Surgery Versus PhysiothErapist-leD Exercise for Traumatic Tears of the Rotator Cuff (SPeEDy)
Primary Purpose
Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Physiotherapist-led exercise
Surgical repair
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients (≥18 years)
- Diagnosed with a symptomatic tear of the rotator cuff following a traumatic incident thought to be of sufficient force to induce a tear.
- Rotator cuff tear confirmed by diagnostic ultrasound or MRI scan undertaken as part of routine diagnostic work-up
- Eligible for rotator cuff repair surgery or a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise as determined by the attending clinician (surgeon or physiotherapist, where appropriate)
- Able to return to the participating NHS hospital or associated orthopaedic and physiotherapy services (where physiotherapists have been trained in trial interventions) for post-operative rehabilitation or the programme of physiotherapist-led exercise.
- Able to understand English.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not eligible for rotator cuff repair surgery or a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise as determined by the attending clinician (surgeon or physiotherapist, where appropriate)
- Patients who are unable to give full informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- University Hospital of Derby & Burton NHS
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Physiotherapist-led exercise
Surgical repair
Arm Description
Structured and progressive physiotherapist-led exercise programme. Reflective of current guidance for exercise programmes for people with rotator cuff disorders, an individualised programme developed in relation to the participant's specific goals will be prescribed by the physiotherapist and supported over approximately six contact sessions across a 12-week period.
Surgical repair of the rotator cuff plus usual post-operative rehabilitation.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Numbers of patients screened, number eligible, number approached, number consenting, number randomised, and number accepting allocation
Numbers of patients screened, number eligible, number approached, number consenting, number randomised, and number accepting allocation will be recorded descriptively
Numbers of participants continuing in allocated treatment
Numbers of participants continuing in allocated treatment will be recorded descriptively
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires (including Oxford Shoulder Score and EQ-5D-5L)
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires will be recorded descriptively
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires (including Oxford Shoulder Score and EQ-5D-5L)
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires will be recorded descriptively
Determination of zone of clinical equipoise
Data from screening logs, including reasons for not approaching potentially eligible patients will be recorded descriptively to inform determination of zone of clinical equipoise
Treatment cross-over
Numbers of participants receiving treatment (surgery or PT-led exercise) other than that which was allocated to determine proportion of participants who cross-over will be recorded descriptively
Participant satisfaction with the interventions: five-point ordinal scale
Participant satisfaction with the interventions on a five-point ordinal scale; Very Satisfied/Satisfied/Neutral/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied
Secondary Outcome Measures
Pain and disability assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)
The OSS is a 12-item shoulder-specific self-report measure of shoulder pain and function primarily for the assessment of outcome of shoulder surgery in RCTs. The OSS is reliable, valid, responsive and acceptable to patients. The items refer to the past 4 weeks with five ordinal response options scored from 0 to 4, with 4 representing the best outcome. When the 12 items are summed, this produces an overall score ranging from 0 to 48, with 48 being the best outcome.
Health related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L
The EQ-5D-5L is a generic measure of health related quality of life that provides a single index value for health status that can be used for the purpose of clinical and health economic evaluation. The EQ-5D-5L consists of questions relating to five health domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and respondents rate their degree of impairment using five response levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. A total of 3125 possible health states can be defined in this way which can then be converted in to a single index value between 0 and 1,
Days lost from work due to the shoulder problem
Days lost from work due to the shoulder problem will be recorded descriptively on a self-report questionnaire
Time taken to return to driving
Time taken to return to driving will be recorded descriptively on a self-report questionnaire
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT04027205
First Posted
July 16, 2019
Last Updated
February 16, 2021
Sponsor
Keele University
Collaborators
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospitals, Leicester, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT04027205
Brief Title
Surgery Versus PhysiothErapist-leD Exercise for Traumatic Tears of the Rotator Cuff
Acronym
SPeEDy
Official Title
Surgery Versus PhysiothErapist-leD Exercise for Traumatic Tears of the Rotator Cuff: a Multi-site Pilot and Feasibility Randomised Controlled Trial (the SPeEDy Study)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Due to Covid-19 disruption
Study Start Date
March 3, 2020 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 3, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 3, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Keele University
Collaborators
National Institute for Health Research, United Kingdom, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospitals, Leicester, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic and District NHS Trust, University Hospitals of North Midlands NHS Trust, University Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trust, Airedale NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, University Hospital Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The SPeEDy study is a parallel group, pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial (RCT) with integrated Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) and further qualitative interviews. The study hypothesis is: In adult patients diagnosed with traumatic tears of the rotator cuff, is it feasible to conduct a future, substantive, multi-site RCT to test the hypothesis that physiotherapist-led exercise is not inferior to surgical repair of the rotator cuff in terms of clinical outcomes but is more cost-effective.
Detailed Description
Tears of the rotator cuff are a significant cause of shoulder pain. Rates of surgical repair have risen approximately 200% over the last 20 years across Europe and the USA. 9 189 repairs were undertaken in 2015/ 2016 in the NHS. The cost of surgery ranges from £2 897 to £5 593 meaning that direct NHS treatment costs alone are £26.6 to £51.4 million annually.
If a patient is suspected of having a traumatic rotator cuff tear, then guidance from the British Elbow and Shoulder Society and British Orthopaedic Association suggests this is a 'red flag' needing urgent surgical opinion. But, this guidance is open to question. Three randomised controlled trials (RCT) (n = 252) have been synthesised in a systematic review which concluded that surgery is not more effective than conservative care for rotator cuff tears. But, of the 252 patients included, only 40 (16%), were diagnosed with traumatic tears. Hence, there is a dearth of randomised evidence to inform decision-making.
Given uncertainty about the comparative effectiveness of surgery and considering the cost, risk, for example infection, there is an urgent need to carry out high-quality research in this area.
Research Question: In patients diagnosed with traumatic tears of the rotator cuff, is it feasible to conduct a future multicentre RCT to test the hypothesis that physiotherapist-led exercise is not inferior to surgical repair in terms of clinical outcomes but is more cost-effective.
Research Design: Two-arm, parallel group, pilot and feasibility RCT with nested Quintet Recruitment Intervention (QRI) and qualitative interviews.
Setting: Eight NHS hospitals.
Objectives:
Determine feasibility of recruiting and retaining patients,
Identify barriers and facilitators to recruitment and retention, including patient and clinician equipoise and proportion and reasons for treatment cross-over (reflective of known challenges in surgical RCTs),
Estimate the number of potential and willing sites for the future main trial.
Participants: Adults with traumatic tears of the rotator cuff, eligible for surgery.
Intervention/ control: Participants will be allocated on a 1:1 ratio, stratified by tear size to: 1) Structured and progressive physiotherapist-led exercise; 2) Surgical repair and usual post-operative rehabilitation.
Key feasibility outcomes: 1) Numbers of patients screened, eligible, approached, consenting, randomised, and accepting allocation; 2) Rate of retention and follow-up; 3) Feasibility of recruiting participating sites; 4) Participant satisfaction.
Key clinical outcomes: 1) Shoulder pain and function (Oxford Shoulder Score): Quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) at baseline, three, and six months.
Health economic outcomes: Health care resource use and days lost from work over six-months.
Sample size: 76 participants.
Analysis: Analysis will focus on process outcomes (recruitment, retention, and treatment cross-over). Means and confidence intervals of clinical outcomes will be calculated only to inform the sample size calculation for the future main trial.
The QRI will use targeted methods including interviews with clinicians and patients, audio-recording of recruitment appointments and document review to understand and then develop an action plan to optimise recruitment and informed consent. Semi-structured qualitative interviews will explore treatment acceptability and the data will be analysed thematically.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Traumatic Rotator Cuff Tear
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Physiotherapist-led exercise
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Structured and progressive physiotherapist-led exercise programme. Reflective of current guidance for exercise programmes for people with rotator cuff disorders, an individualised programme developed in relation to the participant's specific goals will be prescribed by the physiotherapist and supported over approximately six contact sessions across a 12-week period.
Arm Title
Surgical repair
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Surgical repair of the rotator cuff plus usual post-operative rehabilitation.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Physiotherapist-led exercise
Intervention Description
A programme of physiotherapist-led exercise over approximately 12 weeks.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Surgical repair
Intervention Description
Surgical repair of the rotator cuff plus usual post-operative rehabilitation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Numbers of patients screened, number eligible, number approached, number consenting, number randomised, and number accepting allocation
Description
Numbers of patients screened, number eligible, number approached, number consenting, number randomised, and number accepting allocation will be recorded descriptively
Time Frame
Over recruitment period, 15 months
Title
Numbers of participants continuing in allocated treatment
Description
Numbers of participants continuing in allocated treatment will be recorded descriptively
Time Frame
Six months
Title
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires (including Oxford Shoulder Score and EQ-5D-5L)
Description
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires will be recorded descriptively
Time Frame
Three months post-randomisation
Title
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires (including Oxford Shoulder Score and EQ-5D-5L)
Description
Follow-up response rates to questionnaires will be recorded descriptively
Time Frame
Six months post-randomisation
Title
Determination of zone of clinical equipoise
Description
Data from screening logs, including reasons for not approaching potentially eligible patients will be recorded descriptively to inform determination of zone of clinical equipoise
Time Frame
Over recruitment period, 15 months
Title
Treatment cross-over
Description
Numbers of participants receiving treatment (surgery or PT-led exercise) other than that which was allocated to determine proportion of participants who cross-over will be recorded descriptively
Time Frame
Six months
Title
Participant satisfaction with the interventions: five-point ordinal scale
Description
Participant satisfaction with the interventions on a five-point ordinal scale; Very Satisfied/Satisfied/Neutral/Dissatisfied/Very Dissatisfied
Time Frame
Six months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Pain and disability assessed using the Oxford Shoulder Score (OSS)
Description
The OSS is a 12-item shoulder-specific self-report measure of shoulder pain and function primarily for the assessment of outcome of shoulder surgery in RCTs. The OSS is reliable, valid, responsive and acceptable to patients. The items refer to the past 4 weeks with five ordinal response options scored from 0 to 4, with 4 representing the best outcome. When the 12 items are summed, this produces an overall score ranging from 0 to 48, with 48 being the best outcome.
Time Frame
Three and six months post-randomisation
Title
Health related quality of life assessed using the EQ-5D-5L
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a generic measure of health related quality of life that provides a single index value for health status that can be used for the purpose of clinical and health economic evaluation. The EQ-5D-5L consists of questions relating to five health domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression) and respondents rate their degree of impairment using five response levels (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). The patient is asked to indicate his/her health state by ticking the box next to the most appropriate statement in each of the five dimensions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that dimension. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. A total of 3125 possible health states can be defined in this way which can then be converted in to a single index value between 0 and 1,
Time Frame
Three and six months post-randomisation
Title
Days lost from work due to the shoulder problem
Description
Days lost from work due to the shoulder problem will be recorded descriptively on a self-report questionnaire
Time Frame
Three and six months post-randomisation
Title
Time taken to return to driving
Description
Time taken to return to driving will be recorded descriptively on a self-report questionnaire
Time Frame
Three and six months post-randomisation
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Number of recruiting participating sites and numbers of additional sites who are interested in participating in the main trial
Description
Number of recruiting participating sites and numbers of additional sites who are interested in participating in the main trial will be recorded descriptively
Time Frame
Whole study period, 36 months
Title
Number and type of adverse events
Description
Number and type of adverse events will be recorded descriptively following patient or clinician report
Time Frame
Up to six months post-randomisation
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult patients (≥18 years)
Diagnosed with a symptomatic tear of the rotator cuff following a traumatic incident thought to be of sufficient force to induce a tear.
Rotator cuff tear confirmed by diagnostic ultrasound or MRI scan undertaken as part of routine diagnostic work-up
Eligible for rotator cuff repair surgery or a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise as determined by the attending clinician (surgeon or physiotherapist, where appropriate)
Able to return to the participating NHS hospital or associated orthopaedic and physiotherapy services (where physiotherapists have been trained in trial interventions) for post-operative rehabilitation or the programme of physiotherapist-led exercise.
Able to understand English.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not eligible for rotator cuff repair surgery or a programme of physiotherapist-led exercise as determined by the attending clinician (surgeon or physiotherapist, where appropriate)
Patients who are unable to give full informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chris Littlewood, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Manchester Metropolitan University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital of Derby & Burton NHS
City
Derby
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
The anonymised datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are/will be available upon request from primarycare.datasharing@keele.ac.uk. Core data will be available immediately after publication of the trial results. A data request form is required to be completed and must outline the type of data to be obtained, the reason for obtaining this data (research question / objective), the timing for when the data is required to be available (start date/end date). Checks will be performed by a Data Custodian and Academic Proposals (DCAP) committee at Keele to ensure that the data set requested is appropriately suited to answer the research question/objective and that the request fits with the original ethical approval and participant consent and adheres to funder and legal restrictions. Only de-identified data are available for request in aggregated format or at the level of the individual participant.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33413664
Citation
Littlewood C, Wade J, Butler-Walley S, Lewis M, Beard D, Rangan A, Bhabra G, Kalogrianitis S, Kelly C, Mehta S, Singh HP, Smith M, Tambe A, Tyler J, Foster NE. Protocol for a multi-site pilot and feasibility randomised controlled trial: Surgery versus PhysiothErapist-leD exercise for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff (the SPeEDy study). Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2021 Jan 7;7(1):17. doi: 10.1186/s40814-020-00714-x.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33316867
Citation
Littlewood C, Astbury C, Bush H, Gibson J, Lalande S, Miller C, Pitt L, Tunnicliffe H, Winstanley R. Development of a physiotherapist-led exercise programme for traumatic tears of the rotator cuff for the SPeEDy study. Physiotherapy. 2021 Jun;111:66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.physio.2020.07.008. Epub 2020 Aug 3.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Surgery Versus PhysiothErapist-leD Exercise for Traumatic Tears of the Rotator Cuff
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs