Surgical Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLve in Native Mitral Annular Calcification (SITRAL) Study (SITRAL)
Primary Purpose
Mitral Annular Calcification
Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Mitral Valve Replacement with Sapien3
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Mitral Annular Calcification focused on measuring mitral valve regurgitation, mitral valve stenosis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject has severe native mitral annular calcification associated with mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure.
- Subject has a clinical indication for mitral valve replacement, as demonstrated by reported New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater.
- The subject is at least 22 years old.
- The Heart Team agrees that the subject is high risk or inoperable for surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR), based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. The following concomitant procedures, are allowed: MAZE, Tricuspid Valve Procedures (TVP), and Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation, coronary artery bypass grafting and septal myectomy.
- The study subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
- The study subject agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
- Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 30 days before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
- Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease).
- Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 2000 cell/mL), acute anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL), or thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000 cell/mL).
- Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring vasoactive medications, mechanical ventilation at time of procedure.
- Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
- Severe left ventricular dysfunction with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 30%.
- Severe right ventricular dysfunction
- Pregnancy, lactation, or planning to become pregnant
- Echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular mass, thrombus, or concerns of active infective endocarditis.
- Active upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months prior to procedure without treatment or 30 days prior to procedure with definitive treatment.
- A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be maintained on oral anticoagulant following the study procedure.
- End stage renal disease requiring dialysis
- Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 30 days of the procedure.
- Estimated life expectancy < 12 months
Sites / Locations
- St. Vincent Heart Center
- MHRI Maryland
- Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
- Baylor College of Medicine
- The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
- University of Virginia
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Mitral Valve Replacement with Sapien3
Arm Description
subjects with surgical MVR with Sapien3
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Procedural success
Procedural Success is defined as:
Device success, and
No device or procedure related serious adverse events (SAEs) (Life threatening bleed; major vascular or cardiac structural complications requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery; stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (AKI) (includes new dialysis); myocardial infarction (MI) or need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); severe heart failure (HF) or hypotension requiring intravenous (IV) inotrope, ultrafiltration or mechanical circulatory support; prolonged intubation ( > 48 hours)
Technical success
Technical Success is defined as:
Alive, with
Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the device delivery system, and
Deployment and correct positioning (including repositioning/recapture if needed) of the single intended device, and
No need for additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure
Device success
Device Success is defined as:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/operating room (OR)), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5cm2 and mitral valve (MV) gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = mitral regurgitation (MR) >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., paravalvular leak (PVL) > mild, need for a permanent pacemaker (PPM), erosion, Annular rupture or aortic valve (AV) Groove disruption, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient increase > 10mmHg)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Device success
Device Success is defined as:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/operating room (OR)), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = MVA < 1.5cm2 and MV gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = MR >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., PVL > mild, need for a PPM, erosion, Annular rupture or AV Groove disruption, LVOT gradient increase > 10mmHg)
Device Success
Device Success is defined as:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/OR), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = MVA < 1.5cm2 and MV gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = MR >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., PVL > mild, need for a PPM, erosion, Annular rupture or AV Groove disruption, LVOT gradient increase > 10mmHg)
Subject success
Subject Success is defined as:
All of the following must be present:
I. Device success (either optimal or acceptable), and II. Patient returned to the pre-procedural setting: and III. No rehospitalizations or reinterventions for the underlying condition (e.g., mitral regurgitation, heart failure); and IV. Improvement from baseline in symptoms (e.g., NYHA improvement by > or = 1 functional class); and V. Improvement from baseline in functional status (e.g., 6-min walk test improvement by > or = 50 m); and VI. Improvement from baseline in quality-of-life (e.g., Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire improvement by > or = 10)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT02830204
First Posted
May 4, 2016
Last Updated
May 25, 2023
Sponsor
Baylor Research Institute
Collaborators
Edwards Lifesciences
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT02830204
Brief Title
Surgical Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLve in Native Mitral Annular Calcification (SITRAL) Study
Acronym
SITRAL
Official Title
Surgical Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLve in Native Mitral Annular Calcification (SITRAL) Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
September 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Baylor Research Institute
Collaborators
Edwards Lifesciences
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to establish the safety and feasibility of the Edwards SAPIEN 3 valve in subjects with mitral annular calcification (MAC) associated with mitral stenosis (MS) and/or mitral regurgitation who are at high-risk for mitral valve surgery or deemed inoperable due to the extent of calcification.
Detailed Description
Technical Success:
Alive, with
Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the device delivery system, and
Deployment and correct positioning (including repositioning/recapture if needed) of the single intended device, and
No need for additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure
Device Success:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/Operating Room(OR)), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = Mitral Valve Area (MVA) < 1.5cm2 and Mitral Valve (MV) gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = Mitral Regurgitation (MR) >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., Paravalvular Leak (PVL) > mild, need for a Permanent Pacemaker (PPM), erosion, Annular rupture or Aortic Valve (AV) Groove disruption, Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) gradient increase > 10mmHg)
Procedural Success:
Device success, and
No device or procedure related Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) (Life threatening bleed; major vascular or cardiac structural complications requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery; stage 2 or 3 Acute Kidney Injury (includes new dialysis); Myocardial Infarction (MI) or need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); severe heart failure (HF) or hypotension requiring intravenous (IV) inotrope, ultrafiltration or mechanical circulatory support; prolonged intubation ( > 48 hours)
6.2 Secondary objective(s)
Device Success (at 6 months and 1 year)
Subject success 1 year
Device Success:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/Operating Room (OR)), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = MVA < 1.5cm2 and MV gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = MR >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., PVL > mild, need for a PPM, erosion, Annular rupture or AV Groove disruption, LVOT gradient increase > 10mmHg)
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mitral Annular Calcification
Keywords
mitral valve regurgitation, mitral valve stenosis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Mitral Valve Replacement with Sapien3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
subjects with surgical MVR with Sapien3
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Mitral Valve Replacement with Sapien3
Other Intervention Name(s)
MVR
Intervention Description
subjects with surgical MVR with Sapien3
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Procedural success
Description
Procedural Success is defined as:
Device success, and
No device or procedure related serious adverse events (SAEs) (Life threatening bleed; major vascular or cardiac structural complications requiring unplanned reintervention or surgery; stage 2 or 3 acute kidney injury (AKI) (includes new dialysis); myocardial infarction (MI) or need for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)/coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); severe heart failure (HF) or hypotension requiring intravenous (IV) inotrope, ultrafiltration or mechanical circulatory support; prolonged intubation ( > 48 hours)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Technical success
Description
Technical Success is defined as:
Alive, with
Successful access, delivery and retrieval of the device delivery system, and
Deployment and correct positioning (including repositioning/recapture if needed) of the single intended device, and
No need for additional unplanned or emergency surgery or re-intervention related to the device or access procedure
Time Frame
Procedure Stop Time
Title
Device success
Description
Device Success is defined as:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/operating room (OR)), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = mitral valve area (MVA) < 1.5cm2 and mitral valve (MV) gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = mitral regurgitation (MR) >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., paravalvular leak (PVL) > mild, need for a permanent pacemaker (PPM), erosion, Annular rupture or aortic valve (AV) Groove disruption, left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT) gradient increase > 10mmHg)
Time Frame
30 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Device success
Description
Device Success is defined as:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/operating room (OR)), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = MVA < 1.5cm2 and MV gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = MR >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., PVL > mild, need for a PPM, erosion, Annular rupture or AV Groove disruption, LVOT gradient increase > 10mmHg)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Device Success
Description
Device Success is defined as:
Alive and stroke free, with
Original intended device in place, and
No additional surgical or interventional procedures related to access or the device since completion of the original procedure (i.e., exit from the cath lab/OR), and
Intended performance of the device:
Structural performance: No migration, embolization, detachment, fracture, hemolysis, thrombosis (including reduced leaflet motion) or endocarditis, etc, and
Hemodynamic performance: Maintenance of relief of stenosis or insufficiency without producing the opposite (Stenosis = MVA < 1.5cm2 and MV gradient > 5mmHg, Insufficiency = MR >1+), and
Absence of para-device complications (e.g., PVL > mild, need for a PPM, erosion, Annular rupture or AV Groove disruption, LVOT gradient increase > 10mmHg)
Time Frame
1 year
Title
Subject success
Description
Subject Success is defined as:
All of the following must be present:
I. Device success (either optimal or acceptable), and II. Patient returned to the pre-procedural setting: and III. No rehospitalizations or reinterventions for the underlying condition (e.g., mitral regurgitation, heart failure); and IV. Improvement from baseline in symptoms (e.g., NYHA improvement by > or = 1 functional class); and V. Improvement from baseline in functional status (e.g., 6-min walk test improvement by > or = 50 m); and VI. Improvement from baseline in quality-of-life (e.g., Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire improvement by > or = 10)
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
22 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject has severe native mitral annular calcification associated with mitral stenosis and/or regurgitation. Qualifying echo must be within 60 days of the date of the procedure.
Subject has a clinical indication for mitral valve replacement, as demonstrated by reported New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II or greater.
The subject is at least 22 years old.
The Heart Team agrees that the subject is high risk or inoperable for surgical mitral valve repair or replacement (MVR), based on a conclusion that the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeds the probability of meaningful improvement. The following concomitant procedures, are allowed: Maze, Tricuspid Valve Procedures (TVP), and Atrial Fibrillation (AF) ablation, coronary artery bypass grafting and septal myectomy.
The study subject has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the respective clinical site.
The study subject agrees to comply with all required post-procedure follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria:
Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) ≤ 30 days before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total creatine kinase (CK) elevation of creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) ≥ twice normal in the presence of myocardial band (MB) elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days of the index procedure (unless part of planned strategy for treatment of concomitant coronary artery disease).
Leukopenia (white blood cell count < 2000 cell/mL), acute anemia (hemoglobin < 8 g/dL), or thrombocytopenia (platelet count < 50,000 cell/mL).
Hemodynamic or respiratory instability requiring vasoactive medications, mechanical ventilation at time of procedure.
Need for emergency surgery for any reason.
Severe left ventricular dysfunction with Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) < 30%.
Severe right ventricular dysfunction
Pregnancy, lactation, or planning to become pregnant
Echocardiographic evidence of left ventricular mass, thrombus, or concerns of active infective endocarditis.
Active upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding within 3 months prior to procedure without treatment or 30 days prior to procedure with definitive treatment.
A known contraindication or hypersensitivity to all anticoagulation regimens, or inability to be maintained on oral anticoagulant following the study procedure.
End stage renal disease requiring dialysis
Clinically (by neurologist) or neuroimaging confirmed stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) within 30 days of the procedure.
Estimated life expectancy < 12 months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Smith, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Baylor Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
St. Vincent Heart Center
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46290
Country
United States
Facility Name
MHRI Maryland
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lankenau Institute for Medical Research
City
Wynnewood
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19096
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Virginia
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22903
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
IPD Sharing Plan Description
There is currently no plan to share individual participant data
Learn more about this trial
Surgical Implantation of TRAnscatheter vaLve in Native Mitral Annular Calcification (SITRAL) Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs