search
Back to results

Surgical Intervention With DermaPure vs Native Tissue in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Primary Purpose

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
DermaPure®
native tissue
Sponsored by
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  • Subject is female
  • Subject is at least 18 years of age
  • Subject has prolapse of the anterior compartment beyond the hymen
  • Subject reports bulge symptoms as defined in question 3 of the PFDI-20 with a response of 2 or higher ("somewhat", "moderately" or "quite a bit")
  • Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent
  • Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up protocol through 36 months

Exclusion criteria:

  • Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study
  • Subject has untreated severe urogenital atrophy
  • Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis
  • Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical)
  • Subject has had prior pelvic radiation therapy
  • Subject has taken systemic steroids within the last month, or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment within the last 3 months (list attached)
  • Subject has a history of poor wound healing with or without a diagnosis of connective tissue disease
  • Subject has chronic systemic pain that includes the pelvic area or chronic focal pain that involves the pelvis
  • Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) as defined by a hemoglobin A1C < or = to 8% (Underwood, Ata)
  • Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition that may effect of currently affects bladder function
  • Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (colpocleisis)
  • Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position
  • Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another pelvic organ prolapse related study during this study
  • Subject has had previous prolapse repair with synthetic mesh in the anterior compartment
  • Subject is planning to undergo a concomitant prolapse repair in a non-target compartment with anything other than native tissue or DermaPure®
  • Subject is unable to be treated in the anterior compartment with DermaPure®
  • Subject is desirous of a concomitant hysteropexy

Sites / Locations

  • Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

DermaPure

Native Tissue

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Safety through AE and SAE assessments and percentage of incidences
The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related SAE's is assessed at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months. The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related AE's of interest is assessed at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months which include: Vaginal shortening Vaginal scarring or banding De novo vaginal bleeding Atypical vaginal discharge Fistula formation De novo dyspareunia Pelvic pain Peri-operative infection Vaginal infection UTI Neuromuscular disorder SUI (worsening or de novo) UUI (worsening or de novo) Difficulty emptying bladder (worsening or de novo) Graft exposure (into vagina) Graft erosion (into viscus)
Quality of Life through the administration of questionnaires, analyzed at the end of the study as % of patients that are satisfied or above satisfied
The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with bulge symptoms attributable to the target compartment as determined by PFDI-20 question number 3 ("Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area") answering "yes" and >= 2 (responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit"). (Barber) Change in quality of life in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PFDI-20 and the PFIQ-7. (Barber)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
April 30, 2019
Last Updated
January 21, 2020
Sponsor
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
Collaborators
Tissue Regenix Ltd
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03939715
Brief Title
Surgical Intervention With DermaPure vs Native Tissue in Pelvic Organ Prolapse
Official Title
Anterior And Multi-Compartment Vaginal Prolapse Repair Augmented With Decellularized Human Dermal Allograft: A Prospactive, Randomized Controlled, Post Market Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 5, 2020 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
May 5, 2022 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 5, 2022 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
Collaborators
Tissue Regenix Ltd

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Comparing FDA-approved DermaPure with patient's own native tissue surgically for diagnosis of pelvic organ prolapse.
Detailed Description
The investigator is comparing FDA-approved DermaPure with patient's own native tissue for the repair of pelvic organ prolapse. Please see below for detailed objectives and endpoints for our measuring parameters: Objectives Specific Aim #1: To determine the relative safety and efficacy of anterior and multi-compartment vaginal wall prolapse repair augmented with decellularized human dermal allograft (DermaPure®) versus anterior and multi-compartment repair employing native tissue. Specific Aim #2: To evaluate bulge symptoms, quality of life, sexual function, and patient satisfaction Our hypothesis is that pelvic organ prolapse repair augmented with DermaPure® will provide superior anatomic outcomes as compared to native tissue controls with a non-inferior safety profile. Endpoints Safety Endpoint #1: The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related SAE's at 12 months. Safety Endpoint #2: The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related AE's of interest at 12 months, which include: Vaginal shortening Vaginal scarring or banding De novo vaginal bleeding Atypical vaginal discharge Fistula formation De novo dyspareunia Pelvic pain Peri-operative infection Vaginal infection UTI Neuromuscular disorder SUI (worsening or de novo) UUI (worsening or de novo) Difficulty emptying bladder (worsening or de novo) Graft exposure (into vagina) Graft erosion (into viscus) Efficacy Endpoint #1: The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with prolapse of the target compartment beyond the hymen. Efficacy Endpoint #2: The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with bulge symptoms attributable to the target compartment as determined by PFDI-20 question number 3 ("Does the participant usually have a bulge or something falling out that the participant can see or feel in the vaginal area") answering "yes" and >= 2 (responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit"). (Barber) Efficacy Endpoint #3: The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months requiring re-treatment for recurrent prolapse of the target compartment (to include surgery, physical therapy or pessary insertion). Efficacy Endpoint #4: Change in quality of life in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PFDI-20 and the PFIQ-7. (Barber) Efficacy Endpoint #5: Change in sexual function in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PISQ-IR. (Rogers) Efficacy Endpoint #6: Patient satisfaction in each group at 36 months as measured by the SSQ-8. (Haff) Efficacy Endpoint #7: Patient impression in each group at 36 months of postoperative improvement by the PGI-I (Srikrishna)

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pelvic Organ Prolapse

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
DermaPure
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
Native Tissue
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
DermaPure®
Intervention Description
Surgical intervention using DermaPure®
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
native tissue
Intervention Description
Surgical intervention using native tissue
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety through AE and SAE assessments and percentage of incidences
Description
The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related SAE's is assessed at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months. The relative proportion of allograft, native tissue, and procedure-related AE's of interest is assessed at 12 months, 24 months, and 36 months which include: Vaginal shortening Vaginal scarring or banding De novo vaginal bleeding Atypical vaginal discharge Fistula formation De novo dyspareunia Pelvic pain Peri-operative infection Vaginal infection UTI Neuromuscular disorder SUI (worsening or de novo) UUI (worsening or de novo) Difficulty emptying bladder (worsening or de novo) Graft exposure (into vagina) Graft erosion (into viscus)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Quality of Life through the administration of questionnaires, analyzed at the end of the study as % of patients that are satisfied or above satisfied
Description
The proportion of patients in each group at 36 months with bulge symptoms attributable to the target compartment as determined by PFDI-20 question number 3 ("Do you usually have a bulge or something falling out that you can see or feel in the vaginal area") answering "yes" and >= 2 (responses of "somewhat", "moderately", or "quite a bit"). (Barber) Change in quality of life in each group from baseline to 36 months as measured by the PFDI-20 and the PFIQ-7. (Barber)
Time Frame
3 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: Subject is female Subject is at least 18 years of age Subject has prolapse of the anterior compartment beyond the hymen Subject reports bulge symptoms as defined in question 3 of the PFDI-20 with a response of 2 or higher ("somewhat", "moderately" or "quite a bit") Subject is willing and able to provide informed consent Subject is willing and able to comply with the follow-up protocol through 36 months Exclusion criteria: Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the study Subject has untreated severe urogenital atrophy Subject has an active or chronic systemic infection including any gynecologic infection, untreated urinary tract infection (UTI), or tissue necrosis Subject has a history of pelvic organ cancer (e.g. uterine, ovarian, bladder, or cervical) Subject has had prior pelvic radiation therapy Subject has taken systemic steroids within the last month, or immunosuppressive or immunomodulatory treatment within the last 3 months (list attached) Subject has a history of poor wound healing with or without a diagnosis of connective tissue disease Subject has chronic systemic pain that includes the pelvic area or chronic focal pain that involves the pelvis Subject has uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (DM) as defined by a hemoglobin A1C < or = to 8% (Underwood, Ata) Subject has a known neurologic or medical condition that may effect of currently affects bladder function Subject is seeking obliterative vaginal surgery as treatment for pelvic organ prolapse (colpocleisis) Subject is not able to conform to the modified dorsal lithotomy position Subject is currently participating in or plans to participate in another pelvic organ prolapse related study during this study Subject has had previous prolapse repair with synthetic mesh in the anterior compartment Subject is planning to undergo a concomitant prolapse repair in a non-target compartment with anything other than native tissue or DermaPure® Subject is unable to be treated in the anterior compartment with DermaPure® Subject is desirous of a concomitant hysteropexy
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
CATHERINE JAY
Phone
3039558059
Email
cjay@surgone.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
James Lukban, DO
Organizational Affiliation
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Colorado Pelvic Floor Consultants
City
Englewood
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80113
Country
United States
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
CATHERINE JAY
Phone
303-955-8059

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes

Learn more about this trial

Surgical Intervention With DermaPure vs Native Tissue in Pelvic Organ Prolapse

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs