search
Back to results

Sugammadex/Neostigmine and Liver Transplantation

Primary Purpose

Postoperative Residual Curarization, Liver Transplantation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
sugammadex
Neostigmine
Sponsored by
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Postoperative Residual Curarization focused on measuring Rocuronium

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • American Society of Anesthesiology status (ASA) III
  • Ability to give a written informed consent
  • Liver transplantation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Any allergy to medications involved in the study
  • Any disease involving neuromuscular transmission
  • Any therapy with toremifene, flucloxacillin or fusidic acid
  • Renal disease with glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml/min/1.73m2
  • Hyperthermia maligna
  • Anticonceptional therapy
  • Pregnancy
  • Core body temperature less than 35°C or skin temperature less than 32°C at the end of surgery

Sites / Locations

  • AOU Santa Maria della Misericordia

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

sugammadex

neostigmine

Arm Description

at the end of surgery administration of 2 mg/kg of sugammadex after the third T2 twitch at Train of Four (TOF) stimulation

at the end of surgery administration of 50 mcg/kg of neostigmine after the third T2 twitch at Train of Four (TOF) stimulation

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Recovery time from moderate neuromuscular block to a TOF ratio more than 0.9 after administration of sugammadex or neostigmine using TOF-Watch SX.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Any episode PORC (defined as TOF ratio less than 0.9) within 20 minutes after extubation of the patient using TOF-Watch SX.

Full Information

First Posted
February 13, 2016
Last Updated
September 20, 2021
Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02697929
Brief Title
Sugammadex/Neostigmine and Liver Transplantation
Official Title
Sugammadex Versus Neostigmine After Rocuronium Infusion During Liver Transplantation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2014 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Cirrhotic patients undergoing liver transplantation are at very high risk of post operative complication such as post-operative residual curarization. Rocuronium is a neuromuscular blocking agent that nowadays can be safely and rapidly antagonized with sugammadex. No one study compared sugammadex versus neostigmine after rocuronium infusion during liver transplantation.
Detailed Description
It is known that major abdominal surgery is associated with increased risk of morbidity and postoperative mortality. The complexity and the duration of the procedure as well as the failure to antagonize neuromuscular blocking agents at the end of surgical procedure are risk factors for postoperative complications. Muscle relaxation plays an important role that is to facilitate intubation and to allow a better surgical condition. For this reason it is necessary to maintain, during the surgery, a deep neuromuscular block. Deep block at the level of the adductor muscle of the thumb is obtained by measuring 1-2 responses during post-tetanic stimulation (the so-called Post-Tetanic Count or PTC). The maintenance of a deep neuromuscular block requires further doses of neuromuscular blockers and, therefore, the need of long recovery times regardless of the drug used. Pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of neuromuscular blocking and reversals commonly used in clinical practice can undergo significant changes due to the presence of alterations in organ function such as hepatic and renal insufficiency. In these patients we see more frequent adverse events such as prolonged neuromuscular blockade and postoperative residual curarization. In the literature it is considered suitable a recovery from neuromuscular block if the relationship between the fourth and first contraction during Train of Four (TOF) is greater than 0.9 (TOF-ratio> 0.9). This may take a long time so the reversal of blocking agents at the end of the surgical procedure is the solution to reduce this waiting period. The importance of an adequate recovery from neuromuscular block at the end of anesthesia is related to avoid postoperative residual paralysis (PORC) and reducing the risk of postoperative respiratory complications potentially fatal. Rocuronium is characterized by an increase in half-life and an increase in the recovery time of neuromuscular transmission (TOF ratio of 0.9) in cirrhotic patients compared to controls healthy people. To prevent residual neuromuscular blockade and all the complications that it brings with it it could be resorted the use of anti-cholinesterase drugs (neostigmine) to antagonize indirectly the action of non-depolarizing neuromuscular blocking agents. Neostigmine works by increasing the availability of acetylcholine at the neuromuscular junction. The administration of neostigmine may however cause bronchospasm, abdominal pain, nausea, cardiac arrhythmias and can not be used if the neuromuscular blockade is deep. Recently the use of sugammadex, a new drug that can act as an antidote to a comparison of non-depolarizing muscle relaxants amino-steroidal (rocuronium, vecuronium) showed good clinical impact. This drug works by encapsulating the muscle relaxant molecule in the plasma with a high affinity and binding to the complex thus formed which is then eliminated by the kidney. Sugammadex is characterized by the absence of adverse effects at the recommended doses and may be administered at correct dosage, even at deep neuromuscular blockade. Several studies have shown that the recovery from neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium is significantly faster after administration of sugammadex compared with neostigmine both when used in moderate block levels and deep. In literature there are no data and studies that assessed the recovery time of neuromuscular transmission (TOF ratio> 0.9) with the use of sugammadex verus neostigmine in patients undergoing liver transplantation after rocuronium infusion.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Postoperative Residual Curarization, Liver Transplantation
Keywords
Rocuronium

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
sugammadex
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
at the end of surgery administration of 2 mg/kg of sugammadex after the third T2 twitch at Train of Four (TOF) stimulation
Arm Title
neostigmine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
at the end of surgery administration of 50 mcg/kg of neostigmine after the third T2 twitch at Train of Four (TOF) stimulation
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
sugammadex
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Neostigmine
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recovery time from moderate neuromuscular block to a TOF ratio more than 0.9 after administration of sugammadex or neostigmine using TOF-Watch SX.
Time Frame
30 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Any episode PORC (defined as TOF ratio less than 0.9) within 20 minutes after extubation of the patient using TOF-Watch SX.
Time Frame
20 minutes

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: American Society of Anesthesiology status (ASA) III Ability to give a written informed consent Liver transplantation Exclusion Criteria: Any allergy to medications involved in the study Any disease involving neuromuscular transmission Any therapy with toremifene, flucloxacillin or fusidic acid Renal disease with glomerular filtration rate less than 30 ml/min/1.73m2 Hyperthermia maligna Anticonceptional therapy Pregnancy Core body temperature less than 35°C or skin temperature less than 32°C at the end of surgery
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
livia pompei, MD
Organizational Affiliation
AOU Santa Maria Della Misercordia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
giorgio della rocca, FP, MD
Organizational Affiliation
AOU Santa Maria Della Misercordia
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
AOU Santa Maria della Misericordia
City
Udine
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
15681938
Citation
Arbous MS, Meursing AE, van Kleef JW, de Lange JJ, Spoormans HH, Touw P, Werner FM, Grobbee DE. Impact of anesthesia management characteristics on severe morbidity and mortality. Anesthesiology. 2005 Feb;102(2):257-68; quiz 491-2. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200502000-00005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19222432
Citation
Craig RG, Hunter JM. Neuromuscular blocking drugs and their antagonists in patients with organ disease. Anaesthesia. 2009 Mar;64 Suppl 1:55-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05871.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9278198
Citation
van Miert MM, Eastwood NB, Boyd AH, Parker CJ, Hunter JM. The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in patients with hepatic cirrhosis. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1997 Aug;44(2):139-44. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.1997.00653.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8010470
Citation
Khalil M, D'Honneur G, Duvaldestin P, Slavov V, De Hys C, Gomeni R. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of rocuronium in patients with cirrhosis. Anesthesiology. 1994 Jun;80(6):1241-7. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199406000-00011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18946293
Citation
Jones RK, Caldwell JE, Brull SJ, Soto RG. Reversal of profound rocuronium-induced blockade with sugammadex: a randomized comparison with neostigmine. Anesthesiology. 2008 Nov;109(5):816-24. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31818a3fee.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32213163
Citation
Deana C, Barbariol F, D'Inca S, Pompei L, Rocca GD. SUGAMMADEX versus neostigmine after ROCURONIUM continuous infusion in patients undergoing liver transplantation. BMC Anesthesiol. 2020 Mar 25;20(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s12871-020-00986-z.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Sugammadex/Neostigmine and Liver Transplantation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs