search
Back to results

Superiority of VCD Versus CTD in Patients With Newly Diagnose Multiple Myeloma Eligible for Transplantation (GBRAM003r)

Primary Purpose

Multiple Myeloma, Effects of Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone
Sponsored by
Grupo de Estudos Multicentricos em Onco-Hematologia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Multiple Myeloma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • multiple myeloma newly diagnose elegible to autologous transplantation Patients submitted to ctd or vcd Myeloma patients newly diagnose >18yo

Exclusion Criteria:

  • other chemotherapy induction protocol

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Vcd- (Bortezomibe, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone)

    Ctd- Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone

    Arm Description

    Intervention - Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 Intra venous or Subcutaneous once a week (D1-8-15-22) 35days cycle Intervention- Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks orally or Intravenously- total dose per cycle was 160mg. Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg- intravenously or orally- total dose monthly Total of four cycles

    Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg intravenously or orally total dose monthly Intervention- Thalidomide 100-200mg orally- daily dose Intervention -Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks each month- total dose per cycle was 160mg Total of four cycles (cycles of 28 each one) 28 days each cycles- total of four cycles

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Response rate better than very good partial response after 4 induction cycles
    The primary outcome is to observe the difference response rate between VCD and CTD induction myeloma elegible patient

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    December 28, 2017
    Last Updated
    January 17, 2018
    Sponsor
    Grupo de Estudos Multicentricos em Onco-Hematologia
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03402295
    Brief Title
    Superiority of VCD Versus CTD in Patients With Newly Diagnose Multiple Myeloma Eligible for Transplantation
    Acronym
    GBRAM003r
    Official Title
    Superiority of the Triple Combinations of Bortezomib, Cyclophosphamide and Dexamethasone (VCD) Versus Cyclophosphamide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (CTD) in Patients With Newly Diagnose Multiple Myeloma, Eligible for Transplantation
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    January 2018
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    June 15, 2009 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    June 15, 2014 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    October 15, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Grupo de Estudos Multicentricos em Onco-Hematologia

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This study compared two main different induction protocols used to treat myeloma eligible patients in Brazil. VCD against CTD.
    Detailed Description
    The primary aim was observe response rate after 4 induction cycles.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Multiple Myeloma, Effects of Chemotherapy

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Phase 3
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Retrospectively compared two different groups of treatments
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    311 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Vcd- (Bortezomibe, cyclophosphamide and dexamethasone)
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Intervention - Bortezomib 1.3mg/m2 Intra venous or Subcutaneous once a week (D1-8-15-22) 35days cycle Intervention- Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks orally or Intravenously- total dose per cycle was 160mg. Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg- intravenously or orally- total dose monthly Total of four cycles
    Arm Title
    Ctd- Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide and dexamethasone
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Intervention- Cyclophosphamide 900-2000mg intravenously or orally total dose monthly Intervention- Thalidomide 100-200mg orally- daily dose Intervention -Dexamethasone 40mg once a week for four weeks each month- total dose per cycle was 160mg Total of four cycles (cycles of 28 each one) 28 days each cycles- total of four cycles
    Intervention Type
    Drug
    Intervention Name(s)
    Bortezomib, cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, dexamethasone
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Velcade, genuxal, decadron
    Intervention Description
    Comparison between two triple combination chemotherapy that include in different new drugs (bortezomibe e talidomida)
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Response rate better than very good partial response after 4 induction cycles
    Description
    The primary outcome is to observe the difference response rate between VCD and CTD induction myeloma elegible patient
    Time Frame
    Response rate after induction phase - at the end of cycle 4- (28 days each cycle)- time frame trough study completion

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: multiple myeloma newly diagnose elegible to autologous transplantation Patients submitted to ctd or vcd Myeloma patients newly diagnose >18yo Exclusion Criteria: other chemotherapy induction protocol
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Edvan Cusoe, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Federal University of Bahia
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Superiority of VCD Versus CTD in Patients With Newly Diagnose Multiple Myeloma Eligible for Transplantation

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs