Prog Neurobiol. 2011 Mar;93(3):341-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pneurobio.2010.12.002. Epub 2010 Dec 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21208021
Citation
Otero L, Zurita M, Bonilla C, Aguayo C, Vela A, Rico MA, Vaquero J. Late transplantation of allogeneic bone marrow stromal cells improves neurologic deficits subsequent to intracerebral hemorrhage. Cytotherapy. 2011 May;13(5):562-71. doi: 10.3109/14653249.2010.544720. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Subarachnoid Administrations of Adults Autologous Mesenchymal Stromal Cells in SCI
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs